Keywords
Urban Entrepreneurialism
Neoliberal Urbanism
İstanbul
Olympic Bids
Abstract
This study aims to analyse the political impact of sports mega-events through urban lenses. Sports mega-events often come along with drastic transformations in the built environment of the city where they are held. Contemporary urban impact of the sports mega-events, with the increased role rested by local and/or national governments on the private sector in the organization, is highly interconnected with the neoliberal measures of selling out the urban space, undertaken for hosting the event. In terms of the hosts, there is an increasing shift towards the countries where right-wing authoritarian parties are in power. I argue that the promises of these governments guaranteeing more swift urban transformations to meet the infrastructure requirements of hosting these events cause this shift and in turn, right-wing authoritarian governments use these events as platforms for disseminating their ideologies. This research aims to trace this trend, based on the example of İstanbul’s failed bid to host the 2020 Summer Olympics and the neoliberal urban policies in Turkey under the Justice and Development Party (AKP). By using the city master plan presented during the bidding process and the statements made by AKP officials, I aim to demonstrate how hosting international sports events in Turkey is undertaken as part of a neoliberal urban policy and how this is incorporated into a wider conservative-Islamist political project by the AKP.
References
Allison, Lincoln & Terry Monnington. 2002. "Sport, Prestige and International Relations." Government and Opposition 37(1):106–34. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-7053.00089
Amnesty International. 2019. Reality Check: The State of Migrant Workers’ Rights with Four Years to Go Until the Qatar 2022 World Cup. MDE 22/9758/2019. London.
Balaban, Osman. 2016. "İnşaat Sektörü Neyin Lokomotifi?" Pp. 17–32 in İnşaat Ya Resulullah, edited by T. Bora. İstanbul: Birikim.
Batuman, Bülent. 2019. Milletin Mimarisi: Yeni İslamcı Ulus İnşasının Kent ve Mekan Siyaseti. İstanbul: Metis.
Bilsel, Cânâ, and Halûk Zelef. 2011. "Mega Events in Istanbul from Henri Prost’s Master Plan of 1937 to the Twenty-First-Century Olympic Bids." Planning Perspectives 26(4): 621–34. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/02665433.2011.599931
Black, David. 2007. "The Symbolic Politics of Sport Mega-Events: 2010 in Comparative Perspective." Politikon 34(3): 261–76. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/02589340801962536
Bora, Tanıl. 2000. "Fatih’in İstanbul’u: Siyasal İslam’ın Alternatif Küresel Şehir” Hayalleri." Pp. 60–77 in İstanbul: Küresel ile Yerel Arasında, edited by Ç. Keyder. İstanbul: Metis.
Bora, Tanıl. 2016. "Türk Muhafazakarlığı ve İnşaat Şehveti: Büyük Olsun Bizim Olsun." Pp. 9–15 in İnşaat Ya Resulullah, edited by T. Bora. İstanbul: Birikim.
Boykoff, Jules. 2016. Power Games: The Political History of the Olympic Games. London: Verso.
Brown, Wendy. 2003. "Neo-Liberalism and the End of Liberal Democracy." Theory & Event 7(1). doi: https://doi.org/10.1353/tae.2003.0020
Bruff, Ian. 2014. "The Rise of Authoritarian Neoliberalism." Rethinking Marxism 26(1): 113–29. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/08935696.2013.843250
Çavdar, Ayşe. 2016. "Building, Marketing and Living in an Islamic Gated Community: Novel Configurations of Class and Religion in Istanbul." International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 40(3): 507–23. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12364
C̨avuşoğlu, Erbatur & Julia Strutz. 2014. "Producing Force and Consent: Urban Transformation and Corporatism in Turkey." City 18(2): 134–48. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13604813.2014.896643
Chalkley, Brian & Stephen Essex. 1999. "Urban Development through Hosting International Events: A History of the Olympic Games." Planning Perspectives 14(4): 369–94. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/026654399364184
Çoknaz, Dilşad, Meliha Atalay Noordegraaf, Lale Güler, & Müfide Yoruç Çotuk. 2010. "Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Yüksekokulu Öğrencilerinin Olimpik Konulara Yönelik Farkındalıkları ve Olimpik Kavramlara Ilişkin Değerlendirmeleri." Uluslararası İnsan Bilimleri Dergisi 7(1): 1264–1289.
