L2 acquisition of Spanish dative clitics by English and Dutch learners
PDF

Keywords

dative alternation
dative clitics
clitic doubling
argument structure
animacy

How to Cite

Escobar-Álvarez, M. Ángeles. (2017). L2 acquisition of Spanish dative clitics by English and Dutch learners. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 7(3), 517–534. https://doi.org/10.14746/2017.7.3.8

Number of views: 428


Number of downloads: 306

Abstract

This article examines the second language acquisition (SLA) of Spanish dative clitics in clitic doubling (CLD) structures that are closely related to the double object construction (DOC) in English and Dutch. It also addresses the question of how adult English and Dutch speakers learning L2 Spanish in a formal setting develop knowledge and use of the animacy constraint in the target language, which is different from the first language (L1) counterparts. The role of transfer in acquiring new syntactic structures has been taken into account, where dative clitics appear and animate objects are marked by the dative preposition ‘to.’ New findings are obtained on CLD and the Spanish animacy constraint from a grammaticality judgement task (GJT), completed by English and Dutch learners at B1 and B2 CEFR levels. The difficulties learners experienced were not always due to negative L1 transfer, but also related to the complexity of the argument structure where the clitic is inserted. This has clear implications for the teaching of pronominal elements which are closely related to different syntactic configurations in Spanish.

https://doi.org/10.14746/2017.7.3.8
PDF

References

Benati, A., & Angelovska, T. (2016). Second language acquisition. A theoretical introduction to real world applications. London: Bloomsbury.

Boneh, N., & Nash, L. (2011). High and higher applicatives: The case of non-core datives. In M. B. Washburn, K. McKinney-Bock, E. Varis, A. Sawyer, & B. Tomaszewicz (Eds.), Proceedings of the 28th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (pp. 60-68). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.

Bresnan, J., Cueni, A., Nikitina, T., & Baayen, R. J. (2007). Predicting the dative alternation. In G. Bouma, I. Kraemer, & J. Zwarts (Eds.), Cognitive foundations of interpretation (pp. 69-94). Amsterdam: Royal Netherlands Academy of Science.

Bruhn de Garavito, J. (2000). The syntax of Spanish multifunctional clitics and near native competence (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). McGill University, Montreal, Canada.

Chomsky, N. (1995). The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Cuervo, M. C. (2003). Datives at large (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA.

Cuervo, M. C. (2007). Double object in Spanish as a second language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 583-615.

Ellis, R. (2004). The definition and measurement of L2 explicit knowledge. Language Learning, 54, 227-275.

Ellis, R. (2009). Implicit and explicit learning, knowledge and instruction. In R.

Ellis, S. Loewen, C. Elder, R. Erlam, J. Philip, & H. Reinders (Eds.), Implicit and explicit knowledge in second language learning, testing and teaching (pp. 3-25). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.

Escobar, L., & Teomiro, I. (2016). The gradual acquisition of clitic se in Spanish L2. Topics in Linguistics, 17(1), 17-29. doi: 10.1515/2016-0002

Farley, A. P., & McCollam, K. (2004). Learner readiness and L2 production in Spanish: Processability theory on trial. Estudios de Linguistica Aplicada, 22(4), 47-69.

Guijarro-Fuentes, P. (2012). The acquisition of interpretable features in L2 Spanish: Personal a. Bilingualism, Language and Cognition, 15(4), 701-720.

Guijarro-Fuentes, P., & Marinis, T. (2007). Acquiring the syntax/semantic interface in L2 Spanish: The personal preposition “a”. Eurosla Yearbook 2007, 7, 67-87.

Gutiérrez, X. (2013). The construct validity of grammaticality judgment tests as measures of implicit and explicit knowledge. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35(3), 423-449.

Hawkins, R. (2001). Second language syntax: A generative introduction. Malden, MA: Blackwell.

Imaz Agirre, A. (2015). The acquisition of dative alternation in English by Spanish learners. Vigo International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 12, 63-90.

Jäschke, K., & Plag, I. (2016). The dative alternation in German-English interlanguage. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 38(3), 485-521.

Lardiere, D. (2008). Feature assembly in second language in second language acquisition. In J. Liceras, H. Zobl, & H. Goodluck (Eds.), Features in second language acquisition (pp. 106-140). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Laughren, M., & Eisenchlas, S. (2006). The role of animacy and definiteness in the clitic-DP nexus. In K. Allan (Ed.), Selected papers from the Conference of the Australian Linguistic Society (pp. 28-30). Retrieved from http://www.als.asn.au

Martoccio. A. M. (2012). The acquisition of differential object marking in L2 Spanish learners (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, USA.

Montrul, S., & Bowles, M. (2009). Back to basics: Differential Object Marking under incomplete acquisition in Spanish heritage speakers. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 12(4), 363-383.

Perpiñan, S., & Montrul, S. (2006). On binding asymmetries in dative alternation construction in L2 Spanish. In C. A. Klee & T. L. Face (Eds.), Selected proceedings of the 7th Conference on the Acquisition of Spanish and Portuguese as First and Second Languages (pp. 135-148). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project. Retrieved from http://www.lingref.com/cpp/casp/7/index.html

Pylkkänen, L. (2008). Introducing arguments. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Sikorska, M. (2009). Low applicative datives in spanish as a second language: Acquisition of semantics and morphosyntax. RESLA, 22, 327-350.

Teomiro, I. (2013). Low applicatives and optional “se” in Spanish non-anticausative intransitive verbs. Revista de Lingüística y Lenguas Aplicadas, 8, 248-270.

Torrego, E. (2010). Variability in the case patterns of causative formation in Romance and its implications. Linguistic Inquiry, 41(3), 445-470.

VanPatten, B. (2011). Stubborn syntax: How it resists explicit teaching and learning. In C. Sanz & R. Leow (Eds.), Implicit and explicit language learning: Conditions, processing, and knowledge (pp. 9-21). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.