CARING MASCULINITY OR HYBRID MASCULINITY? AN ANALYSIS OF RESEARCH RESULTS ON MALE NURSES IN POLAND

Main Article Content

URSZULA KLUCZYŃSKA

Abstract

In studies on men and masculinities, there is an increasing number of theories, which result from development, discussions and criticism in the area. However, in the context of this paper, two ways of describing masculinities are taken into account, i.e. caring masculinities and hybrid masculinities. The article analyses research results on male nurses in Poland, which were performed by means of in-depth interviews, according to theoretical assumptions on caring and hybrid masculinities. The interviews revealed varying ways of perceiving masculinities in the context of care. Out of the ways identified by the Author, the study focuses on the analysis of how to define masculinity as a belief that masculinity is accomplished by ensuring hegemonic masculinity. It also shows how this way of defining masculinity is related to the assumptions of hybrid masculinity. As a result, the analyses show that caring masculinities are not only diverse but also that the very term is disputable with regard to masculinities involved in various types of care.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
KLUCZYŃSKA, U. (2021). CARING MASCULINITY OR HYBRID MASCULINITY? AN ANALYSIS OF RESEARCH RESULTS ON MALE NURSES IN POLAND. Society Register, 5(1), 7-26. https://doi.org/10.14746/sr.2021.5.1.01
Section
Introduction
Author Biography

URSZULA KLUCZYŃSKA, Collegium Da Vinci, Poznan

Urszula Kluczyńska, a graduate of both sociology and pedagogy, is an associate professor at  Collegium da Vinci in Poznań, Poland. Her research interests are focused on critical studies of men and masculinities, with particular emphasis on men’s health, ageing, sexuality, sport, caring masculinities and medicalization of masculinity. She is an author of the following books: Mężczyźni w pielęgniarstwie.W stronę męskości opiekuńczej [Men in nursing. Caring masculinities] (UMP Poznań 2017) and Metamorfozy tożsamości współczesnych młodych mężczyzn [Metamorphoses of men’s identities in contemporary culture] (Adam Marszałek 2009), and co-author of Poza schematem. Społeczny konstrukt płci i seksualości  [Beyond the scheme. Social construction of gender and sexuality] (with Wiktor Dynarski and Anna M. Kłonkowska) (Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Gdańskiego 2016). She is also a coeditor of three Special Issues, such as “Men and masculinities in the European dimension” (Studia Humanistyczne AGH), “Wymiary męskości” (Interalia), “Gender trouble – from producing and reproducing masculinities to ways of crossing gender” (Miscellanea Anthropologica et Sociologica), and an author of numerous articles on men and masculinities published in Polish books and journals. She is a member of the Polish Sociological Association and the Polish Gender Association.

