Abstract
Phonological writing systems can use different modes in the arrangement of phonological information: linear or emblematic. The latter presupposes a two-dimensional composition of graphic elements which convey information of different levels: basic phonological units or their secondary features. Abugida is one of the most perfect modes of writing, using a two-dimensional principle of organization in its graphemes. Indian scripts imply forms of abugida, based on aksharas - orthographic syllables - as main graphemes, with their vocalization marked by sub-graphemes. Their complex forms reveal hierarchical structures representing phonological structures. Thus, “the akshara’s grammar” may be described, with its paradigms of shapes and meanings, their organization in space, their modes of conjunction. The functional characteristics of diacritic types and ligatures can be specified. The graphic shapes of the akshara can be represented as forming a “grammar” comparable to morphological structures. The graphic complexity of writing can then be estimated in typological perspective. This paper is an attempt to describe such a grammar.
References
Baudouin de Courtenay Ivan A . 1963 (first published in 1912, in Russian). “On the Relation of Russian W riting to the Russian L anguage.” In: Baudouin de Courtenay, Ivan A. Selected Works on General Linguistics 2: 209-235. Moscow: A cademy of Science of the U SSR.
Belova A ., Kogan L ., L oesov S., Romanova O . (eds.). 2009. Languages of the World: The Semitic Languages: Akkadian, Northwest Semitic. Moscow: Academia.
Bhaskararao Peri (ed.). 2003. International Symposium on Indic Scripts: Past and Future. Tokyo: Tokyo University of Foreign Studies.
Bhatia Tej K . 2003. “The G urmukhi Script and O ther W riting Systems of P unjab. H istory, Structure and Identity.” In: Bhaskararao 2003: 181-213.
Bradley David. 2009. “Language P olicy for China Minorities: O rthography Development for the Yi.” Written Language and Literacy 12, 170-187.
Bright William. 1996. “The Devanagari Script.” In: Daniels & Bright 1996: 384-391.
Bright William. 2000. “A Matter of T ypology: A lphasyllabaries and A bugidas.” Studies in the Linguistic Sciences 30(1), 63-71.
Coulmas Florian. 1996. The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Writing Systems. O xford: Blackwell.
Daniels Peter T . 1996. “The Study of W riting Systems.” In: Daniels & Bright 1996: 3-17.
Daniels Peter T . 2006. “On Beyond A lphabets.” Written Language and Literacy 9(1), 7-24.
Daniels Peter T . 2009. “Two N otes on T erminology.” Written Language and Literacy 12(2), 277-281.
Daniels Peter, Bright William (eds.). 1996. The World’s Writing Systems. N ew York: O xford U niversity P ress.
Fedorova Liudmila L . 2009. “The E mblematic Script of A ztec Codices as a P articular Semiotic T ype of W riting System.” Written Language and Literacy 12(2), 258-276.
Fedorova Liudmila L . 2012. “The Development of Structural Characteristics of Brahmi Script in Derivative Writing Systems.” Written Language and Literacy 15(1), 1-25.
Greenberg Joseph H . 1960. “A Quantitative A pproach to the Morphological T ypology of L anguage.” International Journal of AmericanLinguistics 26(3), 178-194 (Russian version: Гринберг Дж. 1963. “Квантита- тивный подход к морфологической типологии языков.” Звегинцев В.А. (ред.). Новое в лингвистике 3, 60-94. Москва, изд. Иностранная литература.).
Ivanov Vyacheslav V. 2004. The Linguistics of the Third Millennium: Questions to the Future. Moscow: Languages of Slavic Culture (in Russian).
Kim-Cho Sek Yen. 2008. “A Solution to Save E ndangered L anguage.” In: The 18th International Congress of Linguists. July 21-26, 2008, Korea University, Seoul, Korea. Abstracts, vol. 2: 178-179.
Lee Sang Oak. 2009. “The K orean A lphabet: A n O ptimal Featural System W ith G raphical Ingenuity.” Written Language and Literacy 12(2), 202-212.
Lee Sang Oak (ed.). 2010. Contemporary Korean Linguistics: International Perspectives. Gyoha-eup (Korea): Thaehaksa.
Lyavdansky A lexej K . 2009. “The O rigin and E arly Development of the W est Semitic A lphabets.” In: Belova et al. 2009: 811-821.
Neef Martin. 2010. “On Defining P honology.” In: Lee 2010: 216-230.
Pandey Pramod. 2003. “Phonetic and P honological Bases of H indi O rthography.” In: Bhaskararao 2003: 41-61.
Rogers Henry. 2005. Writing Systems: A Linguistic Approach. O xford: Blackwell.
Salomon Richard G . 1995. “On the O rigin of the E arly Indian Scripts: A Review.” Journal of the American Oriental Society 115(2), 271-279.
Salomon Richard G . 1996. “South A sian W riting Systems: Brahmi and K haroshthi.” In: Daniels & Bright 1996: 373-383.
Shevoroshkin Vitaly V. 2004. The Sound Chains in the Languages of the World. Moscow: URSS (in Russian; 1st ed. 1964).
Sproat Richard. 2006. “Brahmi-derived Scripts, Script L ayout, and Segmental A wareness. Written Language and Literacy 9(1), 45-66.
Uspensky Vladimir A . 1964 - В.А. Успенский. “Одна модель для понятия фонемы.” Вопросы языкознания, 1964: 6, 39-53 (in Russian).
Wali A., Sproat Richard, Padakannaya P., Bhuvaneshvari B. 2009. “Model for P honemic A wareness in Readers of Indian Script.” Written Language and Literacy 12(2), 161-169.
Zaliznyak Andrej A . 2002. - А.А. Зализняк, “О понятии графемы” // А.А. Зализняк. Русское именное сло- воизменение. С приложением избранных работ по современному русскому языку и общему языкозна- нию. М.: Языки славянской культуры, 2002: 559-576 (in Russian)
http://www.rbardalzo.narod.ru/novosti.htm.
http://www.omniglot.com/writing/tamil.htm.
License
Copyright (c) 2013 Liudmila Fedorova
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.