Filozofia Chrześcijańska https://pressto.amu.edu.pl/index.php/fc <p>“Christian Philosophy” is dedicated to the philosophical research but it does not exclude other related scientific fields of research, theology included. Until now, the journal had a national scope. The magazine presents articles dedicated to the problems present in contemporary culture from a philosophical perspective. Hence, in the area of research so far there have been such issues as: person, freedom, guilt, will, values or body, and the philosophy of mysticism. As mentioned, "Christian Philosophy" is an annual. The next issues appear at the end of the calendar year.</p> <ul class="oczasopismie"> <li class="show"><a href="https://pressto.amu.edu.pl/index.php/fc/about">ABOUT THE JOURNAL</a></li> <li class="show"><a href="https://pressto.amu.edu.pl/index.php/fc/issue/current">CURRENT ISSUE</a></li> <li class="show"><a href="https://pressto.amu.edu.pl/index.php/fc/issue/archive">ARCHIVE</a></li> </ul> <div class="oczasopismie"><strong><span style="vertical-align: inherit;">INDEXED IN:</span></strong> <p>CSHJ, PKP Index; Google Scholar; WordCat</p> </div> <div class="oczasopismie"><strong>JOURNAL METRICS:<br /></strong>Ministry of Education and Science (2021): <strong>20<br /></strong><img src="https://pressto.amu.edu.pl/public/piotr/ikonki/gs_2.png" alt="" /><br />ICV 2020:<strong> 120,50</strong></div> <div class="oczasopismie"><strong><span style="vertical-align: inherit;"><br />DOI:</span></strong><span style="vertical-align: inherit;"> <a href="https://pressto.amu.edu.pl/index.php/fc/index">10.14746/fc</a></span></div> <div class="oczasopismie"><strong><span style="vertical-align: inherit;">ISSN:</span></strong><span style="vertical-align: inherit;"> 1734-4530 </span><strong><span style="vertical-align: inherit;">e-ISSN:</span></strong><span style="vertical-align: inherit;"> 2450-0399</span></div> <div class="oczasopismie"><strong><span style="vertical-align: inherit;">PUBLISHED WORK ARE LICENSED UNDER A CREATIVE COMMONS:</span></strong></div> <div class="oczasopismie"><strong> <a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/"><img src="https://pressto.amu.edu.pl/public/piotr/cc/cc_4_by_nd.png" alt="CC_by-nd/4.0" border="0" /></a></strong></div> en-US <p><strong>Autorzy</strong></p> <p>Autorzy tekstów przyjętych do publikacji w czasopiśmie <em>Filozofia Chrześcijańska</em> są zobowiązani do wypełnienia, podpisania i odesłania na <a href="/index.php/pss/about/contact" target="_self">adres redakcji</a> umowy <a href="/ojs_3/pliki/umowa_autorska.doc" target="_self">o udzielenie nieodpłatnej licencji do utworów, z zobowiązaniem do udzielania sublicencji CC</a>.</p> <p>Zgodnie z umową, autorzy tekstów opublikowanych w czasopiśmie&nbsp;<em>Filozofia Chrześcijańska</em> udzielają Uniwersytetowi im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu&nbsp;niewyłącznej i nieodpłatnej licencji oraz zezwalą na użycie sublicencji Creative Commons <a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/" target="_self">Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-ND 4.0).</a></p> <p>Autorzy zachowują prawa do dalszego, swobodnego rozporządzania utworem.</p> <p><strong>Użytkownicy </strong></p> <p>Zainteresowani użytkownicy internetu uprawnieni są do korzystania z utworów opublikowanych od 2015 roku w <em><em>Filozofia Chrześcijańska</em></em> pod następującymi warunkami:</p> <ul> <li class="show">uznanie autorstwa - obowiązek podania wraz z rozpowszechnionym utworem, informacji, o autorstwie, tytule, źródle (odnośniki do oryginalnego utworu, DOI) oraz samej licencji;</li> <li class="show">bez tworzenia utworów zależnych - utwór musi być zachowany w&nbsp; oryginalnej postaci, nie można bez zgody twórcy rozpowszechniać np. tłumaczeń, opracowań.</li> </ul> <p>Do wszystkich tekstów opublikowanych przed 2015 r. prawa autorskie są zastrzeżone.</p> <p><strong>Inne</strong></p> <p>Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu zachowuje prawo do czasopisma jako całości (układ, forma graficzna, tytuł, projekt okładki, logo itp<em>.</em>)<em>.</em></p> zsfch@amu.edu.pl (o. dr hab. prof UAM Rafał Sergiusz Niziński) pressto@amu.edu.pl (Pressto) Wed, 15 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0100 OJS 3.3.0.13 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss 60 “Hear the word of YHWH” Abraham Abulafi a and Luis de León – the mystic of language https://pressto.amu.edu.pl/index.php/fc/article/view/30530 <p>Abraham Abulafia, a 13th-century Sephardic Kabbalist and brother Luis de León, a 16th-century Spanish theologian, develop in their exegesis a mystic of language that can be divided into mysticism of words and mysticism of letters. The love of the Hebrew language and the conviction that it is the language of God lead both of them to believe that each of its parts is sacred. Abraham Abulafia, wanting to penetrate the secrets of the Holy Scriptures, develops a hermeneutic method of reading it, in which the adept, after special preparation, delves into the inspired text to transform into the divine letter of the Hebrew alphabet. United