Keywords
sociology
anthrozoology
animal rights
speciesism
attitudes toward animals
Number of views: 366
Number of downloads: 317
Abstract
Can western human society apply its definition of the term “animal” on itself? Is it possible that a “person” is not only human? In this article, I explore and analyze various and interdisciplinary doctrines and approaches towards nonhuman animals in order to question the current status-quo regarding nonhuman animals.
Throughout history, as Man developed self-awareness and the ability to empathize with others, hunters were associated with wolves and began to domesticate them and other animals. With the introduction of different religions and beliefs into human society, Man was given the lead in the food chain, and the status of the nonhuman animals became objectified and subject of the property of human animals. Common modern taxonomy identified and described approximately 1.9 million different species. Some estimate the total number of species on earth in 8.7 million. The Human is just one of 5,416 other species in the Mammal class and shares a place of honour among hundreds of other Primates and Great Apes.
It appears to be commonly and scientifically accepted that humans are animals. Humans, as other nonhuman animals, all meet the definitions of the term. However, it seems that there is a wide gap between the human-generated definitions (HGDs) and the human social practice that created a distinct line between humans and “animals”. This alienation is best illustrated by the commonly mistaken equivalence between the terms “human” and “person”, as at least some nonhuman animals answer to many other HGDs. In this article I try to show that a rational and logical interpretation of these definitions’ nonhuman animals (at least some), should be regarded as persons and to suggest an approach to implement in the future.
References
(PIL) No. 43 of 2014. Narayan Dutt Bhatt vs Union of India And Others (4.7.2018). Retrieved September 18, 2018 (http://files.harmonywithnatureun.org/uploads/upload706.pdf).
American Veterinary Medical Association (AVMA). 2007. Market research statistics -U.S. Pet Ownership. Retrieved September 18, 2018 (https://www.avma.org/KB/Resources/Statistics/Pages/Market-research-statistics-US-pet-ownership-2007.aspx).
Arluke, Arnold and Clinton R. Sanders. 1996. Regarding animals. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Arrington v. Arrington. 1981. 613 S.W.2d 565 (Tex.Civ.App.1981).
Barry, John and E. Gene Frankland, eds. 2002. International Encyclopedia of Environmental Politics. London and New York: Routledge.
BBC. 2017. The Countries Where People Still Eat Cats and Dogs for Dinner (12.4.2017).
Bennison, Rod. 2011. “An Inclusive Re-Engagement with our Nonhuman Animal Kin: Considering Human Interrelationships with Nonhuman Animals.” Animals 1(1): 40-55. doi: 10.3390/ani1010040.
Bentham, Jeremy. 2005. The Collected Works of Jeremy Bentham: An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Berman, Paul. S. 2000. “An Observation and A Strange But True ‘Tale’: What Might The Historical Trials Of Animals Tell Us About The Transformative Potential Of Law In American Culture?” Hastings L. J. 52: 123-178.
Blackburn, Simon. 2001. Ethics: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bueckner V. Hamel. 1994. 886 S.W. 2d 368, 378 (Tex.App.1994)
Caplin, Arthur. L. 1990. Ethics of Animals in Our Lives. St. Paul: Minnesota Extension Service of the University of Minnesota.
Carnegie Council for Ethics in International Affairs. 2014. A Conversation with Will Kymlicka on the Challenges of Multiculturalism. Retrieved August 25, 2018 (https://www.carnegiecouncil.org/studio/multimedia/20141029-a-conversation-with-will-kymlicka-on-the-challenges-of-multiculturalism).
Cohen, Glenn., Are There Non-Human Persons? Are There Non-Person Humans? 2017. Retrieved June 24, 2019 (http://www.tedxcambridge.com/talk/non-human-persons-non-person-humans).
Comte, August. 1877. System of Positive Polity. Vol. IV. Translated by Congreve, Richard. London: Longmans, Green and Co.
Donaldson, Sue and Will Kymlicka. 2011. Zoopolis: A Political Theory of Animal Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Douglas, Mary. 1975. Implicit Meanings: Essays in Anthropology. London: Routledge & Paul.
Evans, Edward P. 1987. The Criminal Prosecution and Capital Punishment of Animals: The Lost History of Europe’s Animal Trials. London: Faber and Faber.
European Petfood Industry Federation (FEDIAF). European Facts & Figures. 2018. Retrieved July 16, 2019 (http://www.fediaf.org/who-we-are/european-statistics.html).
