Abstract
The transitivizing/detransitivizing typology of Nichols et al. 2004 also proves useful to historical linguistics. We focus on language families of northern Eurasia, chiefly the three oldest families (Indo-European, Uralic, Nakh-Daghestanian), some of their daughter branches aged about 2000-3000 years, and one younger family for which we have data on enough daughters to support a family phylogeny (Tungusic). We use the 18-pair wordlist of Nichols et al. 2004, which typologizes each pair of verbs depending on which of the two is derived. We make some improvements in the coding of grammatical properties and the typologization of pairs. NeighborNet trees based on this information reveal family-wide linguistic geography and areal trends. Adding minimal information about the cognacy or non-cognacy of the roots of the wordlist items produces Neighbor- Net trees which approximate well the known phylogeny of the family. Thus very small closed data sets, collected originally for typology, yield rich information about language family history - strikingly, a mere 18 verbs (9 pairs), coded for morphological type and cognacy, yield a very good genealogical tree - while historical methods have also improved the typology.
References
Abondolo, Daniel. 2009. Hungarian. In Comrie, Bernard (ed.), The World’s Major Languages (2nd ed.), 484-496. London: Routledge.
Aikio, Ante. 2012. An essay on Saami ethnolinguistic prehistory. In Grünthal, Riho & Kallio, Petri (eds.), A Linguistic Map of Prehistoric Northern Europe, 63-117. Helsinki: Suomalais-Ugrilainen Seura.
Bickel, Balthasar & Zakharko, Taras & Nichols, Johanna. 2016. Better data with late aggregation: Autotyp and beyond. Paper presented at Poznan Linguistics Meeting, Poznań, 15-17 September 2016.
Carlton, Terence. 1991. Introduction to the Phonological History of the Slavic Languages. Columbus: Slavica.
Grünthal, Riho & Kallio, Petri (eds.). 2012. A Linguistic Map of Prehistoric Northern Europe. Helsinki: Suomalais-Ugrilainen Seura.
Haspelmath, Martin. 1993. More on the typology of inchoative/causative verb alternations. In Comrie, Bernard & Polinsky, Maria (ed.), Causatives and Transitivity, 87-120. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Huson, Daniel H. & Bryant, David. 2006. Application of phylogenetic networks in evolutionary studies. Molecular Biology and Evolution 34(3). 254-267.
Janhunen, Juha. 2012. Etymological and ethnohistorical aspects of the Yenisei. Studia Etymologica Cracoviensia 17. 67-87.
Janhunen, Juha. 2009. Proto-Uralic - what, where, and when? In Ylikoski, Jussi (ed.), The Quasquicentennial of the Finno-Ugrian Society, 57-78. (SUST 258.) Helsinki: Suomalais-Ugrilainen Seura.
Lehtinen, Jyri & Honkola, Terhi & Korhonen, Kalle & Syrjänen, Kai & Wahlberg, Niklas & Vesakoski, Outi. 2014. Behind family trees: Secondary connections in Uralic language networks. Language Dynamics and Change 4. 89-221.
Marvan, Jiri. 1979. Prehistoric Slavic contraction. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
Nedjalkov, V. P. 1969. Nekotorye verojatnostnye universalii v glagol’nom slovoobrazovanii. In Vardul’, F. (ed.), Jazykovye universalii i lingvističeskaja tipologija, 106-114. Moscow: Nauka.
Nichols, Johanna. 1982. Ingush transitivization and detransitivization. BLS 8. 445-462.
Nichols, Johanna. 2009. Expanding character sets for phylogeny: A Slavic test case. In Evans, Bethwyn (ed.), Discovering History through Language: Papers in Honor of Malcolm Ross, 127-151. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
Nichols, Johanna. 2014. Derivational paradigms in diachrony and comparison. In Robbeets, Martine & Bisang, Walter (eds.), Paradigm Change in the Transeurasian Languages and Beyond, 61-88. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Nichols, Johanna & Peterson, David A. & Barnes, Jonathan. 2004. Transitivizing and detransitivizing languages. Linguistic Typology 8(2). 149-211.
Nichols, Johanna & Warnow, Tandy. 2008. Tutorial on computational linguistic phylogeny. Language and Linguistics Compass 2(5). 760-820.
Parpola, Asko. 2012. Formation of the Indo-European and Uralic (Finno-Ugric) language families in the light of archaeology: Revised and integrated “total” correlations. In Grünthal, Riho & Kallio, Petri (eds.), A Linguistic Map of Prehistoric Northern Europe, 119-184. Helsinki: Suomalais-Ugrilainen Seura.
Plank, Frans & Aditi, Lahiri. 2015. Macroscopic and microscopic typology: Basic valence orientation, more pertinacious than meets the naked eye. Linguistic Typology 19(1). 1-54.
Saarikivi, Janne & Lavento, Mika. 2012. Linguistics and archaeology: A critical view of an interdisciplinary approach with reference to the prehistory of northern Scandinavia. In Damm, Charlotte & Saarikivi, Janne
(eds.), Networks, Interaction, and Emerging Identities in Fennoscandia and Beyond, 177-216. Helsinki: Suomalais-Ugrilainen Seura.
Salminen, Tapani. 2001. The rise of the Finno-Ugric language family. In Carpelan, Christian & Parpola, Asko & Koskikallio, Petteri (eds.), Early Contacts between Uralic and Indo-European: Linguistic and Archaeological considerations, 385-396. Helsinki: Suomalais-Ugrilainen Seura.
Sammallahti, Pekka. 1988. Historical phonology of the Uralic languages. In Sinor, Denis (ed.), The Uralic languages, 478-554. Helsinki: Suomalais-Ugrilainen Seura.
Schenker, Alexander M. 1995. The Dawn of Slavic. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Shevelov, George Y. 1965. A Prehistory of Slavic: The Phonological History of Common Slavic. New York: Columbia University Press.
Trudgill, Peter. 2011. Sociolinguistic Typology: Social Determinants of Linguistic Structure and Complexity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
von Waldenfels, Ruprecht & Nichols, Johanna. 2013. Better characters for better phylogenies. Paper presented at ICHL 21, Oslo, 5-9 August 2013.
License
Copyright (c) 2016 Riho Grünthal, Johanna Nichols
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.