Keywords
parental alienation
divorce
Number of views: 626
Number of downloads: 341
Abstract
Parental alienation is a phenomenon that appears after the divorce or break-up in a situation, where there is high conflict between the separating parents accompanying the termination of the relationship. It includes actions intentionally taken by one of the sides, who is seeking to distort the relationship between the child and the other parent. As a result of the alienation, the child starts to excessively prefer the custodial parent and intensively reject the non-custodial parent. The discussion concerning parental alienation was initiated by Richard Gardner, a psychiatrist, who introduced the idea of PAS ‘parental alienation syndrome’. His concept was widely commented by its supporters as well as by sceptics and opponents, as a result of which its modified version, PA ‘parental alienation’, was developed. Published research concerning the subject can be found in English-language scientific articles as early as in 1998. However, in Polish academic literature parental alienation is almost non-existent. The objective of this article is to open a discussion on this subject. Apart from theoretical analysis of the phenomenon, the narratives of parents who believe to experience PA were analysed. The analysis regarded aspects such as: definition, characteristics and sources of parental alienation. The article analyses also actions, which are the alienated parents’ reactions to PA. The performed analysis was of netnographic nature.
Funding
The Maria Grzegorzewska University, Poland
References
Baker, Amy. 2005. “The long-term effects of parental alienation on adult children: A qualitative research study." The American Journal of Family Therapy 33:289–302. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01926180590962129
Baker, Amy & Douglas Darnall. 2006. “Behaviours and strategies of parental alienation: A survey of parental experiences.” Journal of Divorce & Remarriage 45:97–124. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1300/J087v45n01_06
Balcerzak-Paradowska, Bożena. 1999. Polityka rodzinna. Między dwoma modelami. Warszawa: IPiSS.
Balmer, Sian, Mandy Matthewson, & Janet Haines. 2017. “Parental alienation: Targeted parent perspective.” Australian Journal of Psychology 70(1): 91–99. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ajpy.12159
Balmer, Sian, Mandy Matthewson, & Janet Haines. 2018. “Parental alienation: Targeted parent perspective.” Australian Journal of Psychology 70: 91–99. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ajpy.12159
Bernet, William, Nilgun Gregory, Kathleen Reay, & Ronald Rohner. 2018. “An objective measure of splitting in parental alienation: The Parental Acceptance-Rejection Questionnaire.” Journal of Forensic Sciences 63:776–783. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-40 29.13625
Bernet, William, Nilgun Gregory, Ronald Rohner, & Kathleen Reay. 2020. “Measuring the Difference Between Parental Alienation and Parental Estrangement: The PARQ-Gap.” Journal of Forensic Sciences. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.14300.
Budrowska, Bogusława. 2008. „Tacierzyństwo czyli nowy wzór ojcostwa.” Kultura i Społeczeństwo 3:123–151.
Czerederecka, Alicja. 2018. „Izolowanie dziecka od drugiego z rodziców po ich rozstaniu.” Pp. 29–84 in Rodzina w sytuacji okołorozwodowej. Współczesne dylematy psychologiczne i prawne, edited by A. Czerederecka. Kraków: Wydawnictwo IES.
Ellis, Elizabeth. 2007. “A stepwise approach to evaluating children for parental alienation syndrome.” Child Custody 4(1–2):55–78.
Gardner, Richard. 1992. The Parental Alienation Syndrome: Guide for Mental Health Professionals. Cresskill, New Jersey: Creative Therapeutics.
Gardner, Richard. 1998. The Parental Alienation Syndrome: Guide for Mental Health Professionals. Cresskill, New Jersey: Creative Therapeutics.
Gardner, Richard. 2001. “The Parental Alienation Syndrome: Sixteen Years Later.” Forum American Academy of Psychoanalysis 45(1): 10–12.
Gardner, Richard. 2002. “The Empowerment of Children in the Development of the Parental Alienation Syndrome.” The American Journal of Forensic Psychology 20(2):5-26. http://www.rgardner.com/refs/ar14.html
Gardner, Richard. 2004. “Commentary on Kelly and Johnston’s ‘The Alienated Child: A Reformulation of Parental Alienation Syndrome.” Family Court Review 42(4).
GUS. 2015. Dzieci w Polsce w 2014 roku. Warszawa: Główny Urząd Statystyczny.
GUS. 2019. Rocznik Demograficzny 2019. Warszawa: Główny Urząd Statystyczny.
Graniewska, Danuta. 2004. Sytuacja rodzin i polityka rodzinna w Polsce. Uwarunkowania demograficzne i społeczne. Warszawa: IPiSS.
Gruber, Helmut. 2011. „Analiza komunikacji w nowych mediach.” Pp. 89–119 in Jakościowa analiza dyskursu w naukach społecznych, edited by R. Wodak & M. Krzyżanowski. Warszawa: Oficyna Wydawnicza Łośgraf.
Harman, Jennifer, Sadie Leder-Elder, & Zeynep Biringen. 2016. “Prevalence of parental alienation drawn from a representative poll.” Children and Youth Services Review 66:62–66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2016.04.021
Harman Jennifer, William Bernet, & Joseph Harman. 2019. “Parental Alienation: The Blossoming of a Field of Study.” Current Directions in Psychological Science. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721419827271.
