Abstract
In studies on men and masculinities, there is an increasing number of theories, which result from development, discussions and criticism in the area. However, in the context of this paper, two ways of describing masculinities are taken into account, i.e. caring masculinities and hybrid masculinities. The article analyses research results on male nurses in Poland, which were performed by means of in-depth interviews, according to theoretical assumptions on caring and hybrid masculinities. The interviews revealed varying ways of perceiving masculinities in the context of care. Out of the ways identified by the Author, the study focuses on the analysis of how to define masculinity as a belief that masculinity is accomplished by ensuring hegemonic masculinity. It also shows how this way of defining masculinity is related to the assumptions of hybrid masculinity. As a result, the analyses show that caring masculinities are not only diverse but also that the very term is disputable with regard to masculinities involved in various types of care.
References
Anderson, Eric. 2009. Inclusive masculinity: the changing nature of masculinities. New York: Routledge.
Baier, Annette. 1985. Postures of the mind: Essays on mind and morale. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Barber, Kristen. 2008. “The Well-Coiffed Man: Class, Race and Heterosexual Masculinity in the Hair Salon.” Gender and Society” 22: 455–476. DOI: 10.1177/0891243208321168
Berggren, Kalle. 2014. “Sticky Msculinity: Post-strukturalism, Phenomenology and Subjectivity in Critival Studies on Men.” Men and Masculinity 17: 231–252. DOI: 10.1177/1097184X14539510
Bradley, Harriet. 1993. “Across the great divide: the entry of men into women’s jobs.” Pp. 10–27 in Doing women’s work: Men in non-traditional occupations, edited by Ch. L. Williams. London: Sage.
Bridges, Tristan. 2010. “Men just weren’t made to do this.” Gender Society 24: 5–30. DOI: 10.11.77/0891243209356924
Bridges, Tristan S. & Michael Kimmel. 2011. “Engaging men in United States: Soft Essentialism and the obstacles to coherent initiatives in education and family policy.” Pp. 159–176 in Men and Masculinities Around the World: Transforming Men's Practices, edited by E. Ruspini, J. Hearn, B. Pease, & K. Pringle. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
Bridges, Tristan & C. J. Pascoe. 2018. “On Elasticity of Gender Hegemony. Why hybrid Masculinities Fail to Undermine Gender and Sexual Inequality.” Pp. 254–274 in Gender Reckonings: New Social Theory and Research, edited by J. W. Messerschmidt, P.Y. Martin, M.A. Messner, R.W. Connell. New York: NYU Press.
Bridges, Tristan & C. J. Pascoe. 2014. “Hybrid masculinities: New directions in the sociology of men and masculinities.” Sociology Compass 8(3): 246–258. DOI: 10.1111/soc4.12134
Centrum Badania Opinii Społecznej CBOS. 2019. Które zawody poważamy. Komunikat z badań. [Which professions we respect. Research report] Warszawa. (https://www.cbos.pl/SPISKOM.POL/2019/K_157_19.PDF).
Charmaz, Kathy. 2006. Constructing grounded theory a practical guide through qualitative analysis. London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi: Sage Publications.
Charmaz, Kathy. 2011 “Grounded theory methods in social justice research.” Pp. 507–536 in The sage handbook of qualitative research 3rd edition, edited by N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln. Los Angeles, London, New Delhi Singapore, Washington: Sage Publications.
Connell, R. W. 1987. Gender and Power: Society, the Persons and Sexual Politics. Sydney: Allen and Unwin.
Connell, R. W. 1995. Masculinities. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.
Demetriou, Demetrakis Z. 2001. “Connell's Concept of Hegemonic Masculinity: A Critique.” Theory and Society 30: 337–361. DOI: 10.1023/A:1017596718715
Domagała, Przemysław et al. 2013. „Percepcja mężczyzn wykonujących zawód pielęgniarza w społeczeństwie.” [Perception of male nurses in socjety] Problemy Pielęgniarstwa 21: 462–470.
Donovan, Brian. 1998. “Political consequences of private authority: Promise Keepers and the transformation of hegemonic masculinity.” Theory and Society 27: 817–843. DOI: 10.1023/A:1006909132442
Dziubak, Małgorzata & Marek Motyka. 2013. “Motywy wyboru zawodu pielęgniarki i ich uwarunkowania — badania studentów kierunku pielęgniarskiego Collegium Medium Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego.” [“Motivation behind the choice of nursing as a profession and its determinants — research among students of nursing at the Medical College of the Jagiellonian University”] Problemy Pielęgniarstwa 21: 281–289.
