Abstract
This paper deals with the role of morphology in the reconstruction of lexical meaning. It focuses on the case of the Arabic Form VIII verbs in order to illustrate the challenge that morpho-semantics presents for historical lexicographers assuming the unity of a language throughout a long period of its use. In this connection, the paper attempts to show that, although Form VIII verbs have been in use since the early stages of Arabic, it is likely that users assigned them different meanings according to whether Form VIII morpho-semantics was transparent or opaque. Three factors have been identified that increase the opacity of this category: allomorphy, polysemy and frequency of the derivation base. 529 items were culled from a bilingual dictionary for the purposes of the study, and allomorphy was found to contribute about 12% to morphological opacity, and more than 70% of the verbs had a non-prototypical sense. Many of the extended senses seem to have lost all kinds of semantic relation to the prototypical sense, thus resulting in less transparency in the semantics of the derived forms. The study also argues that the less frequent the base of the derivation is, the more opaque Form VIII will be. The paper concludes that, given the lack of rich data from the early stages of Arabic, it is likely that a satisfactory reconstruction of the meaning of derived forms will probably never be achieved.
References
Anderson, S. 2015. Morphological change. In Bowern, C. & Evans, B. (eds.), The Routledge handbook of historical linguistics, 264-285. London – New York: Routledge.
Baalbaki, R. 1995. Al-Mawrid: A modern Arabic-English dictionary. Beirut: Dār al-ʕIlm li-l-Malāyīn.
Bahloul, M. 2008. Structure and function of the Arabic verb. London – New York: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203945568
Bauer, L. 2001. Morphological productivity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486210
Booij, G. E. 2013. Morphology in Construction Grammar. In Hoffmann, T. & Trousdale, G. (eds.), The Oxford handbook of Construction Grammar, 255-273. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195396683.013.0014
Brugman, C. 1988. The story of ‘over’: Polysemy, semantics and the structure of the lexicon. New York: Garland Press.
Bybee, J. L. 1985. Morphology: A study of the relation between meaning and form. Amsterdam – Philadelphia: Benjamins. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.9
Copestake, A. & Briscoe, T. 1995. Semi-productive polysemy and sense extension. Journal of Semantics 12. 15-67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/12.1.15
Evans, V. 2009. How words mean: Lexical concepts, cognitive models and meaning construction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199234660.001.0001
Fenk-Oczlon, G. & Fenk, A. 2010. Frequency effects on the emergence of polysemy and homophony. International Journal “Information Technologies and Knowledge” 4(2). 103-109.
Fleisch, F. 1979. Traité de philologie arabe. Vol. II: Pronoms, morphologie verbale, particules. Beyrouth: Dar El-Machreq.
Fortson, B. W. 2003. An approach to semantic change. In Joseph, D. & Janda, R. (eds.), The handbook of historical linguistics, 648-666. Malden etc.: Blackwell. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470756393.ch21
Froud, K. & Khamis-Dakwar, R. 2021. The study of Arabic language acquisition: A critical review. In Ryding, K. C. & Wilmsen, D. (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of Arabic linguistics, 48-82. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108277327.004
Glanville, P. J. 2018. The lexical semantics of the Arabic verb. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198792734.001.0001
Harrell, R. 1962. A short reference grammar of Moroccan Arabic. Washington: Georgetown University Press.
Himmisley, A. & Stump, G. 2016. The Cambridge handbook of morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge Universi-ty Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781139814720
Ibn ʕUṣfūr, A. 1987. Al-Mumtiʕ fī al-taṣrīf. Ed. by F. Qabāwa. Bayrūt: Dar al-Maʕrifa.
Ibn Yaʕīš, M. 2001. Šarḥ al-Mufaṣṣal, vol. 4. Dār al-Kutub al-ʕIlmiyya.
