Main Article Content
The aim of this paper is to analyze four reforms introduced in the Polish family system in the 2010s. The reforms were introduced as an answer to a problem of very low fertility rates, as well as instruments helping women in achieving their work-life balance. The reforms are analyzed here in terms of their (de)genderization effects on Polish mothers and fathers. The use of a genderization-degenderization axis shows that the gendered division of domestic and care work is not challenged by the reforms, but it is rather reinforced by them. It is also doubtful if the reforms will manage to reverse current demographic trends.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Manuscript authors are responsible for obtaining copyright permissions for any copyrighted materials included within manuscripts. The authors must provide permission letters, when appropriate, to the Society Register Editors.
In addition, all published papers in Society Register are published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 Unported License.
1.1 The Author hereby warrants that he/she is the owner of all the copyright and other intellectual property rights in the Work and that, within the scope of the present Agreement, the paper does not infringe the legal rights of another person. The owner of the copyright work also warrants that he/she is the sole and original creator thereof and that is not bound by any legal constraints in regard to the use or sale of the work.
1.2. The Publisher warrants that is the owner of the PRESSto platform for open access journals, hereinafter referred to as the PRESSto Platform.
2. The Author grants the Publisher non-exclusive and free of charge license to unlimited use worldwide over an unspecified period of time in the following areas of exploitation:
2.1. production of multiple copies of the Work produced according to the specific application of a given technology, including printing, reproduction of graphics through mechanical or electrical means (reprography) and digital technology;
2.2. marketing authorisation, loan or lease of the original or copies thereof;
2.3. public performance, public performance in the broadcast, video screening, media enhancements as well as broadcasting and rebroadcasting, made available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them;
2.4. inclusion of the Work into a collective work (i.e. with a number of contributions);
2.5. inclusion of the Work in the electronic version to be offered on an electronic platform, or any other conceivable introduction of the Work in its electronic version to the Internet;
2.6. dissemination of electronic versions of the Work in its electronic version online, in a collective work or independently;
2.7. making the Work in the electronic version available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, in particular by making it accessible via the Internet, Intranet, Extranet;
2.8. making the Work available according to appropriate license pattern CC BY-NC 4.0 as well as another language version of this license or any later version published by Creative Commons.
3. The Author grants the Publisher permission to reproduce a single copy (print or download) and royalty-free use and disposal of rights to compilations of the Work and these compilations.
4. The Author grants the Publisher permission to send metadata files related to the Work, including to commercial and non-commercial journal-indexing databases.
5. The Author represents that, on the basis of the license granted in the present Agreement, the Publisher is entitled and obliged to:
5.1. allow third parties to obtain further licenses (sublicenses) to the Work and to other materials, including derivatives thereof or compilations made, based on or including the Work, whereas the provisions of such sub-licenses will be the same as with the Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) Creative Commons sub-license or another language version of this license, or any later version of this license published by Creative Commons;
5.2. make the Work available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, without any technological constraints;
5.3. appropriately inform members of the public to whom the Work is to be made available about sublicenses in such a way as to ensure that all parties are properly informed (appropriate informing messages).
6. Because of the royalty-free provision of services of the Author (resulting from the scope of obligations stipulated in the present Agreement), the Author shall not be entitled to any author’s fee due and payable on the part of the Publisher (no fee or royalty is payable by the Publisher to the Author).
7.1. In the case of third party claims or actions for indemnity against the Publisher owing to any infractions related to any form of infringement of intellectual property rights protection, including copyright infringements, the Author is obliged to take all possible measures necessary to protect against these claims and, when as a result of legal action, the Publisher, or any third party licensed by the Publisher to use the Work, will have to abandon using the Work in its entirety or in part or, following a court ruling in a legal challenge, to pay damages to a third party, whatever the legal basis
7.2. The Author will immediately inform the Publisher about any damage claims related to intellectual property infringements, including the author’s proprietary rights pertaining to a copyrighted work, filed against the Author. of liability, the Author is obliged to redress the damage resulting from claims made by third party, including costs and expenditures incurred in the process.
7.3. To all matters not settled herein provisions of the Polish Civil Code and the Polish Copyright and Related Rights Act shall apply.