Elliott, Karla. 2015. “Caring masculinities: Theorizing an emerging concept.” Men and Masculinities 12: 1–20. DOI: 10.1177/1097184X15576203
Elliott, Karla. 2020. “Bringing in margin and centre: ‘Open’ and ‘closed’ as concepts for considering men and masculinities.” Gender, Place & Culture. DOI: 10.1080/0966369X.2020.1715348
Engster, Daniel. 2009. „Rozważania na temat teorii opieki: praktyka i obowiązek opieki.” Pp. 25–60 in Gender i ekonomika opieki, edited by E. Charkiewicz, A. Zachorowska-Mazurkiewicz. Warszawa: Biblioteka Think Tanku Feministycznego.
Fineman, Martha. 2004. The autonomy myth: A theory of dependency. New York: The New Press.
Fisher, Berenice & Joan Tronto. 1990. “Towards a feminist theory of caring.” Pp. 35–62 in Circles of care: work and identity in women’s lives, edited by E. Abel, M. Nelson. Albany State: University of New York Press.
Flood, Michael. 2015. “Men and gender equality.” Pp. 1–33 in Engaging men in building gender equality, edited by M. Flood, R. Howson. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Gilligan, Carol. 1982. In a different voice. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
Hanlon, Niall. 2012. Masculinities, care and equality. Identity and nurture in men’s live. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Kapała, Wojciech & Paweł Rucki. 2008. „Mężczyźni w polskim pielęgniarstwie. Jak widzą i oceniają swój zawód polscy pielęgniarze.” [„Polish male nurses. How do they perceive and assess their profession”] Pielęgniarstwo Polskie 27: 7–13.
Kimmel, Michael. 1995. The Politics of Manhood: profeminist men respond to the mythopoetic men's movement (and the mythopoetic leaders answer). Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Kimmell, Michael. 2013. Angry White Men: American Masculinity at the End of an Era. New York: Nation Books.
Kittay, Feder E. 1999. Love’s labour: Essays on women, equality, and dependency. New York: Routledge.
Kluczyńska, Urszula. 2017a. Mężczyźni w pielęgniarstwie. W stronę męskości opiekuńczej. [Men in nursing. Caring masculinities] Poznań: Wyd. UMP.
Kluczyńska, Urszula. 2017b. “Motives for choosing and resigning from nursing by men in Poland and the definition of masculinity: a qualitative study.” Journal of Advanced Nursing 73: 1366–1376. DOI: 10.1111/jan.13240
Kubisa, Julia. 2012. Bunt białych czepków. Analiza działalności związkowej pielęgniarek i położnych. [The rebellion of the white bonnets. Analysis of the trade union activity of nurses and midewives] Warszawa: Scholar.
Mackintosh, Carolyn. 1997. “A historical study of men in nursing.” Journal of Advanced Nursing 26: 232–236.
Masters, N. Tatiana. 2010. ”‘My Strength is Not for Hurting’: Men’s Anti-Rape Websites and their Construction of Masculinity and Male Sexuality.“ Sexualities 13: 33–46. DOI: 10.11.77/1363460709346115
Matthaei, Julie. 2001. “Healing ourselves, healing our economy: paid work, unpaid work and the next stage of feminist economic transformation.“ Journal of Radical Economic 33: 461–494. DOI: 10.1177/048661340103300406
Messner, Michael. 2007. “The Masculine of the Governator.“ Gender and Society 21: 461–480. DOI: 10.1177/0891243207303166
Messner, Michael. 2011. “Gender ideologies, youth sport, and the production of soft essentialism.” Sociology of Sport Journal 28: 151–170. DOI: 10.1123/ssj.28.2.151
Naczelna Izba Pielęgniarek i Położnych. 2018. Liczba pielęgniarek i położnych zarejestrowanych i zatrudnionych [Numerer of registered and employed nurses and midwives] Warszawa (https://nipip.pl/liczba-pielegniarek-poloznych-zarejestrowanych-zatrudnionych).
O’Lynn, Chad E. 2007. “History of men in nursing. A review.” Pp. 5–23 in Men in nursing: history, challenges, and opportunities, edited by Ch. E. O’Lynn, R. E. Tranbarger. New York: Springer.
Philips, Judith. 2009. Troska. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Sic!
