Paraconsistent Doxastic Logic
Journal cover Sensus Historiae, volume 47, no. 2, year 2022, title Essays in honor of Professor Tadeusz Buksiński on the eightieth anniversary of his birth - vol. II
PDF (Język Polski)

Keywords

paraconsistent doxastic logic
versions of logic
inconsistent beliefs

How to Cite

Tworak, Z. (2022). Paraconsistent Doxastic Logic. Sensus Historiae, 47(2), 167–184. https://doi.org/10.14746/sh.2022.47.2.011

Number of views: 13


Number of downloads: 19

Abstract

Both in everyday-life situation and in science, we often deal with inconsistent information. From one reliable source we learn a certain piece of information, while from another one we get some information that contradicts this. In classical logic representing inconsistent information cannot be done non-trivially. In this paper, I develop a three-valued paraconsistent doxastic logic, which is intended to model inconsistent information states. I present „static” and „dynamic” versions of the logic. The systems reflects the idea that having inconsistent beliefs does not imply believing everything.

https://doi.org/10.14746/sh.2022.47.2.011
PDF (Język Polski)

References

Arieli O., Avron A., Zamansky A. 2011, Ideal Paraconsistent Logics, “Studia Logica” 99, s. 31-60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11225-011-9346-y

Asenjo F.G., Tamburino J. 1975, Logic of Antinomies, “Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic” 16, s. 17-45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1305/ndjfl/1093891610

Avron A. 1986, On An Implication Connective of RM, “Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic” 27, s. 201-209. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1305/ndjfl/1093636612

Avron A. 1991, Natural 3-valued logics — characterization and proof theory, “The Journal of Symbolic Logic” 56(1), s. 276–294. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2274919

Blackburn P., DeRijke M., Vanema Y. 2001, Modal Logic, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Carnielli W., Coniglio M.E., Marcos J. 2007, Logics od Formal Inconsistency, [w:] D. M. Gabbay, F. Guenthner (eds.), Handbook of Philosophical Logic, Vol. 14, Springer, Dordrecht, s. 1-93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6324-4_1

Ciuciura J. 2018, Hierarchie systemów logiki parakonsystentnej, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego, Łódź. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18778/8142-190-4

Da Costa N., French S. 1989, On the Logic of Belief, “Philosophy and Phenomenological Research” 46(3), s. 431-446. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2107797

D’Ottaviano I. M. L, da Costa N. 1970, Sur un problème de Jaśkowski, « Comptes Rendus de l’Académie des Sciences de Paris », 270, s. 1349-1353.

Gerbrandy J., Groeneveld W. 1997, Reasoning about information change, “Journal of Logic, Language and Information” 6, 2, s. 147-169. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008222603071

Girard P., Tanaka K. 2016, Paraconsistent dynamics, “Synthese” 193(1), s. 1-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-015-0740-2

Habermas J. 1997, Pojęcie racjonalności komunikacyjnej w świetle teorii aktów mowy, [w:] T. Buksiński (red.), Rozumność i racjonalność, Wydawnictwo Naukowe IF UAM, Poznań 1997, s. 51-77.

Koons R. C. 1992, Paradoxes of belief and strategic rationality, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511625381

Plaza J. 2007, Logics of public communications, “Synthese” 158(2), s. 165 -179. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-007-9168-7

Poczobut R. 1999, Sprzeczności doksastyczne a zagadnienie racjonalności przekonań, „Filozofia Nauki”, 3-4, s. 61-84.

Priest G. 1979, Logic of Paradox, “Journal of Philosophical Logic” 8, s. 219-241. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00258428

Tuziak R. 2019, Logika sprzeczności. Uwagi o logice parakonsystentnej, Oficyna Wydawnicza ATUT, Wrocław.

Tworak Z. 2009, Współczesne teorie prawdy, Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM, Poznań.

Tworak Z. 2018, Informacja, wiedza, logika, Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM, Poznań.

van Benthem J. 2007, Dynamic Logic for Belief Revision, “Journal of Applied Non- Classical Logics” 17, s. 1-27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3166/jancl.17.129-155

van Benthem J. 2011, Logical Dynamics of Information and Interaction, Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511974533

van Ditmarsch H., van der Hoek W., Kooi B. 2007, Dynamic Epistemic Logic, “Synthese Library” vol. 337 Springer, Dordrecht. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5839-4

van der Hoek W., Meyer J.-J. C. 1989, Possible logics for belief, “Logique et Analyse” 127-128, s. 177-194.

Williams J. 1982, Believing the Self-contradictory, “American Philosophical Quarterly” 19, 3, s. 279-285.