Kognitywny zwrot w religioznawstwie. Perspektywy i ograniczenia
PDF

Słowa kluczowe

Religia
poznanie
ewolucja
zwrot kognitywny

Jak cytować

Sztajer, S. (2024). Kognitywny zwrot w religioznawstwie. Perspektywy i ograniczenia. Sensus Historiae, 54(1), 115–122. https://doi.org/10.14746/sh.2024.54.1.009

Liczba wyświetleń: 6


Liczba pobrań: 3

Abstrakt

The cognitive turn in the study of religion refers to new interdisciplinary research projects developed on the foundation of cognitive science and having increasing influence on the contemporary study of religion. The cognitive science of religion introduces essential theoretical and methodological innovations, emphasizing the role of empirical research, including the experimental method, and drawing on the achievements of natural sciences. Cognitive scientists focus on the cognitive and evolutionary determinants of religious ideas and behavior. The article discusses the main features, methodological assumptions, and limitations of the cognitive science of religion.

https://doi.org/10.14746/sh.2024.54.1.009
PDF

Bibliografia

Ambasciano, L. (2019). Un Unnatural History of Religions: Academia, Post-truth, and the Quest for Scientific Knowledge. London: Bloomsbury.

Antes, P., A.W. Geertz, R.R. Warne (eds.) (2004). New Approaches to the Study of Religion, vol. 1 i 2. Berlin: De Gruyter.

Atran, S. (2013). Ewolucyjny krajobraz religii. Kraków: Zakład Wydawniczy „Nomos”.

Barrett, J.L. (2004). Why would anyone believe in God? Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.

Barrett, J.L. 2012. Born Believers: The Science of Children’s Religious Belief. New York: Free Press.

Boyer, P. (1994). The naturalness of religious ideas: A cognitive theory of religion.

Berkeley: University of California Press.

Bulbulia J., Schjoedt, U. (2013). The Neural Basis of Religion. [W:] F. Krueger, J. Grafman, (eds.). The Neural Basis of Human Belief Systems. Hove: Psychology Press: 169-190.

Czáchesz, I. (2017). Cognitive Science and the New Testament: A New Approach to Early Christian Research. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Czeremski M. (2021). Mit w umyśle. Ewolucyjno-kognitywne podstawy form mitycznych. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego.

Geertz, A.W., J.S. Jensen, (eds.) (2011). Religious Narrative, Cognition and Culture: Image and Word in the Mind of Narrative. London: Equinox Publishing.

Lakatos, I. (1995). Pisma z filozofii nauk empirycznych. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.

Martin H.L., Wiebe D., Religious Studies as a Scientific Discipline: The Persistence of a Delusion, “Journal for the American Academy of Religion” 80(3), 2012: 587-597.

McCauley, R.N. (2017). Philosophical Foundations of the Cognitive Science of Religion: A Head Start. New York : Bloomsbury Academic.

McCauley, R. N., E. T. Lawson (2002). Bringing Ritual to Mind: Psychological Foundations of Cultural Forms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Norenzayan, A. 2013. Big Gods: How Religion Transformed Cooperation and Conflict. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Pyysiäinen, I. (2003). How Religion Works: Towards a New Cognitive Science of Religion. Leiden: Brill.

Schjoedt, U. (2009). The Religious Brain: A General Introduction to the Experimental Neuroscience of Religion. “Method & Theory in the Study of Religion” 21 (3): 310-339.

Sørensen, J. (2007). A Cognitive Theory of Magic. Lanham, MD: AltaMira.

Sztajer, S. (2018). Pojęciowa konstrukcja świata religijnego. Przekonania religijne a procesy poznawcze. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Wydziału Nauk Społecznych UAM.

Taves, Ann. 2009. Religious Experience Reconsidered: A Building-Block Approach to the Study of Religion and Other Special Things. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

White, C. (2021). An Introduction to the Cognitive Science of Religion: Connecting Evolution, Brain, Cognition, and Culture. Milton: Taylor and Francis.

Wilson, D.S. (2002). Darwin’s Cathedral: Evolution, Religion, and the Nature of Society. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.