RE-EVALUATION OF ANIMAL PROTECTION BY THE FINNISH ANIMAL RIGHTS LAWYERS SOCIETY
PDF

Keywords

human-animal interests
animal law
animal’s fundamental rights
re-evaluation of animal protection

Abstract

The recognition of animals as sentient beings in the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) gave rise to expectations as to real concern and care for animal welfare and a balance of human-animal interests. However, both the EU-legislation and the Finnish animal protection legislation is based on an animal welfare paradigm, meaning that animals have a weak legal status compared to humans that makes it impossible to de facto balance human and animal needs and interests in an effective manner from an animal point of view. The weak legal status of animals in the hierarchy of norms in the Finnish legal system contributes to the continuation of the oppression and exploitation of animals. The Finnish Animal Rights Lawyers Society have therefore made a proposal to strengthen animals’ legal status by including animals in the Finnish Constitution (FC) by safeguarding animals’ certain fundamental rights, thereby providing tools for balancing of human-animals interests. This article focuses on the re-evaluation of animal protection from an animal and constitutional point of view.

https://doi.org/10.14746/sr.2019.3.3.07
PDF

References

Algers, Bo. 1990. “Naturligt beteende – ett naturligt begrepp?” (natural behaviour – a natural concept?). Svensk Veterinärtidning 42(12): 517–519. (only available in Swedish).

Algers, Bo. 2008. Naturligt beteende – lagen och biologin. Djuren är väl också människor – en antologi om hälsa och välbefinnande i djurens och människans värld (natural behaviour – the law and biology). Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet, Institutionen för husdjurens miljö och hälsa, Avdelningen för husdjurshygien. Rapport 20. (only available in Swedish).

Bailey, R. & Froggatt, A. & Wellesley, L. 2014. Livestock – Climate Change’s Forgotten Sector. London: Chatham House. The Royal Institute of International Affairs.

Francione, Gary L. & Robert Garner. 2010. The Animal Rights Debate. New York: Columbia University Press.

Gerten, Diter, Johan Rockström, Jens Heinke, Will Steffen, Katherine Richardson, & Sarah Cornell. 2015. “Response to Comment on ‘Planetary boundaries: guiding human development on a changing planet’.” Science 348(6240): 1217. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aab0031

Isomäki, Risto. 2016. Meat, Milk and Climate. Helsinki: Into.

IUCN Annual Report. 2018: 70 years: International Union for Conservation of Nature.

Koneswaran, Gowri and Danielle Nierenberg. 2008. “Global Farm Animal Production and Global Warming: Impacting and Mitigating Climate Change.” Environmental Health Perspectives 116(5): 578–582.
Kurki, Visa. 2017. A Theory of Legal Personality. Doctoral Thesis. Cambridge University.

Hessler, Kathy, Joyce Tischler, Pamela Hart & Sonia S. Waisman. 2017. Animal Law New Perspectives on Teaching Traditional Law. Durham, North Carolina: Carolina Academic Press.

MacKinnon, Catharine. 1993. “Crimes of war, crimes of peace.” Pp. 84 in Human Rights: The Oxford Amnesty Lectures, edited by S. Shute and S. Hurley. New York: Basic Books.

Pietrzykowski, Tomasz. 2018. Personhood Beyond Humanism. Animals, Chimeras, Autonomous Agents and the Law. Cham: Springer Briefs in Law.

Pöyhönen, Juha, ed. 2002. An Introduction to Finnish Law. Helsinki: Kauppakaari Finnish Lawyer’s Publishing.

Rojas-Downing, M. Melissa, A. Pouyan Nejadhashemi, Timothy Harrigan & Sean A. Woznicki. 2017. “Climate change and livestock: Impacts, adaptation, and mitigation.” Climate Risk Management 16/2017: 145–163. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crm.2017.02.001

Scarborough, Peter, Paul N. Appleby, Anja Mizdrak, Adam D. M. Briggs, Ruth C. Travis, Kathryn E. Bradbury, & Timothy J. Key. 2014. “Dietary greenhouse gas emissions of meat-eaters, fish-eaters, vegetarians and vegans in the UK.” Climatic Change 125:179–192. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-014-1169-1

Sowery, Katy. 2018. “Sentient Beings and Tradable Products: The Curious Constitutional Status of Animals under Union Law.” Common Market Law Review 55(1): 55–100.

Wahlberg, Birgitta. 2011. Produktions- och slaktdjurs rättsposition med utgångspunkt i EU-lagstiftningen och EU-domstolens tolkningslinjer samt i individens ansvar över miljön (the legal status of farm and slaughter animals based on EU legislation subject to the interpretations made by the European Court of Justice and Section 20 in the Constitution of Finland). JFT 1/2011:34-66 (only available in Swedish).

Winston, Morton. 2007. “Human Rights as Moral Rebellion and Social Construction.” Journal of Human Rights 6:279–305.