Factors influencing the pronunciation of adult speakers of a foreign language
PDF

Keywords

second language acquisition
second language phonology
pronunciation

How to Cite

Szalkowska-Kim, E. (2014). Factors influencing the pronunciation of adult speakers of a foreign language. Lingua Posnaniensis, 56(1), 141–158. https://doi.org/10.2478/linpo-2014-0009

Abstract

The present paper is an overview of selected investigations into acquisition of second language phonology (L2).1 It describes L2 phonology researchers’ attempts to determine the number, quantity, quality and roles of the factors which shape the pronunciation of L2 adult speakers, i.e. what is the influence of native language limitation, how the L2 phonology acquisition is governed by universal linguistic features, and whether adults use the same processes in acquiring the L2 that are used by children when they acquire their first language. This article will describe a number of longstanding phonetic and phonological projects whose aim was to discover patterns in the improvement of pronunciation in a second language (see research by Archibald, Broselow, Eckman, Flege, Hancin-Bhatt, Major and Weinberger, published in numerous compilations). It strives to explain the universal stages in the development of second language phonology. The main goal of the research is to assess the grammatical knowledge of the L2 learner, i.e. their competence in their interlanguage. The analyses show typological disproportions and universality of the strategies applied by the speakers in the target language. A few important hypotheses have been established (see below for their description), but it is important to note that most of the results verifying these hypotheses concern the acquisition of the English language, with a variable being the “input” languages of the speakers. Although this unilateral focus of the research projects reflects the expansion of the English language as the lingua franca of modern times, it might severely limit understanding of the important and interesting aspects of second language acquisition which structurally do not apply to that language, and are consequently overlooked.

https://doi.org/10.2478/linpo-2014-0009
PDF

References

Akamatsu, Nobuhiko. 2003. The effects of first language orthographic features on second language reading in text. Language Learning 53(2). 207-231.

Altenberg, Evelyn P . & Vago, Robert M. 1983. Theoretical implications of an error analysis of second language phonology production. Language Learning 33. 427-447.

Archibald, John. 2000. P arsing procedures and the question of full access in L2 phonology. New Sounds 2000 Plenary Address. Best 1995.

Birdsong, David. & Molis, Michelle. 2001. On the evidence for maturational constraints in second-language acquisition. Journal of Memory and Language 44. 235-249.

Boersma, Paul. 1998. Functional phonology. Formalizing the interactions between articulatory & perceptual drives. Netherlands Graduate School of Linguistics, IFOTT .

Bornstein, Marc. 1989. Sensitive periods in development: Structural characteristics and causal interpretations. Psychological Bulletin 105. 179-197.

Broselow, Ellen. 2001. Stress-epenthesis interactions. Halle & Vaux (eds.), SUN Y Stony Brook.

Broselow, Ellen. & Chen, S. & Wang, C. 1998. The emergence of the unmarked. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 20. 261-280.

Broselow, Ellen. & Finer, D. 1991. Parameter setting in second language phonology and syntax. Second Language Research 7. 35-59.

Clements, G . N . & Hume, E . 1995. The internal organization of speech sounds. In Goldsmith, (ed.), The Handbook of Phonological Theory, 245-306. Cambridge, Ma.-Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.

Desrochers, Richard. 1998. T he role of parameters in phonology: a critical account. Language Sciences 20. 369-397.

Dziubalska-Kołaczyk, Katarzyna. 1990. A theory of second language acquisition within the framework of Natural Phonology. A Polish-English Contrastive Study. Poznań: UAM Press.

Dziubalska-Kołaczyk, K atarzyna. 1999. Fonologia naturalna: podstawy i zastosowania. In J assem, W . & Basztura C. & Demenko, G . & Jassem, K . (eds.), Speech and Language Technology, vol. 3, 21-32. Poznań: Polish Phonetic A ssociation.

Dziubalska-Kołaczyk, Katarzyna. 2002. Speech is in the ear of the listener: some remarks on the acquisition of second language sounds. In: Selected Papers from the 6th College-wide Conference for Students of Languages, Linguistics, and Literature, Honolulu: University of Hawai´i.

Eckman, Fred R. From phonemic differences to constraint rankings: research on second language phonology: State of the A rt. http://www.uwm.edu/~rlschlei/pdfs/L2.phonology.SOA.rev.pdf.

Eckman, Fred R. & Elreyes, A . & Iverson, G . K . 2003. Some principles of second language phonology. Second Language Research 19(3). 169-208.

Ellis, Rod. 2004. The definition and measurement of L2 explicit knowledge. Language Learning 54(2). 227-275.

Flege, James Emil. 1981. The phonological basis of foreign accent: A hypothesis. TESOL Quarterly 14. 443-455.

Flege, James Emil. 1987. The production of ‘new’ and ‘similar’ phones in a foreign language: evidence for the effect of equivalence classification. Journal of Phonetics 15. 47-65.

Flege, James Emil & Davidian, R. 1984. Transfer and developmental processes in adult foreign language speech production. Applied Psycholinguistics 5. 323-347.

Flege, James Emil & Bohn, O .-S. & Jang, S.-Y. 1997. Effects of experience on non-native speakers’ production and perception of English vowels. Journal of Phonetics 25. 437-470.

Flege, James Emil & Munro, M. J . & MacKay, I. R. A . 1995. Effects of age of second-language learning on the production of English consonants. Speech Communication 16. 1-26.

Flege, James Emil & Schirru, C. & MacKay, I. R. A . 2003. Interaction between the native and second language phonetic subsystems. Speech Communication 40. 467-491.

Flege, James Emil & Yeni-Komshian, G . H . & Liu, S. 1999. Age constraints on second-language acquisition. Journal of Memory and Language 41, 78-104. ID jmla 1999.2638 at http://www.idealibrary.com.

