New Indo-Aryan associative plural markers derived from Old Indo-Aryan apara ‘other’ and their further grammaticalization
PDF

Keywords

associative plural
honorific particle
grammaticalization
contact influence
New Indo-Aryan languages

How to Cite

Renkovskaya, E. (2020). New Indo-Aryan associative plural markers derived from Old Indo-Aryan apara ‘other’ and their further grammaticalization. Lingua Posnaniensis, 62(2), 65–80. https://doi.org/10.2478/linpo-2020-0011

Abstract

The paper deals with associative plurals in New Indo-Aryan languages, which are derived from the Old Indo- Aryan apara ‘other’. These markers are found in a large number of NIA languages, but in many of these languages they underwent further grammaticalization into other grammatical units, such as honorific particle, standard plural marker, definiteness marker, marker of inalienable possession etc. Among the factors which underlie this grammatical development, contacts with non-Indo-Aryan languages play a significant role.

https://doi.org/10.2478/linpo-2020-0011
PDF

References

Allassonnière-Tang, M. & Kilarski, M. 2020. Functions of gender and numeral classifiers in Nepali. Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics. 56:1. 113-168.

Babaev, Kirill V. (Бабаев Кирилл В.). 2009. O proishozhdenii lichnyh mestoimenij v jazykah mira (О происхождении личных местоимений в языках мира) [On the origins of personal pronouns]. Voprosy jazykoznanija (Вопросы языкознания) [Topics in the study of language] № 4. 119-138.

Bahl, Kali Charan. 1975. A grammatical sketch of Panjabi. Grammatical sketches of Indian Languages with comparative vocabulary and texts. Language Monographs. 1961 Series, Vol. 1. Ram Chandra, Nigam & Sukumar, Sen (eds.).

Bailey, Thomas Grahame. 1904. Panjabi Grammar: A brief grammar of Panjabi as spoken in the Wazirabad District. Lahore: Punjab Government Press.

Bailey, Thomas Grahame & Cummings, Thomas F. 1994 (first ed. 1925). Panjabi manual and grammar: A guide to the colloquial Panjabi of the northern Panjab. New Delhi–Madras: Asian educational services.

Bendix, E.H. 1974. Indo-Aryan and Tibeto-Burman contact as seen through Nepali and Newari verb tenses. Contact and convergence in South Asian Languages, 42-59. Southworth F.C., Apte (eds.).

Bhandari, Bh. & Banjade, G. & Yadava, Y.P. 2011. Danuwar. In Oranskaia, Tatiana I. & Mazurova, Yulia V. & Kibrik, Andrej A. & Kulikov, Leonid I. & Rusakov, Aleksandr Y. (eds.). Languages of the World: New Indo-Aryan Languages. 291-299. Moscow: Academia.

Bhandari, Bh. & Chaudhari, M.K. 2011. Tharu. In Oranskaia, Tatiana I. & Mazurova, Yulia V. & Kibrik, Andrej A. & Kulikov, Leonid I. & Rusakov, Aleksandr Y. (eds.). Languages of the World: New Indo-Aryan Languages. 310-317. Moscow: Academia.

Bhatt, Haridatt. 2007. Gaṛhwālī bhāṣā aur uskā sāhitya (गढ़वाली भाषा और उसका साहित्य) (Garhwali language and literature). New Delhi: Takshshila prakashan.

Bickel, B. 2001. The Tibeto-Burman substrate in Nepali. Paper presented at the Substrate Workshop, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, October 20.

Biswas, Priyanka. 2014. Bangla associative plural -ra: A cross-linguistic comparison with Chinese men and Japanese -tachi. Proceedings of the 31st West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics. Santana-LaBarge, Robert E. (ed.). 56-65. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.

Bloch, Jules (trans. A. Master). 1965. Indo-Aryan from the Vedas to modern times. Paris: Adrien-Maisonneuve.

Corbett, G.G. 2000. Number. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Corbett, G.G. & Mithun M. 1996. Associative forms in a typology of number systems: evidence from Yup’ik. Journal of Linguistics 32. 1-17.

Daniel, Michael A. (Даниэль Михаил А.). 2000. Tipologija assotsiativnoj mnozhestvennosti (Типология ассоциативной множественности) [Typology of associative plurality]. PhD diss. Moscow.