References

  1. Anderson, Eric. 2009. Inclusive masculinity: the changing nature of masculinities. New York: Routledge.
  2. Baier, Annette. 1985. Postures of the mind: Essays on mind and morale. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  3. Barber, Kristen. 2008. “The Well-Coiffed Man: Class, Race and Heterosexual Masculinity in the Hair Salon.” Gender and Society” 22: 455–476. DOI: 10.1177/0891243208321168
  4. Berggren, Kalle. 2014. “Sticky Msculinity: Post-strukturalism, Phenomenology and Subjectivity in Critival Studies on Men.” Men and Masculinity 17: 231–252. DOI: 10.1177/1097184X14539510
  5. Bradley, Harriet. 1993. “Across the great divide: the entry of men into women’s jobs.” Pp. 10–27 in Doing women’s work: Men in non-traditional occupations, edited by Ch. L. Williams. London: Sage.
  6. Bridges, Tristan. 2010. “Men just weren’t made to do this.” Gender Society 24: 5–30. DOI: 10.11.77/0891243209356924
  7. Bridges, Tristan S. & Michael Kimmel. 2011. “Engaging men in United States: Soft Essentialism and the obstacles to coherent initiatives in education and family policy.” Pp. 159–176 in Men and Masculinities Around the World: Transforming Men's Practices, edited by E. Ruspini, J. Hearn, B. Pease, & K. Pringle. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
  8. Bridges, Tristan & C. J. Pascoe. 2018. “On Elasticity of Gender Hegemony. Why hybrid Masculinities Fail to Undermine Gender and Sexual Inequality.” Pp. 254–274 in Gender Reckonings: New Social Theory and Research, edited by J. W. Messerschmidt, P.Y. Martin, M.A. Messner, R.W. Connell. New York: NYU Press.
  9. Bridges, Tristan & C. J. Pascoe. 2014. “Hybrid masculinities: New directions in the sociology of men and masculinities.” Sociology Compass 8(3): 246–258. DOI: 10.1111/soc4.12134
  10. Centrum Badania Opinii Społecznej CBOS. 2019. Które zawody poważamy. Komunikat z badań. [Which professions we respect. Research report] Warszawa. (https://www.cbos.pl/SPISKOM.POL/2019/K_157_19.PDF).
  11. Charmaz, Kathy. 2006. Constructing grounded theory a practical guide through qualitative analysis. London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi: Sage Publications.
  12. Charmaz, Kathy. 2011 “Grounded theory methods in social justice research.” Pp. 507–536 in The sage handbook of qualitative research 3rd edition, edited by N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln. Los Angeles, London, New Delhi Singapore, Washington: Sage Publications.
  13. Connell, R. W. 1987. Gender and Power: Society, the Persons and Sexual Politics. Sydney: Allen and Unwin.
  14. Connell, R. W. 1995. Masculinities. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.
  15. Demetriou, Demetrakis Z. 2001. “Connell's Concept of Hegemonic Masculinity: A Critique.” Theory and Society 30: 337–361. DOI: 10.1023/A:1017596718715
  16. Domagała, Przemysław et al. 2013. „Percepcja mężczyzn wykonujących zawód pielęgniarza w społeczeństwie.” [Perception of male nurses in socjety] Problemy Pielęgniarstwa 21: 462–470.
  17. Donovan, Brian. 1998. “Political consequences of private authority: Promise Keepers and the transformation of hegemonic masculinity.” Theory and Society 27: 817–843. DOI: 10.1023/A:1006909132442
  18. Dziubak, Małgorzata & Marek Motyka. 2013. “Motywy wyboru zawodu pielęgniarki i ich uwarunkowania — badania studentów kierunku pielęgniarskiego Collegium Medium Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego.” [“Motivation behind the choice of nursing as a profession and its determinants — research among students of nursing at the Medical College of the Jagiellonian University”] Problemy Pielęgniarstwa 21: 281–289.
  19. Elliott, Karla. 2015. “Caring masculinities: Theorizing an emerging concept.” Men and Masculinities 12: 1–20. DOI: 10.1177/1097184X15576203
  20. Elliott, Karla. 2020. “Bringing in margin and centre: ‘Open’ and ‘closed’ as concepts for considering men and masculinities.” Gender, Place & Culture. DOI: 10.1080/0966369X.2020.1715348
  21. Engster, Daniel. 2009. „Rozważania na temat teorii opieki: praktyka i obowiązek opieki.” Pp. 25–60 in Gender i ekonomika opieki, edited by E. Charkiewicz, A. Zachorowska-Mazurkiewicz. Warszawa: Biblioteka Think Tanku Feministycznego.
  22. Fineman, Martha. 2004. The autonomy myth: A theory of dependency. New York: The New Press.