Edelman, Murray. 1967. The Symbolic Uses of Politics. London: University of Illinois Press.
Giulianotti, Richard, Gary Armstrong, Gavin Hales, & Dick Hobbs. 2015. "Sport Mega-Events and Public Opposition: A Sociological Study of the London 2012 Olympics." Journal of Sport and Social Issues 39(2): 99–119. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0193723514530565
Grix, Jonathan & Donna Lee. 2013. "Soft Power, Sports Mega-Events and Emerging States: The Lure of the Politics of Attraction." Global Society 27(4): 521–36. doi: 10.1080/13600826.2013.827632
Harvey, David. 1989. "From Managerialism to Entrepreneurialism: The Transformation in Urban Governance in Late Capitalism." Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography 71(1): 3–17. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/04353684.1989.11879583
Hiller, Harry H. 1999. "Toward an Urban Sociology of Mega-Events. Pp. 181–205 in Constructions of Urban Space. Vol. 5, Research in Urban Sociology, edited by R. Hutchison. Bradford: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Horne, John & Wolfram Manzenreiter. 2006. "An Introduction to the Sociology of Sports Mega-Events." The Sociological Review 54(2): 1–24. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2006.00650.x
Jessop, Bob. 2002. "Liberalism, Neoliberalism, and Urban Governance: A State–Theoretical Perspective." Antipode 34(3): 452–72. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8330.00250
Keyder, Çağlar. 2000. "Arka Plan." Pp. 9–40 in İstanbul: Küresel ile Yerel Arasında. İstanbul: Metis.
Lauermann, John. 2016. "Temporary Projects, Durable Outcomes: Urban Development through Failed Olympic Bids?" Urban Studies 53(9): 1885–1901. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098015585460
Lefebvre, Henri. 1991. The Production of Space. Oxford, UK & Cambridge, USA: Blackwell.
Leitner, Helga & Mark Garner. 1993. "The Limits of Local Initiatives: A Reassessment of Urban Entrepreneurialism for Urban Development." Urban Geography 14(1): 57–77. doi: https://doi.org/10.2747/0272-3638.14.1.57
McManus, John. 2018. Welcome to Hell? In Search of the Real Turkish Football. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.
Peck, Jamie, Nik Theodore, & Neil Brenner. 2009. "Neoliberal Urbanism: Models, Moments, Mutations." SAIS Review of International Affairs 29(1): 49–66. doi: https://doi.org/10.1353/sais.0.0028
Skey, Michael. 2006. "Carnivals of Surplus Emotion? Towards an Understanding of the Significance of Ecstatic Nationalism in a Globalising World." Studies in Ethnicity and Nationalism 6(2): 143–61. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1754-9469.2006.tb00154.x
Swyngedouw, Erik Achille. 1992. "The Mammon Quest. Glocalisation, Interspatial Competition and the New Monetary Order: The Construction of New Scales." Pp. 39–67 in Cities and Regions in the New Europe, edited by M. Dunford & Kaflakas Grigoris. London: Belhaven.
Tokdoğan, Nagehan. 2018. Yeni Osmanlıcılık: Hınç, Nostalji, Narsisizm. İstanbul: İletişim.
Tomlinson, Alan & Christopher Young, eds. 2006. National Identity and Global Sports Events: Culture, Politics and Spectactle in the Olympics and the Football World Cup. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Vincent, John, John S. Hill, Andrew Billings, John Harris, & C. Dwayne Massey. 2018. "We Are GREAT Britain: British Newspaper Narratives during the London 2012 Olympic Games." International Review for the Sociology of Sport 53(8): 895–923. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1012690217690345
Yeşilbağ, Melih. 2016. "Hegemonyanın Harcı: AKP Döneminde İnşaata Dayalı Birikim Rejimi." SBF Dergisi 71(2): 599–626.