Daniel, Michael A. 2005. Understanding inclusives. Clusivity: Typology and case studies of the inclusive–exclusive distinction. Filimonova, Elena (ed.). 3-48

Daniel, Michael A, Moravcsik, Edith. 2005. Associative plurals. World atlas of language structures. 150-153. Dryer, M.S. & Haspelmath, M. & Gil D. & Comrie B. (eds.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Daniel, Michael & Moravcsik, Edith. 2013. The associative plural. In Dryer, M.S. & Haspelmath M. (eds.). The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. http://wals.info/chapter/36.

Dayal, Veneeta. 2014. Bangla plural classifiers. Language and Linguistics 15.1. 47-87.

David, Anne Boyle. 2015. Descriptive grammar of Bangla. Conners, Thomas J. & Chacón, Dustin A. (eds.). De Gruyter Mouton.

Dhakal, D.N. & Yadava, Y.P. 2011. Darai. In Oranskaia, Tatiana I. & Mazurova, Yulia V. & Kibrik, Andrej A. & Kulikov, Leonid I. & Rusakov, Aleksandr Y. (eds.). Languages of the World: New Indo-Aryan Languages. 299-305. Moscow: Academia.

Dwivedi, Amitabh Vikram. 2015. Bhadarwahi: A typological sketch. Acta Linguistica Asiatica 5 (1). 125-148.

Erdal, Marcel. 2004. A grammar of old turkic. Leiden: Brill.

Genetti, Carol. 1994. Introduction (with a Sketch of Nepali grammar). In Genetti, Carol (ed.). Aspects of Nepali grammar. Papers in Linguistics, V. 6. Linguistics Department, University of California, Santa Barbara.

Gonda, J. 1954. The History and Original Function of the Indo-European Particle kue, especially in Greek and Latin. Mnemosyne IV. 177-214.

Görgülü, E. 2011. Plural marking in Turkish: Additive or associative? Working Papers of the Linguistics Circle 21 (1). 70-80.

Grierson, Sir George A. 1903. The Linguistic survey of India. Vol. V-2. Calcutta.

Grierson, Sir George A. 1908. The Linguistic survey of India. Vol.I X-2. Calcutta.

Grierson, Sir George A. 1916. The Linguistic Survey of India. Vol. IX-4. Delhi–Varanasi–Patna.

Grierson, Sir George A. 1919. The Linguistic survey of India. Vol. VIII-1. Calcutta.

Irvine, J.T. 1992. Ideologies of honorific language. Pragmatics 2.3. 251-262.

Kavyopadhyaya, Hira Lal. 1921. A grammar of the Chhattisgarhi dialect of Eastern Hindi. Calcutta: Baptist Mission Press.

Kellogg, Samuel H.A. 1955. Grammar of the Hindi Language: in which are treated the standard Hindi, braj, and the Eastern Hindi of the Ramayan of Tulsi Das, also the colloquial dialects of Marwar, Kumaon, Avadh, Baghelkhand, Bhojpur, etc. with copious philological notes. London (third ed., first ed. In 1876).

Kononov, A.N. (Кононов А.Н.). 1960. Grammatika sovremennogo uzbekskogo literaturnogo jazyka (Грамматика современного узбекского литературного языка) (Grammar of the modern Uzbek literary language). Moscow–St. Petersburg: Izdatelstvo Akademii Nauk SSSR.

Krasa, D. 2011. Banjari/Lambadi. In Oranskaia, Tatiana I. & Mazurova, Yulia V. & Kibrik, Andrej A. & Kulikov, Leonid I. & Rusakov, Aleksandr Y. (eds.). Languages of the World: New Indo-Aryan Languages. 146-165. Moscow: Academia.

Masica, Colin. 1986. Definiteness marking in South Asian languages. In Krishnamurti, B. & Masica, Colin P. Sinha & Anjani K. (eds.). South Asian Languages: Structure, Convergence and Diglossia, 123-146. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.

Masica, Colin. 1991. The Indo-Aryan languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Mauri, Caterina & Sansò, Andrea. 2018. Linguistic strategies for ad hoc categorization: theoretical assessment and cross-linguistic variation. Folia linguistica 52. 1-35.

