Abstract
This paper is concerned with the epistemological status of testimony; whether true beliefs based on the word of others deserve the name of knowledge and whether our reliance on testimony can be a justified epistemic strategy. If we assume that it is so and testimony-based beliefs can be epistemically justified, then the question arises of what it is that confers justification on such beliefs. On the basis of what other people say we may form true or false beliefs, so dependence on testimony in general is not an infallible strategy to form beliefs. Hence, according to many philosophers representing traditional Cartesian-style epistemological individualism, testimony-based beliefs are not epistemically justified, and, therefore, they do not make knowledge. According to other philosophers, especially in more recent Anglo-American epistemology, that inherent lack of certainty in testimony can be overcome, and testimony based beliefs can be regarded as justified, and, if true, they will constitute knowledge, which can be furthered transferred, via testimony, to other people.
References
Adler, J. (2012). Epistemological Problems of Testimony. In: Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/testimony-episprob/
Arnauld, A., Nicole, P. (1996 [1662]). Logic or the Art of Thinking. Translated by J.V. Buroker. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139166768
Augustine (1871 [427]) Retractationes. In: The Works of Aurelius Augustinus, Bishop of Hippo. Ed. by M. Dods. Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark.
BonJour, L., Sosa, E. (2003). Epistemic Justification: Internalism vs. Externalism, Foundations vs. Virtues. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Chisholm, R.M. (1973). The Problem of the Criterion. Milwaukee: Marquette University Press.
Coady, C. A.J. (1992). Testimony. A Philosophical Study. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Coady, C. A.J. (2004). Reid and the Social Operations of Mind. In: T. Cuneo, R. Van Woudenberg (eds.) The Cambridge Companion to Thomas Reid (pp. 180-203). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL0521812704.008
Cohen, L.J. (1992). An Essay on Belief and Acceptance. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Cuneo, T., Van Woudenberg, R. (eds.) (2004). The Cambridge Companion to Thomas Reid. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL0521812704
Descartes, R. (1984 [1637]) Discourse on the Method of Rightly Conducting the Reason, and Seeking the Truth in the Sciences. In: J. Cottingham, R. Stoothoff, D. Murdoch (eds. and trans.), The Philosophical Writings of Descartes, Vol. 1, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Descartes, R. (1984 [1644]) Principles of Philosophy. In: J. Cottingham, R. Stoothoff, D. Murdoch (eds. and trans.), The Philosophical Writings of Descartes, Vol. 1, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511805042
Descartes, R. (1984 [1641]). Meditations on First Philosophy. In: J. Cottingham, R. Stoothoff, D. Murdoch (eds. and trans.), The Philosophical Writings of Descartes, Vol. 1, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511818998
Faulkner, P. (2011). Knowledge on Trust. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199589784.001.0001
Feldman, R. (2003). Epistemology. Upper Saddle River NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Feldman, R., Conee, E. (1985). Evidentialism. Philosophical Studies, 48: 15-34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00372404
Fumerton, R. (2006). The epistemic role of testimony: internalist and externalist perspectives. In: J. Lackey, E. Sosa (eds.). The Epistemology of Testimony. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 77-92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199276011.003.0004
Gettier, E. (1963). Is justified true belief knowledge? Analysis, 23 (1963): 121-123. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/23.6.121
Gilbert, D.T. (1991). How mental systems believe? American Psychologists, vol. 46, no. 2: 107-119. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.46.2.107
Gilbert, D.T. (1993). The assent of man: mental representation and the control of belief. In: D. Wegner, J.W. Pennebaker (eds.). Handbook of Mental Control. Englewood Cliff: NJ Prentice Hall: 57-87.
Gilbert, D.T., Krull, D.S., Malone, P.S. (1990). Unbelieving the unbelievable: some problems in the rejection of false information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59 (4): 601-613. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.59.4.601
Gilbert, D.T., Tafarodi, R.W., Malone, P.S. (1993). You can’t not believe everything you read. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65 (2): 221-233. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.65.2.221
Goldberg, S.C. (2010). Relying on Others: An Essay in Epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199593248.001.0001
Goldman, A. (1999). Knowledge in a Social World. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/0198238207.001.0001
Goldman, A. (2012 [1979]). What is justified belief? In: A. Goldman Reliabilism and Contemporary Epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 29-49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199812875.003.0002
Grice, P. (1989). Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Hume, D. (1999 [1748]). An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding. Ed. by L. A. Selby-Bigge, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Lechniak, M. (2011). Przekonania i zmiana przekonań. Analiza logiczna i filozoficzna. Lublin: Wydawnictwo KUL.
Locke, J. (1975 [1690]) An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. Ed. by P. H. Nidditch, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Łukasiewicz, E. (2010). Can common sense knowledge be common? On Thomas Reid’s self-evident truths from the perspective of anthropological linguistics. Archiwum Historii Filozofii i Myśli Społecznej, 55/ 2010: 127-161.
McMyler, B. (2011). Testimony, Trust and Authority. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199794331.001.0001
Moran, R. (2006). Getting told and being believed. In: J. Lackey, E. Sosa (eds.) The Epistemology of Testimony. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 272-306. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199276011.003.0013
Plato (c. 369 BC) Theaetetus. Translated by B. Jowett. https://ebooks.adelaide.edu.au/p/plato/p71th/
Plato (c. 380 BC) The Republic. Translated by B. Jowett. https://ebooks.adelaide.edu.au/p/plato/p71r/
Price, H.H. (1969). Belief. London: George Allen & Unwin Ltd.
Reid, Th. (1969 [1788]) Essays on the Active Powers of the Human Mind [Essays on the Active Powers of Man]. Ed. by B. Brody, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Reid, Th. (2002a [1764]). An Inquiry into the Human Mind, On the Principles of Common Sense. Ed. by D. R. Brookes, University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
Reid, Th. 2002b [1785]. Essays on the Intellectual Powers of Man. Ed. by D.R. Brookes, University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
Russel, B. (1948). Human Knowledge, its Scope and Limits. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Schwitzgebel, E. (2015). Belief. In: Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/belief/#Bib
Sosa, E. (2007). A Virtue Epistemology. Apt Belief and Reflective Knowledge, Volume 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199297023.001.0001
Spinoza, de B. (1989 [1677]). Ethics including the Improvements of Understanding. Translated by R.H.M. Elwes, Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books.
Thomas Aquinas (1987 [1258]). Commentary on Boethius’s De Trinitate. Translated by A. Mauer, Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Medieval Studies.
Wolterstorff, N. (1996). John Locke and the Ethics of Belief. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511598234
Wolterstorff, N. (2001). Thomas Reid and the Story of Epistemology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511613845
Wolterstorff, N. (2004). Reid on Common Sense. In: T. Cuneo, R. Van Woudenberg (eds.) The Cambridge Companion to Thomas Reid. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 77-100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL0521812704.004
Zagzebski Trinkaus, L. (1996). Virtues of the Mind. An Inquiry into the Nature of Virtue and the Ethical Foundations of Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139174763
Zagzebski Trinkaus, L. (2012). Epistemic Authority. A Theory of Trust, Authority, and Autonomy of Belief. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199936472.001.0001
License
Copyright (c) 2017 Elżbieta Łukasiewicz

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License.
