Keywords
pandemic
lockdown
border
twin cities
everyday life
Abstract
Borders’ closure during the COVID-19 pandemic had a particular impact on the everyday life of borderland residents. As part of the research on bordering processes carried out since a few years, during the closure of the state borders in 2020, qualitative interviews on everyday life in the COVID-19 pandemic have been conducted. In this paper, we present the results of the exploratory study on the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on Polish-German border twin cities. We indicate at what levels borders’ closure affected the border landscape, border practices of the inhabitants of the researched territories, and their notion of the border. We also suggest how border relations were shaped due to differences in the management and perception of the pandemic situation in two countries. The results obtained indicate that the closure of borders has made life more difficult in an area under examination and has also affected the identity and specificity of the place. This issue is worth exploring further to establish the true extent of the impact of the pandemic in the borderlands.
Funding
This work was supported by the Polish National Science Centre under Grant UMO-2016/23/G/HS6/04021
References
Asher, Andrew D. “A Paradise on the Oder? ethnicity, europeanization, and the EU referendum in a Polish-German border city.” City & Society 12(1): 127-152.
Asher, Andrew D. 2012. “Inventing a city: cultural citizenship in ‘Słubfurt.’” Social Identities: Journal for the Study of Race, Nation and Culture 8(5): 497-520. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504630.2012.667601
Bahr, Gerald. 2020. “Darum wollen Deutsche wieder sofort nach Polen.” Nordkurier, 11 June, https://www.nordkurier.de/mecklenburg-vorpommern/darum-wollen-deutsche-wieder-sofort-nach-polen-1139660106.html [03 September 2021].
Barthel, Martin. 2020. “Capricious pathways – a comparative analysis of local identity building in border regions. A case study of Polands Western and Eastern border.” Belgeo Revue belge de géographie 2: 1-12. https://doi.org/10.4000/belgeo.38736
Bærenholdt, JO. 2013. “Governmobility: The Powers of Mobility.” Mobilities 8: 20-34. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2012.747754
Berger, Peter L. & Thomas Luckmann. 1966. The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. New York: Penguin Books.
Bilger, Oliver. 2020. “Pendler protestieren an der polnischen Grenze <>.” Der Tagesspiegel, 29 April, https://www.tagesspiegel.de/themen/reportage/pendler-protestieren-an-der-polnischen-grenze-wir-wollen-nicht-dass-unser-leben-in-zwei-stuecke-gerissen-wird/25783824.html [03 September 2021].
Cassidy, Kathryn, Nira Yuval-Davis, and Georgie Wemyss. 2018. “Debordering and everyday (re)bordering in and of Dover: Post-borderland borderscapes.” Political Geography 66: 171-179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2017.04.005
Doevenspeck, Martin. 2011. “Constructing the border from below: Narratives from the Congolese–Rwandan state boundary.” Political Geography 30: 129-142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2011.03.003
Eurofund. 2020. Living, working and Covid-19: First findings, https://www.eurofound.europa.eu/publications/report/2020/living-working-and-covid-19-first-findings-april-2020 [03 September 2021].
Haselsberger, Beatrix. 2014. “Decoding borders. Appreciating border impacts on space and people.” Planning Theory and Practice 15: 505-526. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2014.963652
Irvine, Annie. 2011. “Duration, Dominance and Depth in Telephone and Face-to-Face Interviews: A Comparative Exploration.” International Journal of Qualitative Methods 10(3): 202–220. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940691101000302
Jańczak, Jarosław. 2018. “Symmetries, asymmetries and cross-border cooperation on the German–Polish border. Towards a new model of (de)bordering.” Documents d’Anąlisi Geogrąfica 64(3): 509-527. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/dag.518
Jensen, Anne. 2013. “Mobility Regimes and Borderwork in the European Community.” Mobilities 8: 35-51. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2012.747780
Joennieni, Pertti. 2016. “Others as Selves, Selves as Others: Theorizing City-Twinning.” Journal of Borderlands Studies 32(4): 1-14. https://doi.org10.1080/08865655.2016.1260040
Kaczmarek, Jerzy. 2001. “Euromiasto Gubin-Guben—model zjednoczonej Europy?” Pp. 369-378 in Transgraniczność w perspektywie socjologicznej. Kontynuacje i wyzwania. Zielona Góra: Lubuskie Towarzystwo Naukowe.
Kaczmarek, Jerzy. 2010. “Badania wizualne pogranicza polsko-niemieckiego.” Ruch Prawniczy, Ekonomiczny i Socjologiczny 72: 203-216.
Kurzępa, Jacek. 2007. Socjopatologia pogranicza. Zmiany w życiu społeczności zachodniego pogranicza. Studium socjologiczne. Zielona Góra: Oficyna Wydawnicza Uniwersytetu Zielonogórskiego.
Machaj, Irena. 2005. Społeczno-kulturowe konteksty tożsamości mieszkańców wschodniego i zachodniego pogranicza Polski. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar.
Matthiesen, Ulf. 2015. “Governance Milieus in Shrinking Post-Socialist City Regions—and their Respective Forms of Creativity: Case Miniatures and Conceptual Propositions.” disP – The Planning Review 162(3): 53-61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02513625.2005.10556932
Newman, David. 2006. “Borders and Bordering Towards an Interdisciplinary Dialogue.” European Journal of Social Theory 9(2): 171–186. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431006063331
Opiłowska, Elżbieta. 2014. “The Miracle on the Oder.” East Central Europe 41(2-3): 204-222 https://10.1163/18763308-04103003
Osękowski, Czesław & Hieronim Szczegóła. 1999. Pogranicze polsko-niemieckie w okresie transformacji (1989-1997). Zielona Góra: WSP.
