ANIMAL TURN AS A META-TURN?

Main Article Content

HANNA MAMZER

Abstract

Human sciences as a reflection of social transformations fluctuate with dynamic changes of current cognitive paradigms. Following the textual and visual turn and the turn towards things (objects), there are intensified tendencies to think in terms of an “animal turn”, which becomes close not only to activists and pro-animal activists but also to scientifically engaged humanists. I believe, however, that the animal turn should be treated as a meta-turn: a process that requires a change in the relationship between the reflecting subject and the object of reflection, and not only as a specific kind of representation of the surrounding world. In the proposed text, I attempt to analyze the causes of the turn towards animals. I also address the theme of cognitive resistance in view of the recognition of animal studies as a fully-fledged theoretical and research area of contemporary humanities.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
MAMZER, H. (2019). ANIMAL TURN AS A META-TURN?. Society Register, 3(3), 7-17. https://doi.org/10.14746/sr.2019.3.3.01
Section
Introduction
Author Biography

HANNA MAMZER, Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań

Hanna Mamzer is professor of sociology at the Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań, Poland.

References

    Baratay, Eric. 2012. Le point de vue animal. Une autre version de l’histoire. Paris: Seuil.

    Bakke, Monika. 2011. „Studia nad zwierzętami: od aktywizmu do akademii i z powrotem?” Teksty Drugie 3(129): 193-204.

    BBC News. 2016. “Belgium Walloons block key EU Ceta trade deal with Canada.” Retrieved January 1, 2017 (https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-37749236).

    Braidotti, Rosi. 2013. The Posthuman. Cambridge, Malden: Polity.

    DeMello, Margo. 2012. Animals and Society: An Introduction to Human-Animals Studies. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Domańska Ewa. 2008. „Humanistyka nie-antropocentryczna a studia nad rzeczami.” Kultura współczesna 3: 9-21.

    Domańska Ewa. 2008. „Problem rzeczy we współczesnej archeologii.” Pp. 27-60 in Rzeczy i ludzie. Humanistyka wobec materialności, edited by J. Kowalewski, W. Piasek, M. Śliwa. Olsztyn: Wydawnictwo Instytutu Filozofii Uniwersytetu Warmińsko-Mazurskiego.

    Empatyczne mizantropki? – wizerunek osób działających w organizacjach pozarządowych na rzecz zwierząt. Raport z badań. 2012. Kraków: Fundacja Czarna Owca Pana Kota. Retrieved October 10, 2019 (https://czarnaowca.org/download/empatyczne_mizantropki.pdf).

    Gardocka, Teresa, Agnieszka Gruszczyńska, Robert Maślak, Agnieszka Sergiel, eds. 2014. Dobrostan zwierząt w ogrodach zoologicznych a standardy prawne UE. Warszawa: Dom Wydawniczy Elipsa.

    Kołacz, Romana and Zbigniew Dobrzański. 2006. Higiena i dobrostan zwierząt gospodarskich. Wrocław: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Przyrodniczego we Wrocławiu.

    Mamzer, Hanna. 2008. Poczucie bezpieczeństwa ontologiczne. Uwarunkowania społeczno-kulturowe. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM.

    Mitchell, William J. T. 1994. Picture Theory: Essays on Verbal and Visual Representation. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.

    Pedersen, Helena. 2014. “Knowledge Production in the ‘Animal Turn’: Multiplying the Image of Thought, Empathy, and Justice.” Pp. 13-18 in Exploring the Animal Turn: Human-Animal Relations in Science, Society and Culture, edited by E. A. Cederholm, A. Björck, K. Jennbert, A.-S. Lönngren. Lund: The Pufendorf Institute for Advanced Studies.

    Pina e Cuhna Miguel and Armenio Rego. 2018. “Dogs in organizations.” Human Relations 72(4): 778-800. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726718780210

    Pręgowski, Michał P. and Justyna Włodarczyk, eds. 2016. Free Market Dogs: The Human-Canine Bond In Post-Communist Poland. West Lafayette, Indiana: Purdue University Press. West Lafayette.

    Ritvo, Harriet. 2007. “On the animal turn.” Daedalus 136(4): 118-122: Retrieved November 1, 2016 (https://www.jstor.org/stable/20028156).

    Simmons, Laurence and Philip Armstrong, eds. 2007. Knowing Animals. Leiden: Brill.

    The Animal Turn and the Law. 2017. Conference: The Animal Turn and the Law: Interdisciplinary Perspectives and New Directions in Animal Law. Retrieved January 1, 2017 (https://animalturn.wordpress.com/about/).

    TVN 24. 2016. “Żadnych fajerwerków i petard. Pierwszy taki sylwester w Rzymie.” Retrieved January 1, 2017 (https://tvn24.pl/wiadomosci-ze-swiata,2/zakaz-uzywania-fajerwerkow-i-petard-w-czasie-sylwestra-w-rzymie,701949.html).

    Weil, Kari. 2010. “A Report on the Animal Turn.” Differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies 21(2): 1-23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/10407391-2010-001.

    Wolfe, Cary. 2009. What is Posthumanism? Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press.

    Wolfe, Cary. 2011. “Moving forward, kicking back: The animal turn.” Postmedieval: A Journal of Medieval Cultural Studies 2(1): 1-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/pmed.2010.46.