Humaniora. Czasopismo Internetowe 2022-04-28T11:59:35+00:00 Zbigniew Drozdowicz Open Journal Systems <p>„Humaniora. Czasopismo Internetowe” ukazuje się od 2013 r. Jest kwartalnikiem, w którym publikowane są teksty z zakresu nauk humanistycznych i społecznych. Ma charakter interdyscyplinarny.</p> <p>Czasopismo dostępne jest na stronie <a href=""></a></p> <ul class="oczasopismie"> <li class="show"><a href="/index.php/h/about" target="_blank" rel="noopener">POLITYKA FUNKCJONOWANIA CZASOPISMA</a></li> <li class="show"><a href="/index.php/h/issue/current" target="_blank" rel="noopener">AKTUALNY NUMER</a></li> <li class="show"><a href="/index.php/h/issue/archive" target="_blank" rel="noopener">ARCHIWUM</a></li> </ul> <p><strong>INDEKSOWANE W:</strong></p> <p>ERIH PLUS, Index Copernicus Master List, CEJSH – The Central European Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, BazHum</p> <p><strong>WSKAŹNIKI OCENY CZASOPISMA:</strong></p> <p><strong>Ministerstwo Edukacji i Nauki (2021): 40 punktów</strong></p> <div class="oczasopismie"><strong>DOI:<a href=""> 10.14746/h</a></strong></div> <div class="oczasopismie"><strong>e-ISSN: 2353-3145</strong></div> <div class="oczasopismie">&nbsp;</div> <div class="oczasopismie"><strong><strong><img src="" alt="Creative Commons License"> PRACE PUBLIKOWANE W CZASOPIŚMIE DOSTĘPNE SĄ NA LICENCJI CREATIVE COMMONS: </strong></strong><strong><a href="">Uznanie autorstwa - Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 Międzynarodowe</a></strong></div> <div class="oczasopismie">&nbsp;</div> Wstęp 2022-04-28T11:56:24+00:00 Sławomir Sztajer <p>Wstęp</p> 2022-04-28T09:18:22+00:00 Copyright (c) 2022 Sławomir Sztajer Fraktalna interpretacja religijnej różnorodności 2022-04-28T11:59:35+00:00 Stanisław Obirek <p>The Fractal Interpretation of Religious Diversity (FIRR) is an original theological proposition of Perry Schmidt-Leukel, which was of great interest for theologians interested in interreligious dialogue. Thanks to FIRR, an intriguing opportunity was created to overcome the existing tensions and conflicts between religions, which turn out to be not only unnecessary, but even contrary to the nature of both the human mind and historically created religious systems. Dtespite the impression of novelty, the main intuition of FIRR was also present in the earlier interpretations of the multiplicity of religions, an example of which is the original anthropology of word elaborated by Walter Ong’s, which was recalled in the second part of the article.</p> 2022-04-28T00:00:00+00:00 Copyright (c) 2022 Stanisław Obirek Kartezjański obraz Boga i nieba. Kontrowersje 2022-04-28T11:59:33+00:00 Zbigniew Drozdowicz <p>One of the more controversial issues was and still is the picture of God and heaven as taken by the philosophers. Today, without a great effort we may be able to find such who openly claim that there is no God and the belief his in existence is (to use the term by R. Dawkins) a human “delusion.” However heaven does exist but it is a part of the natural world. In the times of Descartes such philosophers and scholars also did occur. Nevertheless they were not numerous and so unimportant that we may ignore them. Descartes wasn’t one of them. His philosophy was acknowledged and still is by many specialists in the philosophical tradition as groundbraking and influential. Since this very moment of its emergence deep controversies had arised among others by the issue of carthesian picture of God and heaven. In these remarks I do recall several of them. My general thesis can be summed up by the stand point that in the carthesian system God had been assigned with an important but not central role. The central role had been reserved for sich a man that wants and is able to use his/hers own intellect.</p> 2022-04-28T00:00:00+00:00 Copyright (c) 2022 Zbigniew Drozdowicz Does myth have to be old? Philosophical reflection on myth 2022-04-28T11:59:32+00:00 Marcin Lisiecki <p>The present paper is an introduction to the debate on the contemporary methodology of research on myths. I attempt herein to elucidate the essence of myth, with the attempt being carried out in two parts. In the first part, I overview a history of the philosophical debate on the subject as well as I specify the reasons why myth ought to be reunited with truth anew, as was the case with Greek philosophers. In the latter part, I deal with the analysis of myth in relation with a human being – both in the individualist senseand in the social one, with the latter sense performing a significant role in understanding the world as well as humanity at large. Furthermore, I suggest what the essence of myth might be and what validity it can have for the contemporary man. The reflection included in the present text is inspired by some pertinent philosophical conceptions that allow me to show that it is possible to say something new about myth and the research thereupon.</p> 2022-04-28T00:00:00+00:00 Copyright (c) 2022 Marcin Lisiecki Prophetic ministry in Poland. Spiritual encounters among Charismatics 2022-04-28T11:59:30+00:00 Ewelina Berdowicz <p>The growth of prophetic ministry, which started in the 1980s, has resulted in numerous testimonies of great faith and hope. The emphasis put on signs and wonders, eagerly promoted by John Wimber and his adherents, has contributed to the rapid spread of new forms of worship. For decades, spiritual encounters — a desirable product in the religious marketplace, have also served as an easily recognizable trademark of both Pentecostals and Charismatics. The principal objective of the study is to investigate the nature of the prophecies shared among the selected Polish religious communities. For this particular reason, the main features of the Charismatic ritual language will be discussed, with special attention given to the question of God-Human intimacy. Furthermore, a reference will be made to the rise of the prophetic office within contemporary denominational and non-denominational churches. Finally, the content of the chosen prophecies will be thoroughly analyzed.</p> 2022-04-28T00:00:00+00:00 Copyright (c) 2022 Ewelina Berdowicz Sokrates populista 2022-04-28T11:59:27+00:00 Jacek Sieradzan <p>Platonic Socrates is uncompromising populist who want to show that he is always right. During discussion he uses eristic techniques. He attacks a man, not his views. He uses all methods and arguments in order to avoid essence of discussion when it is awkward for him. He ignores criticism of others, and in discussion he often contradicts oneself. In the end he sacrfices his life in order his ideas and opinions to be survived.</p> 2022-04-28T10:51:07+00:00 Copyright (c) 2022 Jacek Sieradzan