Abstract
The topic of migration is often used by populist and non-populist politicians in order to arouse emotions, polarise social attitudes and thus mobilise voters. The present study aims to identify themes (a cognitive aspect of attitudes) and discrete emotions (an emotional aspect of attitudes) in online social discourse as a reaction to the media posts of the main Slovak political parties on the topic of migration in the pre-election period (January-February 2020). Methodological triangulation of discourse analysis and Text mining was used to analyse the data. Analysis of the discourse revealed that articles with pro-migrant rhetoric provoked more discussion about the security and identity threat, while articles by populists provoked more discussion about the morality of elites and the economic threat of migration. The evoked sentiment throughout the discourse leaned more towards negative emotions (fear, anger) but pro-migrant articles and articles by non-populist politicians evoked also positive emotions (joy). Results indicate that rather than fear of migration, the anticipation of a change in the morale of the elites was the key element of the pre-election period in Slovakia. Limitations and implications of the study are further discussed. The value of this paper lies in focusing on both emotional and cognitive aspects of attitudes towards migration.
Funding
(VEGA), no. 2/0065/21
References
Androvičová, J. (2015). Sekuritizácia Migrantov Na Slovensku—Analýza Diskurzu. Sociológia, 47(4), 319–99.
Anon. (2020). 12 Ľudskoprávnych Organizácií Píše Politikom: Nešírte Strach z Migrácie, Hovorte Fakty. Aktuality.sk. Retrieved from https://www.aktuality.sk/clanok/767221/12-ludskopravnych-organizacii-pise-poli-tikom-nesirte-strach-z-migracie-hovorte-fakty/?fbclid=IwAR2o6tEZ_UzKELLO2dWZaOREZGKdZOubAHkPM-Bxh_AsrZ7fOsxkCc_2Yzo
Aslanidis, P. (2015). Is populism an ideology? A refutation and a new perspective. Political Studies, 64(1_suppl), 88–104. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.12224 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.12224
Belážiová, I. (2019). Sentiment Analysis of the User Comments with the Theme of Migration Posted as Interactive Content on the Hospodárske Noviny Website. Človek a Spoločnosť [Individual and Society], 22(3), 43–61. doi: https://doi.org/10.31577/cas.2019.03.558 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31577/cas.2019.03.558
Bonansinga, D. (2020). Who Thinks, Feels. The Relationship Between Emotions, Politics and Populism. Partecipazione, 13(1). doi: https://doi.org/10.1285/i20356609v13i1p83
Bureau of Border and Foreign Police, (2021). Statistical overview of Legal and Illegal Migration of the Slovak Republic. Retrieved from https://www.minv.sk/swift_data/source/policia/hranicna_a_cudzinecka_policia/rocenky/rok_2021/2021-I.polrok-UHCP-EN.pdf
Bos, L., Schemer, Ch., Corbu, N., Hameleers, M., Andreadis, I., Schulz, A., Schmuck. D., Reinemann, C., & Fawzi, N. (2020). The Effects of Populism as a Social Identity Frame on Persuasion and Mobilisation: Evidence from a 15-Country Experiment. European Journal of Political Research, 59(1), 3–24. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12334 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12334
Denzin, N. (1978). The Research Act: A Theoretical Introduction To Sociological Methods. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill. doi: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315134543 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315134543
Dubey, A. (2020). Twitter Sentiment Analysis During COVID19 Outbreak. SSRN Electronic Journal. doi: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3572023 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3572023
Ernst, N., Blassing, S., Engesser, S., Büchel, F., & Esser, F. (2019). Populists Prefer Social Media Over Talk Shows: An Analysis of Populist Messages and Stylistic Elements Across Six Countries. Social Media + Society, 5(1). doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305118823358 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305118823358
Findor, A., Hruška, M., Jankovská, P., & Pobudová, M. (2021). Re-Examining Public Opinion Preferences for Migrant Categorizations: ‘Refugees’ Are Evaluated More Negatively than ‘Migrants’ and ‘Foreigners’ Related to Participants’ Direct, Extended, and Mass-Mediated Intergroup Contact Experiences. International Joutnal of Intercultural Relations, 80, 262–73. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2020.12.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2020.12.004
Gallo Kriglerová, E., Kadlečíková, J., Holka Chudžíková, A., & Píšová, M. (2021). Cudzie Nechceme, Svoje Si Nedáme: Postoje Majoritnej Populácie k Migrácii a Cudzincom Na Slovensku. Bratislava: Centrum pre výskum etnicity a kultúry. Retrieved from
http://cvek.sk/?attachment_id=2877&download=true
