DISTRIBUTION OF SEMI-CLAUSE CONSTRUCTIONS IN ACTS OF PARLIAMENT VS. APPELLATE JUDGMENTS
PDF

Keywords

semi-clause construction
present participle
past participle

How to Cite

NAD’OVÁ, Z. (2014). DISTRIBUTION OF SEMI-CLAUSE CONSTRUCTIONS IN ACTS OF PARLIAMENT VS. APPELLATE JUDGMENTS. Comparative Legilinguistics, 18, 8–22. https://doi.org/10.14746/cl.2014.18.1

Abstract

The paper presents the findings obtained by comparative syntactic analysis of four types
of semi-clause constructions (present participial, gerundial, infinitival and past participial) in two
corpora of British legal English, i.e. Acts of Parliament and appellate judgments. The analysis
focuses on differences in the employment of the respective types of semi-clauses across the two
corpora (both quantitative differences and differences in their syntactic functions) and on their
functional interpretation. The quantitative findings of analysis revealed that the mean number of
semi-clauses per sentence is significantly higher in the corpus of Acts of Parliament as compared to
the corpus of appellate judgments (2,97 and 1,58 respectively), which contributes to a higher level
of sentence condensation of the genre of Acts of Parliament. Comparison of syntactic functions
conveyed by the respective types of semi-clauses across the two corpora confirmed a significant
predominance of semi-clauses with nominal syntactic functions in the corpus of Acts of Parliament.
Corpus findings also suggest that the employment of the analyzed constructions contributes to
stylistic qualities of the legal genres under analysis, such as a higher level of precision and
unambiguity of meaning in the corpus of Acts of Parliament and a less rigid and formal style of
appellate judgments.

https://doi.org/10.14746/cl.2014.18.1
PDF

References

Bhatia, V.K.Swales. 1993. Analyzing Genre. Language Used in Professional Settings. London: Longman.

Biber, Douglas, Johansson, Stiq, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad and Edward Finegan. 1999. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Pearson Education Ltd.

Crystal, David, and Derek Davy. 1969. Investigating English Style. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Dontcheva-Navratilova, Olga. 2005. Supplementive Clauses in Resolutions. In Theory and Practice in English Studies 3 (2005): 43-52, http://www.phil.muni.cz/plonedata/wkaa/Offprints%20THEPES%203/TPES%203%20(043-052)%20Doncheva-Navratilova.pdf (accessed 26.7.2012)

Dušková, Libuše. 1988. Kapitola II. Syntax. In Mluvnice současné angličtiny na pozadí češtiny, 309-647. Praha: Academia.

Dušková, Libuše, ed. 2003. Dictionary of the Prague School of Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins B.V.

Gocheco, Paulina M. 2011. An Analysis of Verb Groups in Legal Discourse. Tesol Journal, vol. 4, no. 1: 2-14.

Hiltunen, Risto. 1984. The Type and Structure of Clausal Embedding in Legal English. Text – Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse, vol. 4: 107-121

Hladký, Josef. 1961. Remarks on Complex Condensation Phenomena in Some English and Czech Contexts. Brno Studies in English, vol.3 (1961):105-118.

Janigová, Slávka. 2008. Syntax of -ing Forms in Legal English. Frankfurt am Mein: Peter Lang.

Maley, Yon. 1994. The Language of the Law. Language and the Law. London: Longman.

Quirk, Randolph, Jan Svartvik, Geoffrey Leech, and Sidney Greenbaum. 1985. Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. New York: Longman.

Tiersma, Peter Meijes. 1999. Legal Language. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Tomášek, Michal. 1998. Překlad v právní praxi. Praha: Linde.

Williams, Christopher. 2007. Tradition and Change in Legal English. Verbal Constructions in Prescriptive Texts. 2nd edition. Bern: Peter Lang AG.