Abstract
Starting with the Transitivity Requirement hypothesis [the direct object counterpart of Extended Projection P rinciple (EPP)], we examine the development of cognate objects and cognate subjects in English. We show that English extended the range of both cognate objects - which are now also possible with activity/event nouns - and cognate subjects - cognate subjects became an option for impersonal verbs. However, we argue that a correlation between the development of cognate arguments and the changes in null arguments should be excluded, whereas the development of the cognate arguments appears to be related to aspectual changes.
References
Aarts, Bas 1995. Secondary predicates in English. In Aarts, Bas & Meyer, Charles F. (eds.), The verb in contemporary English: Theory and description, 75−100. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Alexiadou, Artemis & Anagnostopoulou, Elena. 1998. Parametrizing agr: Word order, verb-movement and EPP - checking. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 16(3). 491−539.
Allerton, D.J. 2002. Stretched verb constructions in English. London-New York: Routledge.
Basilico, David. 1998. Object position and predication forms. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 16. 541−595.
Borer, Hagit. 1994. The projection of arguments. In Benedicto, Elena & Runner, Jeffrey (eds.), Functional projections. University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers 17, 19−46. Amherst: University of Massachusetts, GLSA.
Bowers, John. 2002. Transitivity. Linguistic Inquiry 33. 183−224.
Cummins, Sarah & Roberge, Yves. 2004. Null objects in French and English. In: Auger, Julie & Clements, Clancy & Vance, Barbara (eds.), Contemporary approaches to Romance linguistics: Selected papers from the 33rd Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL), 121−138. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Cummins, Sarah & Roberge, Yves. 2005. A modular account of null objects in French. Syntax 8(1). 44−64.
Denison, David. 1993. English historical syntax: Verbal constructions. London-New York: Longman.
DOE : Dictionary of Old English: A to G on CD-ROM. Cameron, Angus et al. (eds.). Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies for the Dictionary of Old English Project 2008.
Erteschik-Shir, Nomi & Rapoport, Tova R. 2004. Bare aspect: A theory of syntactic projection. In Guéron, Jacqueline & Lecarme, Jacqueline (eds.), The syntax of time, 217−234. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Frascarelli, Mara & Hinterhölzl, Roland. 2007. Types of topics in German and Italian. In Schwabe, Kerstin & Winkler, Susanne (eds.), On Information Structure, Meaning and Form, 87−116. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
García Velasco, Daniel & Portero Muñoz, Carmen. 2002. Understood objects in functional grammar (Working Papers in Functional Grammar 76). University of Amsterdam.
Gelderen van, Elly. 2000a. A history of English reflexive pronouns: Person, self, and interpretability. Amsterdam- Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Gelderen van, Elly. 2000b. The role of person in the loss of verbal agreement and of pro-drop. In Fischer, Olga & Stein Dieter (eds.), Pathways of change: Grammaticalization processes in Older English, 187−206. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Gelderen van, Elly. 2004. Grammaticalization as economy. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Gelderen van, Elly. 2010. “Pro-drop and pronominal subjects: Reanalyzing features in the history of English. Paper presented at the Workshop “Subjects in Diachrony”, Regensburg. http://www.public.asu.edu/~gelderen/Regensburg-talk.pdf.
Giannakidou, Anastasia & Merchant, Jason. 1997. O n the interpretation of null indefinite objects in Greek. Studies in Greek Linguistics 17. 141−155.
Gummere, Francis B. (ed.). 1910. Beowulf (The Harvard Classics 49). New York: P .F. Collier & Son.
Höche, Silke. 2009. Cognate object constructions in English. A cognitive-linguistic account. Tübingen: Narr.
Horrocks, Geoffrey & Stavrou, Melita. 2003. Actions and their results in Greek and English: The complementarity of morphologically encoded (viewpoint) aspect and syntactic resultative predication. Journal of Semantics 20. 297−327.
Horrocks, Geoffrey & Stavrou, Melita. 2007. Grammaticalized Aspect and Spatio-temporal Culmination. Lingua 117. 605−644.
Horrocks, Geoffrey & Stavrou Melita. 2010. Morphological aspect and the distribution of cognate objects across languages. In Rappaport Hovav, Malka & Doron, Edit & Sichel, Ivy (eds.), Lexical semantics, syntax, and event structure, 284−308. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Huang, James C.-T. 1984. On the distribution and reference of empty pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry 15. 531−574.
Jones, Michael Allen. 1988. Cognate objects and the case filter. Journal of Linguistics 24. 89−111.
Killie, Kristin. 2008. From locative to durative to focalized? The English progressive and ‘PROG imperfective drift’. In Gotti, Maurizio & Dossena, Marina & Dury, Richard (eds.), English historical linguistics 2006. Vol. 1: Syntax and morphology, 69−88. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins
Kranich, Svenja. 2010. The progressive in Modern English. A corpus-based study of grammaticalization and related changes. Amsterdam-New York: Rodopi.
Kroch, Anthony. 1989. Reflexes of grammar in patterns of language change. Language Variation and Change 1. 199−244.
Kroch, Anthony & Taylor Ann. 2000. The Penn-Helsinki Parsed Corpus of Middle English (PPCME2). Department of Linguistics, University of Pennsylvania. CD-ROM, second edition. http://www.ling.upenn.edu/histcorpora.
Kroch, Anthony & Santorini, Beatrice & Delfs, Lauren. 2004. The Penn-Helsinki Parsed Corpus of Early Modern English (PPCEME). Department of Linguistics, University of Pennsylvania. CD-ROM, first edition. http://www.ling.upenn.edu/hist-corpora.