Gerstlé, J., & Nai, A. (2019). Negativity, Emotionality and Populist Rhetoric in Election Campaigns Worldwide, and Their Effects on Media Attention and Electoral Success. European Journal of Communication, 34(4), 410–44. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323119861875 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323119861875
Gultasli, S. (2021). Professor Carlos de La Torre: Populism Is Here to Stay. European Center for Populism Studies. Retrieved February 2, 2022
Hameleers, M., Bos. L., & de Vreese Claes. H. (2017). They Did It’: The Effects of Emotionalized Blame Attribution in Populist Communication. Communication Research, 44(6), 870–900. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650216644026 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650216644026
Hoffmann, T. (2018). Too Many Americans Are Trapped In Fear, Violence And Poverty: A Psychology-Informed Sentiment Analysis Of Campaign Speeches From The 2016 US Presidential Election. Linguistics, 4(1). doi: https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2017-0008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2017-0008
Jagers, J., & Walgrave, S. (2007). Populism as Political Communication Style: An Empirical Study of Political Parties’ Discourse in Belgium. European Journal of Political Research, 46(3), 319–45. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2006.00690.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2006.00690.x
Jockers, M. (2020). Introduction to the Syuzhet Package. Retrieved May 12, 2021 from https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/syuzhet/vignettes/syuzhet-vignette.html
Kazharski, A., & Makarychev, A. (2020). Populism in Estonia and Slovakia: Performances, Transgressions, and Communicative Styles. Populism, 3(2), 165–185. doi: https://doi.org/10.1163/25888072-bja10005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/25888072-BJA10005
Lenč, J. (2019). Predvolebná Kampaň 2020: V Znamení Šírenia Strachu z Islámu a Muslimov. Islamonline.Sk. Retrieved from https://www.islamonline.sk/2019/12/predvolebna-kampan-2020-v-znameni-sirenia-strachu-z-islamu-a-muslimov/
Marcus, G. (2021). The Rise of Populism: The Politics of Justice, Anger, and Grievance. In J. P. Forgas, C. W. D., & K. Fiedler (Eds.), The psychology of populism: The tribal challenge to liberal democracy (pp. 81-104). London: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003057680-6
Marincea, A., & Školkay, A. (2020). Boris Kollár and OĽaNO Party Communication on Facebook. Politické Vedy, 23(4), 109–36. doi: https://doi.org/10.24040/politickevedy.2020.23.4.109-136 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24040/politickevedy.2020.23.4.109-136
Martella, A., & Bracciale, R.. (2021). Populism and Emotions: Italian Political Leaders’ Communicative Strategies to Engage Facebook Users. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2021.1951681 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2021.1951681
Matthes, J., & Schmuck, D. (2017). The Effects of Anti-Immigrant Right-Wing Populist Ads on Implicit and Explicit Attitudes: A Moderated Mediation Model. Communication Research, 44(4). doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650215577859 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650215577859
Meijers, M., & Zaslove, A. (2020). Populism and Political Parties Expert Survey 2018 (POPPA), https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/8NEL7B
Ministry of the Interior of the Slovak Republic. (2022). Asylum and Migration statistics. Retrieved from https://www.minv.sk/?statistiky-20
Moffitt, B. (2016). The Global Rise of Populism. Performance, Political Style, and Representation. Stanford: Stanford University Press. doi: https://doi.org/10.11126/stanford/9780804796132.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.11126/stanford/9780804796132.001.0001
Mudde, C. (2004). The Populist Zeitgeist. Government and Opposition, 39(4), 542–63. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-7053.2004.00135.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-7053.2004.00135.x
Mudde, C., & Kaltwasser, C. (2012). Populism: Corrective and Threat to Democracy. In C. Mudde & C. Kaltwasser (Eds.), Populism in Europe and the America: Threat or Corrective for Democracy? (pp. 205-222). Cambridge, TAS, Australia: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139152365.011
Mudde, C., & Kaltwasser, C. (2017). Populism: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/actrade/9780190234874.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/actrade/9780190234874.001.0001
Nai, A. (2021). Fear and Loathing in Populist Campaigns? Comparing the Communication Style of Populists and Non-Populists in Elections Worldwide. Journal of Political Marketing, 20(2), 219–50. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/15377857.2018.1491439 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15377857.2018.1491439
Nuiamäe, M., Sepper, M., & Anniste, K. (2020). ‘I Am European’: Migration Stories & Facts for the 21st Century. The Views of Young Europeans on Migration. Tallinn: Poliitikauuringute Keskus Praxis.
