Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to prove the Mass Noun Hypothesis wrong. The hypothesis claims that all common nouns in classifier languages like Mandarin Chinese are mass nouns. The objection against it consists in displaying its implausible deduction, where false conclusions have been drawn due to relying on the grammar of English, which is incongruent with the grammar of Chinese. Consequently, this paper defends the Count Noun Thesis, stating that in Chinese there are count as well as mass nouns. In support of this statement, first, the typology of numeral classifiers had to be established, which resulted in gathering and completing all the reasons to distinguish classifiers from measure words. After only this necessary differentiation was made, it was possible to show that the count/mass distinction exists in Mandarin Chinese. That is, count nouns by default have only one classifier, with certain disclaimers. Apart from that, count nouns, as in every language, may undergo some measurement with measure words. Mass nouns, however, in the context of quantification may appear only with measure words, but not with classifiers. These conditions naturally follow from the ontological status of the two types of nouns’ referents, i.e. bounded objects denoted by count nouns, and scattered substances denoted by mass nouns.
References
Carroll, J.B. (ed.). 1956. Language, Thought, and Reality. Selected Writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf. New York: The Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Chan, S.-W. (ed.). 2016. The Routledge Encyclopedia of the Chinese Language. New York: Routledge.
Chang, J.-H. (ed.). 2011. Language and Cognition: Festschrift in Honor of James H.-Y. Tai on His 70th Birthday. Taipei: The Crane Publishing.
Chao, Y.-R. 1968. A Grammar of Spoken Chinese. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Chao, Y.-R. (赵元任). 1979. 汉语口语语法，吕叔湘译，商务印书馆：北京.
Chen, M.Y. & Tseng, O.J.L. (eds). 1994. In Honor of Professor William S-Y. Wang: Interdisciplinary Studies on Language and Language Change. Taipei: Pyramid Publishing Company.
Cheng, L.L.-S. & Sybesma, R. 1998. “Yi-wan Tang, yi-ge Tang: classifiers and massifiers”. Tsing Hua Journal of Chinese Studies 28(3). 385-412.
Cheung, C.C.-H. 2016. “Chinese: Parts of Speech”. In Chan, S.-W. (ed.). The Routledge Encyclopedia of the Chinese Language, New York: Routledge. 242-294.
Craig, C.G. (ed.). 1986. Noun classes and categorization. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Deng, N.Y.-R. & Sun, S.-W. 鄧育仁，孫式文. 2011. “在可數與不可數名詞之外” (Beyond Count Nouns and Mass nouns). In Jung-hsing, Chang (ed.). Language and Cognition: Festschrift in Honor of James H.-Y. Tai on His 70th Birthday, Taipei: The Crane Publishing. 103-112.
Erbaugh, M.S. 1986. “Taking stock: the development of Chinese noun classifiers historically and in young children”. In Craig, Colette G. (ed.). Noun Classes and Categorization, John Benjamins Publishing Company. 399-436.
Gentner, D. & Goldin-Meadow, S. (eds.). 2003. Language in Mind. Advances in the Study of Language and Thought. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Hansen, C. 1976. “Mass nouns and ”, Philosophy East and West, Vol. 26, No. 2. 189-209.
Hansen, C. 1983. Language and Logic in Ancient China. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
Hansen, C. 1992. A Daoist Theory of Chinese Thought. A Philosophical Interpretation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Her, O.-S. & Hsieh, C.-T. 2010. “On the semantic distinction between Classifiers and Measure Words in Chinese”, Language and Linguistics 11:3. 527-551.
Hsieh, M.-L. 2008. The Internal Structure of Noun Phrases in Chinese. Taipei: Crane Publishing.
Iida, T. 1998. “Professor Quine on Japanese Classifiers”, Annals of the Japan Association for Philosophy of Science, Vol. 9, No. 3. 111-118.
Imai, M. & Mazuka, R. 2003. “Reevaluating Linguistic Relativity: Language-Specific Categories and the Role of Universal Ontological Knowledge in the Construal of Individuation”. In Gentner, Dedre & Goldin-Meadow, Susan (eds.). Language in Mind. Advances in the Study of Language and Thought. Cambridge: The MIT Press. 429-464.
Kilarski, M. 2013. Nominal Classification: A History of Its Study from the Classical Period to the Present. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Lakoff, G. 1986. “Classifiers as a reflection of mind”. In Craig, Colette G. (ed.). Noun Classes and Categorization. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 13-51.
Li, C.N. & Thompson, S.A. 1981. Mandarin Chinese. A Functional Reference Grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Link, G. 1991. “Quantity and Number”. In Zaefferer D. (ed.). Semantic Universals and Universal Semantics (Groningen-Amsterdam Studies in Semantics 12). Berlin: Foris Publications. 133-149.
Massam, D. (ed.). 2012. Count and Mass Across Languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Nakamura, H. 1964. Ways of Thinking of Eastern Peoples: India, China, Tibet, Japan. Honolulu: Eat-West Center Press.
Pietrow, J.A. 2011. Kategoryzacja kwantytatywna w języku japońskim (Quantitative Categorization in Japanese Language). Kraków: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego.
Quine, W.V. 1969. Ontological Relativity and Other Essays. Columbia University Press.
Soja, N.N. & Carey, S. & Spelke E.S. 1991. “Ontological categories quide young children’s inductions of word meaning: Object terms and substance terms”, Cognition 38. 179-211.
Sun, C.-F. 2006. Chinese: A Linguistic Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tai, J.H.-Y. 1994. “Chinese Classifier Systems and Human Categorization”. In Chen, Matthew Y. & Tseng, Ovid J.L. (eds.). In Honor of Professor William S-Y. Wang: Interdisciplinary Studies on Language and Language Change. Taipei: Pyramid Publishing Company. 479-494.
Tai, J.H.-Y. 2003. “Cognitive relativism: resultative construction in Chinese”, Language and Linguistics 4.2. 301-316.
Tai, J.H.-Y., & Chao, F.-Y. 1994. “A Semantic Study of the Classifier zhang”, Journal of Chinese Language Teachers Association 29.3. 67-78.
Tai, J.H.-Y. & Wang, L.-Q. 1990. “A Semantic Study of the Classifier tiao”, Journal of the Chinese Language Teachers Association 25.1. 35-56.
Yi, B.-U. 2009. “Chinese classifiers and count nouns”, Journal of Cognitive Science 10. 209-225.
Yi, B.-U. 2014. “Numeral classifiers and the white horse paradox”, Frontiers of Philosophy in China, Vol. 9, No. 4. 498-522.
Yi, B.-U. 2018. “White horse paradox and semantics of Chinese nouns”, In Bo, Mou (ed.). Philosophy of Language, Chinese Language, Chinese Philosophy Leiden–Boston: Brill.
Zaefferer, D. (ed.). 1991. Semantic Universals and Universal Semantics (Groningen-Amsterdam Studies in Semantics 12). Berlin: Foris Publications.
Zhang, N.N. 2012. “Countability and numeral classifiers in Mandarin Chinese”. In Massam, Diane (ed.). Count and Mass Across Languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 220-237.
Zhang, N.N. 2013. Classifier Structures in Mandarin Chinese. Berlin–Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Nastazja Stoch
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.