Keywords
right to the city
urban space
NGOs
autocratic government
Abstract
Due to rapid urbanization and the influence of neoliberal development policies, slum dwellers frequently encounter marginalization, inadequate living conditions, limited access to urban resources and spaces, and limited political representation throughout the world. Bangladesh is not an exception. This study investigates the right to appropriate and political participation of the urban poor in Bangladesh within the context of neoliberal development. In addition, the study critically evaluates the role of the state and various non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and civil society organizations in mobilizing the urban poor in Bangladesh. The study, therefore, implements a mixed-methods approach, including surveys, interviews, and community consultations, to obtain answers to these questions from two slums in Dhaka, Bangladesh, named Sattola and Pallabi. The findings show that the urban poor in these informal settlements confront significant challenges in claiming urban spaces due to local legislation, regulations, and development plans. As a result, they must negotiate with various formal and informal stakeholders to exercise their rights over urban spaces. The study also emphasizes that the urban poor face social and institutional barriers that limit their ability to participate effectively in decision-making, such as exclusion from formal political processes, limited access to information, and a lack of awareness of their rights. These difficulties exacerbate their marginalization from conventional urban development planning. Furthermore, the study demonstrates that due to the authoritarian state’s control over them, NGOs and other civil society organizations cannot assist the urban poor in mobilizing their right to the city. As a result, this study underlines the importance of a democratic government in Bangladesh for recognizing and defending the rights of the urban poor. Additionally, it emphasizes the importance of policy reforms and partnerships among government institutions, civil society organizations, and international actors to achieve inclusive and sustainable urban development that prioritizes the rights and well-being of the urban poor.
References
Adler, D. (2015, June 15). Do We Have a Right to the City? Jacobin.
Arefin, S. (2018). The real estate and capital accumulation: An inquiry into Harvey’s model in Dhaka. Peoples’ Preface, 2(2), 153-165.
Arefin, S., & Rashid, T. (2021). The Urban Poor in Dhaka: Perspectives on the Right to The City. Journal of Urban and Regional Analysis, 13(1), 145-161. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37043/JURA.2021.13.1.9
Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A Ladder of Citizen Participation. Journal of the American Planning Association, 35(4), 216-24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01944366908977225
Banks, N. (2008, September 26). A tale of two ward: Political participation and the urban poor in Shaka city. Environment and Urbanization, 361-376. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0956247808096116
Bernal, V. & Grewal, I. (2014). The NGO Form: Feminist Struggles, States and Neoliberalism. In V. Bernal & I. Grewal (Eds.), Theorizing NGOs: States, Feminisms, and Neoliberalism (pp. 1-18). Durham: Duke University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv11688xv.4
Begum, S., & Sen, B. (2005). Pulling rickshaws in the city of Dhaka: A way out of poverty? Environment and Urbanization, 17(2), 11-25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/095624780501700202
Castells, M. (1977). The Urban Question: A Marxist Approach. London: Edward Arnold.
Colau, A. (2016, October 20). After Habitat III: for the right to the city to become real, we need concrete policies. American Planning Association (APA).
Crețan R., & O’brien T. (2020), Corruption and conflagration: (in)justice and protest in Bucharest after the Colectiv fire. Urban Geography, 41(3), 368-388. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2019.1664252
CitiesAlliance (September 10, 2009). Climate migration drives slum growth in Dhaka, Retrived from https://www.citiesalliance.org/newsroom/news/urban-news/climate-migration-drives-slum-growthdhaka#:~:text=Friedman%20notes%20that%20some%20500%2C000,entire%20population%20of%20Washington%2C%20DC
Davis, M. (2004). The Urbanization of empire: megacities and the laws of chaos. Social Text, 81(4), 9-15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/01642472-22-4_81-9
Dawn, P. (2016). Tenant Organizing for the Right to The City. 388 Atlantic Avenue: Right To The City Alliance. Retrieved from http://righttothecity.org/tenant-organizing-for-the-right-to-the-city/
DemocracyWatch. (2002). An Assessment on the Uprooted Slum Dwellers of Dhaka City. Ramna, Dhaka: Research And Social Survey Unit (RASSU) Democracywatch. Retrieved from www.dwatch-bd.org/rassu1/reports/slum.doc
DhakaTribune. (2014, November 18). Study: Half the urban population in Bangladesh slum dwellers. Retrieved from http://archive.dhakatribune.com/bangladesh/2014/nov/18/study-half-urban-population-bangladesh-slum-dwellers
Easterly, W. (2005). What Did Structural Adjustment Adjust? The Association of Policies and Growth with Repeated IMF and World Bank Adjustment Loans. Journal of Development Economics, 76, 1-22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3878(04)00087-2
Evans, P. (1979). Dependent Development: The Alliance of Multinational, State, and Local Capital in Brazil. Princeton: Princeton University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691186801
Elizabeth, M., & Arnoldo, G. (1996). What is Neoliberalism? Intercontinental Encounter for Humanity and against Neoliberalism. La Realidad, Chiapas. Retrieved from http://www.corpwatch.org/article.php?id=376
Ferguson, J. (2009). The Uses of Neoliberalism. Antipode, 41, 166-184. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8330.2009.00721.x
Friedman, J. (1995). The Right to the CIty. Society and Nature, 1, 71-84.
