RIGHT TO THE MAP? COUNTER-MAPPING PRACTICES OF SMOG ALERTS AND URBAN GREENERY MOVEMENTS IN POLAND

Main Article Content

RENATA PUTKOWSKA-SMOTER
JAN FRANKOWSKI

Abstract

Data production is becoming an emerging trend in critical urban activism. Precise and reliable public information, including spatial and environmental information, serves individual and collective ‘right to the city’ beliefs. One of the common strategies adopted by contemporary urban movements to ensure the accuracy and inclusiveness of urban data production processes are various forms of counter-mapping, which we introduce in this paper as a perspective aimed in critical evaluation of urban environmental conditions in Polish cities. By process tracing of smog alerts and urban greenery movements, we investigate the main strategies of using such tools and their effects for both particular social actors, and general urban environmental policy. We argue that the core idea of a citizen-driven collection of geographical data is strongly supported by its other features – social involvement and collective production of visualizations illustrating the scale and dynamics of particular environmental problems. In this sense, counter-mapping is aimed rather at repoliticizing urban environmental data in order to critically evaluate existing urban policy, than just to ensure greater citizen involvement in environmental decision-making.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
PUTKOWSKA-SMOTER, R., & FRANKOWSKI, J. (2020). RIGHT TO THE MAP? COUNTER-MAPPING PRACTICES OF SMOG ALERTS AND URBAN GREENERY MOVEMENTS IN POLAND. Society Register, 4(4), 129-150. https://doi.org/10.14746/sr.2020.4.4.06
Section
Articles
Author Biographies

RENATA PUTKOWSKA-SMOTER, Polish Academy of Sciences

Renata Putkowska-Smoter is researcher at the IFiS PAN. She is interested in ambiguity and ambivalence towards nature and environmental protection and how they influence to conflicts, governance and politics at local and national level.

JAN FRANKOWSKI, Polish Academy of Sciences

Jan Frankowski is researcher at the IFiS PAN and analyst at the Institute for Structural Research. His interests cover opportunities and risks of the energy transition for households, cities, and regions.

