Keywords
public survey
services
Culture
public funds
emergency
COVID-19
Abstract
Most studies on the management of COVID-19 have analyzed the issue from the perspective of the central government, while only a small portion have focused on local institutions, especially in countries such as Italy that are characterized by a multilevel governance system. Our study focuses on Peccioli, which is a municipality of under 5,000 inhabitants in Tuscany. We will investigate the citizens’ perceptions of the various actions that were put in place by the local government of Peccioli to manage the emergency. We aim to understand the ranking of the priorities that municipalities are required to accomplish for their citizens. A survey of a representative sample of the local population has found that citizens’ evaluations of municipal initiatives are overall positive, but that culture (defined here as cultural initiatives and events) and funding (and culture before funding) are considered to be more important than services. In particular, cultural events played an important role in the citizens’ perceptions because they strengthened community resilience during the emergency. This result can inform public administrators, who in times of crisis tend to make the first investment cuts in culture. This study underscores the importance of understanding how to effectively reach all citizens.
References
Alfano, V., & Ercolano, S. (2022). Stay at Home! Governance Quality and Effectiveness of Lockdown. Social Indicators Research, 159: 101-1233. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-021-02742-3
Arboretti Giancristofaro, R., Bonnini, S., & Salmaso, L. (2007). A performance indicator for multivariate data. Quaderni di statistica, 9: 1–29.
Boase J., & Humphreys, L. (2018). Mobile methods: Explorations, innovations, and reflections. Mobile Media and Communication, 6(2): 153–162. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157918764215
Bowyer, B.T., & Rogowski, J.C., (2017). Mode Matters: Evaluating Response Comparability in a Mixed-Mode Survey. Political Science Research and Methods, 5(2): 295–313. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2015.28
Carlini, R. (2020, January 21). Fabrizio Barca: “Un nuovo patto europeo contro le disuguaglianze”. La Repubblica. https://www. repubblica.it/dossier/esteri/fondi-strutturali-europei-progetti-italia/2020/01/21/news/ fabrizio_barca_un_nuovo_patto_europeo_contro_le_diseguaglianze_-246310744/
Castriota, S., Delmastro, M., & Tonin, M. (2020). National or Local? The Demand for News in Italy during COVID-19, CESifo Working Papers (No. 8699). https://www.cesifo.org/en/publikationen/2020/working-paper/national-or-local-demand-news-italy-during-covid-19 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3733273
Djalante, R., Shaw, R., DeWit, A. (2020). Building resilience against biological hazards and pandemics: COVID-19 and its implications for the Sendai Framework. Progress in Disaster Science, 6: 1–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdisas.2020.100080
ESPON 1.4.1. (2006). The Role of Small and Medium-Sized Towns (SMESTO). Final Report. https://www.espon.eu/sites/default/files/attachments/fr-1.4.1_revised-full.pdf
Gollust, S.E., Nagler, R.H., & Fowler, E.F. (2020). The Emergence of COVID-19 in the U.S.: A Public Health and Political Communication Crisis. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 45(6): 967–981. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/03616878-8641506
Gupta, S., Nguyen, T.D., Lozano Rojas, F., Raman, S., Lee, B., Bento, A., Simon, K.I., & Wing, C. (2020). Tracking Public and Private Responses to the COVID-19 Epidemic: Evidence from State and Local Government Actions, NBER Working Papers (No. 27027). DOI: https://doi.org/10.3386/w27027
Hendra, R., & Hill, A., (2019). Rethinking Response Rates: New Evidence of Little Relationship Between Survey Response Rates and Nonresponse Bias. Evaluation Review, 43(5): 307–330. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0193841X18807719
Lovari, A. (2020). Spreading (Dis)trust: COVID-19 misinformation and government intervention in Italy. Media and Communication, 8(2): 458–461. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v8i2.3219
Klausch, T., Schouten, B., & Hox, J.J. (2017). Evaluating Bias of Sequential Mixed-mode Designs Against Benchmark Surveys. Sociological Methods & Research, 46(3): 456–489. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124115585362
Malandrino, A., & Demichelis, E. (2020). Conflict in decision making and variation in public administration outcomes in Italy during the COVID-19 crisis. European Policy Analysis, 6: 138–146. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/epa2.1093
Mandato, M. (2020). Il rapporto Stato-Regioni nella gestione del COVID-19. Nomos: Le attualità del diritto, 1: 1–8. http://www.nomos-leattualitaneldiritto.it/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/COVID-19_rapporto-Stato-Regioni_Mandato.pdf
Mori, E., Barabaschi, B., Cantoni, F., & Virtuani, R. (2020). ‘Local governments’ communication through Facebook. Evidences from COVID-19 pandemic in Italy. Journal of Public Affairs, 21(4): e2551. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.2551
Nardo, M., Saisana, M., Saltelli, A., & Tarantola, S. (2005). Tools for composite indicators building, European Comission, Ispra. https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC31473
OECD-JRC (2008). Handbook on constructing composite indicators: Methodology and user guide. Paris: OECD.
