Abstract
The purpose of this article is discourse analysis of masculinity created in reports assessing the current condition of Polish startups. The analysis covered reports published by the Startup Poland foundation from 2015-2019. This text is an attempt to apply the heuristic framework of integrative gender theories to interpret the results of the research, and explain how the discursively masculinity was constructed. Startups as innovative professional structures belonging to the knowledge-based economy model are an example of organizations typical of the information society. Numerous studies report changes (crises) occurring among the practiced male patterns (especially those typical for the countries of the global North). The results of the analysis show that despite these reports, the largest startup organizations striving to produce innovative solutions and using modern solutions, on the discursive surface, are associated with cultural patterns of hegemonic masculinity. Polish startups, on a structural and symbolic dimensions, are a highly masculine spaces. However, due to the practice of achieving hegemony, they (startups) can be interpreted in terms of cooperative or hybrid masculinity.
Funding
NCN Preludium 19 no. 2020/37/N/HS6/03913
References
Acker, Joan. 1990. “Hierarchies, jobs, bodies: A Theory of Gendered Organizations.” Gender & Society 4(2): 139–158. doi: 10.1177/089124390004002002.
Acker, Joan. 1992. "From sex roles to gendered institutions." Contemporary sociology 21(5): 565–569. doi: 10.2307/2075528.
Acker, Joan. 2006. "Inequality regimes: Gender, class, and race in organizations." Gender & Society 20(4): 441–464. doi:10.1177/0891243206289499.
Acker, Joan. 2012. "Gendered organizations and intersectionality: problems and possibilities, Equality, Diversity and Inclusion." An International Journal 31(3): 214–224. doi:10.1108/02610151211209072.
Alsos, Agnete G., Elisabet Ljunggren, & Ulla Hytti. 2013. "Gender and innovation: State of the art and a research agenda." International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship 5(3): 236–256. doi: 10.1108/IJGE-06-2013-0049.
Alvesson, Mats & Yvonne D. Billing. 1992. "Gender and Organization: Towards a Differentiated Understanding." Organization Studies 13(1): 73–103. doi: 10.1177/017084069201300107.
Alvesson, Mats & Yvonne D. Billing. 2009. Understanding gender and organizations. London: Sage.
Anderson, Eric. 2009. Inclusive Masculinity. New York: Routledge.
Anderson, Eric & Mark McCormack. 2018. "Inclusive masculinity theory: overview, refection and refinement." Journal of gender studies 27(5): 547–561. doi: 10.1080/09589236.2016.1245605
Arxer, Steven. 2011. "Hybrid Masculine Power." Humanity & Society 35(4): 390–422. doi: 10.1177/016059761103500404.
Ashcraft, Catherine & Sarah Blithe. 2010. Women in IT: The Facts. Colorado: National Center for Women & Information Technology. Retrieved August 28, 2020 (https://www.ncwit.org/resources/women-it-facts).
Bendl, Regine. 2008. "Gender subtexts–reproduction of exclusion in organizational discourse." British Journal of Management 19: 50–64. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8551.2008.00571.x.
Berggren, Kalle. 2014. "Sticky masculinity: Post-structuralism, phenomenology and subjectivity in critical studies on men." Men and Masculinities 17(3): 231–252. doi: 10.1177/1097184X14539510.
Berglund, Karin & Jennie G. Thorslund. 2012. "Innovative policies? Entrepreneurship and innovation policy from a gender perspective." Pp. 25–46 in Promoting innovation: Policies, practices and procedures, edited by S. Andersson, K. Berglund, E. Gunnarsson, & E. Sundin. Stockholm: Vinnova.
Bhattacharya, Tithi. 2013. "Explaining gender violence in the neoliberal era." International Socialist Review 91: 2013–2014. Retrieved August 15, 2020 (https://isreview.org/issue/91/explaining-gender-violence-neoliberal-era).
Bird, Sharon R. & Laura. A. Rhoton. 2011. "Women professionals’ gender strategies: Negotiating gendered organizational barriers" Pp. 245–262 in Handbook of Gender, Work and Organization, edited by E. J. Leanes, D. Knights, & P. Y. Martin. Chichester: Wiley: Blackwell.
