BRIDGING TOGETHER AUTHORITARIAN RIGHT-WING POLITICS AND NEOLIBERAL URBAN POLITICS: ISTANBUL’S BID FOR 2020 SUMMER OLYMPICS

Main Article Content

YAVUZ YAVUZ

Abstract

This study aims to analyse the political impact of sports mega-events through urban lenses. Sports mega-events often come along with drastic transformations in the built environment of the city where they are held. Contemporary urban impact of the sports mega-events, with the increased role rested by local and/or national governments on the private sector in the organization, is highly interconnected with the neoliberal measures of selling out the urban space, undertaken for hosting the event. In terms of the hosts, there is an increasing shift towards the countries where right-wing authoritarian parties are in power. I argue that the promises of these governments guaranteeing more swift urban transformations to meet the infrastructure requirements of hosting these events cause this shift and in turn, right-wing authoritarian governments use these events as platforms for disseminating their ideologies.  This research aims to trace this trend, based on the example of İstanbul’s failed bid to host the 2020 Summer Olympics and the neoliberal urban policies in Turkey under the Justice and Development Party (AKP). By using the city master plan presented during the bidding process and the statements made by AKP officials, I aim to demonstrate how hosting international sports events in Turkey is undertaken as part of a neoliberal urban policy and how this is incorporated into a wider conservative-Islamist political project by the AKP.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
YAVUZ, Y. (2021). BRIDGING TOGETHER AUTHORITARIAN RIGHT-WING POLITICS AND NEOLIBERAL URBAN POLITICS: ISTANBUL’S BID FOR 2020 SUMMER OLYMPICS. Society Register, 5(3), 95-112. https://doi.org/10.14746/sr.2021.5.3.06
Section
Articles
Author Biography

YAVUZ YAVUZ, Ankara University

Yavuz Yavuz is a researcher at the Sociology Department of Ankara University in Turkey. His research interests include sociology of sport, nationalism theories and urban sociology.