with the Creator, he becomes capable&nbsp;&nbsp; of prophesying, and it is the main goal of the prophetic or ecstatic kabbalah developed by the Sephardic sage. Luis de León does not go that far, but by identifying the name with God, he comes to the conclusion that the letters, having a double function, encompass the whole of existence, becoming self-sufficient. In the texts of a Catholic religious from a family of converts, and in particular in the treatise Meditations&nbsp; on the Divine Name, one can find numerous traces of the Sephardic method, which proves that the cultural heritage of the Jews expelled from Spain in 1492 survived in the minds of their grandchildren. The author, taking on the above-mentioned text by Luis de León, Light of Intellect and Book of the Sign of Abraham Abulafia, presents the mysticism of the language, with particular emphasis on the mysticism of the word and letters, which combine to form numerous forms of God’s names. Both Abraham Abulafia and Brother Luis de León, in their understanding of the Scriptures, were both faithful to tradition – for example, when they reached for the authority of another Sephardic, Abraham ibn Ezra – as innovative, in keeping with the spirit of Jewish exege- sis in which, as succinctly expressed by the Hasidic rabbi Nachman from Bracław: „It is forbidden to grow old!”</p> JADWIGA CLEA MORENO SZYPOWSKA Copyright (c) 2021 JADWIGA CLEA MORENO SZYPOWSKA https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ https://pressto.amu.edu.pl/index.php/fc/article/view/30530 Wed, 15 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0100 Jean-Yves Lacoste’s phenomenology of liturgy as philosophy of mysticism https://pressto.amu.edu.pl/index.php/fc/article/view/30531 <p>Phenomenology of liturgy is the main philosophical project of Jean-Yves Lacoste, a contemporary French thinker, up to this time not well known in Poland. Liturgy is hereby understood in a broader sense, as a mode of life, which consist of facing God, understood as a subject and a promise of relationship. Therefore, it seems to be both a philosophical and mystical experience, which is why it is going to be considered here as philosophy of mysticism. The paper examines Lacoste’s undertaking of the task of thinking, his way to philosophy of mysticism, as well as the relation between philosophical and mystical experience in his thought. Finally, a question will emerge: is mysticism in its core a way of experiencing time?</p> PRZEMYSŁAW ZGÓRECKI Copyright (c) 2021 PRZEMYSŁAW ZGÓRECKI https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ https://pressto.amu.edu.pl/index.php/fc/article/view/30531 Wed, 15 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0100 The outline of the philosophy of spiritual being from the Thomistic perspective https://pressto.amu.edu.pl/index.php/fc/article/view/30533 <p>From the Thomistic point of view, the outline of philosophy of spiritual being takes into account three basic dimensions of the spirit. The first deals with the existence of independent personal beings, i.e. individual substances: God, angelic beings and human souls. The second is related to the fundamental phenomena of the inner life of a person, that is powers of the soul, their acts and objects. The last form of the spirit deals with personal external activity in the course of which all kinds of extra-mental beings are created. These include, above all, the multiple forms of the so-called spiritual culture, present nowadays mainly in science, art, morals and religion.</p> KAZIMIERZ MIKUCKI Copyright (c) 2021 KAZIMIERZ MIKUCKI https://pressto.amu.edu.pl/index.php/fc/article/view/30533 Wed, 15 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0100 On the Destiny of Evil in Leszek Kołakowski’s Thought https://pressto.amu.edu.pl/index.php/fc/article/view/30535 <p>In Leszek Kołakowski’s thought, a devil is not abstract but real. What does he know about it? What do we know? How much of it do we know? It seems that Kołakowski knows it well – he speaks with it, discusses it, and defines it. As if they both were friends. ‘The devil by Kołakowski’ seems to be human-friendly and supportive. Thus, the article poses the following questions: What is the role of evil as defined by Kołakowski in human world and life? How does it work? What is its destiny?