Keywords
hate speech
communication
social representations
narrative in the media
social networks
Number of views: 139
Number of downloads: 131
Abstract
The overall objective of the article is to demonstrate how the polarisation of communication observed in today’s fragmented society on certain issues is not due to the similarity of the sociocultural and historical contexts of different countries but rather to the social problem being communicated. To do so, the subject of this article is communication referring to migration flows—a universal phenomenon and hot topic in international public debate—that generates, more often than not, polarisation oriented toward hostility toward migrants. To achieve this objective, with the support of the analysis of multiple cases of media communication (analysis of language and forms of communication), we will observe what happens in two countries (Italy and Colombia) is entirely different. Despite its limitations due to the impossibility of generalising the findings to all social phenomena, the article highlights how the two diametrically different countries can polarise communication towards migrants with similar hate speech within social networks and digital platforms. This leads to the specific objective: to open a critical debate around the dynamics that polarise communication, mainly if it takes on negative valences.
References
Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Boston: Addison-Wesley.
Amerio, P. (2004). Problemi umani in comunità di massa. Torino: Einaudi.
Amnesty International Italia (2021). Barometro dell’odio [Hate barometer]. Rome: Amnesty International Sezione Italiana.
Amnesty International Italia (2022). Barometro dell’odio [Hate barometer]. Rome: Amnesty International Sezione Italiana.
ANIF. (2020). Tensiones del mercado laboral, productividad e incrementos del SML. Comentario Económico del día. Retrieved from https://www.anif.com.co/sites/default/files/ene22-20.pdf
Barómetro de Xenofobia (2021). Informe trimestral. Balance general de la migración en Colombia. Primer Trimestre 2021. Bogotá: USAID/Universidad Externado de Colombia. Retrieved from https://issuu.com/elderechoanoobedecer/docs/informe_primer_trimestre_2021_-_bx_oficial_compres#google_vignette
BBC (2019/11/28). Cómo los venezolanos se están convirtiendo en el chivo expiatorio por las protestas en Sudamérica. Retrieved from https://www.bbc.com/mundo/noticias-america-latina-50559187
Baranowski, M. (2024) The database construction of reality in the age of AI: the coming revolution in sociology? AI & Society, 1-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-024-01873-8
Ben Allouch, S., de Graaf, M., & Šabanović, S. (2020). Introduction to the Special Issue on the Mutual Shaping of Human–Robot Interaction. International Journal of Social Robotics, 12, 843-845. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-020-00681-6
Benguerna, M. & Mangone, E. (Eds.) (2016). Beyond the borders: the Mediterranean between cultures, migrations and life-world. Fisciano: ICSR Mediterranean Knowledge.
Bentivegna, S. & Rega, S. (2020). I discorsi d’odio online in una prospettiva comunicativa: ì un’agenda per la ricerca. Mediascapes journal, 16, 151-171. https://rosa.uniroma1.it/rosa03/mediascapes/article/view/17201
Berger, P. L. & Luckmann, T. (1984). The Social Construction of Reality. A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. London: Penguin Books.
Bianchi, C. (2018). Hate speech: Il lato oscuro del linguaggio. Roma-Bari: Editori Laterza.
Blum, L. (2004). Stereotypes And Stereotyping: A Moral Analysis. Philosophical Papers, 33(3), 251-289. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/05568640409485143
Boccia Artieri, G. & Bantivegna, S. (Eds.) (2019). Niente di nuovo sul fronte mediale. Agenda pubblica e campagna elettorale. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
Brown, A. (2015). Hate Speech Law A Philosophical Examination. New York: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315714899
Butler, J. (1997). Lenguaje, poder e identidad. Madrid: Editorial Síntesis.
Cappi, V., Barretta, P., Musarò, P., & Parmiggiani, P. (2021). L’Africa immaginata dai giovani: il ruolo delle narrazioni mediali nella costruzione di un continente altro. Problemi dell’informazione, 3, 303-326.