References

  1. Bąkowska, Edyta, Tomasz Kaczmarek, Zbigniew Zwoliński, Łukasz Mikuła, Michał Czepkiewicz, Piotr Jankowski, and Cezary Brudka. 2016. ‘Geo-questionnaire in urban planning: preliminary results of the experimental application in Poland’. Rozwój Regionalny i Polityka Regionalna 35: 37–54.
  2. Bergier, Tomasz, Jakub Kronenberg and Paweł Lisicki (editors). 2013. ‘Sustainable development applications 4. Nature in the city. Solutions.’ Kraków: Sendzimir Foundation.
  3. Béal. Vincent. 2012. ‘Urban governance, sustainability and environmental movements: post-democracy in French and British cities’ European Urban and Regional Studies. 19(4): 404–419.
  4. Bruno, Isabelle, Emmanuel Didier and Tommaso Vitale. 2014. ‘Statactivism: Forms of Action between Disclosure and Affirmation’. Partecipazione E Conflitto 7(2): 198–220.
  5. Castells, Manuel. 1983. ‘The City and the Grassroots: A Cross-Cultural Theory of Urban Social Movements’. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
  6. Chełmiński, Jakub. 2018. ‘Akcja Miasto Jest Nasze: Smogowa Mapa Warszawy i czarne serce dla Hanny Gronkiewicz-Waltz’. Gazeta Wyborcza Warszawa, February 14.
  7. Chełmiński, Jakub. 2019. ‘Kopciuchy Zatrują Warszawę. W niektórych dzielnicach pieców przybyło. Mamy najnowsze dane’. Gazeta Wyborcza Warszawa, October 28.
  8. Cowart, Alicia, and Susan Powell. 2019. ’Guerrilla Cartography: Promoting Diverse Perspectives and the Expansion of the Cartographic Arts’. Cartographic Perspectives 92, 58–64.
  9. Environmental Protection Program for the City of Krakow for the years 2012-2015, including tasks completed in 2011 and with the perspective for 2016-2019. 2015. The City of Krakow
  10. Environmental protection program for the Capital City of Warsaw for the years 2017-2020 with a perspective until 2023. 2017. The City of Warsaw
  11. Dalton, Craig M. and Tim Stallmann. 2018. ‘Counter-Mapping Data Science: Counter-Mapping’. The Canadian Geographer / Le Géographe Canadien 62(1): 93–101.
  12. Dalton, Craig M. and Liz Mason-Deese. 2012. "Counter (Mapping) Actions: Mapping as Militant Research". ACME: An International Journal for Critical Geographies 11(3), 439–466. .
  13. Devine-Wright, Patrick. 2007. ‘Energy Citizenship: Psychological Aspects of Evolution in Sustainable Energy Technologies’. Framing the Present, Shaping the Future: Contemporary Governance of Sustainable Technologies, 63–86.
  14. Domaradzka, Anna. 2018. ‘Urban Social Movements and the Right to the City: An Introduction to the Special Issue on Urban Mobilization’. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations 29(4): 607–620.
  15. Dovey, Kim and Mirjana Ristic. 2017. ‘Mapping Urban Assemblages: The Production of Spatial Knowledge’. Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability 10(1): 15–28.
  16. Elwood, Sarah. 2006. ’Critical Issues in Participatory GIS: Deconstructions, Reconstructions, and New Research Directions‘. Transactions in GIS. 10(5): 693–708.
  17. Frąckowiak, Maciej. 2016. ‘Miasto z otwartym kodem. W poszukiwaniu sposobów na uspołecznienie przestrzeni publicznych’. Przegląd Socjologiczny 65(1): 49–63.
  18. Gabrys, Jennifer. 2016. Program Earth: Environmental Sensing Technology and the Making of a Computational Planet. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  19. Grabkowska, Maja, Łukasz Pancewicz, and Iwona Sagan. 2015. ‘The Impact of Information and Communication Technology on the Rise of Urban Social Movements in Poland’. Pp. 93–113 in Emerging Issues, Challenges, and Opportunities in Urban E-Planning. Hershey.
  20. Habermas, Jürgen. 1987. The Theory of Communicative Action. Boston: Beacon Press.
  21. Harley, John B. 1989. ‘Deconstructing the map’. Cartographica: The International Journal for Geographic Information and Geovisualization 26(2): 1–20.
  22. Harvey, David. 2008. The Right to the City. New Left Review 53, 23–40.
  23. Hazen, Helen D. and Leila Harris. 2017. ‘Power of Maps: (Counter) Mapping for Conservation’. ACME: An International Journal for Critical Geographies 4(1), 99–130.
  24. Jankowski, Piotr, Tomasz Kaczmarek, Zbigniew Zwoliński, Edyta Bąkowska-Waldmann, Cezary Brudka, Michał Czepkiewicz, Łukasz Mikuła, and Marek Młodkowski. 2018. Zastosowanie aplikacji geoankiety i geodyskusji w partycypacyjnym planowaniu przestrzennym: dobre praktyki. Poznań: Bogucki Wydawnictwo Naukowe.