Blake, Megan K. & Susan Hanson. 2005. "Rethinking innovation: context and gender." Environment and planning 37(4): 681–701. doi: 10.1068/a3710.
Bridges, Tristan & Cheri J. Pascoe. 2014. "Hybrid masculinities: New directions in the sociology of men and masculinities." Sociology Compass 8(3): 246–258. doi: 10.1111/soc4.12134.
Britton, Dana M. & Laura Logan. 2008. "Gendered organizations: Progress and prospects." Sociology Compass 2(1): 107–121. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-9020.2007.00071.x
Coles, Tony. 2008. "Finding space in the field of masculinity: Lived experiences of men's masculinities." Journal of Sociology 44(3): 233–248. doi: 10.1177/1440783308092882.
Comeau, Tammy D. & Candace L. Kemp. 2007. "Intersections of age and masculinities in the information technology industry." Ageing and Society 27: 215–232. doi: 10.1017/S0144686X06005605.
Connell, Raewyn W. 2003. "Developing a theory of gender as practice: Notes on Yancey Martin's feminist lecture." Gender & Society 17(3): 370–372. doi: 10.1177/0891243203017003004.
Connell, Raewyn W. 2005. Masculinities. 2th ed. Cambridge: Polity.
Connell, Raewyn W. 2006. "Glass ceilings or gendered institutions? Mapping the gender regimes of public sector worksites." Public administration review 66(6): 837–849. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00652.x
Connell, Raewyn W. 2009. Gender in World Perspective. Cambridge: Polity.
Cooper, Marianne. 2000. "Being the "go-to guy": Fatherhood, masculinity, and the organization of work in Silicon Valley." Qualitative Sociology 23(4): 379–405. doi: 10.1023/A:1005522707921
Demartini, Paola. 2018. "Innovative female-led startups. Do women in business underperform?" Administrative Sciences 8(4): 70. doi: 10.3390/admsci8040070
Duell, Nicola. 2004. Defining and assessing precarious employment in Europe: a review of main studies and surveys. Munich: ESOPE Project.
Epstein, Cynthia F. 1988. Deceptive distinctions: Sex, gender, and the social order. Yale University Press.
Ewens, Michael & Richard R. Townsend. 2020. "Are early stage investors biased against women?" Journal of Financial Economics 135(3): 653–677. doi: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2019.07.002
Gherardi, Silvia. 1996. "Gendered organizational cultures: narratives of women travellers in a male world." Gender, Work & Organization 3(4): 187–201. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0432.1996.tb00059.x
Gherardi, Silvia & Barbara Poggio. 2001. "Creating and recreating gender order in organizations." Journal of world business 36(3): 245–259. doi: 10.1016/S1090-9516(01)00054-2
Glass, Jennifer L., Sassler Sharon, Levitte Yael, & Katherine M. Michelmore. 2013. "What’s So Special about STEM? A Comparison of Women’s Retention in STEM and Professional Occupations." Social forces 92(2): 723–756. doi: 10.1093/sf/sot092
Gompers, Paul A. & Sophie Q. Wang. 2017. Diversity in innovation. Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research.
Hearn, Jeff. 2019. "So what has been, is, and might be going on in studying men and masculinities?: Some continuities and discontinuities". Men and Masculinities 22(1): 53-63. doi: 10.1177/1097184X18805550.
Henderson, Loren, Herring Cedric, Horton D. Hayward, & Thomas Melvin. 2015. "Credit Where Credit is Due?: Race, Gender, and Discrimination in the Credit Scores of Business Startups." The Review of Black Political Economy 42(4): 459–479. doi: 10.1007/s12114-015-9215-4
Illuminate Ventures. 2010. High Performance Entrepreneurs Women in High Tech. Retrieved March 28, 2015 (http://www.illuminate.com/whitepaper/).
Jabłońska, Barbara. 2006. "Krytyczna analiza dyskursu: refleksje teoretyczno-metodologiczne." Przegląd Socjologii Jakościowej 2(1): 53–67. Retrieved June 15, 2020 (http://www.qualitativesociologyreview.org /PL/archive_pl.php).