OECD (2021). The state of school education. One year into the COVID pandemic. Preliminary results, March 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/201dde84-en
Ozerdem, A. (2003). Disaster as manifestation of unresolved development challenges: The Marmara earthquake, Turkey. In M. Pelling (ed.), Natural disasters and development in a globalizing world (pp. 199–213). Routledge.
Pisano, G.P, Sadun, R., & Zanini, M. (2020, March 27). Lessons from Italy’s Response to Coronavirus. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2020/03/lessons-from-italys-response-to-coronavirus
Pyles, L. (2007). Community organizing for post-disaster social development: Locating social work. International Social Work, 50(3): 321–333. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0020872807076044
Ren, X. (2020). Pandemic and lockdown: a territorial approach to COVID-19 in China, Italy and the United States. Eurasian Geography and Economics, 61(4-5): 423–434. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15387216.2020.1762103
Ruiu, M.L. (2020). Mismanagement of COVID-19: lessons learned from Italy. Journal of Risk Research, 23(7-8): 1007–1020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2020.1758755
Saisana, M., & Tarantola, S. (2002). State-of-the-art report on current methodologies and practices for composite indicator development (Vol. 214). Ispra: European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Institute for the Protection and the Security of the Citizen, Technological and Economic Risk Management Unit. https://op.europa.eu/s/vhoP
Sanfelici, M. (2020). The Italian Response to the COVID-19 Crisis: Lessons Learned and Future Direction in Social Development. The Journal of Community and Social Development, 2(2): 191–210. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2516602620936037
Smith, A. (2021). The comparison of local government leadership during the COVID-19 pandemic. Case study: New Zealand, Italy and China. Psychology and Education Journal, 58(2): 10646–10650.
Trimarchi, M. (2021). Dall’emergenza epidemiologica due indicazioni per la riforma dell’autonomia comunale. P.A. Persona e Amministrazione, 2.
United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction (UNISDR) (2015). Sendai Framework for disaster risk reduction 2015–2020. https://www.preventionweb.net/files/43291_spanishsendaiframeworkfordisasterri.pdf
Van Bavel, J.J., Baicker, K., Boggio, P.S. et al. (2020). Using Social and Behavioural Science to Support COVID-19 Pandemic Response. Nature Human Behaviour, 4: 460–471. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-0884-z
van Zyl, L.E. (2021). Social Study Resources and Social Wellbeing Before and During the Intelligent COVID‑19 Lockdown in The Netherlands. Social Indicators Research, 157: 393–415. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-021-02654-2
Wolf, C., Joye, D., Smith, T.W., & Fu, Y. (2016). The SAGE Handbook of Survey Methodology. Sage. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473957893
World Health Organization. (2019). Health emergency and disaster risk management framework. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/326106/9789241516181-eng.pdf?ua=1
Wu, C. (2021). Social capital and COVID-19: a multidimensional and multilevel approach. Chinese Sociological Review, 53(1), 27-54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/21620555.2020.1814139
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Laura Pagani, Leopoldina Fortunati, Manuela Farinosi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Manuscript authors are responsible for obtaining copyright permissions for any copyrighted materials included within manuscripts. The authors must provide permission letters, when appropriate, to the Society Register Editors.