Fasenfest, David. 2007. “Critical sociology.” Pp. 17-24 in 21st Century Sociology: A Reference Handbook. Specialty and Interdisciplinary Studies, vol. 1, edited by C. D. Bryant and D. L. Peck. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Finkelstein, Jacob J. 1981. “The Ox That Gored.” Transactions of the American Philosophical
Society 71(2): 1-89.
Harari, Yuval N. 2011. Sapiens: A Brief History of Humankind. London: Vintage Books.
Horigan, Stephen. 1988. Nature and Culture in Western Discourses. London: Routledge.
Horkheimer, Max. 1990. Critical Theory: Selected Essays. New York: Seabury Press.
Hurn, Samantha. 2012. Humans and Other Animals: Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Human-Animal Interactions. London: Pluto Press.
Hyde, Walter W. 1916. “The Prosecution and Punishment of Animals and Lifeless Things in the Middle Ages and Modern Times.” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 64(7): 696-730.
Imanishi, Kinji. 2002. A Japanese View of Nature: The World of Living Things. Translated by Asquith, Pamela J., Kawakatsu, Heita, Yagi Shusuke and Hiroyuki Takasaki. London: Routledge.
Ingold, Tim., ed. 2016. What is An Animal? London: Routledge.
Irvine, Leslie. 2008. “Animals and Sociology.” Sociology Compass 2(6): 1954-1971.
Jones, John W. 1956. “The Law And Legal Theory Of The Greeks.” The American Historical Review 63(2): 378-379.
Kant, Immanuel. 1963. Lectures on Ethics, Harper & Row.
Macdowell, Douglas M. 1965. Athenian Homicide Law in The Age of The Orators. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Matsuzawa, Tetsuro and McGrew, William C. 2008. “Kinji Imanishi and 60 years of Japanese primatology.” Current Biology 18(14): R587-R591.
Mora, Camilo, Derek P. Tittensor, Sina Adl, Alastair G. B. Simpson, and Boris Worm. 2011. “How Many Species Are There on Earth and in the Ocean?” PLoS Biology 9(8). Retrieved 17 August 2019 (https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.1001127).
Nussbaum, Martha C. 2001. “Animal Rights: The need for a theoretical basis.” Harvard Law Review 114(5): 1506-1549.
Pocar, Valerio. 1992. “Animal Rights: A Socio-legal Perspective.” Journal of Law and Society 19(2): 214–230.
Robinson, Catherine and Cush, Denise. 1997. “The Sacred Cow: Hinduism and ecology.” Journal of Beliefs & Values 18(1): 25-37.
Robinson, Olivia F., Thomas D. Fergus, and William M. Gordon. 1985. An Introduction to European Legal History. Abingdon: Professional Books.
Sanders, Clinton R. 2007. “The Sociology of Nonhuman Animals and Society.” Pp. 405-426 in 21st Century Sociology: A Reference Handbook. Specialty and Interdisciplinary Studies. vol. 2, edited by C. D. Bryant and D. L. Peck Dennis. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Saptarshi, Ray. 2018. “Animals accorded same rights as humans in Indian state.” Daily Telegraph. Retrieved 6 May, 2019 (https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2018/07/05/animals-accorded-rights-humans-indian-national-park).
Scharfstein, Ben-Ami. 1978. History of Philosophy from the Renaissance to Kant. Israel: Ministry of Defense Press.
Schwartz, Wynn R. 1982. “The Problem of Other Possible Persons: Dolphins, Primates and Aliens.” Advances in Descriptive Psychology 2: 31-55.
Serpell, James A. 2007. “Lambs of God: A Short History of Western Attitudes and Beliefs Regarding Animals.” Pp. 15-32 in Human Beings and other Animals in Historical Perspective, edited by Arbel, Benjamin, Terkel, Joseph and Menache, Sophia. Jerusalem: Carmel.
Singer, Peter. 2009. Animal Liberation. New York: Harper Collins.
Singer, Peter. 1999. Practical Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sugawara, Kazuyoshi. 2018. “The Situationality of Animal Borders: From Phenomenology to Natural History of Evolution.” Pp. 29-50 in The Situationality of Human-Animal Relations: Perspectives from Anthropology and Philosophy, edited by T. Breyer and T. Widlok. New York: Columbia University Press.
