Keywords
higher education
epistemology
ontology
theory
How to Cite
Number of views: 36
Number of downloads: 31
Abstract
This essay develops a reflection on the methodology and theory-making capacity of contemporary higher education research. This relatively marginal area of social reflection has been a source of knowledge feeding powerful processes of transformation of the university sector in recent years. A reflection on the methodological limitations of this area seems essential if one wants to counteract the processes destroying contemporary forms of knowledge development in universities. In the essay, the crass empiricism of higher education research is countered by another strand of reflection—Marxism with its method of critique. By revealing an interest in the ontology (political and historical) of a specific strand of Marxism indebted to the work of György Lukács and Antonio Negri, the essay proposes a starting point for a methodology of critical higher education research.
References
Arboledas-Lérida, L. (2020) Capital and the Scientific Endeavour. An Appraisal of Some Marxist Contributions to the Debate on the Commodification of Science. Critique 48(4): 321-367. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03017605.2020.1850631
Ashwin, P. (2012). How often are theories developed through empirical research into higher education? Studies in Higher Education, 37(8): 941-955. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2011.557426
Azeri, Siyaves. (2019). Activity, labour, and praxis: an outline for a critique of epistemology. Critique, 47(4): 585-602. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03017605.2019.1678267
Becher, T., & Kogan, M. (1992). Process and structure in higher education. London: Routledge.
Bligh, B. & Flood, M. (2017). Activity theory in empirical higher education research: choices, uses and values. Tertiary Education and Management, 23(2): 125-152. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13583883.2017.1284258
Cantwell, B. (2020). Explanatory accounts in international and comparative higher education research. Higher Education Quarterly 74 (2): 149-161. Conrad, C. F. (1989). Meditations on the Ideology of Inquiry in Higher Education: Exposition, Critique, and Conjecture. The Review of Higher Education, 12(3): 199-220. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.12246
Dakka, F., & Smith, R. (2019). „An exploration of rhythms in the contemporary academy: Time, space and affect”. In J. Huisman & M. Tight (Eds.) Theory and Method in Higher Education Research. (pp. 153-171), London: Emerald Publishing Limited. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/S2056-375220190000005010
Hall, R. (2021). The Hopeless University: Intellectual Work at the end of The End of History. London: MayFly Books.
Hamann, J., & Kosmützky, A. (2021). Does higher education research have a theory deficit? Explorations on theory work. European Journal of Higher Education, 11: 468-488. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/21568235.2021.2003715
Holloway, J. (2015). Read capital: the first sentence: or, capital starts with wealth, not with the commodity. Historical Materialism, 23(3): 3-26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/1569206X-12341420
Lukács, G. (1974). Conversations with Lukács, Cambridge Mass.: MIT Press.
Lukács, G. (1978a). Ontology of Social Being, Volume 1 Hegel. London: Merlin Press.
Lukács, G. (1978b). Ontology of Social Being, Volume 2 Marx. London: Merlin Press.
Marks, K. (1969). Theories of Surplus Value: Part 1-3. Moscow: Progress Publishers.
Murphy, T. S. (2003). The Ontological Turn in the Marxism of Georg Lukacs and Antonio Negri. Strategies, 16(2), 163-184. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1040213032000151584
Nail, T. (2020). Marx in motion: A new materialist Marxism. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197526477.001.0001
Roggero, G. (2011). The production of living knowledge. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Slaughter: (2001). Problems in comparative higher education: Political economy, political sociology and postmodernism. Higher Education, 41(4): 389-412. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017505525288
Tight, M. (2003). Researching Higher Education. Open University Press: London.
Tight, M. (2004). Research into higher education: An a-theoretical community of practice?. Higher Education Research & Development, 23(4): 395-411. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0729436042000276431
Tight, M. (2013). Discipline and methodology in higher education research. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2012.750275
Higher Education Research & Development, 32(1): 136-151.
Tight, M. (2014). Discipline and theory in higher education research. Research Papers in Education, 29(1): 93-110. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2012.729080
Tight, M. (2015). Theory development and application in higher education research: Tribes and territories. Higher Education Policy, 28(3): 277-293. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/hep.2014.11
Teichler, U. (1996). Comparative higher education: Potentials and limits. Higher education, 32(4): 431-465. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00133257
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Krystian Szadkowski
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.