2024-03-28T17:10:37Z
http://pressto.amu.edu.pl/index.php/cbes/oai
oai:ojs.pressto.amu.edu.pl:article/4423
2016-02-08T13:52:44Z
cbes:Fil
driver
v2
http://pressto.amu.edu.pl/index.php/cbes/article/view/4423
2016-02-08T13:52:44Z
Adam Mickiewicz University Poznan
No. 11 (2014): Fenomen Edyty Stein - Das Phänomen Edith Stein; 11-16
The Rationality of Edith Stein’s Philosophy
Artykuł naukowy
Półtawski, Andrzej; Uniwersytet im. Stefana Kardynała Wyszyńskiego, Warszawa
2016-01-28
url:http://pressto.amu.edu.pl/index.php/cbes/article/view/4423
pl_PL
Starting from Ernst Tugendhat’s discrimination of the ‘dogmatic’ and the‘critical’ motive of Husserl’s epistemology, the author argues that the former leads to anatomistic, analytic theory of ‘pure consciousness’, while the latter needs to be developedby holistic approach, in which the cognitive justification – as Ernest Sosa put it – derivesultimately not from direct obviousness or plausibility alone but from maximum coherencewith all relevant considerations, including all relevant intuitively plausible data. Inthe centre of Edith Stein’s philosophy lies an elaborate theory of sense showing a hierarchicalorder of beings. This seems to involve just the ‘critical’ attitude. Yet, if this is correct,Stein’s understanding of the ‘moments of essence’ as constituting the upper layer ofthe order of sense seems to be a relic of the Husserlian ‘dogmatic’, atomistic motive
oai:ojs.pressto.amu.edu.pl:article/4424
2016-02-08T13:52:44Z
cbes:Fil
driver
v2
http://pressto.amu.edu.pl/index.php/cbes/article/view/4424
2016-02-08T13:52:44Z
Adam Mickiewicz University Poznan
No. 11 (2014): Fenomen Edyty Stein - Das Phänomen Edith Stein; 17-27
Edith Stein and Roman Ingarden –Concepts of Man
Artykuł naukowy
Stróżewski, Władysław; Uniwersytet Jagielloński
Akademia Ignatianum w Krakowie
2016-01-28
url:http://pressto.amu.edu.pl/index.php/cbes/article/view/4424
pl_PL
In this article the author reconstructs and compares two concepts of man in thoughts of two great phenomenologists – Edith Stein and Roman Ingarden – connectedjoint not only by the intellectual bond but also by great friendship. The paper consists of two parts. First, the author presents Stein’s and Ingarden’s philosophy of man. Suchnotions as: subject, soul, spirit and body, experience, self-experience and activity of will, are shown from two perspectives. By analysing terminology used by both Stein and Ingardenin their works, the author tried to depict an appropriate – according to them –psychophysical constitution of man. While discussing Stein’s concepts, the author demonstratesalso her transition from phenomenology to mystical domain as well as her inspirationof Saint John of the Cross’ and Saint Theresa of Ávila’s works. Ingarden did notenter as firmly as Stein into the mystical domain, yet he opened a path into the Transcendenceby creating a concept of metaphysical qualities.