Sweetlove, Lee. 2011. “Number of species on Earth tagged at 8.7 million.” Nature. Retrieved 16 February, 2019 (https://www.nature.com/news/2011/110823/full/news.2011.498.html).
Voelpel, John. 2010. “Descartes’ Bête Machine, the Leibnizian Correction and Religious Influence.” Graduate Theses and Dissertations. University of South Florida. Retrieved 3 March, 2019 (http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/3527).
Warren, Marry A. 1973. “On the Moral and Legal Status of Abortion.” The Monist 57(1): 43-61.
Weber, Max. 1947. The Theory of Social and Economic Organization. NY: Free Press.
Wilson, Don E. and Reeder, DeeAnn M., ed. 2005. Mammal Species of the World. A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference, 3rd ed. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
License
Manuscript authors are responsible for obtaining copyright permissions for any copyrighted materials included within manuscripts. The authors must provide permission letters, when appropriate, to the Society Register Editors.
In addition, all published papers in Society Register are published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 Unported License.
1.1 The Author hereby warrants that he/she is the owner of all the copyright and other intellectual property rights in the Work and that, within the scope of the present Agreement, the paper does not infringe the legal rights of another person. The owner of the copyright work also warrants that he/she is the sole and original creator thereof and that is not bound by any legal constraints in regard to the use or sale of the work.
1.2. The Publisher warrants that is the owner of the PRESSto platform for open access journals, hereinafter referred to as the PRESSto Platform.
2. The Author grants the Publisher non-exclusive and free of charge license to unlimited use worldwide over an unspecified period of time in the following areas of exploitation:
2.1. production of multiple copies of the Work produced according to the specific application of a given technology, including printing, reproduction of graphics through mechanical or electrical means (reprography) and digital technology;
2.2. marketing authorisation, loan or lease of the original or copies thereof;
2.3. public performance, public performance in the broadcast, video screening, media enhancements as well as broadcasting and rebroadcasting, made available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them;
2.4. inclusion of the Work into a collective work (i.e. with a number of contributions);
2.5. inclusion of the Work in the electronic version to be offered on an electronic platform, or any other conceivable introduction of the Work in its electronic version to the Internet;
2.6. dissemination of electronic versions of the Work in its electronic version online, in a collective work or independently;
2.7. making the Work in the electronic version available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, in particular by making it accessible via the Internet, Intranet, Extranet;
2.8. making the Work available according to appropriate license pattern CC BY-NC 4.0 as well as another language version of this license or any later version published by Creative Commons.
3. The Author grants the Publisher permission to reproduce a single copy (print or download) and royalty-free use and disposal of rights to compilations of the Work and these compilations.
4. The Author grants the Publisher permission to send metadata files related to the Work, including to commercial and non-commercial journal-indexing databases.
5. The Author represents that, on the basis of the license granted in the present Agreement, the Publisher is entitled and obliged to:
5.1. allow third parties to obtain further licenses (sublicenses) to the Work and to other materials, including derivatives thereof or compilations made, based on or including the Work, whereas the provisions of such sub-licenses will be the same as with the Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) Creative Commons sub-license or another language version of this license, or any later version of this license published by Creative Commons;
5.2. make the Work available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, without any technological constraints;
5.3. appropriately inform members of the public to whom the Work is to be made available about sublicenses in such a way as to ensure that all parties are properly informed (appropriate informing messages).
6. Because of the royalty-free provision of services of the Author (resulting from the scope of obligations stipulated in the present Agreement), the Author shall not be entitled to any author’s fee due and payable on the part of the Publisher (no fee or royalty is payable by the Publisher to the Author).
7.1. In the case of third party claims or actions for indemnity against the Publisher owing to any infractions related to any form of infringement of intellectual property rights protection, including copyright infringements, the Author is obliged to take all possible measures necessary to protect against these claims and, when as a result of legal action, the Publisher, or any third party licensed by the Publisher to use the Work, will have to abandon using the Work in its entirety or in part or, following a court ruling in a legal challenge, to pay damages to a third party, whatever the legal basis
7.2. The Author will immediately inform the Publisher about any damage claims related to intellectual property infringements, including the author’s proprietary rights pertaining to a copyrighted work, filed against the Author. of liability, the Author is obliged to redress the damage resulting from claims made by third party, including costs and expenditures incurred in the process.
7.3. To all matters not settled herein provisions of the Polish Civil Code and the Polish Copyright and Related Rights Act shall apply.