Johnson, Michael A., Regan M. Stevenson, & Chaim R. Letwin. 2018. "A woman's place is in the… startup! Crowdfunder judgments, implicit bias, and the stereotype content model." Journal of Business Venturing 33(6): 813–831. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2018.04.003
Kalleberg, Arne L. 2009. "Precarious Work, Insecure Workers: Employment Relations in Transition." American Sociological Review 74(1): 1–22. doi: 10.1177/000312240907400101
Kanter, Moss R. 1977. Men and Women of the Corporation. New York: Basic Books.
Kanze, Dana, Huang Laura, Conley Mark A., & Tory E. Higgins. 2018. "We ask men to win and women not to lose: Closing the gender gap in startup funding." Academy of Management Journal 61(2): 586–614. doi: 10.5465/amj.2016.1215
Kimmel, Michael. 1993. "Invisible Masculinity." Society 30(6): 28–35. doi: 10.1007/BF02700272
Kimmel, Michael. 2011. The Gendered Society. 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kluczyńska, Urszula. 2010. "Sport jako obszar konstruowania tożsamości mężczyzn. Znaczenia wpisane w sport i możliwości ich definiowania." Pp. 86–99 in Męskość jako kategoria kulturowa, edited by M. Dąbrowska & A. Radomski. Lublin: Wydawnictwo Portalu Wiedza i Edukacja.
Kulej, Agnieszka. 2018. "Atrybuty start-upów jako podmiotów o charakterze innowacyjny." Zeszyty Naukowe Politechniki Częstochowskiej 31: 145–153. doi: 10.17512/znpcz.2018.3.12
Kwapisz, Agnieszka & Diana M. Hechavarría. 2018. "Women don’t ask: an investigation of start-up financing and gender." Venture Capital 20(2): 159–190. doi: 10.1080/13691066.2017.1345119
Kwapisz, Agnieszka, Bryant Scott, & Brent Rosso. 2014. "Should Men and Women Start Companies Together? The Impact of Team Diversity on Startup Success." Academy of Management Proceedings No. 1. doi: 10.5465/AMBPP.2014.17252abstract
Leszczyńska, Katarzyna. 2016. Płeć w instytucje uwikłana. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar.
Leszczyńska, Katarzyna & Katarzyna Skowronek. 2010. "Socjologia języka / socjolingwistyka a społeczna analiza dyskursu. Perspektywa socjologa i językoznawcy." Socjolingwistyka 24: 7–28.
Lindberg, Malin. 2012. "A striking pattern: Co-construction of innovation, men and masculinity in Sweden’s innovation policy." Pp. 47–67 in Promoting innovation: Policies, Practices and Procedures, edited by M. Lindberg. Stockholm: Vinnova.
Lisowska-Magdziarz, Małgorzata. 2007. Analiza tekstu w dyskursie medialnym. Przewodnik dla studentów. Kraków: Wydawnictwo UJ.
Lohan, Maria & Wendy Faulkner. 2004. "Masculinities and technologies: Some introductory remarks." Men and masculinities 6(4): 319–329. doi: 10.1177/1097184X03260956
Marlow, Susan & Maura Mcadam. 2012. "Analyzing the influence of gender upon high–technology venturing within the context of business incubation." Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 36(4): 655–676. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00431.x
Martin, Patricia Y. & David Collinson. 2002. "Over the pond and across the water’: developing the field of ‘gendered organizations.’" Gender, Work & Organization 9(3): 244–265. doi: 10.1111/1468-0432.00159
Martin, Patricia. 2003. “’Said and done’ versus ‘saying and doing’: Gendering practices, practicing gender at work.” Gender & Society 17: 342–366. doi: 10.1177/0891243203017003002
McCormack, Mark & Eric Anderson. 2014. "Homohysteria: Definitions, context and intersectionality." Sex Roles 71(3–4): 152–158. doi: 10.1007/s11199-014-0401-9
Messerschmidt, James. 2010. Hegemonic Masculinities and Camouflaged Politics. Boulder: Paradigm Publishers.
Messner, Michael. 1993. "”Changing Men” and Feminist Politics in the United States." Theory and Society 22(5): 723-737. doi: 10.1007/BF00993545.
