Keywords
philosophy of action
analytical sociology
collective intentionality
How to Cite
Number of views: 18
Number of downloads: 16
Abstract
The purpose of the article is to shed light on the nature of organizational routines, taking into account the research traditions of philosophy of action and analytical sociology. The article proposes a perspective that integrates different research disciplines and reveals the complexity of the issue of collective intentionality.
References
Aabell, P., Felin, T. & Foss, N. 2008. Building micro-foundations for the routines, capabilities, and performance links. Managerial and Decision Economics, 29, 489-502. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.1413
Bacharach, M. 1999. Interactive team reasoning: A contribution to the theory of co-operation. Research in Economics, 53, 117-147. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/reec.1999.0188
Barney, J. & Felin, T. 2013. What are microfoundations? Academy of Management Perspectives, 27, 138-155. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2012.0107
Bhaskar, R. 1979. The Possibility of Naturalism, London, Routledge.
Bourdieu, P. 2007. Szkic teorii praktyki poprzedzony trzema studiami na temat etnologii Kabylów, Kęty, Antyk Marek Derewiecki.
Bratman, M. E. 2014. Shared Agency: A Planning Theory of Acting Together, New York, Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199897933.001.0001
Buksiński, T. 1996. Racjonalność współdziałań. Szkice z filozofii polityki, Poznań, WN IF UAM.
Buksiński, T. (ed.) 1997. Wspólnotowość wobec wyzwan liberalizmu, Poznań: WN IF UAM.
Chater, N., Zeitoun, H. & Melkonyan, T. 2022. The paradox of social interaction: Shared intentionality, we-reasoning, and virtual bargaining. Psychological Review, 129, 415-437. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000343
Coleman, J. S. 1990. Foundations of Social Theory, Cambridge, MA, Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Danner-Schröder, A. 2020. Without actors, there is no action: How interpersonal interactions help to explain routine dynamics. Review of Managerial Science. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-020-00408-x
Dittrich, K. & Seidl, D. 2018. Emerging intentionality in routine dynamics: A pragmatist view. Academy of Management Journal, 61, 111-138. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2015.0010
Durand, R. & Vaara, E. 2009. Causation, counterfactuals, and competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 30, 1245-1264. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.793
Elder-Vass, D. 2015. Collective Intentionality and Causal Powers. Journal of Social Ontology, 1, 251-269. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jso-2014-0039
Feldman, M. S. 2016. Routines as process: Past, present and future. In: Howard-Grenville, J., Rerup, C., Langley, A. & Tsoukas, H. (eds.) Organizational Routines. How They Are Created, Maintained, and Changed. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198759485.003.0002
Feldman, M. S., Pentland, B. T., D’adderio, L., Dittrich, K., Rerup, C. & Seidl, D. (eds.) 2021. Cambridge Handbook of Routine Dynamics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108993340
Felin, T., Foss, N., Heimeriks, K. H. & Madsen, T. L. 2012. Microfoundations of routines and capabilities: Individuals, processes, and structure. Journal of Management Studies, 49, 1351-1374. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2012.01052.x
Felin, T., Foss, N. J. & Ployhart, R. E. 2015. The microfoundations movement in strategy and organization theory. The Academy of Management Annals, 9, 575-632. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2015.1007651
Foss, N. J. & Lindenberg, S. 2013. Microfoundations for Strategy: A Goal-Framing Perspective on the Drivers of Value Creation. Academy of Management Perspectives, 27, 85-102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2012.0103
Foss, N. J. & Linder, S. 2019. Microfoundations: Nature, Debate, and Promise. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108685498
Garfinkel, H. 2007. Studia z etnometodologii, Warszawa, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
Giddens, A. 2004. Socjologia, Warszawa, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
Hedström, P. & Ylikoski, P. 2010. Causal Mechanisms in the Social Sciences. Annual Review of Sociology, 36, 49-67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.012809.102632
Hirsch, P. M. & Levin, D. Z. 1999. Umbrella advocates versus validity police: A life-cycle model. Organization Science, 10, 199-212. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.10.2.199
Lindenberg, S. & Foss, N. J. 2011. Managing Joint Production Motivation: The Role of Goal Framing and Governance Mechanisms. Academy of Management Review, 36, 500-525. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2011.61031808
Makowski, P. T. 2021. Routines: towards the complexity of organizational intentionality. Review of Philosophy and Psychology. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/2rmb7
March, J. G. & Olsen, J. P. 1989. Rediscovering institutions: the organizational basis of politics, New York, The Free Press.
March, J. G. & Simon, H. A. 1964. Teoria organizacji, Warszawa, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
Mccormick, J. M. & Mitchell, N. J. 1997. Human Rights Violations, Umbrella Concepts, and Empirical Analysis. World Politics, 49, 510-525. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043887100008030
Meglio, O. & Schriber, S. 2020. Umbrella Constructs: An Overarching Framework. In: Meglio, O. & Schriber, S. (eds.) Mergers and Acquisitions : Rethinking Key Umbrella Constructs. Cham: Springer International Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-40459-8
Nelson, R. R. & Winter, S. G. 1982. An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change, Cambridge, MA, The Belknap Press / Harvard University Press
Parmigiani, A. & Howard-Grenville, J. 2011. Routines revisited: Exploring the capabilities and practice perspectives. The Academy of Management Annals, 5, 413-453. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2011.589143
Rupert, R. D. 2014. Against Group Cognitive States. From Individual to Collective Intentionality: New Essays. Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199936502.003.0005
Sawyer, R. K. 2003. Nonreductive Individualism Part II—Social Causation. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 33, 203-224. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0048393103033002003
Schlosser, M. E. 2012. Causally efficacious intentions and the sense of agency: In defense of real mental causation. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 32, 135-160. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027618
Shapiro, S. 2014. Massively shared agency. In: Vargas, M. & Yaffe, G. (eds.) Rational and Social Agency. The Philosophy of Michael Bratman. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199794515.003.0011
Tuomela, R. 2006. Joint intention, we-mode and I-mode. Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 30, 35–58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4975.2006.00127.x
Tuomela, R. 2007. The Philosophy of Sociality: The Shared Point of View, New York, Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195313390.001.0001
Tuomela, R. 2011. Holistic Social Causation and Explanation. In: Dieks, D., Gonzalez, W. J., Hartmann, S., Uebel, T. & Weber, M. (eds.) Explanation, Prediction, and Confirmation. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1180-8_21
Turner, S. F. & Cacciatori, E. 2016. The multiplicity of habit: Implications for routines research. In: Howard-Grenville, J. A., Rerup, C., Langley, A. & Tsoukas, H. (eds.) Organizational Routines: How They Are Created, Maintained, and Changed. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198759485.003.0004
Weber, M. 2002. Gospodarka i społeczeństwo: zarys socjologii rozumiejącej, Warszawa, WN PWN.
Ylikoski, P. 2012. Micro, Macro, and Mechanisms. In: Kincaid, H. (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Social Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195392753.013.0002
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Piotr Tomasz Makowski
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.