Kroch, Anthony & Santorini, Beatrice & Diertani, Ariel. 2010. The Penn-Helsinki Parsed Corpus of Modern British English (PPCMBE). Department of Linguistics, University of Pennsylvania. CD-ROM, first edition. http://www.ling.upenn.edu/hist-corpora.
Lambrecht, Knud & Lemoine, Kevin. 1996. Vers une grammaire des compléments zéro en français parlé. In Chuquet, Jean & Fryd, Mare (eds.), Travaux linguistiques du CERLICO 9. Absence de marques et représentation de l’absence, 279−306. Rennes: Presses universitaires de Rennes.
Larjavaara, Meri. 2000. Présence ou absence de l’objet. Limites du possible en français contemporain. Helsinki: Academia Scientiarum Fennica.
Larson, Richard. 1988. On the double object construction. Linguistic Inquiry 19. 335−391.
Lavidas, N ikolaos. 2013a. U naccusativity and the diachrony of null and cognate objects in G reek. In Gelderen van, Elly & Barðdal, Jóhanna & Cennamo, Michela (eds.). 2012. Argument Structure in Flux: The Naples- Capri Papers. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Lavidas, Nikolaos. 2013b. Null and cognate objects and changes in (in)transitivity: Evidence from the history of English. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 60(1). 69−106.
Los, Bettelou & Kemenade, A ns van. 2012. Discourse and information structure in the history of English. In Bergs, Alexander & Brinton, Laurel (eds.), Historical Linguistics of English (HSK 34.2), 1475-1490. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Macfarland, Talke. 1995. Cognate objects and the argument/adjunct distinction in English. Northwestern University. (Ph.D. dissertation) Massam, Diane. 1990. Cognate objects as thematic objects. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 35. 161−190.
MED: Middle English Dictionary, XXII vol. 1956-1999. Kurath, H ans & Kuhn, Sherman M. (eds.). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. http://ets.umdl.umich.edu/m/mec.
Mittwoch, Anita. 1998. Cognate objects as reflections of Davidsonian event arguments. In Rothstein, Susan (ed.), 309−332. Events and Grammar. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Nevalainen, Terttu & Raumolin-Brunberg, Helena & Keränen, Jukka & Nevala, Minna & Nurmi, Arja & Palander- Collin, Minna. 1998. Corpus of Early English Correspondence (CEE C). Department of English, University of Helsinki. http://www.helsinki.fi/varieng/CoRD/corpora/CEEC.
OED: The Oxford English Dictionary [Online]. Simpson, John A . (ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. http://www.oed.com.
Panagiotidis, Phoevos. 2003. E mpty nouns. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 21. 381−432.
Pereltsvaig, Asya. 1999. Two classes of cognate objects. In: Shahin, Kimary & Blake, Susan & Kim, Eun-Sook (eds.), The Proceedings of the WCCFL XVII, 537−551. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Pintzuk, Susan. 2002. Morphological case and word order in Old English. Language Sciences 24. 381−395.
Pirvulescu, Mihaela & Roberge, Yves. 1999. Objects and the structure of imperatives. In: Authier, J .-Marc & Bullock, Barbara E . & Reed, Lisa A . (eds.), Formal perspectives on Romance linguistics, 211−226. Amsterdam- Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Roberge, Yves. 2002. Transitivity requirement effects and the EPP . Paper presented at the Western Conference on Linguistics (WE COL ), November 2002, Vancouver.
Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann. 2007. Argument features, clausal structure and the computation. In Reuland, Eric & Bhattacharya, Tanmoy & Spathas, Giorgos (eds.), Argument Structure, 121−158. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann. 2011. Conditions on argument drop. Linguistic Inquiry 42. 267−304.
Taylor, Ann & Warner, Anthony & Pintzuk, Susan & Beths, Frank. 2003. The York-Toronto-Helsinki Parsed Corpus of Old English Prose (YCOE). Department of Language and Linguistic Science, University of York. Available through the Oxford Text Archive. Tenny, Carol. 1987. Grammaticalizing Aspect and Affectedness. MIT. (Ph.D. dissertation) Tenny, Carol. 1994. Aspectual roles and the syntax-semantics interface. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Travis, Lisa. 1994. E vent phrase and a theory of functional categories. In Koskinen, Paivi (ed.), Proceedings of the 1994 Canadian Linguistic Association Meeting at the University of Calgary, 559−570. Toronto: Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics.
Tsimpli, Ianthi Maria & Papadopoulou, Despina. 2006. Aspect and argument realization: A study on antecedentless null objects in Greek. Lingua 116. 1595−1615.
Visser, Frederikus Theodorus (1963) [2002]. An historical syntax of the English language. Vol. 1. Leiden: E.J. Brill.
Walkden, George. 2011. Null arguments in Old English. Paper presented at the LAG B 2011. http://www.srcf.ucam.org/~gw249/Walkden_2011_LAGB.pdf.
Williams, Alexander. 2000. Null subjects in Middle English existentials. In Pintzuk, Susan & Tsoulas, George & Warner, Anthony (eds.), Diachronic syntax: Models and mechanisms, 164−188. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Zaefferer, Dietmar. 2002. T he puzzle of the autoantonymous argument role. Unraveling the polysemy of risk/ riskieren. In Restle, David & Zaefferer, Dietmar (eds.), Festschrift for Theo Vennemann on the occasion of his 65th birthday, 413−437. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
License
Copyright (c) 2014 Nikolaos Lavidas
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.