License
Manuscript authors are responsible for obtaining copyright permissions for any copyrighted materials included within manuscripts. The authors must provide permission letters, when appropriate, to the Society Register Editors.
In addition, all published papers in Society Register are published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 Unported License.
1.1 The Author hereby warrants that he/she is the owner of all the copyright and other intellectual property rights in the Work and that, within the scope of the present Agreement, the paper does not infringe the legal rights of another person. The owner of the copyright work also warrants that he/she is the sole and original creator thereof and that is not bound by any legal constraints in regard to the use or sale of the work.
1.2. The Publisher warrants that is the owner of the PRESSto platform for open access journals, hereinafter referred to as the PRESSto Platform.
2. The Author grants the Publisher non-exclusive and free of charge license to unlimited use worldwide over an unspecified period of time in the following areas of exploitation:
2.1. production of multiple copies of the Work produced according to the specific application of a given technology, including printing, reproduction of graphics through mechanical or electrical means (reprography) and digital technology;
2.2. marketing authorisation, loan or lease of the original or copies thereof;
2.3. public performance, public performance in the broadcast, video screening, media enhancements as well as broadcasting and rebroadcasting, made available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them;
2.4. inclusion of the Work into a collective work (i.e. with a number of contributions);
2.5. inclusion of the Work in the electronic version to be offered on an electronic platform, or any other conceivable introduction of the Work in its electronic version to the Internet;
2.6. dissemination of electronic versions of the Work in its electronic version online, in a collective work or independently;
2.7. making the Work in the electronic version available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, in particular by making it accessible via the Internet, Intranet, Extranet;
2.8. making the Work available according to appropriate license pattern CC BY-NC 4.0 as well as another language version of this license or any later version published by Creative Commons.
3. The Author grants the Publisher permission to reproduce a single copy (print or download) and royalty-free use and disposal of rights to compilations of the Work and these compilations.
4. The Author grants the Publisher permission to send metadata files related to the Work, including to commercial and non-commercial journal-indexing databases.
5. The Author represents that, on the basis of the license granted in the present Agreement, the Publisher is entitled and obliged to:
5.1. allow third parties to obtain further licenses (sublicenses) to the Work and to other materials, including derivatives thereof or compilations made, based on or including the Work, whereas the provisions of such sub-licenses will be the same as with the Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) Creative Commons sub-license or another language version of this license, or any later version of this license published by Creative Commons;
5.2. make the Work available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, without any technological constraints;
5.3. appropriately inform members of the public to whom the Work is to be made available about sublicenses in such a way as to ensure that all parties are properly informed (appropriate informing messages).
6. Because of the royalty-free provision of services of the Author (resulting from the scope of obligations stipulated in the present Agreement), the Author shall not be entitled to any author’s fee due and payable on the part of the Publisher (no fee or royalty is payable by the Publisher to the Author).
7.1. In the case of third party claims or actions for indemnity against the Publisher owing to any infractions related to any form of infringement of intellectual property rights protection, including copyright infringements, the Author is obliged to take all possible measures necessary to protect against these claims and, when as a result of legal action, the Publisher, or any third party licensed by the Publisher to use the Work, will have to abandon using the Work in its entirety or in part or, following a court ruling in a legal challenge, to pay damages to a third party, whatever the legal basis
7.2. The Author will immediately inform the Publisher about any damage claims related to intellectual property infringements, including the author’s proprietary rights pertaining to a copyrighted work, filed against the Author. of liability, the Author is obliged to redress the damage resulting from claims made by third party, including costs and expenditures incurred in the process.
7.3. To all matters not settled herein provisions of the Polish Civil Code and the Polish Copyright and Related Rights Act shall apply.