In addition, all published papers in Society Register are published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 Unported License.
1.1 The Author hereby warrants that he/she is the owner of all the copyright and other intellectual property rights in the Work and that, within the scope of the present Agreement, the paper does not infringe the legal rights of another person. The owner of the copyright work also warrants that he/she is the sole and original creator thereof and that is not bound by any legal constraints in regard to the use or sale of the work.
1.2. The Publisher warrants that is the owner of the PRESSto platform for open access journals, hereinafter referred to as the PRESSto Platform.
2. The Author grants the Publisher non-exclusive and free of charge license to unlimited use worldwide over an unspecified period of time in the following areas of exploitation:
2.1. production of multiple copies of the Work produced according to the specific application of a given technology, including printing, reproduction of graphics through mechanical or electrical means (reprography) and digital technology;
2.2. marketing authorisation, loan or lease of the original or copies thereof;
2.3. public performance, public performance in the broadcast, video screening, media enhancements as well as broadcasting and rebroadcasting, made available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them;
2.4. inclusion of the Work into a collective work (i.e. with a number of contributions);
2.5. inclusion of the Work in the electronic version to be offered on an electronic platform, or any other conceivable introduction of the Work in its electronic version to the Internet;
2.6. dissemination of electronic versions of the Work in its electronic version online, in a collective work or independently;
2.7. making the Work in the electronic version available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, in particular by making it accessible via the Internet, Intranet, Extranet;
2.8. making the Work available according to appropriate license pattern CC BY-NC 4.0 as well as another language version of this license or any later version published by Creative Commons.
3. The Author grants the Publisher permission to reproduce a single copy (print or download) and royalty-free use and disposal of rights to compilations of the Work and these compilations.
4. The Author grants the Publisher permission to send metadata files related to the Work, including to commercial and non-commercial journal-indexing databases.
5. The Author represents that, on the basis of the license granted in the present Agreement, the Publisher is entitled and obliged to:
5.1. allow third parties to obtain further licenses (sublicenses) to the Work and to other materials, including derivatives thereof or compilations made, based on or including the Work, whereas the provisions of such sub-licenses will be the same as with the Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) Creative Commons sub-license or another language version of this license, or any later version of this license published by Creative Commons;
5.2. make the Work available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, without any technological constraints;
5.3. appropriately inform members of the public to whom the Work is to be made available about sublicenses in such a way as to ensure that all parties are properly informed (appropriate informing messages).
6. Because of the royalty-free provision of services of the Author (resulting from the scope of obligations stipulated in the present Agreement), the Author shall not be entitled to any author’s fee due and payable on the part of the Publisher (no fee or royalty is payable by the Publisher to the Author).
7.1. In the case of third party claims or actions for indemnity against the Publisher owing to any infractions related to any form of infringement of intellectual property rights protection, including copyright infringements, the Author is obliged to take all possible measures necessary to protect against these claims and, when as a result of legal action, the Publisher, or any third party licensed by the Publisher to use the Work, will have to abandon using the Work in its entirety or in part or, following a court ruling in a legal challenge, to pay damages to a third party, whatever the legal basis
7.2. The Author will immediately inform the Publisher about any damage claims related to intellectual property infringements, including the author’s proprietary rights pertaining to a copyrighted work, filed against the Author. of liability, the Author is obliged to redress the damage resulting from claims made by third party, including costs and expenditures incurred in the process.
7.3. To all matters not settled herein provisions of the Polish Civil Code and the Polish Copyright and Related Rights Act shall apply.