Messner, Michael. 2007. "The Masculinity of the Governator." Gender & Society 21(4): 461–80. doi: 10.1177/0891243207303166
Młodożeniec, Marek & Anna Knapińska. 2013. "Czy nauka wciąż ma męską płeć? Udział kobiet w nauce." Nauka 2: 47–72.
Pacholok, Shelley. 2009. "Gendered strategies of self: Navigating hierarchy and contesting masculinities." Gender, Work & Organization 16(4): 471–500. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0432.2009.00452.x
Paoloni, Paola & John Dumay. 2015. "The relational capital of micro-enterprises run by women: The startup phase." Vine 45(2): 72–197. doi: 10.1108/VINE-01-2014-0003
Patrick, Holly & Kate Elks. 2015. "From Battery Hens to Chicken Feed: The Perceived Precarity and Identity of Australian Journalists." Asia Pacific Journal of Arts and Cultural Management 12(1): 48–66.
Ridgeway, Cecilia L. & Shelley J. Correll. 2004. "Unpacking the gender system: A theoretical perspective on gender beliefs and social relations." Gender & Society 18(4): 510–531. doi: 10.1177/0891243204265269
Risman, Barbara J. 2004. "Gender as a social structure: Theory wrestling with activism." Gender & Society 18(4): 429–450. doi: 10.1177/0891243204265349
Risman, Barbara J. 2011. "Gender as structure or trump card?" Journal of Family Theory & Review 3(1): 18–22. doi: 10.1111/j.1756-2589.2010.00076.x
Risman, Barbara J. & Georgiann Davis. 2013. "From sex roles to gender structure." Current Sociology 61(5–6): 733–755. doi: 10.1177/0011392113479315
Scollon, Ron. 2001. "Action and text: towards an integrated understanding of the place of text in social (inter) action, mediated discourse analysis and the problem of social action." Pp. 139–183 in Methods of critical discourse analysis. Vol. 113, edited by R. Wodak & M. Meyer. London: Sage.
Shih, Johanna. 2006. "Circumventing discrimination: Gender and ethnic strategies in Silicon Valley." Gender & Society 20(2): 177–206. doi: 10.1177/0891243205285474
Siemieńska, Renata, ed. 2019. Kariery akademickie kobiet i mężczyzn. Różne czy podobne? Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar.
Startup Genome. 2019. Global Startup Ecosystem Report 2019. Retrieved August 5, 2019 (https://startupgenome.com/reports/gser2020).
Startup Genome. 2020. Global Startup Ecosystem Report 2020. Retrieved August 5, 2020 (https://startupgenome.com/reports/gser2020).
Warat, Marta & Ewa Krzaklewska. 2016. "Czy prekariat ma płeć? Sytuacja kobiet i mężczyzn na rynku pracy w Polsce." Rocznik Lubuski 42(1): 229–245.
Williams, Mary L., Charles Waldauer, & Vijaya G. Duggal. 1992. "Gender differences in economic knowledge: An extension of the analysis." The Journal of Economic Education 23(3): 219–231. doi: 10.1080/00220485.1992.10844756
Wynn, Alison T. 2019. "Pathways toward change: ideologies and gender equality in a Silicon Valley technology company." Gender & Society 34(1)” 106–130. doi: 10.1177/0891243219876271
Yazdanfar, Darush & Saeid Abbasian. 2015. "Gender and the use of external business advice: a Swedish study." International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship 7(1): 105–124. doi: 10.1108/IJGE-05-2014-0016
ANALYZED REPORTS
Kruczkowska, Eliza, Magdalena A. Olczak, & Agnieszka Skala. 2015. Startup Poland. Raport 2015. Retrieved March 15, 2020 (https://www.citibank.pl/poland/kronenberg/polish/files/Startup_Poland_raport_2015.pdf).
Kruczkowska, Eliza & Agnieszka Skala. 2016. Startup Poland. Raport 2016. Retrieved March 15, 2020 (http://www.citi.com/poland/kronenberg/polish/files/Startup_Poland_Raport_2016_16.pdf).
Beauchamp, Magdalena, Agata Kowalczyk, Agnieszka Skala, & Tomasz Ociepka. 2017. Startup Poland. Raport 2017. Retrieved March 15, 2020 (http://www.citi.com/poland/kronenberg/polish/files/Startup_Poland_raport_2017.pdf).