Gąsiorowski, P . 1999. Teoria optymalności: nowe spojrzenie na kompetencję językową. In Jassem, W . & Basztura, Cz. & Demenko, G . & Jassem, K . (eds.), Speech and Language Technology. Vol. 3, 51-57. Poznań: Polish Phonetic Association.

Gnanadesikan, Amalia. 2004. Markedness and faithfulness constraints in child phonology. In Kager, R. & Pater, J . & Zonneveld, W . (eds.), Constraints in Phonological Acquisition. Cambridge University Press.

Goldsmith, John. 1990. Autosegmental and Metrical Phonology. Oxford: Blackwell.

Greenberg, J . H . 1978. Universals of human language. Vol. 2. Phonology. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Grijzenhout, Janet & van Rooy, Bertus. Second language phonology: Acquisition through gradual constraint demotion. http://www.phil-fak.uni-duesseldorf.de/sfb282/working_papers/Sfb119.pdf.

Hahne, Anja. 2001. W hat’s different in second-language processing? Evidence from event-related brain-potentials. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 30(3). 251-266.

Hancin-Bhatt, Barbara. 2000. Optimality in second language phonology: codas in Thai ESL. Second Language Research 16(3). 201-232.

Harklau, L . 2002. T he role of writing in classroom second language acquisition. Journal of Second Language Writing 11. 329-350.

Hayes, Rachel. (http://www.u.arizona.edu/~rhayes/) The perception of novel phoneme contrasts in a second language: a developmental study of native speakers of English learning Japanese Singleton and Geminate Consonant Contrasts. Coyote Papers 12. 28-41. Language in Cognitive Science.

Hu, Ch.-F. 2003. Phonological memory, phonological awareness and foreign language word learning. Language Learning 53(3). 429-462.

Jacewicz, Ewa. 1999. Phonological context in the acquisition of second language vowels. (Abstract) Jones, R. H . 1997. Beyond “listen and repeat”: pronunciation teaching materials and theories of second language. System 25(1). 103-112.

Koren, Shira. 1995. Foreign language pronunciation testing: A new approach. System 23(3). 387-400.

Lado, Robert. 1957. Linguistics across cultures: applied linguistics for language teachers. University of Michigan Press.

Lakshmanan, U . & Selinker, L . 2001. Analysing interlanguage: how do we know what learners know? Second Language Research 17(4). 393-420.

Lenneberg, E . 1967. Biological foundations of language. New York: Wiley.

Lin, H .-L., Chang, H .-W., Cheung, H . 2004. T he effect of early English learning on auditory perception of English minimal pairs by Taiwan university students. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 33(1). 25-49.

Lombardi, Linda. 2003. Second Language data and constraints on Manner: Explaining substitutions for the English interdentals. Second Language Research 19(3). 225-250.

Major, Roy. C. 1987. A model for interlanguage phonology. In Ioup, G . & Weinberger, S. (ed.), Interlanguage Phonology, 101-124. Rowley: Newbury House Publishers.

Major, Roy. C. 2000. Chronological and stylistic aspects of second language acquisition of consonant clusters. New Sounds 92: 2nd Amsterdam Symposium on the Acquisition of Second Language Speech.

Major, Roy. C. 2001. Foreign accent: the ontogeny and phylogeny of second language phonology. Mahwah-New Jersey-London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.

Marsden, Heather. 2002. Poverty of the stimulus and UG in Japanese L 2 acquisition: a response to Sheen (2000). Durham Working Papers in Linguistics 8. 67-80.

McAllister, R. & Flege, J .E. & Piske, T . 1999. Second language comprehension: a discussion of some influencing factors. In The Proceedings of the 9th Annual Conference on the European Second Language Association (EU ROSLA 9), Lund, Sweden.

McCarthy, John J . & Prince, Alan. 1994. T he emergence of the unmarked: Optimality in prosodic morphology. NELS Proceedings 24. 333-379.

Pallier, C. & Colomé, A . & Sebastian-Gallés, N . 2001. T he influence of native-language phonology on lexical access: exemplar-based vs. abstract lexical entries. Psychological Science 2001.

Paradowska, Anna. 2002. 폴란드의 한국어 모음의 발음과 청취에 대한 실험음성학적 연구. Production and perception of Korean vowels by Polish learners: An experimental phonetic approach. Seoul National University. (Unpublished doctoral thesis)

Piske, T . & MacKay, I.R.A. & Flege, J .E. 2001. Factors affecting degree of foreign accent in an L 2: a review. Journal of Phonetics 29. 191-215.

Prince, Alan S. & Smolensky, Paul. 1993. Optimality theory. Constrain interaction in Generative Grammar. ROA Version, 8/2002.

Robinson, Peter. 2001. Individual differences, cognitive abilities, aptitude complexes and learning conditions in second language acquisition. Second Language Research 17(4). 368-392.

Selinker, Larry. 1972. Interlanguage. IRAL 10. 209-231.

Shohamy, Elana. 2000. T he relationship between language testing and second language acquisition, revisited. System 28. 541-553.

Tan, L .H. & Spinks, J .A. & Feng, C.-M. & Siok, W .T. & Perfetti, C.A. & Xiong, J . & Fox, P .T. & Gao, J .H. 2003. Neural systems of second language reading are shaped by native language. Human Brain Mapping 18. 158-166.

Tesar, Bruce & Smolensky, Paul. 1998. Learnability in Optimality Theory. Linguistic Inquiry 29. 229-268.

Wode, H . 1976. Developmental sequences in naturalistic second language acquisition. Working Papers on Bilingualism 11. 1-13.

Yang, Byunggon. 1996. A comparative study of American English and Korean vowels produced by male and female speakers. Journal of Phonetics 24. 245-261.