- Andersson, Gunnar, Ann-Zofie Duvander, & Karsten Hank. 2004. “Do Child-Care Characteristics Influence Continued Child Bearing in Sweden? An Investigation of the Quantity, Quality, and Price Dimension.” Journal of European Social Policy 14(4):407–18. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0958928704046881.
- Ayres, Lioness. 2008. “Thematic Coding and Analysis.” Pp. 867–68 in The SAGE Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research Methods, edited by L. M. Given. Los Angeles, Calif: Sage Publications.
- Benaquisto, Lucia. 2008. “Code and Coding.” Pp. 85–88 in The SAGE Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research Methods, edited by L. M. Given. Los Angeles, Calif: Sage Publications.
- Billingsley, Sunnee & Tommy Ferrarini. 2014. “Family Policy and Fertility Intentions in 21 European Countries: Family Policy and Fertility Intentions.” Journal of Marriage and Family 76(2):428–45. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12097.
- Duvander, Ann-Zofie & Gunnar Andersson. 2006. “Gender Equality and Fertility in Sweden.” Marriage & Family Review 39(1–2):121–42. doi: https://doi.org/10.1300/J002v39n01_07.
- European Commission. 2002. “Presidency Conclusions.” Barcelona European Council.
- European Commission. 2013. Barcelona Objectives: The Development of Childcare Facilities for Young Children in Europe with a View to Sustainable and Inclusive Growth. Luxembourg: European Union.
- Florek, Ludwik. 2015. “Ewolucja Kodeksu Pracy.” Studia Iuridica Lublinensia 24(3):29. doi: https://doi.org/10.17951/sil.2015.24.3.29.
- Graff, Agnieszka. 2014. Matka Feministka. Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Krytyki Politycznej.
- Javornik, Jana & Anna Kurowska. 2017. “Work and Care Opportunities under Different Parental Leave Systems: Gender and Class Inequalities in Northern Europe.” Social Policy & Administration 51(4):617–37. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12316.
- Karwacki, Arkadiusz & Tomasz Szlendak. 2021. “Fulfilled Promise or a Tool of Political Rhetoric? Analysis of the Consequences of the Polish ‘500+ Family’ Program.” Problemy Polityki Społecznej. Studia i Dyskusje 51:75–98. doi: https://doi.org/10.31971/pps/131160.
- Kaufman, Gayle & Anna-Lena Almqvist. 2017. “The Role of Partners and Workplaces in British and Swedish Men’s Parental Leave Decisions.” Men and Masculinities 20(5):533–51. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1097184X17727570.
- Korolczuk, Elżbieta & Renata E. Hryciuk. 2012. „Wstęp pożegnanie z Matką Polką?” Pp. 7–24 in Pożegnanie z Matką Polką? Dyskursy, praktyki i reprezentacje macierzyństwa we współczesnej Polsce, edited by E. Korolczuk & R. E. Hryciuk. Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego.
- Korsvik, Trine Rogg & Marta Warat. 2016. “Framing Leave for Fathers in Norway and Poland: Just a Matter of Gender Equality?” NORA – Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research 24:110–25. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/08038740.2016.1182588.
- Kotowska, Irena, Janina Józwiak, Anna Matysiak, & Anna Baranowska. 2008. “Poland: Fertility Decline as a Response to Profound Societal and Labour Market Changes?” Demographic Research 19:795–854. doi: https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2008.19.22.
- Kurowska, Anna. 2013. „Ocena Zasadności Założeń Reformy Urlopów i Zasiłków Związanych z Opieką Nad Małym Dzieckiem.” Problemy Polityki Społecznej 2(21):155–70.
- Kurowska, Anna. 2018. “(De)Familialization and (De)Genderization – Competing or Complementary Perspectives in Comparative Policy Analysis?” Social Policy & Administration 52(1):29–49. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12272.
- Kurowska, Anna, Bartosz Pieliński, Ryszard Szarfenberg, & Anna Wójtewicz. 2016. Perspektywa gender w polityce społecznej. Toruń: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Mikołaja Kopernika.