Sarvan, David. 1998. Talking Like A Men: White Masculinity, Maschimo, and Contemporary American Culture. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Scambor Elli, Nadja Bergman, Katarzyna Wojnicka, Sophia Belghiti-Mahut, Jeff Hearn, Øysten Gullvåg Holter, Marc Gärtner, Majda Hrženjak, Christian Scambor, & Alan White. 2014. “Men and gender equality: European insights.” Men and Masculinities 17: 553–554. DOI: 10.1177/1097184X14558239
Scambor, Elli, Katarzyna Wojnicka, & Nadja Bergmann, eds. 2012. The Role of Men in Gender Equality – European strategies & insights. Wien, Berlin, Graz. (http://ec.europa.eu/justice/gender-equality/files/gender_pay_gap/130424_final_report_role_of_men_en.pdf).
Ungerson, Clare. 1987. Policy is personal: sex, gender and informal care. London: Tavistock.
Waling, Andrea. 2018. “Rethinking Masculinity Studies: Feminism, Masculinity, and Poststructural Accounts of Agency and Emotional Reflexivity.” Journal of Men’s Studies 27: 89–107. DOI: 10.1177/1060826518782980
Ward, Jane. 2015. Not gay. Sex between straight white men. New York: NYU Press.
License
Manuscript authors are responsible for obtaining copyright permissions for any copyrighted materials included within manuscripts. The authors must provide permission letters, when appropriate, to the Society Register Editors.
In addition, all published papers in Society Register are published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 Unported License.
1.1 The Author hereby warrants that he/she is the owner of all the copyright and other intellectual property rights in the Work and that, within the scope of the present Agreement, the paper does not infringe the legal rights of another person. The owner of the copyright work also warrants that he/she is the sole and original creator thereof and that is not bound by any legal constraints in regard to the use or sale of the work.
1.2. The Publisher warrants that is the owner of the PRESSto platform for open access journals, hereinafter referred to as the PRESSto Platform.
2. The Author grants the Publisher non-exclusive and free of charge license to unlimited use worldwide over an unspecified period of time in the following areas of exploitation:
2.1. production of multiple copies of the Work produced according to the specific application of a given technology, including printing, reproduction of graphics through mechanical or electrical means (reprography) and digital technology;
2.2. marketing authorisation, loan or lease of the original or copies thereof;
2.3. public performance, public performance in the broadcast, video screening, media enhancements as well as broadcasting and rebroadcasting, made available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them;
2.4. inclusion of the Work into a collective work (i.e. with a number of contributions);
2.5. inclusion of the Work in the electronic version to be offered on an electronic platform, or any other conceivable introduction of the Work in its electronic version to the Internet;
2.6. dissemination of electronic versions of the Work in its electronic version online, in a collective work or independently;
2.7. making the Work in the electronic version available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, in particular by making it accessible via the Internet, Intranet, Extranet;
2.8. making the Work available according to appropriate license pattern CC BY-NC 4.0 as well as another language version of this license or any later version published by Creative Commons.
3. The Author grants the Publisher permission to reproduce a single copy (print or download) and royalty-free use and disposal of rights to compilations of the Work and these compilations.
4. The Author grants the Publisher permission to send metadata files related to the Work, including to commercial and non-commercial journal-indexing databases.
5. The Author represents that, on the basis of the license granted in the present Agreement, the Publisher is entitled and obliged to:
5.1. allow third parties to obtain further licenses (sublicenses) to the Work and to other materials, including derivatives thereof or compilations made, based on or including the Work, whereas the provisions of such sub-licenses will be the same as with the Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) Creative Commons sub-license or another language version of this license, or any later version of this license published by Creative Commons;
5.2. make the Work available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, without any technological constraints;
5.3. appropriately inform members of the public to whom the Work is to be made available about sublicenses in such a way as to ensure that all parties are properly informed (appropriate informing messages).
6. Because of the royalty-free provision of services of the Author (resulting from the scope of obligations stipulated in the present Agreement), the Author shall not be entitled to any author’s fee due and payable on the part of the Publisher (no fee or royalty is payable by the Publisher to the Author).
7.1. In the case of third party claims or actions for indemnity against the Publisher owing to any infractions related to any form of infringement of intellectual property rights protection, including copyright infringements, the Author is obliged to take all possible measures necessary to protect against these claims and, when as a result of legal action, the Publisher, or any third party licensed by the Publisher to use the Work, will have to abandon using the Work in its entirety or in part or, following a court ruling in a legal challenge, to pay damages to a third party, whatever the legal basis
7.2. The Author will immediately inform the Publisher about any damage claims related to intellectual property infringements, including the author’s proprietary rights pertaining to a copyrighted work, filed against the Author. of liability, the Author is obliged to redress the damage resulting from claims made by third party, including costs and expenditures incurred in the process.
7.3. To all matters not settled herein provisions of the Polish Civil Code and the Polish Copyright and Related Rights Act shall apply.