THE CORONAVIRUS IN LIBERAL AND ILLIBERAL DEMOCRACIES AND THE FUTURE OF GLOBALIZED WORLD

Main Article Content

KRZYSZTOF BRZECHCZYN

Abstract

The aim of this article is to compare the effectiveness of two political systems: liberal democracy and illiberal democracy in fighting the coronavirus pandemic. The analysis has been carried out on the basis of the theoretical assumptions and conceptualization of non-Marxian historical materialism. In the first part of my article, I present the concept of ‘regulative credit” which has been introduced in that theory. In standard socio-political conditions, the growth of power regulations is usually contested by citizens. However, in a situation of danger, when social order is undermined, citizens support the authorities’ extraordinary regulations. This social support, called regulative credit, lasts as long as the danger persists. In chapter two, I characterize shortly liberal and illiberal democracies. In liberal democracy, there is a balance between different branches of power, and citizens share a socio-political consciousness of the individualistic type. In illiberal democracy, the executive branch of power – although it has been democratically chosen – has an advantage over the two other kinds of power, and citizens share a socio-political consciousness of the collectivist type. Those differences result in diverse reactions of the authorities to a situation of threat. The political authorities of an illiberal democracy react faster in comparison with the political authorities in liberal democracies that react slower. Also, the attitude of citizens toward the introduced restrictions varied. Societies of illiberal democracies are more self-disciplined and more willing to accept restrictions from above. Whereas societies of liberal democracies are more individualistic and less willing to accept limitations. In the fourth part of my paper, I analyze briefly the influence of the pandemic on globalization processes and on the relations between the EU and the nation states in Europe. In the summary (chapter five), I predict that the mass use of modern technologies to control social life and strengthening of the sovereignty of nation states will be the two most important effects of the pandemic.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
BRZECHCZYN, K. (2020). THE CORONAVIRUS IN LIBERAL AND ILLIBERAL DEMOCRACIES AND THE FUTURE OF GLOBALIZED WORLD. Society Register, 4(2), 83-94. https://doi.org/10.14746/sr.2020.4.2.06
Section
Articles
Author Biography

KRZYSZTOF BRZECHCZYN, Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań

Krzysztof Brzechczyn is professor of the humanities, employed in the Faculty of Philosophy at Adam Mickiewicz University. He is author of following books (in Polish): Historical Distinctiveness of Central Europe. A Methodological Study (1998), Troubles with Poland. Selected Political Essays (1998), On the Multitude of Developmental Lines in Historical Process. An Attempt at Interpretation of Evolution of Mexican Society (2004) On the Evolution of the Social-Political Thought of Solidarność in the Years 1980-1981 (2013). He has edited Idealization XIII: Modeling in History (2009) and co-edited Thinking about Provincialism in Thinking (with K. Paprzycka 2012), Models in Science (with G. Borbone 2016), Towards a Revival of Analytical Philosophy of History: Around Paul A. Roth’s Vision of Historical Sciences (2018), New Perspectives in Transnational History of Communism in East Central Europe (2019). Fields of interests: philosophy of history, political and social philosophy, methodology of history and theory of historiography.

