Abstract
The purpose of this article is to interpret the term the “reflexive historicizing of communication” used by the editors of the Handbook of Communication History published in 2013. In the preface and in the first chapter, the editors introduce the above-mentioned concept, postulating that it is associated with the most important among several possible trends in communication history. Reflexive historicizing, as an important and innovative methodological directive, however, is described therein rather laconically. This article contains comments on both historicism and reflexivity. Their genesis is presented as well as their most important interpretations and possible applications in the social sciences. Particular attention is paid to the concept of historicism, since it is charged with numerous controversies and polemics (Karl Popper’s famous criticism). The main purpose of this article is to explain the meaning of historicism (and reflexivity) so as to avoid confusion and over-interpretation in the application of these concepts within communication history.
References
Bambach, Charles R. 1995. Heidegger, Dilthey, and the Crisis of Historicism. New York: Cornell University Press.
Berger, Stefan. 2001. Debate: Stefan Berger Responds to Ulrich Muhlack. Bulletin of the German Historical Institute London 23(1). 21-33.
Bhaskar, Roy. 1998. The Possibility of Naturalism: A Philosophical Critique of the Contemporary Human Sciences. London: Routledge.
Bourdieu, Pierre & Wacquant, L.J.D. 1992. An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Brannigan, John. 1998. New Historicism and Cultural Materialism. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Briggs, Asa & Burke, Peter. 2010. Social History of the Media: From Gutenberg to the Internet. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Burke, Peter. 1993. The Art of Conversation. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Burke, Peter. 2007. The Social History of Language. In Burke, P. (ed.), The Art of Conversation. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Clark, Elisabeth A. 2009. History, Theory, Text: Historians and the Linguistic Turn. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
D’Amico, Roberto. 1989. Historicism and Knowledge. London: Routledge.
Ellis, Brian. 2001. Scientific Essentialism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fay, Brian. 1996. Contemporary Philosophy of Social Science: A Multicultural Approach. Hoboken: Wiley.
Nerone, John. 2006. The Future of Communication History. Critical Studies in Media Communication 23(3). 254-262.
Page, Carl. 2010. Philosophical Historicism and the Betrayal of First Philosophy. University Park: Penn State Press.
Passmore, John. 1974. The Poverty of Historicism Revisited. History and Theory 14(4). 30-47.
Peters, John D. 2012. Speaking into the Air: A History of the Idea of Communication. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Popper, Karl R. 1945 [2002]. The Open Society and Its Enemies. London: Routledge.
Popper, Karl R. 1957 [2002]. The Poverty of Historicism. London: Routledge.
Reddy, Michael. 1979. The Conduit Metaphor: A Case of Frame Conflict in Our Language About Language. In Ortony, A. (ed.), Metaphor and Thought, 284-310. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schnädelbach, Herbert. 1984. Philosophy in Germany 1831-1933. Cambridge: CUP Archive.
Simonson, P. & Peck, J. & Craig, R.T. & Jackson, J. (eds.). 2013. Handbook of Communication History. New York, London: Routledge.
Steenblock, Volker 1991. Transformationen des Historismus. MüFink.
Susen, Simon. 2007. The Foundations of the Social: Between Critical Theory and Reflexive Sociology. Oxford: Bardwell Press.
Thomas, Brook. 1991. The New Historicism: And Other Old-fashioned Topics. Princeton University Press.
Veeser, Harold. 1989. The New Historicism. London: Routledge.
White, Hayden. 1975. Historicism, History, and Figurative Imagination. History and Theory 14(4). 48-67.
Yerxa, Donald. 2012. The Birth of the Past: An Interview with Zachary Sayre Schiffman. Historically Speaking 13(1). 18-20.
License
Copyright (c) 2017 Michał Wendland
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.