Gray, J. (2010, January 7). The Neoliberal State. NewStatesmen. Retrieved from http://www.newstatesman.com/non-fiction/2010/01/neoliberal-state-market-social
Han, B.-C. (2015, November 03). Why Revolution is no Longer Possible. Development & Society, 1-6. Retrieved from https://ourworld.unu.edu/en/why-revolution-is-no-longer-possible
Haque, K. (2012, July). The Political Economy of Urban Space: Land and Real Estate in Dhaka City. Institute of Governance Studies. BRAC University.
Harvey, D. (1973). Social Justice and The City. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Harvey, D. (2000). Spaces of Hope. Berkely: University of California Press.
Harvey, D. (2006). Spaces of Global Capitalism: Towards a Theory of Uneven Geographical Development. New York: Verso.
Harvey, D. (2008, September October). The Right to the City. New Left Review, 53, 23-40.
Harvey, D. (2011). The Enigma of Capital and Crises of Capitalism (First South Asian Edition ed.). London: Profile Book.
Harvey, D. (2012). Rebel Cities: From the Right to the City to the Urban Revolution. London, New York: Verso. Retrieved from http://abahlali.org/files/Harvey_Rebel_cities.pdf
Harvey, D. (2016, July 23). Neoliberalism Is a Political Project. Retrieved from https://www.jacobinmag.com/2016/07/david-harvey-neoliberalism-capitalism-labor-crisis-resistance/
Holston, J. (2008). Insurgent Citizenship: Disjunctions of Democracy and Modernity in Brazil. Princeton: NJ: Princeton University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400832781
Hossain, S. (2007). Poverty and Vulnerability in urban Bangladesh: the case of slum communities in Dhaka City. International Journal of Development Issues, 6(1), 50-62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/14468950710830554
Hossain, S. (2011). Urban Poverty in Bangladesh: Slum Communities, Migration and Social Integration. London: IB Tauris. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9780755692651
Hossain, S. (2013). Migration, Urbanization and Poverty in Dhaka, Bangladesh. Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bangladesh (Hum.), 58(2), 369-382.
Hossain, S. (2016, July 2). Urban development in Bangladesh pushes millions to the edge. Asian Currents, 1-4. Retrieved from http//asaa.asn/urban-development-in-bangladesh-pushes-millions-to-the-edge/
Human Rights Watch (December 10, 2020). International Community: Stand against Authoritarian Rule in Bangladesh. Retrived from https://www.hrw.org/news/2020/12/10/international-community-stand-against-authoritarian-rule-bangladesh
Humphrey, M. (2013). Violence and Urban Governance in Neoliberal Cities in Latin America. People and the Planet 2013 Conference: Transforming the Future (pp. 1-19). Melbourne: Global Cities Research Institute, RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia. Retrieved from http//global-cities.info/news-events/conferences-forums/conferences-proceedings
IOM. (2011). Glossary on Migration. Retrieved from http://www.iom.int/key-migration-terms
Ishtiaque, A., & Mahmud, M. S. (2011). Migration objectives and their fulfillment: A micro study of the rural-urban migrants of the slums of Dhaka city. Geografia: Malaysian Journal of Society and Space, 7(4), 24-29.
Islam, N., & Nazem, N. I. (Ausugt, 2009). Slums of Dhaka City. The Daily Star.
Islam, N. (2013). Overview of Urbanization in Bangladesh. Dhaka: Habitat for Humanity Bangladesh.
Junior, O. A. (2014). Urban Common space, heterotopia and the right to the city: Reflections on the ideas of Henri Lefebvre and David Harvey. Brazilian Journal of Urban Management, 6(2), 146-147. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7213/urbe.06.002.SE02
Kabeer, N; Mahmud, S, Isaza J. G. (2012), NGOs and the Political Empowerment of Poor People in Rural Bangladesh: Cultivating the Habits of Democracy?, World Development, Volume 40, Issue 10, 2012, Pages 2044-2062. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2012.05.011
Khan, S. H. (2014). Neoliberal Urbanism and Privatization of Space: A Study of Dhaka City. University of Dhaka. Department of Sociology. Dhaka: Unpublished Master’s Thesis. Retrieved from repository.library.du.ac.bd/xmlui/handle/123456789/677?show=full
Khondoker, H. H. (2004). Class and State in Bangladesh: Political Economy of Authoritarian Democracy. Journal of Bangladesh Studies, 6(1), np.