Mauri, Caterina & Sansò, Andrea. 2019. Nouns & co. Converging evidence in the analysis of associative plurals. Language typology and universals 72. 603-626.

Mauri, Caterina & Sansò, Andrea. 2020. Heterogeneous sets: A diachronic typology of associative and similative plurals, submitted paper, academia.edu https://www.academia.edu/40520091/Heterogeneous_sets_A_diachronic_typology_of_associative_and_similative_plurals.

Moravcsik, Edith. 2003. A semantic analysis of associative plurals. Studies in Language 27. 469-503.

Peterson, John. 2010. Language contact in Jharkhand: Linguistic convergence between Munda and Indo-Aryan in eastern-central India. Himalayan Linguistics 9 (2). 56-86. Santa Barbara: University of California.

Schackow, Diana. 2015. A grammar of Yakkha. Studies in Diversity Linguistics 7. Berlin: Language Science Press.

Schikowski, Robert. Object-conditioned differential marking in Chintang and Nepali. Zurich: Univ. of Zurich, 2013.

Schmidt, Ruth Laila. 1993. A Practical dictionary of modern Nepali. Ratna Sagar. https://dsalsrv04.uchicago.edu/dictionaries/schmidt/.

Singh, Maya. 1895. The Panjabi dictionary. Lahore: Munshi Gulab Singh & Sons. https://dsalsrv04.uchicago.edu/dictionaries/singh/.

Singh, Sh. & Kumar, R. & Atreya, L. 2014. Politeness in language of Bihar: a case study of Bhojpuri, Magahi, and Maithili. International Journal of Linguistics and Communication, Vol. 2, No. 1. 97-117.

Srivastava, Dayanand. Nepali language: Its history and development. Calcutta: Calcutta Univ. Press, 1962.

Turnbull, Archibald. 1992. Nepali grammar & vocabulary. New Delhi: Asian Educational Services.

Turner, Ralph Lilley. 1962-1985. A comparative dictionary of Indo-Aryan languages. London: Oxford University Press, URL: http://dsal.uchicago.edu/dictionaries/soas/.

Türker, L. 2019. Noun Phrases in Article-less Languages: Uzbek and beyond. Amsterdam–Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Upreti, Bhavani Datta (उप्रेती, भवानी दत्त). 1976. Kumāunī bhāṣā kā adhyayan (कुमाउँनी भाषा का अध्ययन) (A study of the Kumaoni language). Allahabad: Samriti Prakashan.

Van de Velde, M. 2006. The alleged class 2a prefix bɔ̀ in Eton: A plural word. In Cover R. & Kim Y. (eds.). Proceedings of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 31st annual meeting. 119-130.

Van Driem, George. 1993. A Grammar of Dumi. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

Vassilieva, Masha. 2005. Associative and pronominal plurality. PhD diss Stony Brook University.

Verma, M. 2011. Bhojpuri. In Oranskaia, Tatiana I. & Mazurova, Yulia V. Kibrik & Andrej A. & Kulikov, Leonid I. Rusakov Aleksandr Y. (eds.). Languages of the World: New Indo-Aryan Languages. 335-351. Moscow: Academia.

Woolner A. 1928. Introduction to Prakrit. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.

Zograf, Georgij A. (Зограф Георгий А.). 1976. Morfologicheskij stroj novykh indoarijskikh yazykov: opyt strukturno-tipologicheskogo analiza (Морфологический строй новых индоарийских языков: опыт структурно-типологического анализа) (Morphological structure of New Indo-Aryan Languages: An attempt of structural and typological analysis). Moscow: Nauka.

Zograph, Georgij A. & Oranskaia, Tatiana I. 2011. Hindi. In Oranskaia, Tatiana I. & Mazurova, Yulia V. Kibrik & Andrej A. & Kulikov, Leonid I. Rusakov Aleksandr Y. (eds.). Languages of the World: New Indo-Aryan Languages. 47-105. Moscow: Academia.

Zograph, Georgij A. 2011. Bihari. In Oranskaia, Tatiana I. & Mazurova, Yulia V. Kibrik & Andrej A. & Kulikov, Leonid I. Rusakov Aleksandr Y. (eds.). Languages of the World: New Indo-Aryan Languages. 317-322. Moscow: Academia.