Abstrakt
This paper argues that some tenets of thought by British historian Arnold Toynbee live on and may be applicable to generate insight into modern social phenomena in Europe. As “civilization” framed as a mode of analysis regains popularity, Toynbee’s insight into some historical processes calls for re-examination. This article claims that a set of Toynbee’s concepts related to “disintegration” of a civilization (“internal proletariat,” “universal state,” “religion as chrysalis”) may be applied to generate an interpretation of religious and demographical processes that take place in Europe. The article first identifies European Union as an “universal state” and some groups within European Muslim community as “internal proletariat.” It then goes on to analyse the logical consequences of Toynbee’s assumption that Christianity and Islam are the carriers (chrysalides) of, respectively, Western and Islamic civilizations. In accordance with Toynbee’s model of civilizational evolution (summarized in the article) there are at least six or seven logically possible outcomes of an ongoing interaction between the Western and Islamic civilizations on the territory of the EU. Both civilizations may succeed in the competition for European souls.
Bibliografia
Aylesworth, Gary (2015). “Postmodernism.” Stanford Encyclopaedia of Philosophy, Spring Edition.
Coker, Christopher (1998). Twilight of the West, Oxford.
Cooper, Robert (2000). The post-modern state and the world order, Demos.
Goodman, Sara W. (2014). “The root problem of Muslim integration in Britain is alienation,” Washington Post, October 6.
Greif, Adi (2007). “Double Alienation and Muslim Youth in Europe,” The United States Institute of Peace, available online: http://www.usip.org/publications/double-alienation-and-muslim-youth-in-europe
Hackett, Conrad et. al. (2015). The Future of World Religions: Population Growth Projections, 2010-2050, Pew Research Center.
Kumar, Krishan (2014A). “The Return of Civilization - and of Arnold Toynbee?,” Comparative Studies in Society and History, 56, pp 815-843. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0010417514000413
Kumar, Krishan (2014B). “Civilized Values: The Return of Arnold Toynbee?,” The Times Literary Supplement, October 24, 2014, pp. 16-17.
Lee, Lois (2012). “Research Note: Talking About a Revolution for the New Field of Non-religion Studies.” Journal of Contemporary Religion. 27(1), pp. 129-139. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13537903.2012.642742
Lewicki, Greg Grzegorz (2012). Nadchodzi nowy proletariat! Cywilizacja helleńska a zachodnia według Arnolda Toynbee’ego [Here comes the new proletariat! Hellenic and Western civilizations according to Arnold Toynbee], Kraków.
Lyotard, François (1984 [1979). The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge, Minneapolis. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1772278
Malpas, Simon (2005). The postmodern, London and new York. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203307120
Montagu, Ashley (1956). (ed.), Toynbee and History: Critical Essay and Reviews, Boston.
Mumford, Lewis (1956). “Napoleon of Notting Hill,” in: Montagu 1956.
Scheuerman, William (2014). “Globalization,” Stanford Encyclopaedia of Philosophy (Summer 2014 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.)
Schmid, Alex P. (2014).“Violent and Non-Violent Extremism: Two Sides of the Same Coin?,” The International Centre for Counter-Terrorism, ICCT Research Paper. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19165/2014.1.05
Schuman, Robert (1950). “The Schuman Declaration — 9 May 1950,” available online: http://europa.eu/about-eu/basic-information/symbols/europeday/schuman-declaration/index_en.htm
Spiegel, Peter (2015). “Refugee influx threatens fall of EU, warns Dutch PM,” Financial Times, November 26.
Stone, Lawrence (1956). “Historical consequences and happy families,” in: Montagu 1956.
Toynbee, Arnold J. (1948A). Civilization on Trial, London.
Toynbee, Arnold J. (1948B). “Islam, the West and the future,” in: Toynbee 1948A.
Toynbee, Arnold J. (1934–1961). A Study of History. 12 vols. Oxford.
Toynbee, Arnold J. (1951). A Study of History, volume I.
Toynbee, Arnold J. (1948) [1939]. A study of History, volume V.
Toynbee, Arnold J. (1954). A study of History, volume X.
Toynbee, Arnold J. (1956). “Comment,” in. Montagu 1956.
Toynbee, Arnold J. (1959)., A Study of History, volume XI: atlas.
Toynbee, Arnold. (1974A [1965]), A Study of History, abridgement of volumes i-vi by D.C. Somervell, New York and London.
Toynbee, Arnold. (1974B [1965]), A study of History, abridgement of volumes vii-x by D.C. Somervell, New York and London.
Weil, Gotthold (1956). “Arnold Toynbee’s Conception of the Future of Islam,” in: Montagu 1956.
Zielonka, Jan (2007). Europe as Empire: The Nature of the Enlarged European Union, Oxford. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/0199292213.001.0001
Zielonka, Jan (2011). “Europe as Empire: The Nature of the Enlarged European Union,” Wilson Center, Jul 7, 2011, available online: https://www.wilsoncenter.org/publication/326-europe-empire-the-nature-theenlarged-european-union
Zięba, Aleksandra and D. Szlachter (2015), “Countering Radicalisation of Muslim Community Opinions on the EU Level,” International Studies. Interdisciplinary Political and Cultural Journal, Volume 17, Issue 1, Dec. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ipcj-2015-0009
Žižek, Slavoj (2009). Fragile absolute, London.
Licencja
Prawa autorskie (c) 2017 Grzegorz Lewicki

Praca jest udostępniana na licencji Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License.