Obradović, S., Power, S., & Sheehy-Skeffington, J. (2020). Understanding the Psychological Appeal of Populism. Current Opinion in Psychology, 35, 125–31. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.06.009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.06.009
Pejchal, V. (2018). Hate Speech Regulation in Post-Communist Countries: Migrant Crises in the Czech and Slovak Republics. International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy, 7(2), 58–74. doi: https://doi.org/10.5204/ijcjsd.v7i2.500 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5204/ijcjsd.v7i2.500
Plutchik, R. (1982). A Psychoevolutionary Theory Of Emotions. Social Science Information, 21,(4-5), 529-553. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/053901882021004003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/053901882021004003
Rooduijn, M., van Kessel, S., Froio, C., Pirro, A., de Lange, S., Halikiopoulou, D., Lewis, P., Mudde, C., & Taggart, P. (2019). The PopuList: An Overview of Populist, Far Right, Far Left and Eurosceptic Parties in Europe.
Salmela, M., & von Scheve, Ch.. (2017). Emotional Roots of Right-Wing Political Populism. Social Science Information, 56(4), 567–95. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0539018417734419 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0539018417734419
Sawiris, M., & Kuchta, R.. (2020). Analýza Facebooku a Webstránok v Kontexte Predvolebnej Kampane. Súhrn Zistení: November 2019 – Január 2020. Globsec. Retrieved February 2, 2022.
Slosiarik, M., & Focus, A. (2019). Prieskumy Verejnej Mienky a Populizmus. Retrieved February 2, 2022.
Školkay, A. (2021). Impact of Populism on the Party System in Slovakia 2000–2020. Background Study for DEMOS H2020 Project. Manuscript, Version 01, 59. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.24007.01444
Štatistický úrad Slovenskej republiky. (2020). Voľby Do Národnej Rady Slovenskej Republiky 2020. Statistics.Sk. Retrieved February 2, 2022.
Štefančík, R., & Kiner, A. (2021). ‘Sorry, I Don’t Want Them Here.’ Migration in Slovak Political Discourse. Professional Discourse & Communication, 3(2), 10–20. doi: https://doi.org/10.24833/2687-0126-2021-3-2-10-20 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24833/2687-0126-2021-3-2-10-20
Suteu, S. (2019). The Populist Turn in Central and Eastern Europe: Is Deliberative Democracy Part of the Solution? European Constitutional Law Review, 15(3), 488–518. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1574019619000348 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1574019619000348
de la Torre, C. (2010). Populist Seduction in Latin America. Athens: A Ohio University Press Book. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/20049820 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/20049820
Widmann, T. (2021). How Emotional Are Populists Really? Factors Explaining Emotional Appeals in the Communication of Political Parties. Political Psychology, 42(1), 163–81. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12693 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12693
Wirth, W., Esser, F., Wettstein, M., Engesser, S., Wirz, D., Schulz, A., Ernst, N., Büchel, F., Caramani, D., Manucci, L., Steenbergen, M., Bernhard, L., Weber, E., Hänggli, R., Dalmus, C., & Schemer, Ch. (2016). The Appeal of Populist Ideas, Strategies and Styles: A Theoretical Model and Research Design for Analyzing Populist Political Communication. NCCR Democracy Working Paper, 88. doi: https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.20358.37440
Wirz, D. (2018). Persuasion Through Emotion? An Experimental Test of the Emotion-Eliciting Nature of Populist Communication. International Journal of Communication, 12,1114–38. doi: https://doi.org/1932–8036/20180005
Wirz, D., Wettstein, M., Schulz, A., Müller, P., Schemer, Ch., Ernst, N., Esser, F., & Werner, W. (2018). The Effects of Right-Wing Populist Communication on Emotions and Cognitions toward Immigrants. The International Journal of Press/Politics,
(4), 496–516. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161218788956 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161218788956
Žúborová, V., & Borárosová, I. (2016). Migrácia v Médiách: Utečenci Verzus Migranti. Chápanie Migrantov a Utečencov v Mediálnom Priestore v Kontexte Pozitívnej a Negatívnej Mediatizácie. Central European Journal of Politics, 2(1), 1–15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jnmlp-2017-0005
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Alexander Loziak, Ivana Piterová, Jana Papcunová
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Manuscript authors are responsible for obtaining copyright permissions for any copyrighted materials included within manuscripts. The authors must provide permission letters, when appropriate, to the Society Register Editors.
