Keywords
Ukraine
war
political decision-making
authoritarianism
cleptocracy
Western militant democracy
Abstract
The paper aims to determine the extent of the rationality of Vladimir Putin’s decision to begin a war with Ukraine. Its central argument is that this decision was irrational on three levels. Firstly, the Russian decision-making elites failed to foresee the ability of the Ukrainian army and people to resist efficiently. It might have resulted from the imperial superiority syndrome reinforced by the experiences of 2014. Secondly, the elites treated the reports on the Russian army’s combat readiness as reliable and did not make an effort to verify them. Probably no one can determine the scale of the kleptocracy, and therefore no one has reliable data on the quality of the Russian army’s combat preparation. Thirdly, the elites failed to envisage the scale of support for Ukraine from Western democracies. What is more, they did not take into account the democratic rationality of Western politicians. The same politicians who appeared to Putin to be weak and incapable of action, immediately after the mass social protests and condemnation of Russia’s aggression by public opinion, acted following the clearly expressed will of the political nation. The article reflects on the systemic reasons for such a poor definition of the decision-making situation and then tries to formulate the general relationship between the quality of the decision-making elite and the acceleration of the bifurcation processes of the Russian autocratic regime.
References
Allison, R. (2014). Russian ‘Deniable’ Intervention in Ukraine: How and Why Russia Broke the Rules. International Affairs, 90(6), 1255–1297.
Apnews (2019). Putin: Russians, Ukrainians Are ‘One People’. Retrieved from https://apnews.com/article/entertainment-oliver-stone-europe-russia-ukraine-3fe3ff2299994fae97825381765b831c
Baker, P., & Glasser, S. (2005). Kremlin Rising: Vladimir Putin's Russia and the End of Revolution. Washington, D.C.: Potomac Books, Inc.
Bäcker, R. (2007). Rosyjskie myślenie polityczne za czasów prezydenta Putina. Toruń: Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek.
Beliakova, P., & Perlo-Freeman, S. (2018). Corruption in the Russian Defense Sector. Somerville, Massachusetts: World Peace Foundation.
Bowles, C. (1958). The Power of Public Opinion. Naval War College Review, 10(7), 1–24.
Bukkvoll, T. (2008). Their Hands in the Till: Scale and Causes of Russian Military Corruption. Armed Forces & Society, 34(2), 259–275. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095327X06294622
Canetti, E. (1984). Crowds and Power. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
CIA (2022). Factbook: Ukraine. Retrieved from https://www.cia.gov/the-world-factbook/countries/ukraine/#economy
Cimbala, S. J. (2017). Putin and Russia in Retro and Forward: The Nuclear Dimension. Defense & Security Analysis, 33(1), 57–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/14751798.2017.1289636
Cohen, A., & Hamilton, R. E. (2011). The Russian Military and the Georgia War: Lessons and Implications. Carlisle Barracks, Pennsylvania: Strategic Studies Institute.
Davidson, H., & Yuhas, A. (2014). Malaysia Airlines Plane MH17 ‘Shot Down’ in Ukraine—as it Happened. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/jul/17/malaysia-airlines-plane-crashes-ukraine-live
Dawisha, K. (2015). Putin’s Kleptocracy: Who Owns Russia? New York: Simon & Schuster.
Dunn, E. C., & Bobick, M. S. (2014). The Empire Strikes Back: War Without War and Occupation Without Occupation in the Russian Sphere of Influence. American Ethnologist, 41(3), 405–413. https://doi.org/10.1111/amet.12086
Fomin, I. (2022). Sixty Shades of Statism: Mapping the Ideological Divergences in Russian Elite Discourse. Demokratizatsiya: The Journal of Post-Soviet Democratization, 30(3), 305–332.
Freedman, L. (2014). Ukraine and the Art of Limited War. Survival, 56(6), 7–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/00396338.2014.985432
Fuller, W. C. (2014). Civil-Military Conflict in Imperial Russia, 1881-1914. New York: Princeton University Press.
Glad, B. (2002). Why Tyrants Go Too Far: Malignant Narcissism and Absolute Power. Political Psychology, 23(1), 1–37.