Beauchamp, Magdalena, Julia Krysztofiak-Szopa, Tomasz Ociepka, & Agnieszka Skala. 2018. Startup Poland. 2018. Retrieved March 15, 2020 (http://citi.com/poland/kronenberg/polish/files/raport_startup_poland_2018.pdf).
Krysztofak-Szopa, Julia & Monika Wisłowska. 2019. The Polish Tech Scene. 5 years. Retrieved March 15, 2020 (https://www.startups2019.startuppoland.org/).
License
Manuscript authors are responsible for obtaining copyright permissions for any copyrighted materials included within manuscripts. The authors must provide permission letters, when appropriate, to the Society Register Editors.
In addition, all published papers in Society Register are published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 Unported License.
1.1 The Author hereby warrants that he/she is the owner of all the copyright and other intellectual property rights in the Work and that, within the scope of the present Agreement, the paper does not infringe the legal rights of another person. The owner of the copyright work also warrants that he/she is the sole and original creator thereof and that is not bound by any legal constraints in regard to the use or sale of the work.
1.2. The Publisher warrants that is the owner of the PRESSto platform for open access journals, hereinafter referred to as the PRESSto Platform.
2. The Author grants the Publisher non-exclusive and free of charge license to unlimited use worldwide over an unspecified period of time in the following areas of exploitation:
2.1. production of multiple copies of the Work produced according to the specific application of a given technology, including printing, reproduction of graphics through mechanical or electrical means (reprography) and digital technology;
2.2. marketing authorisation, loan or lease of the original or copies thereof;
2.3. public performance, public performance in the broadcast, video screening, media enhancements as well as broadcasting and rebroadcasting, made available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them;
2.4. inclusion of the Work into a collective work (i.e. with a number of contributions);
2.5. inclusion of the Work in the electronic version to be offered on an electronic platform, or any other conceivable introduction of the Work in its electronic version to the Internet;
2.6. dissemination of electronic versions of the Work in its electronic version online, in a collective work or independently;
2.7. making the Work in the electronic version available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, in particular by making it accessible via the Internet, Intranet, Extranet;
2.8. making the Work available according to appropriate license pattern CC BY-NC 4.0 as well as another language version of this license or any later version published by Creative Commons.
3. The Author grants the Publisher permission to reproduce a single copy (print or download) and royalty-free use and disposal of rights to compilations of the Work and these compilations.
4. The Author grants the Publisher permission to send metadata files related to the Work, including to commercial and non-commercial journal-indexing databases.
5. The Author represents that, on the basis of the license granted in the present Agreement, the Publisher is entitled and obliged to:
5.1. allow third parties to obtain further licenses (sublicenses) to the Work and to other materials, including derivatives thereof or compilations made, based on or including the Work, whereas the provisions of such sub-licenses will be the same as with the Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) Creative Commons sub-license or another language version of this license, or any later version of this license published by Creative Commons;
5.2. make the Work available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, without any technological constraints;
5.3. appropriately inform members of the public to whom the Work is to be made available about sublicenses in such a way as to ensure that all parties are properly informed (appropriate informing messages).
6. Because of the royalty-free provision of services of the Author (resulting from the scope of obligations stipulated in the present Agreement), the Author shall not be entitled to any author’s fee due and payable on the part of the Publisher (no fee or royalty is payable by the Publisher to the Author).
7.1. In the case of third party claims or actions for indemnity against the Publisher owing to any infractions related to any form of infringement of intellectual property rights protection, including copyright infringements, the Author is obliged to take all possible measures necessary to protect against these claims and, when as a result of legal action, the Publisher, or any third party licensed by the Publisher to use the Work, will have to abandon using the Work in its entirety or in part or, following a court ruling in a legal challenge, to pay damages to a third party, whatever the legal basis
7.2. The Author will immediately inform the Publisher about any damage claims related to intellectual property infringements, including the author’s proprietary rights pertaining to a copyrighted work, filed against the Author. of liability, the Author is obliged to redress the damage resulting from claims made by third party, including costs and expenditures incurred in the process.
7.3. To all matters not settled herein provisions of the Polish Civil Code and the Polish Copyright and Related Rights Act shall apply.