Kemmer, S. 1993. The middle voice. Amsterdam – Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Khamis-Dakwar, R. & Froud, K. 2019. Diglossia and language development. In Al-Wer, E. & Horesh, U. (eds.), The Routledge handbook of Arabic sociolinguistics, 300-313. Abingdon – New York: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315722450-21
Klaiman, M. H. 1991. Grammatical voice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kotowski, S. & Plag, I. (eds.). 2023. The semantics of derivational morphology: Theory, methods, evidence. Berlin – Boston: De Gruyter. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111074917
Lakoff, G. 1987. Women, fire and dangerous things: What categories can reveal about the mind. Chicago: Chicago University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001
Langacker, R. 1987. Foundations of cognitive grammar I: Theoretical pre-requisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Langacker, R. 1991. Foundations of cognitive grammar II: Descriptive application. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Larcher, P. 2003. Le système verbal de l’arabe classique. Aix-en-Provence: Publications de l’Université de Provence.
Lehrer, A. 2003. Polysemy in derivational affixes. In Nerlich, B. & Todd, Z. & Herman, V. & Clarke, D. D. (eds.), Polysemy: Flexible patterns of meaning in mind and language, 217-232. Berlin – New York: Mou-ton de Gruyter. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110895698.217
Lieber, R. 2004. Morphology and lexical semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
McCarthy, J. 1979. Formal problems in Semitic phonology and morphology. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT. (Doctoral dissertation.)
Milton, J. 2009. Measuring second language vocabulary acquisition. Bristol – Buffalo – Toronto: Multilingual Matters. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847692092
Muʕǧam = Muʕǧam al-Dawḥa al-Tārīxī li-l-Luγa al-ʕArabiyya. (https://www.dohadictionary.org/) (Accessed 2023-05-10.)
Qafisheh, H. 1977. A short reference grammar of Gulf Arabic. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.
Rainer, F. 2014. Polysemy in derivation. In Lieber, R & Štekauer, P. (eds.), The Oxford handbook of deriva-tional morphology, 338-353. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rainer, F. & Dressler, W. U. & Gardani, F. & Luschützky, H. C. 2014. Morphology and meaning: An over-view. In Rainer, F. & Gardani, F. & Luschützky, H. C. & Dressler, W. U. (eds.), Morphology and mean-ing, 3-46. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.327.02rai
Romaine, S. 1982. Socio-historical linguistics: Its status and methodology. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511720130
Ryding, K. 2005. A reference grammar of Modern Standard Arabic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486975
Saad, G. N. 1982. Transitivity, causation and passivization: A semantic-syntactic study of the verb in Classical Arabic. London – New York: Routledge.
Schulte, M. 2015. The semantics of derivational morphology: A synchronic and diachronic investigation of the suffixes -age and -ery in English. Tübingen: Narr. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24053/9783823379638
Talmy, L. 2000. Toward a cognitive semantics. 2 vols. Cambridge – London: The MIT Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/6847.001.0001
Traugott, E. C. 2000. Semantic change: An overview. In Chen, L. & Sybesma, R. (eds.), The First Glot Inter-national State-of-the-Article Book: The latest in linguistics, 385-406. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110822861.385
Tsohatzidis, S. L. (ed.). 1990. Meanings and prototypes: Studies in linguistic categorization. London – New York: Routledge.
al-Tūnī, M. Z. Ḥ. (1997). Ṣīγat iftaʕal fī al-QurɁān al-Karīm: Dirāsa luγawiyya. Maǧallat Kulliyyat al-Tarbiya (al-Qism al-ɁAdabī) 3(3). 1-120.
Versteegh, K. 1984. Pidginization and creolization: The case of Arabic. Amsterdam – Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.33
Versteegh, K. 2014. The Arabic language. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Wright, W. 1896. A grammar of the Arabic language, vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Zalami, F. B. 2007. First language acquisition. In Versteegh, K. & Eid, M. & Elgibali, A. & Woidich, M. & Zabor-ski, A. (eds.), Encyclopedia of Arabic language and linguistics, vol. 2, 96-104. Leiden – Boston: Brill.
Zúñiga, F. & Kittilä, S. 2019. Grammatical voice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316671399
Zwettler, M. 1978. The oral tradition of Classical Arabic poetry: Its character and implications. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Ahmed Ech-Charfi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.