- Lappegård, Trude, Marit Rønsen, & Kari Skrede. 2011. “Fatherhood and Fertility.” Fathering: A Journal of Theory, Research, and Practice about Men as Fathers 9(1):103–20. doi: https://doi.org/10.3149/fth.0901.103.
- Lundqvist, Åsa. 2011. Family Policy Paradoxes: Gender Equality and Labour Market Regulation in Sweden, 1930-2010. Bristol: Policy Press.
- Magda, Iga, Michał Brzeziński, Agnieszka Chłoń-Domińczak, Irena Kotowska, Michał Myck, Mateusz Najsztub, & Joanna Tyrowisz. 2019. ‘Rodzina 500+’ – Ocena Programu i Propozycje Zmian. Warsaw: Instytut Badań Strukturalnych.
- Mynarska, Monika. 2011. „Kto Planuje Mieć Dzieci w Polsce Do 2015 Roku?” Studia Demograficzne 159(1):75–98.
- Neyer, Gerda, Trude Lappegård, & Daniele Vignoli. 2013. “Gender Equality and Fertility: Which Equality Matters?” European Journal of Population / Revue Européenne de Démographie 29(3):245–72. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-013-9292-7.
- Pustułka, Paula, Justyna Struzik, & Magdalena Ślusarczyk. 2015. “Caught between breadwinning and emotional provisions—The case of Polish migrant fathers in Norway.” Studia Humanistyczne AGH 14(2): 117. https://doi.org/10.7494/human.2015.14.2.117.
- Ridgeway, Cecilia L. & Shelley J. Correll. 2004. “Unpacking the Gender System a Theoretical Perspective on Gender Beliefs and Social Relations.” Gender & Society 18(4):510–31. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243204265269.
- Rothbauer, Paulette M. 2008. “Triangulation.” Pp. 893–94 in The SAGE Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research Methods, edited by L. M. Given. Los Angeles, Calif: Sage Publications.
- Saxonberg, Steven. 2013. “From Defamilialization to Degenderization: Toward a New Welfare Typology.” Social Policy & Administration 47(1):26–49. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9515.2012.00836.x.
- Saxonberg, Steven. 2014. Gendering Family Policies in Post-Communist Europe: A Historical-Institutional Analysis. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Saxonberg, Steven & Tomáš Sirovátka. 2006. “Failing Family Policy in Post-Communist Central Europe.” Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice 8(2):185–202. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13876980600682089.
- Saxonberg, Steven & Dorota Szelewa. 2007. “The Continuing Legacy of the Communist Legacy? The Development of Family Policies in Poland and the Czech Republic.” Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society 14(3):351–79. doi: 10.1093/sp/jxm014.
- Scambor, Elli, Nadia Bergmann, Katarzyna Wojnicka, Sophia Belghiti-Mahut, Jeff Hearn, Øystein Gullvåg Holter, Marc Gärtner, Majda Hrženjak, Christian Scambor, & Allan White. 2014. “Men and Gender Equality: European Insights.” Men and Masculinities 17(5):552–77. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1097184X14558239.
- Serafin, Katarzyna. 2010. „Prawo Do Urlopu Ojcowskiego w Polskiej Regulacji Prawne.” Zeszyty Prawnicze UKSW (10.1):221–32.
- Statistics Poland. 2016. Budżet Czasu Ludności 2013. Część II [Time Use Survey 2013. Part 2]. Warsaw.
- Statistics Poland. 2018. Structure of Wages and Salaries by Occupations in October 2016. Warszawa: Statistics Poland. Demographic Surveys and Labour Market Department.
- Suwada, Katarzyna. 2017. Men, Fathering and the Gender Trap. Sweden and Poland Compared. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Suwada, Katarzyna. 2021. Parenting and Work in Poland: A Gender Studies Perspective. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
- Szelewa, Dorota. 2017. “From Implicit to Explicit Familialism: Post-1989 Family Policy Reforms in Poland.” Pp. 129–51 in Gender and Family in European Economic Policy. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Szelewa, Dorota & Michal P. Polakowski. 2008. “Who Cares? Changing Patterns of Childcare in Central and Eastern Europe.” Journal of European Social Policy 18(2):115–31. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0958928707087589.