Parker, Noel & Nick Vaughan-Williams. 2009. “Lines in the Sand? Towards an Agenda for Critical Border Studies.” Geopolitics 14: 582–587. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650040903081297
Roose, Jochen & Elżbieta Opiłowska. 2015. “Introduction.” Pp. 7–15 in Microcosm of European Integration: The German-Polish Border Regions in Transformation. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft.
Schroer, Markus. 2009. “Grenzen in Bewegung.” Powision. Magazin am Institut für Politikwissenschaft 1: 64-65.
Schultz, Helga. 2005. “Doppelstädte als Laboratorien der Integration.” Pp. 13-26 in Stadt – Grenze – Fluss. Europäische Doppelstädte. Berlin: Berliner Wissenschafts-Verlag.
Szlachcicowa, Irena. 2019. “Borderscapes – krajobrazy granic jako nowa perspektywa badan.” Politeja 58: 15-29. https://doi.org/10.12797/Politeja.16.2019.58.02
Scuzzarello, Sarah & Catarina Kinnavall. 2013. “Rebordering France and Denmark. Narratives and Practices of Border-Construction in Two European Countries.” Mobilities 8: 90-106. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2012.747775
Sohn, Christophe. 2014a. “Modelling Cross-Border Integration: The Role of Borders as a Resource.” Geopolitics 19: 587-608. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2014.913029
Sohn, Christopne. 2014b. “The Border as a Resource in the Global Urban Space: A Contribution to the Cross-border Metropolis Hypothesis.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 38: 1697-1711. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12071
License
Manuscript authors are responsible for obtaining copyright permissions for any copyrighted materials included within manuscripts. The authors must provide permission letters, when appropriate, to the Society Register Editors.
In addition, all published papers in Society Register are published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 Unported License.
1.1 The Author hereby warrants that he/she is the owner of all the copyright and other intellectual property rights in the Work and that, within the scope of the present Agreement, the paper does not infringe the legal rights of another person. The owner of the copyright work also warrants that he/she is the sole and original creator thereof and that is not bound by any legal constraints in regard to the use or sale of the work.
1.2. The Publisher warrants that is the owner of the PRESSto platform for open access journals, hereinafter referred to as the PRESSto Platform.
2. The Author grants the Publisher non-exclusive and free of charge license to unlimited use worldwide over an unspecified period of time in the following areas of exploitation:
2.1. production of multiple copies of the Work produced according to the specific application of a given technology, including printing, reproduction of graphics through mechanical or electrical means (reprography) and digital technology;
2.2. marketing authorisation, loan or lease of the original or copies thereof;
2.3. public performance, public performance in the broadcast, video screening, media enhancements as well as broadcasting and rebroadcasting, made available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them;
2.4. inclusion of the Work into a collective work (i.e. with a number of contributions);
2.5. inclusion of the Work in the electronic version to be offered on an electronic platform, or any other conceivable introduction of the Work in its electronic version to the Internet;
2.6. dissemination of electronic versions of the Work in its electronic version online, in a collective work or independently;
2.7. making the Work in the electronic version available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, in particular by making it accessible via the Internet, Intranet, Extranet;
2.8. making the Work available according to appropriate license pattern CC BY-NC 4.0 as well as another language version of this license or any later version published by Creative Commons.
3. The Author grants the Publisher permission to reproduce a single copy (print or download) and royalty-free use and disposal of rights to compilations of the Work and these compilations.
4. The Author grants the Publisher permission to send metadata files related to the Work, including to commercial and non-commercial journal-indexing databases.
5. The Author represents that, on the basis of the license granted in the present Agreement, the Publisher is entitled and obliged to:
5.1. allow third parties to obtain further licenses (sublicenses) to the Work and to other materials, including derivatives thereof or compilations made, based on or including the Work, whereas the provisions of such sub-licenses will be the same as with the Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) Creative Commons sub-license or another language version of this license, or any later version of this license published by Creative Commons;
5.2. make the Work available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, without any technological constraints;
5.3. appropriately inform members of the public to whom the Work is to be made available about sublicenses in such a way as to ensure that all parties are properly informed (appropriate informing messages).
6. Because of the royalty-free provision of services of the Author (resulting from the scope of obligations stipulated in the present Agreement), the Author shall not be entitled to any author’s fee due and payable on the part of the Publisher (no fee or royalty is payable by the Publisher to the Author).
7.1. In the case of third party claims or actions for indemnity against the Publisher owing to any infractions related to any form of infringement of intellectual property rights protection, including copyright infringements, the Author is obliged to take all possible measures necessary to protect against these claims and, when as a result of legal action, the Publisher, or any third party licensed by the Publisher to use the Work, will have to abandon using the Work in its entirety or in part or, following a court ruling in a legal challenge, to pay damages to a third party, whatever the legal basis
7.2. The Author will immediately inform the Publisher about any damage claims related to intellectual property infringements, including the author’s proprietary rights pertaining to a copyrighted work, filed against the Author. of liability, the Author is obliged to redress the damage resulting from claims made by third party, including costs and expenditures incurred in the process.
7.3. To all matters not settled herein provisions of the Polish Civil Code and the Polish Copyright and Related Rights Act shall apply.