Henderson, J. (2011). The Constitution of the Russian Federation: A Contextual Analysis. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
Hoffman, D. E. (2011). The Oligarchs: Wealth and Power in the New Russia. New York: Hachette.
Johannesson, J., & Clowes, D. (2022). Energy Resources and Markets—Perspectives on the Russia–Ukraine War. European Review, 30(1), 4–23. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1062798720001040
Kalinin, K. (2016). The Social Desirability Bias in Autocrat’s Electoral Ratings: Evidence from the 2012 Russian Presidential Elections. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 26(2), 191–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/17457289.2016.1150284
Laurinavičius, M. (2016). Putin’s Russia: The Nature and Contradictions of the Regime. Lithuanian Annual Strategic Review, 14(1), 119–138.
Ledeneva, A. V. (2013). Can Russia Modernize?: Sistema, Power Networks and Informal Governance. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Maher, D., & Pieper, M. (2021). Russian Intervention in Syria: Exploring the Nexus between Regime Consolidation and Energy Transnationalisation. Political Studies, 69(4), 944–964. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321720934637
Mărcău, F.-C. (2022). War in Ukraine. A New Iron Curtain? Research and Science Today, 1, 9–10.
Motyl, A. J. (2016). Putin’s Russia as a Fascist Political System. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 49(1), 25–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postcomstud.2016.01.002
Nisbet, E. C., & Kamenchuk, O. (2021). Russian News Media, Digital Media, Informational Learned Helplessness, and Belief in COVID-19 Misinformation. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 33(3), 571–590. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edab011
Rak, J., & Bäcker, R. (2020). Theory behind Russian Quest for Totalitarianism. Analysis of Discursive Swing in Putin’s Speeches. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 53(1), 13–26. https://doi.org/10.1525/cpcs.2020.53.1.13
Roxburgh, A. (2021). The Strongman: Vladimir Putin and the Struggle for Russia. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
Scislowska, M., & Niedzielski, R. (2022). Ukrainians Return from Abroad to Fight Russian Invasion. Retrieved from https://apnews.com/article/russia-ukraine-europe-poland-migration-8de0893dfcf7db46e6a6acf9911104a4
Sherlock, T. (2016). Russian Politics and the Soviet Past: Reassessing Stalin and Stalinism under Vladimir Putin. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 49(1), 45–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postcomstud.2016.01.001
Shiraev, E., & Zubok, V. (2000). Anti-Americanism in Russia: From Stalin to Putin. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Shlapentokh, V. (2003). Russia’s Acquiescence to Corruption Makes the State Machine Inept. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 36(2), 151–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0967-067X(03)00023-0
Sikora, J. J. (1959). The ‘Problem’ of Induction. The Thomist: A Speculative Quarterly Review, 22(1), 25–36. https://doi.org/10.1353/tho.1959.0001
The Diplomat (2022). Rajeswari Pillai Rajagopalan, Putin and Xi Frame a New China-Russia Partnership Pressure that Both Sides Face from the United States and the West Gives Their Partnership New Depth. Retrieved from https://thediplomat.com/2022/02/putin-and-xi-frame-a-new-china-russia-partnership/
The Kremlin (2021). Vladimir Putin Spent Several Days on Vacation in the Siberian Federal District. Retrieved from http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/66762
Tsygankov, A. P. (2018). The Sources of Russia’s Fear of NATO. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 51(2), 101–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postcomstud.2018.04.002
Van Herpen, M. (2013). Putinism: The Slow Rise of a Radical Right Regime in Russia. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Weiss, M. (2013). Corruption and Cover-Up in the Kremlin: The Anatoly Serdyukov Case. Retrieved from https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2013/01/corruption-and-cover-up-in-the-kremlin-the-anatoly-serdyukov-case/272622/
Weiss, M. (2011). Man on a Mission: Bill Browder vs. the Kremlin. World Affairs, 174(5), 53–68.