Knafo, S. (2015). The Atlantic: Is gentrification a human rights violation? Atlantic Avenue: Right To The City Alliance. Retrieved from http://righttothecity.org/the-atlantic-is-gentrification-a-human-rights-violation/
Lata, L. N. (2020a). Gendered Urban Space in Bangladesh. Global Dialogue, 10(2). Retrieved form https://globaldialogue.isa-sociology.org/articles/gendered-urban-space-in-bangladesh
Lata, L. N. (2020b). Neoliberal Urbanity and the Right to Housing of the Urban Poor in Dhaka, Bangladesh. Environment and Urbanization ASIA, 11(2), 218-230. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0975425320938520
Lata, L. N. (2020c). To Whom Does the City Belong? Obstacles to Right to the City for the Urban Poor in Bangladesh. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 51(4), 638-659. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00472336.2020.1791934
Lata, L., Walters, P., & Roitman, S. (2019). A Marriage of Convenience: Street vendors’ everyday accommodation of power in Dhaka, Bangladesh. Cities, 84, 143-150. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2018.08.002
Lefebvre, H. (1967). The Right to the City. In E. Kofman, & E. Lebas (Eds.), Writings on Cities (pp. 63-184). London: Blackwell.
Lefebvre, H. (1991). The Production of Space. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Lefebvre, H. (1996). The Right to the City. In E. Kofman, & E. Lebas (Eds.), Writings on Cities: Henri Lefebvre (pp. 147-159). Cambridge: MA: Blackwell.
Loghlen, A. O. (2015). Neoliberalism and the Right to the City: the Challenges for the Urban Slum Dwellers. RC21 International Conference on “The Ideal City: between myth and reality. Representations, policies, contradictions and challenges for tomorrow’s urban life Urbino”. Italy, August, 27-29.
Machabanski, G. (2013). The Chilean Experience: Struggling for the Right to the City in the Neoliberal Era. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/2142/45251
Mondol, L. K. (2014). Social Formation in Bangladesh: An Essay on the Political Economy of State, Class and Capitalism. Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bangladesh (Hum.), 59(2), 343-365.
Mueller-Hirth, N. (2012). If You Don’t Count, You Don’t Count: Monitoring and Evaluation in South African NGOs. Development and Change, 43(3), 649-670. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7660.2012.01776.x
Muhammad, A. (2016, March). Bangladesh – A Model of Neoliberalism. Monthly Review, 66(10). Retrieved from http://monthlyreview.org/2015/03/01/bangladesh-a-model-of-neoliberalism/ DOI: https://doi.org/10.14452/MR-066-10-2015-03_3
Murshid, N. S. (2020). Examining Microfinance Participants’ Use of Neoliberal Language in Bangladesh. Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research, 11(2), 285-312. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/709822
Nazrul, I., Mahbub, A. Q. M., & Nazem, N. I. (2016). Urban Slums of Bangladesh. Dhaka: The Daily Star. Retrieved from http://www.thedailystar.net/news-detail-93293
Parnell, S., & Pieterse, E. (2010). The ‘Right to the City’: Institutional Imperatives of a Developmental State. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 34, 146-162. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2010.00954.x
Plyushteva, A. (2005-2009). The Right to The City and the Struggles over Public Citizenship: exploring the links. The Urban Reinventors Online Journal, 3, 1-17. Retrieved from www.urbanreinventors.net
Polanyi, K. (1944/1957). The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time. Boston: Beacon Press.
Purcell, M. (2002). Excavating Lefebvre: The Right to the city and its urban politics of the inhabiants. GeoJournal, 58(2/3), 99-108. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:GEJO.0000010829.62237.8f
Salahuddin, T. (2010). Sattala slum razed without rehabilitating dwellers. Dhaka. Retrieved from https://www.flicker.com/photos/tareqsalahuddin/sets/72157624677629296/comments/
Sanderson, D. (1999). Household livelihood security in urban settlements. CARE International UK Urban Briefing Notes, 1, 1-8.
Sassen, S. (2001). The Global City (2nd edition ed.). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Seckin, E. (2014, December). Right to the City and Cities for People, Not for Profit. Unpublished Manuscript, Submitted to The Graduate School of Social Sciences, Middle East Technical University.
Siddiqui, T. (2012). Neoliberalism and Urban Governance in Bangladesh. University of Dhaka, Department of Sociology. Dhaka: Unpublished Masters Thesis. Retrieved from http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:BIf261OY5sUJ:repository.library.du.ac.bd/xmlui/bitstream/handle/123456789/383/Tamanna%2520Siddiqui.pdf%3Fsequence%3D1+&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=bd
Tamanna, M. (2014). Neoliberal Restructuring and The urban Poor: Does Urban Poor Doing Better than Their Rural Counterparts? Asian Profile, 44(1), 15-28.