References

  1. Antoszewski, Andrzej. 2018. „Demokracja nieliberalna jako projekt polityczny” [Non-liberal Democracy as a Political Project]. Pp. 51-68 in Zmierzch demokracji liberalnej?, edited by K. A. Wojtaszczyk, P. Stawarz and J. Wiśniewska-Grzelak. Warszawa: Aspra-JR.
  2. Brzechczyn, Krzysztof. 1993. “Unsuccessful Conquest and Successful Subordination. A Contribution to the Theory of Intersocial Relations.” Pp. 445–456 in Social System, Rationality and Revolution. Poznań Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities, vol. 33, edited by L. Nowak and M. Paprzycki. Amsterdam/Atlanta, GA: Rodopi.
  3. Brzechczyn, Krzysztof. 2004. O wielości linii rozwojowych w procesie historycznym. Próba interpretacji ewolucji społeczeństwa meksykańskiego [On the Multitude of the Lines of Developments. An Attempt at Interpretation of Evolution of Mexican Society]. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM.
  4. Garewicz, Jan. 1983. „Pokolenie jako kategoria socjo-filozoficzna” [Generation as a Socio-Philosophical Category]. Studia Socjologiczne 1(88): 75-87.
  5. Goodhart, David. 2020. “Farewell free trade, and good riddance.” UnHerd, 6 III. Retrieved March 16, 2020 (https://unherd.com/2020/03/its-time-liberals-embraced-economic-nationalism/?tl_inbound=1&amptl_groups[0]=18743&amptl_period_type=3).
  6. Huntington, Samuel P. 1996. The Clash of Civilization and the Remaking of the New Order. New York: Simon and Schuster.
  7. Lanier, Jaron, E. Glen Weyl. 2020. “How Civic Technology Can Help Stop a Pandemic.” Foreign Affairs, Retrieved March 26, 2020 (https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/asia/2020-03-20/how-civic-technology-can-help-stop-pandemic).
  8. Lilla, Mark. 2017. The Once and Future Liberal: After Identity Politics. New York: Harper.
  9. Łepkowski, Paweł 2020. “Brytyjski sposób na koronowirusa.” [The British approach to the coronavirus] Rzeczpospolita, March 14. Retrieved March 16, 2020 (https://www.rp.pl/Koronawirus-2019-nCoV/200319461-Brytyjski-sposob-na-koronawirusa.html).
  10. Nowak Leszek. 1983. Property and Power. Towards a non-Marxian Historical Materialism. Dordrecht/Boston/Lancaster: Reidel
  11. Nowak, Leszek. 1991. Power and Civil Society. Towards a Dynamic Theory of Real Socialism. London: Greenwood Press.
  12. Ossowska, Maria. 1963. „O pojęciu pokolenia.” Studia Socjologiczne 2(9): 47-51.
  13. Przybysz, Piotr. 1999. “O sposobach przechodzenia między ideałem i praktyką w liberalizmie.” [On the ways of transitioning between the ideal and practice in liberalism] Pp. 133–148 in Czym jest filozofia polityki?, edited by R. Piekarski. Gdańsk: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Gdańskiego.
  14. Rogacz, Dawid. 2015. “Konfucjanizm Yong Huanga: na rozdrożu pomiędzy tradycją i współczesnością.” [Yong Huang’s Confucianism at a Crossroads between Tradition and Contemporariness] Prace Naukowe Akademii Jana Długosza w Częstochowie. Filozofia 12: 75-88. http://dx.doi.org/10.16926/fil.2015.12.04.
  15. Rogacz, Dawid. 2016. „Dynamika władzy w powojennych Chinach. Próba analizy teoretycznej.” [Dynamics of Power in Post-war China. An Attempt of Theoretical Analysis] Człowiek i Społeczeństwo 42: 161-181.
  16. Shen, Hanna. 2020. „Władze Chin kłamią o koronawirusie? Polska dziennikarka z Tajwanu obnaża prawdę.” Portal Do Rzeczy. Retrieved March 26, 2020 (https://www.dorzeczy.pl/kraj/133177/wladze-chin-klamia-o-koronawirusie-polska-dziennikarka-z-tajwanu-obnaza-prawde.html?fbclid=IwAR2Uf6C2BAhI1HAPzYL-4prIErWoZVoAQ3Z29GD48Myy9IhNK17ZWGl9SC8Aa).
  17. Turecki, Kamil. 2020. “Koronawirus. Azjatycka lekcja dla całego świata.” [Coronavirus. A lesson from Asia for the whole world] The Onet portal. Retrieved March 20, 2020 (https://www.msn.com/pl-pl/wiadomosci/koronawirus/koronawirusazjatycka-lekcja-dla-całego-świata/ar-BB11tGxJ?li=BBr5KbO).
  18. Vallance, Patrick. 2020. “News.” Evening Standard. Website of the Year. Retrieved March 26, 2020 (https://www.standard.co.uk/news/uk/coronavirus-latestcovid19-herd-immunity-patrick-vallance-a4386476.html).