Castillo, J. (Ed.) (2019). Seguridad ciudadana y migración venezolana. Documento de seguimiento No. 1. Bogotá: Fundación Ideas para la Paz.
Castro Franco, A. (Ed.) (2019). Venezuela migra: aspectos sensibles del éxodo hacia Colombia. Bogotá: Universidad Externado de Colombia. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1k03rxz
Cohen-Almagor, R. (2011). Fighting Hate and Bigotry on the Internet. Policy & Internet, 3(3), 89-114. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2202/1944-2866.1059
Council of Europe (2014). Human rights guide for internet users. Brussels: Council of Europe.
Cubeddu, F. & Scocco, M. (2024). Online Hate Speech as a Form of Cyberviolence: Communication Practices, Social Perception and Vulnerabilities in the Experience of Young People. In E. Gualda (Ed.), Teorias de la conspiraòn y discursos de odio en DOI: https://doi.org/10.14679/2761
linea en la Sociedad de las plataformas. Comparación de pautas en las narrativas y redes sociales sobre COVID-19, inmigrantes, refugiados, estudios de género y personas LGTBIQ+ (pp. 221-235). Madrid: Dykinson.
De Blasio, E. & Sorice, M. (2023). Il disordine informativo e l’odio in rete. Democrazia a rischio = Information disorder and online hatred. Democracy at risk. H-ermes. Journal of Communication, 23, 217-243.
de Haas, H., Castles, S., & Miller, M. J. (2019). The Age of Migration: International Population Movements in the Modern World. London: Bloomsbury Publishing PLC.
Di Rosa, A. (2020). Hate speech e discriminazione. Un’analisi performativa tra diritti umani e teorie della libertà. Modena: Mucchi Editore.
Donato, S., Eslen-Ziya, H., & Mangone, E. (2022). From offline to online violence: new challenges for the contemporary society. International Review of Sociology, 32(3), 400-412. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03906701.2022.2133405
Durkheim, E. (1898). Représentations individuelles et Représentations collectives. Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale, 6, 273-302.
Faloppa, F. (2020). #Odio. Manuale di resistenza alla violenza delle parole. Torino: UTET.
Flores, R. A. de. (2004). La dinámica migratoria colombo-venezolana: evolución y perspectiva actual. Geoenseñanza, 9(2), 121-202.
Foucault, M. (1988). El sujeto y el poder. Revista Mexicana de Sociología, 50(3), 3-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3540551
Gandini, L., Lozano Ascencio, F., & Prieto Rosas, V. (2019). Crisis y migración de población venezolana. Entre la desprotección y la seguridad jurídica en Latinoamérica. México: UNAM. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22201/sdi.9786073019460p.2018
Gelber, K. & Stone, A. (2007). Hate Speech and Freedom of Speech in Australia (1.a ed.). Australia: The Federation Press.
Giaccardi, C. (2005). La comunicazione interculturale nell’era digitale. il Mulino, Bologna.
Giampaolo, M. & Ianni, A. (2020). L’inclusione sociale dei migranti nell’UE. BackGround Document n. 2. Roma: Focsiv. Retrieved from https://www.focsiv.it/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/BackGround-Document-n.-2-ITA-24.02.2020.pdf
Girard, R. (1999). Il capro espiatorio. Milano: Adelphi.
Habermas, J. (1974). The public Sphere: An Encyclopedia Article (1964). New German Critique, 3, 49-55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/487737
Hadhri, M. & Mangone, E. (2016). Intercultural Complexity of the Southern Mediterranean: Arab-Mediterranean Perceptions and Outlooks. Journal of Mediterranean Knowledge-JMK, 1(2), 125-141.
Hietanen, M. & Eddebo, J. (2022). Towards a Definition of Hate Speech—With a Focus on Online Contexts. Journal of Communication Inquiry, 47(4), 440-458. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/01968599221124309
Informe Calidad de Vida (2020). Calidad de vida en Bogotá. Retrieved from https://bogotacomovamos.org/vigesimo-tercer-informe-de-calidad-de-vida-en-bogota-2020-presentacion/
Koechlin, J. & Eguren, J. (2018). El éxodo venezolano entre el exilio y la emigración. Lima: Universidad Antonio Ruiz de Montoya.