Uddin, F. K. A., & Piracha, A. (2023). Neoliberalism, power, and right to the city and the urban divide in Sydney, Australia. Social Sciences, 12(2), 1-18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci12020083
UN-HABITAT. (2012, September 5). Urban Slum. Massive Urban Slum in Developing Countries. Retrieved from http://www.unhabitat.org/pmss/listItemDetails.aspx?publicationID=2917/;geography.about.com/od/urbaneconomicgeography/a/Urban-Slums.htm
UNICEF (2020). Children in cities. Retrieved form https://www.unicef.org/bangladesh/en/children-cities
Wacquant, L. (2009). Punishing the Poor: The Neoliberal Governance of Social Insecurity. Durham: Duke University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822392255
World Bank. (2004). Bangladesh Urban Service Delivery: A Scorecard. Proshika Survey and Research System. World Bank, Washington DC.
World Population Review (2023). Dhaka Population 2023, Retrieved from https://worldpopulationreview.com/world-cities/dhaka-population
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Shamsul Arefin
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Manuscript authors are responsible for obtaining copyright permissions for any copyrighted materials included within manuscripts. The authors must provide permission letters, when appropriate, to the Society Register Editors.
In addition, all published papers in Society Register are published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 Unported License.
1.1 The Author hereby warrants that he/she is the owner of all the copyright and other intellectual property rights in the Work and that, within the scope of the present Agreement, the paper does not infringe the legal rights of another person. The owner of the copyright work also warrants that he/she is the sole and original creator thereof and that is not bound by any legal constraints in regard to the use or sale of the work.
1.2. The Publisher warrants that is the owner of the PRESSto platform for open access journals, hereinafter referred to as the PRESSto Platform.
2. The Author grants the Publisher non-exclusive and free of charge license to unlimited use worldwide over an unspecified period of time in the following areas of exploitation:
2.1. production of multiple copies of the Work produced according to the specific application of a given technology, including printing, reproduction of graphics through mechanical or electrical means (reprography) and digital technology;
2.2. marketing authorisation, loan or lease of the original or copies thereof;
2.3. public performance, public performance in the broadcast, video screening, media enhancements as well as broadcasting and rebroadcasting, made available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them;
2.4. inclusion of the Work into a collective work (i.e. with a number of contributions);
2.5. inclusion of the Work in the electronic version to be offered on an electronic platform, or any other conceivable introduction of the Work in its electronic version to the Internet;
2.6. dissemination of electronic versions of the Work in its electronic version online, in a collective work or independently;
2.7. making the Work in the electronic version available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, in particular by making it accessible via the Internet, Intranet, Extranet;
2.8. making the Work available according to appropriate license pattern CC BY-NC 4.0 as well as another language version of this license or any later version published by Creative Commons.
3. The Author grants the Publisher permission to reproduce a single copy (print or download) and royalty-free use and disposal of rights to compilations of the Work and these compilations.
4. The Author grants the Publisher permission to send metadata files related to the Work, including to commercial and non-commercial journal-indexing databases.
5. The Author represents that, on the basis of the license granted in the present Agreement, the Publisher is entitled and obliged to:
5.1. allow third parties to obtain further licenses (sublicenses) to the Work and to other materials, including derivatives thereof or compilations made, based on or including the Work, whereas the provisions of such sub-licenses will be the same as with the Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) Creative Commons sub-license or another language version of this license, or any later version of this license published by Creative Commons;
5.2. make the Work available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, without any technological constraints;
5.3. appropriately inform members of the public to whom the Work is to be made available about sublicenses in such a way as to ensure that all parties are properly informed (appropriate informing messages).
6. Because of the royalty-free provision of services of the Author (resulting from the scope of obligations stipulated in the present Agreement), the Author shall not be entitled to any author’s fee due and payable on the part of the Publisher (no fee or royalty is payable by the Publisher to the Author).
7.1. In the case of third party claims or actions for indemnity against the Publisher owing to any infractions related to any form of infringement of intellectual property rights protection, including copyright infringements, the Author is obliged to take all possible measures necessary to protect against these claims and, when as a result of legal action, the Publisher, or any third party licensed by the Publisher to use the Work, will have to abandon using the Work in its entirety or in part or, following a court ruling in a legal challenge, to pay damages to a third party, whatever the legal basis
7.2. The Author will immediately inform the Publisher about any damage claims related to intellectual property infringements, including the author’s proprietary rights pertaining to a copyrighted work, filed against the Author. of liability, the Author is obliged to redress the damage resulting from claims made by third party, including costs and expenditures incurred in the process.
7.3. To all matters not settled herein provisions of the Polish Civil Code and the Polish Copyright and Related Rights Act shall apply.