References

  1. Allison, Lincoln & Terry Monnington. 2002. "Sport, Prestige and International Relations." Government and Opposition 37(1):106–34. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-7053.00089
  2. Amnesty International. 2019. Reality Check: The State of Migrant Workers’ Rights with Four Years to Go Until the Qatar 2022 World Cup. MDE 22/9758/2019. London.
  3. Balaban, Osman. 2016. "İnşaat Sektörü Neyin Lokomotifi?" Pp. 17–32 in İnşaat Ya Resulullah, edited by T. Bora. İstanbul: Birikim.
  4. Batuman, Bülent. 2019. Milletin Mimarisi: Yeni İslamcı Ulus İnşasının Kent ve Mekan Siyaseti. İstanbul: Metis.
  5. Bilsel, Cânâ, and Halûk Zelef. 2011. "Mega Events in Istanbul from Henri Prost’s Master Plan of 1937 to the Twenty-First-Century Olympic Bids." Planning Perspectives 26(4): 621–34. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/02665433.2011.599931
  6. Black, David. 2007. "The Symbolic Politics of Sport Mega-Events: 2010 in Comparative Perspective." Politikon 34(3): 261–76. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/02589340801962536
  7. Bora, Tanıl. 2000. "Fatih’in İstanbul’u: Siyasal İslam’ın Alternatif Küresel Şehir” Hayalleri." Pp. 60–77 in İstanbul: Küresel ile Yerel Arasında, edited by Ç. Keyder. İstanbul: Metis.
  8. Bora, Tanıl. 2016. "Türk Muhafazakarlığı ve İnşaat Şehveti: Büyük Olsun Bizim Olsun." Pp. 9–15 in İnşaat Ya Resulullah, edited by T. Bora. İstanbul: Birikim.
  9. Boykoff, Jules. 2016. Power Games: The Political History of the Olympic Games. London: Verso.
  10. Brown, Wendy. 2003. "Neo-Liberalism and the End of Liberal Democracy." Theory & Event 7(1). doi: https://doi.org/10.1353/tae.2003.0020
  11. Bruff, Ian. 2014. "The Rise of Authoritarian Neoliberalism." Rethinking Marxism 26(1): 113–29. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/08935696.2013.843250
  12. Çavdar, Ayşe. 2016. "Building, Marketing and Living in an Islamic Gated Community: Novel Configurations of Class and Religion in Istanbul." International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 40(3): 507–23. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12364
  13. C̨avuşoğlu, Erbatur & Julia Strutz. 2014. "Producing Force and Consent: Urban Transformation and Corporatism in Turkey." City 18(2): 134–48. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13604813.2014.896643
  14. Chalkley, Brian & Stephen Essex. 1999. "Urban Development through Hosting International Events: A History of the Olympic Games." Planning Perspectives 14(4): 369–94. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/026654399364184
  15. Çoknaz, Dilşad, Meliha Atalay Noordegraaf, Lale Güler, & Müfide Yoruç Çotuk. 2010. "Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Yüksekokulu Öğrencilerinin Olimpik Konulara Yönelik Farkındalıkları ve Olimpik Kavramlara Ilişkin Değerlendirmeleri." Uluslararası İnsan Bilimleri Dergisi 7(1): 1264–1289.
  16. Edelman, Murray. 1967. The Symbolic Uses of Politics. London: University of Illinois Press.
  17. Giulianotti, Richard, Gary Armstrong, Gavin Hales, & Dick Hobbs. 2015. "Sport Mega-Events and Public Opposition: A Sociological Study of the London 2012 Olympics." Journal of Sport and Social Issues 39(2): 99–119. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0193723514530565
  18. Grix, Jonathan & Donna Lee. 2013. "Soft Power, Sports Mega-Events and Emerging States: The Lure of the Politics of Attraction." Global Society 27(4): 521–36. doi: 10.1080/13600826.2013.827632
  19. Harvey, David. 1989. "From Managerialism to Entrepreneurialism: The Transformation in Urban Governance in Late Capitalism." Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography 71(1): 3–17. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/04353684.1989.11879583
  20. Hiller, Harry H. 1999. "Toward an Urban Sociology of Mega-Events. Pp. 181–205 in Constructions of Urban Space. Vol. 5, Research in Urban Sociology, edited by R. Hutchison. Bradford: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
  21. Horne, John & Wolfram Manzenreiter. 2006. "An Introduction to the Sociology of Sports Mega-Events." The Sociological Review 54(2): 1–24. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2006.00650.x
  22. Jessop, Bob. 2002. "Liberalism, Neoliberalism, and Urban Governance: A State–Theoretical Perspective." Antipode 34(3): 452–72. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8330.00250
  23. Keyder, Çağlar. 2000. "Arka Plan." Pp. 9–40 in İstanbul: Küresel ile Yerel Arasında. İstanbul: Metis.
  24. Lauermann, John. 2016. "Temporary Projects, Durable Outcomes: Urban Development through Failed Olympic Bids?" Urban Studies 53(9): 1885–1901. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098015585460
  25. Lefebvre, Henri. 1991. The Production of Space. Oxford, UK & Cambridge, USA: Blackwell.
  26. Leitner, Helga & Mark Garner. 1993. "The Limits of Local Initiatives: A Reassessment of Urban Entrepreneurialism for Urban Development." Urban Geography 14(1): 57–77. doi: https://doi.org/10.2747/0272-3638.14.1.57
  27. McManus, John. 2018. Welcome to Hell? In Search of the Real Turkish Football. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.
  28. Peck, Jamie, Nik Theodore, & Neil Brenner. 2009. "Neoliberal Urbanism: Models, Moments, Mutations." SAIS Review of International Affairs 29(1): 49–66. doi: https://doi.org/10.1353/sais.0.0028
  29. Skey, Michael. 2006. "Carnivals of Surplus Emotion? Towards an Understanding of the Significance of Ecstatic Nationalism in a Globalising World." Studies in Ethnicity and Nationalism 6(2): 143–61. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1754-9469.2006.tb00154.x
  30. Swyngedouw, Erik Achille. 1992. "The Mammon Quest. Glocalisation, Interspatial Competition and the New Monetary Order: The Construction of New Scales." Pp. 39–67 in Cities and Regions in the New Europe, edited by M. Dunford & Kaflakas Grigoris. London: Belhaven.
  31. Tokdoğan, Nagehan. 2018. Yeni Osmanlıcılık: Hınç, Nostalji, Narsisizm. İstanbul: İletişim.
  32. Tomlinson, Alan & Christopher Young, eds. 2006. National Identity and Global Sports Events: Culture, Politics and Spectactle in the Olympics and the Football World Cup. Albany: State University of New York Press.
  33. Vincent, John, John S. Hill, Andrew Billings, John Harris, & C. Dwayne Massey. 2018. "We Are GREAT Britain: British Newspaper Narratives during the London 2012 Olympic Games." International Review for the Sociology of Sport 53(8): 895–923. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1012690217690345
  34. Yeşilbağ, Melih. 2016. "Hegemonyanın Harcı: AKP Döneminde İnşaata Dayalı Birikim Rejimi." SBF Dergisi 71(2): 599–626.