In addition, all published papers in Society Register are published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 Unported License.
1.1 The Author hereby warrants that he/she is the owner of all the copyright and other intellectual property rights in the Work and that, within the scope of the present Agreement, the paper does not infringe the legal rights of another person. The owner of the copyright work also warrants that he/she is the sole and original creator thereof and that is not bound by any legal constraints in regard to the use or sale of the work.
1.2. The Publisher warrants that is the owner of the PRESSto platform for open access journals, hereinafter referred to as the PRESSto Platform.
2. The Author grants the Publisher non-exclusive and free of charge license to unlimited use worldwide over an unspecified period of time in the following areas of exploitation:
2.1. production of multiple copies of the Work produced according to the specific application of a given technology, including printing, reproduction of graphics through mechanical or electrical means (reprography) and digital technology;
2.2. marketing authorisation, loan or lease of the original or copies thereof;
2.3. public performance, public performance in the broadcast, video screening, media enhancements as well as broadcasting and rebroadcasting, made available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them;
2.4. inclusion of the Work into a collective work (i.e. with a number of contributions);
2.5. inclusion of the Work in the electronic version to be offered on an electronic platform, or any other conceivable introduction of the Work in its electronic version to the Internet;
2.6. dissemination of electronic versions of the Work in its electronic version online, in a collective work or independently;
2.7. making the Work in the electronic version available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, in particular by making it accessible via the Internet, Intranet, Extranet;
2.8. making the Work available according to appropriate license pattern CC BY-NC 4.0 as well as another language version of this license or any later version published by Creative Commons.
3. The Author grants the Publisher permission to reproduce a single copy (print or download) and royalty-free use and disposal of rights to compilations of the Work and these compilations.
4. The Author grants the Publisher permission to send metadata files related to the Work, including to commercial and non-commercial journal-indexing databases.
5. The Author represents that, on the basis of the license granted in the present Agreement, the Publisher is entitled and obliged to:
5.1. allow third parties to obtain further licenses (sublicenses) to the Work and to other materials, including derivatives thereof or compilations made, based on or including the Work, whereas the provisions of such sub-licenses will be the same as with the Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) Creative Commons sub-license or another language version of this license, or any later version of this license published by Creative Commons;
5.2. make the Work available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, without any technological constraints;
5.3. appropriately inform members of the public to whom the Work is to be made available about sublicenses in such a way as to ensure that all parties are properly informed (appropriate informing messages).
6. Because of the royalty-free provision of services of the Author (resulting from the scope of obligations stipulated in the present Agreement), the Author shall not be entitled to any author’s fee due and payable on the part of the Publisher (no fee or royalty is payable by the Publisher to the Author).
7.1. In the case of third party claims or actions for indemnity against the Publisher owing to any infractions related to any form of infringement of intellectual property rights protection, including copyright infringements, the Author is obliged to take all possible measures necessary to protect against these claims and, when as a result of legal action, the Publisher, or any third party licensed by the Publisher to use the Work, will have to abandon using the Work in its entirety or in part or, following a court ruling in a legal challenge, to pay damages to a third party, whatever the legal basis
7.2. The Author will immediately inform the Publisher about any damage claims related to intellectual property infringements, including the author’s proprietary rights pertaining to a copyrighted work, filed against the Author. of liability, the Author is obliged to redress the damage resulting from claims made by third party, including costs and expenditures incurred in the process.
7.3. To all matters not settled herein provisions of the Polish Civil Code and the Polish Copyright and Related Rights Act shall apply.