Harman, Jennifer, Edward Kruk, & Denise Hines. 2018. “Parental alienating behaviours: An unacknowledged form of family violence.” Psychological Bulletin 144:1275–1299. DOI:10.1037/bul0000175
Huff, Scott, Shayne Anderson, Adamsons, & Rachel Tambling. 2017. “Development and validation of a scale to measure children’s contact refusal of parents following divorce.” The American Journal of Family Therapy 45:66–77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01926187.2016.1275066
Hryciuk, Renata & Elżbieta Korolczuk. 2012. Pożegnanie z Matką Polką? Dyskursy, praktyki i reprezentacje macierzyństwa we współczesnej Polsce. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego.
Kelly, Joan & Janet Johnston. 2001. “The alienated child: a reformulation of parental alienation syndrome.” Family Court Review 39(3):249–66. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.174-1617.2001.tb00609.x
Kubicki, Paweł. 2009. „Przemiany ojcostwa we współczesnej Polsce.” in Być rodzicem we współczesnej Polsce. Nowe wzory w konfrontacji z rzeczywistością, edited by M. Sikorska. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego.
Lee ,Margaret & Nancy Olesen. 2001. “Assessing for alienation in child custody and access evaluations.” Family Court Review 39(3):282–98. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.174-1617.2001.tb00611.x
Sikorska, Małgorzata. 2009. Nowa matka, nowy ojciec, nowe dziecko. O nowym układzie sił w polskich rodzinach. Warszawa: Wydawnictwa Akademickie i Profesjonalne.
Tyszka, Zbigniew. 2002. Rodzina we współczesnym świecie. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM.
Walęcka-Matyja, Katarzyna. 2009. Struktura rodziny z zróżnicowanie zachowań społecznych i osobowości młodzieży. Łódź: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego.
License
Manuscript authors are responsible for obtaining copyright permissions for any copyrighted materials included within manuscripts. The authors must provide permission letters, when appropriate, to the Society Register Editors.
In addition, all published papers in Society Register are published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 Unported License.
1.1 The Author hereby warrants that he/she is the owner of all the copyright and other intellectual property rights in the Work and that, within the scope of the present Agreement, the paper does not infringe the legal rights of another person. The owner of the copyright work also warrants that he/she is the sole and original creator thereof and that is not bound by any legal constraints in regard to the use or sale of the work.
1.2. The Publisher warrants that is the owner of the PRESSto platform for open access journals, hereinafter referred to as the PRESSto Platform.
2. The Author grants the Publisher non-exclusive and free of charge license to unlimited use worldwide over an unspecified period of time in the following areas of exploitation:
2.1. production of multiple copies of the Work produced according to the specific application of a given technology, including printing, reproduction of graphics through mechanical or electrical means (reprography) and digital technology;
2.2. marketing authorisation, loan or lease of the original or copies thereof;
2.3. public performance, public performance in the broadcast, video screening, media enhancements as well as broadcasting and rebroadcasting, made available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them;
2.4. inclusion of the Work into a collective work (i.e. with a number of contributions);
2.5. inclusion of the Work in the electronic version to be offered on an electronic platform, or any other conceivable introduction of the Work in its electronic version to the Internet;
2.6. dissemination of electronic versions of the Work in its electronic version online, in a collective work or independently;
2.7. making the Work in the electronic version available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, in particular by making it accessible via the Internet, Intranet, Extranet;
2.8. making the Work available according to appropriate license pattern CC BY-NC 4.0 as well as another language version of this license or any later version published by Creative Commons.
3. The Author grants the Publisher permission to reproduce a single copy (print or download) and royalty-free use and disposal of rights to compilations of the Work and these compilations.
4. The Author grants the Publisher permission to send metadata files related to the Work, including to commercial and non-commercial journal-indexing databases.
5. The Author represents that, on the basis of the license granted in the present Agreement, the Publisher is entitled and obliged to:
5.1. allow third parties to obtain further licenses (sublicenses) to the Work and to other materials, including derivatives thereof or compilations made, based on or including the Work, whereas the provisions of such sub-licenses will be the same as with the Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) Creative Commons sub-license or another language version of this license, or any later version of this license published by Creative Commons;
5.2. make the Work available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, without any technological constraints;
5.3. appropriately inform members of the public to whom the Work is to be made available about sublicenses in such a way as to ensure that all parties are properly informed (appropriate informing messages).
6. Because of the royalty-free provision of services of the Author (resulting from the scope of obligations stipulated in the present Agreement), the Author shall not be entitled to any author’s fee due and payable on the part of the Publisher (no fee or royalty is payable by the Publisher to the Author).
7.1. In the case of third party claims or actions for indemnity against the Publisher owing to any infractions related to any form of infringement of intellectual property rights protection, including copyright infringements, the Author is obliged to take all possible measures necessary to protect against these claims and, when as a result of legal action, the Publisher, or any third party licensed by the Publisher to use the Work, will have to abandon using the Work in its entirety or in part or, following a court ruling in a legal challenge, to pay damages to a third party, whatever the legal basis
7.2. The Author will immediately inform the Publisher about any damage claims related to intellectual property infringements, including the author’s proprietary rights pertaining to a copyrighted work, filed against the Author. of liability, the Author is obliged to redress the damage resulting from claims made by third party, including costs and expenditures incurred in the process.
7.3. To all matters not settled herein provisions of the Polish Civil Code and the Polish Copyright and Related Rights Act shall apply.