  23. Fisher, Berenice & Joan Tronto. 1990. “Towards a feminist theory of caring.” Pp. 35–62 in Circles of care: work and identity in women’s lives, edited by E. Abel, M. Nelson. Albany State: University of New York Press.
  24. Flood, Michael. 2015. “Men and gender equality.” Pp. 1–33 in Engaging men in building gender equality, edited by M. Flood, R. Howson. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
  25. Gilligan, Carol. 1982. In a different voice. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
  26. Hanlon, Niall. 2012. Masculinities, care and equality. Identity and nurture in men’s live. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  27. Kapała, Wojciech & Paweł Rucki. 2008. „Mężczyźni w polskim pielęgniarstwie. Jak widzą i oceniają swój zawód polscy pielęgniarze.” [„Polish male nurses. How do they perceive and assess their profession”] Pielęgniarstwo Polskie 27: 7–13.
  28. Kimmel, Michael. 1995. The Politics of Manhood: profeminist men respond to the mythopoetic men's movement (and the mythopoetic leaders answer). Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
  29. Kimmell, Michael. 2013. Angry White Men: American Masculinity at the End of an Era. New York: Nation Books.
  30. Kittay, Feder E. 1999. Love’s labour: Essays on women, equality, and dependency. New York: Routledge.
  31. Kluczyńska, Urszula. 2017a. Mężczyźni w pielęgniarstwie. W stronę męskości opiekuńczej. [Men in nursing. Caring masculinities] Poznań: Wyd. UMP.
  32. Kluczyńska, Urszula. 2017b. “Motives for choosing and resigning from nursing by men in Poland and the definition of masculinity: a qualitative study.” Journal of Advanced Nursing 73: 1366–1376. DOI: 10.1111/jan.13240
  33. Kubisa, Julia. 2012. Bunt białych czepków. Analiza działalności związkowej pielęgniarek i położnych. [The rebellion of the white bonnets. Analysis of the trade union activity of nurses and midewives] Warszawa: Scholar.
  34. Mackintosh, Carolyn. 1997. “A historical study of men in nursing.” Journal of Advanced Nursing 26: 232–236.
  35. Masters, N. Tatiana. 2010. ”‘My Strength is Not for Hurting’: Men’s Anti-Rape Websites and their Construction of Masculinity and Male Sexuality.“ Sexualities 13: 33–46. DOI: 10.11.77/1363460709346115
  36. Matthaei, Julie. 2001. “Healing ourselves, healing our economy: paid work, unpaid work and the next stage of feminist economic transformation.“ Journal of Radical Economic 33: 461–494. DOI: 10.1177/048661340103300406
  37. Messner, Michael. 2007. “The Masculine of the Governator.“ Gender and Society 21: 461–480. DOI: 10.1177/0891243207303166
  38. Messner, Michael. 2011. “Gender ideologies, youth sport, and the production of soft essentialism.” Sociology of Sport Journal 28: 151–170. DOI: 10.1123/ssj.28.2.151
  39. Naczelna Izba Pielęgniarek i Położnych. 2018. Liczba pielęgniarek i położnych zarejestrowanych i zatrudnionych [Numerer of registered and employed nurses and midwives] Warszawa (https://nipip.pl/liczba-pielegniarek-poloznych-zarejestrowanych-zatrudnionych).
  40. O’Lynn, Chad E. 2007. “History of men in nursing. A review.” Pp. 5–23 in Men in nursing: history, challenges, and opportunities, edited by Ch. E. O’Lynn, R. E. Tranbarger. New York: Springer.
  41. Philips, Judith. 2009. Troska. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Sic!
  42. Sarvan, David. 1998. Talking Like A Men: White Masculinity, Maschimo, and Contemporary American Culture. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  43. Scambor Elli, Nadja Bergman, Katarzyna Wojnicka, Sophia Belghiti-Mahut, Jeff Hearn, Øysten Gullvåg Holter, Marc Gärtner, Majda Hrženjak, Christian Scambor, & Alan White. 2014. “Men and gender equality: European insights.” Men and Masculinities 17: 553–554. DOI: 10.1177/1097184X14558239
  44. Scambor, Elli, Katarzyna Wojnicka, & Nadja Bergmann, eds. 2012. The Role of Men in Gender Equality – European strategies & insights. Wien, Berlin, Graz. (http://ec.europa.eu/justice/gender-equality/files/gender_pay_gap/130424_final_report_role_of_men_en.pdf).
  45. Ungerson, Clare. 1987. Policy is personal: sex, gender and informal care. London: Tavistock.
  46. Waling, Andrea. 2018. “Rethinking Masculinity Studies: Feminism, Masculinity, and Poststructural Accounts of Agency and Emotional Reflexivity.” Journal of Men’s Studies 27: 89–107. DOI: 10.1177/1060826518782980
  47. Ward, Jane. 2015. Not gay. Sex between straight white men. New York: NYU Press.