Westerlund, F., & Norberg, J. (2016). Military Means for Non-military Measures: The Russian Approach to the Use of Armed Force as Seen in Ukraine. The Journal of Slavic Military Studies, 29(4), 576–601. https://doi.org/10.1080/13518046.2016.1232560
Wright, R. (2022). Russia and China Unveil a Pact Against America and the West. World Affairs https://www.newyorker.com/news/daily-comment/russia-and-china-unveil-a-pact-against-america-and-the-west
Zhavoronkov, S. (2013). The Political and Economic Results of December 2012. Russian Economic Developments, 1, 7–11.
License
Manuscript authors are responsible for obtaining copyright permissions for any copyrighted materials included within manuscripts. The authors must provide permission letters, when appropriate, to the Society Register Editors.
In addition, all published papers in Society Register are published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 Unported License.
1.1 The Author hereby warrants that he/she is the owner of all the copyright and other intellectual property rights in the Work and that, within the scope of the present Agreement, the paper does not infringe the legal rights of another person. The owner of the copyright work also warrants that he/she is the sole and original creator thereof and that is not bound by any legal constraints in regard to the use or sale of the work.
1.2. The Publisher warrants that is the owner of the PRESSto platform for open access journals, hereinafter referred to as the PRESSto Platform.
2. The Author grants the Publisher non-exclusive and free of charge license to unlimited use worldwide over an unspecified period of time in the following areas of exploitation:
2.1. production of multiple copies of the Work produced according to the specific application of a given technology, including printing, reproduction of graphics through mechanical or electrical means (reprography) and digital technology;
2.2. marketing authorisation, loan or lease of the original or copies thereof;
2.3. public performance, public performance in the broadcast, video screening, media enhancements as well as broadcasting and rebroadcasting, made available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them;
2.4. inclusion of the Work into a collective work (i.e. with a number of contributions);
2.5. inclusion of the Work in the electronic version to be offered on an electronic platform, or any other conceivable introduction of the Work in its electronic version to the Internet;
2.6. dissemination of electronic versions of the Work in its electronic version online, in a collective work or independently;
2.7. making the Work in the electronic version available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, in particular by making it accessible via the Internet, Intranet, Extranet;
2.8. making the Work available according to appropriate license pattern CC BY-NC 4.0 as well as another language version of this license or any later version published by Creative Commons.
3. The Author grants the Publisher permission to reproduce a single copy (print or download) and royalty-free use and disposal of rights to compilations of the Work and these compilations.
4. The Author grants the Publisher permission to send metadata files related to the Work, including to commercial and non-commercial journal-indexing databases.
5. The Author represents that, on the basis of the license granted in the present Agreement, the Publisher is entitled and obliged to:
5.1. allow third parties to obtain further licenses (sublicenses) to the Work and to other materials, including derivatives thereof or compilations made, based on or including the Work, whereas the provisions of such sub-licenses will be the same as with the Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) Creative Commons sub-license or another language version of this license, or any later version of this license published by Creative Commons;
5.2. make the Work available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, without any technological constraints;
5.3. appropriately inform members of the public to whom the Work is to be made available about sublicenses in such a way as to ensure that all parties are properly informed (appropriate informing messages).
6. Because of the royalty-free provision of services of the Author (resulting from the scope of obligations stipulated in the present Agreement), the Author shall not be entitled to any author’s fee due and payable on the part of the Publisher (no fee or royalty is payable by the Publisher to the Author).
7.1. In the case of third party claims or actions for indemnity against the Publisher owing to any infractions related to any form of infringement of intellectual property rights protection, including copyright infringements, the Author is obliged to take all possible measures necessary to protect against these claims and, when as a result of legal action, the Publisher, or any third party licensed by the Publisher to use the Work, will have to abandon using the Work in its entirety or in part or, following a court ruling in a legal challenge, to pay damages to a third party, whatever the legal basis
7.2. The Author will immediately inform the Publisher about any damage claims related to intellectual property infringements, including the author’s proprietary rights pertaining to a copyrighted work, filed against the Author. of liability, the Author is obliged to redress the damage resulting from claims made by third party, including costs and expenditures incurred in the process.
7.3. To all matters not settled herein provisions of the Polish Civil Code and the Polish Copyright and Related Rights Act shall apply.