</p> AGNIESZKA BIEGALSKA Copyright (c) 2021 AGNIESZKA BIEGALSKA https://pressto.amu.edu.pl/index.php/fc/article/view/30535 Wed, 15 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0200 Christian Philosophy and the image of the world. Notes from the perspective of the Sociology of Philosophy https://pressto.amu.edu.pl/index.php/fc/article/view/30538 <p>In this article, I present a proposal to study Christian philosophy understood as a research tradition from the perspective of the sociology of philosophy. For a sociologist of philosophy, Christian philosophy is a specific empirical phenomenon that we can learn by discovering the mechanisms of its functioning. The article focuses on the issue of accepting the image of the world that defines the identity of Christian philosophy. The task of the sociology of philosophy is to discover the mechanisms that influence the context of acceptance of this image of the world. The sociology of philosophy distances itself from assessing the truth or falsehood of the content of theses advocated by individual philosophers. Although each philosophy develops according to the principles of the so-called immanent logic, it is, however, certain social and psychological factors that influence what a given philosopher accepts as obvious and beyond discussion. In the article, I showed that the acceptance of the image of the world is a consequence of upbringing that takes place in a specific social group (e.g. family, school) which shares certain axiological ideas and descriptive beliefs. Thanks to the upbringing, in the future student of philosophy, who always remains a child of his time and culture, the mental and emotional ground is prepared for the acceptance of an already more speculative image of the world, which the adept gets acquainted with during professional university studies (philosophy or theology) under the supervision of recognized by him authorities. The mind, shaped by specific educational processes, is able to carry out a personal and holistic act of epistemic faith in a specific picture of the world that is given to it through theories and educational practice. Acceptance and involvement in the image of the world enables the formulation of specific argumentation strategies within it, the task of which is (i) explication, (ii) explanation and (iii) justification of the objective consequences of the image of the world. We adopt argumentative practices through training, we learn them both orally and in writing, of course under the supervision of those who have practically tried these arguments themselves. The student simply believes teachers and textbooks. Up to a certain point, this belief is rational. The image of the world as a whole, consisting of content-descriptive and normative beliefs, is not subject to any final rational justification. The accepted theses are assigned a different epistemological status; from theses endowed with unconditional obviousness, the correlate of which is not only subjective experience, but also objective reality, to those that can be subjected to a more or less creative revision by means of various kinds of interpretative procedures. No picture of the world is ultimately captivating. It is always possible to change the image of the world to a different one that better suits our intellectual needs and emotional sensitivity. This change takes the form of a specific conversion in certain situations.</p> PIOTR DUCHLIŃSKI Copyright (c) 2021 PIOTR DUCHLIŃSKI https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ https://pressto.amu.edu.pl/index.php/fc/article/view/30538 Wed, 15 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0100 The phenomenological paradigm of Gestalt psychotherapy https://pressto.amu.edu.pl/index.php/fc/article/view/30559 <p>This article examines the influence of the assumptions of the phenomenological method on the shape of Gestalt psychotherapy. Therefore, a comparative analysis of the main ideas of Edmund Husserl’s&nbsp; philosophy and the basic assumptions of Gestalt psychotherapy was performer. The strenght and importance of the underlying connections are indicated by both research methods used in Gestalt therapy: the directness of experiencem „suspedding” one’s own beliefs, horizontal description, and categories related to awareness: contact intentionality and „here and now” experience.</p> MAREK JAWOR Copyright (c) 2021 MAREK JAWOR https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ https://pressto.amu.edu.pl/index.php/fc/article/view/30559 Wed, 15 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0100 A proposal to solve the problem of moral luck in the context of the principle of control https://pressto.amu.edu.pl/index.php/fc/article/view/30560 <p>The article presents a proposal of solution of the problem of moral luck in the context of the principle of control. This principle states that the condition for assigning responsibility, moral guilt / merit is to have control over the action by the perpetrator. According to his supporters, a moral hit causes the moral evaluation of a subject's action that was disturbed by chance or a factor beyond the subject's control. The article tries to show that there is no complete lack of control in the actions that are affected by chance. Hence, one cannot put forward such distant consequences of the impact of luck on morality as the negation of the rationality of assigning moral responsibility and blame / merit in general. Instead, the article proposes to assign moral responsibility separately from guilt / merit, depending on the intention of the acting subject.</p> PRZEMYSŁAW STRZYŻYŃSKI Copyright (c) 2021 PRZEMYSŁAW STRZYŻYŃSKI https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ https://pressto.amu.edu.pl/index.php/fc/article/view/30560 Wed, 15 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0100