  25. Kidd, Dorothy. 2019. ‘Extra-Activism: Counter-Mapping and Data Justice’. Information, Communication & Society 22(7): 954–970.
  26. Kopeć, Jarosław, Jakub Chełmiński and Katarzyna Korzeniowska. 2019. ‘Warszawska Mapa Miejskich Kopciuchów. Wiemy, kiedy przestaną dymić’. Biqdata.pl, January 4.
  27. Maharawal, Manissa M. and Erin McElroy. 2018. ‘The Anti-Eviction Mapping Project: Counter Mapping and Oral History Toward Bay Area Housing Justice’. Annals of the American Association of Geographers 108(2): 380–389.
  28. Miasto jest Nasze. 2018. ‘Mapa Kopciuchów Miejskich’.
  29. National Environmental Policy 2030 (NEP 2030). 2018. Warsaw: The Ministry of Environment
  30. Offe, Claus. 1985. New Social Movements: Challenging the Boundaries of Institutional Politics. Social Research 52(4), 817–868.
  31. PAP. 2019. ‘Wiceprezydent Warszawy: Wymiana pieców w lokalach komunalnych do końca 2019 r.’ Portal Samorządowy, February 14.
  32. Peluso, Nancy Lee. 1995. ‘Whose woods are these? Counter-mapping forest territories in Kalimantan, Indonesia’. Antipode 27(4): 383–406.
  33. Pfeffer, Karin, Javier Martinez, David O’Sullivan, and Dianne Scott. 2015. ‘Geo-Technologies for Spatial Knowledge: Challenges for Inclusive and Sustainable Urban Development’. Pp. 147–173 in Geographies of Urban Governance: Advanced Theories, Methods and Practices, edited by J. Gupta, K. Pfeffer, H. Verrest, and M.
  34. Ros-Tonen. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
  35. Pluciński, Przemysław and Marek Nowak. 2017. ‘E Pluribus Unum? Źródła i specyfika ruchów miejskich we współczesnej Polsce’. Przegląd Socjologiczny 66(3): 115–135.
  36. Polish National Strategy for Adaptation to Climate Change (NAS 2020) with the perspective by 2030. 2013. Warsaw: The Ministry of Environment Author 2020.
  37. Rattray, Nicholas. 2015. Counter-Mapping as Situated Knowledge: Integrating Lay Expertise. Pp. 131 - 146. In Participatory Geographic Research in Participatory Visual and Digital Research in Action, edited by Gubrium, Aline, Krista Harper, and Marty Otañez. Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press.
  38. Renzi, Alessandra and Ganaele Langlois. 2015. 'Data Activism'. Pp. 202-225 in Compromised Data From Social Media to Big Data, edited by Langlois, Ganaele, Joanna Redden, and Greg Elmer.
  39. Rieder, Bernhard. 2013. ‘Studying Facebook via Data Extraction: The Netvizz Application’. Pp. 346–355 in Proceedings of the 5th Annual ACM Web Science Conference, WebSci ’13. New York: ACM.
  40. Rocío, Valderrama-Hernández, Noelia Melero and Emilio Lucio-Villegas. 2013. ‘Social Mapping: A Tool for a Participatory Construction of the City’, Conference: Renewal of adult education practices and professions in the context of urban development, Ghent.
  41. Rosol, Marit, Vincent Béal, and Samuel Mössner. 2017. ’Greenest cities? The (post-)politics of new urban environmental regimes‘. Environment and Planning A. 49(8): 1710–1718.
  42. Skawiński Alarm Smogowy. 2017. ‘Pytacie nas, czy będziemy publikować zdjęcia kopcących domów z naszej gminy...’ Retrieved (https://www.facebook.com/SkawinskiAlarmSmogowy/photos/a.641534752693272/799159620264117/?type=3&theater).
  43. Syngellakis, Stavros, Kharen Pinilla, Birgit Hoinle, Anna Mahecha-Groot, and Juliana Cepeda-Valencia. 2018. ’Mapping the Agrodiversity in Bogotá – the Platform Mapeo Agroecobogotá‘. International Journal of Design & Nature and Ecodynamics. 13(4): 407–414.
  44. Tahvilzadeh, Nazem, Stig Montin, and Mikael Cullberg. 2017. ’Functions of Sustainability: Exploring What Urban Sustainability Policy Discourse “does” in the Gothenburg Metropolitan Area‘. Local Environment 22(sup1): 66–85.
  45. Taylor, Katie Headrick. Counter-Mapping the Neighborhood: A Social Design Experiment for Spatial Justice. 2013. <http://etd.library.vanderbilt.edu/available/etd-06142013-141535/>.
  46. Urban Theses. 2015. Gorzow Wielkopolski: Urban Movements Congress, retrieved from https://kongresruchowmiejskich.pl/urban-theses/
  47. Wilson, Japhy, and Eric Swyngedouw. 2014. The Post-Political and Its Discontents: Spaces of Depoliticisation, Spectres of Radical Politics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
  48. Woźny, Piotr. 2019. ‘Był taki kawałek - „Strzelaj albo emigruj”.’ Retrieved 9 December 2019 (https://twitter.com/Wozny3).