Landowski, E. (2007). Presencias del otro (1.a ed.). Lima: Fondo Editorial de la Universidad de Lima.
Luhmann, N. (1966). The Reality of the Mass Media. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Lunaria (2023). Il razzismo nell’anno del ritorno delle destre al potere. Rapporto [Racism in the year of the return of right-wingers to power]. Rome: Lunaria. Retrieved from https://www.cronachediordinariorazzismo.org/wp-content/uploads/Focus-Razzismo-Giugno-2023.pdf
MacKinnon, C. (1996). Only Words. Harvard: Harvard University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvjk2xs7
Mangone, E. (2016). The us/them encounter: The Mediterranean between Land and Sea Borders. In M. Benguerna & E. Mangone (Eds.), Beyond the Borders: The Mediterranean between Cultures, Migrantions and Life-world. Fisciano: ICSR Mediterranean Knowledge.
Mangone, E. (2022a). Narratives and Social Change. Social Reality in Contemporary Society. Cham: Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-94565-7
Mangone, E. (2022b). Italian Migration Policies and Newspaper Communication: A Case Study. Tripodos, 53(2), 105-121. DOI: https://doi.org/10.51698/tripodos.2022.53.02
Mangone, E. (2024). Tempo, narrazione e mutamento sociale. CSI Review, 8, 37-52.
Mangone, E. & Donato, S. (2011). Online hate speech as an unintended and paradoxical outcome of cancel culture. In E. Gualda (Ed.), Teorias de la conspiraòn y discursos de odio en linea en la Sociedad de las plataformas. Comparación de pautas en las narrativas y redes sociales sobre COVID-19, inmigrantes, refugiados, estudios de género y personas LGTBIQ+ (pp. 61-73). Madrid: Dykinson.
Mangone, E. & Marsico, G. (2011). Social representations and valorial orientations: the immigrants case. Memorandum: Memória E História Em Psicologia, 20, 211-224.
Mangone, E. & Pece, E. (2017). I media e la “traduzione” di eventi in moral panics: la comunicazione del terrore. Comunicazioni sociali, 2, 344-356.
Mangone, E., Masullo, G., & Gallego M. (2018). Migration in the mediterranean between cultural, pluralism, innovation, and social polices. In E. Mangone, G. Masullo, & M. Gallego (Eds.), Gender and Sexuality in the migration trajectories. Studies Between the Northern and Southern Mediterranean Shores (pp. xi-xix). Charlotte (NC): IAP.
Marwick, A. & Miller, R. (2014). Online Harassment, Defamation, and Hateful Speech: A Primer of the Legal Landscape. Fordham Center on Law and Information Policy Report. Retrieved from http://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/clip
McCombs, M. E. & Shaw, D. L. (1972). The Agenda-Setting Function Of Mass Media. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 36(2), 176-187. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/267990
Mejía Ochoa, W. (2012). Colombia y las migraciones internacionales: evolución reciente y panorama actual a partir de las cifras. REMHU–Revista Interdisciplinar da Mobilidade Humana, 20(39), 185-210. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1980-85852012000200010
Moran, M. (1994). Talking about Hate Speech: A Rhetorical Analysis of American and Canadian Approaches to the Regulation of Hate Speech. Wisconsin Law Review, 2320-2321.
Moreno, V. C. & Pelacani, G. (2023). Perspectivas sociojurídicas de la migración. Aprendizajes a partir de la experiencia venezolana. Bogotá: Universidad de los Andes. Mortari, L. (2023). La cultura della cura: sguardo, ascolto e responsabilità. Bologna: Asmepa edizioni. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15425/2022.669
Moscovici, S. (1961). La Psycanalyse: son image et son public. Paris: PUF.
Mucchi Faina, A. (2006). Comunicazione interculturale. Il punto di vista psicologico-sociale. Roma-Bari: Laterza.
Musarò, P. & Parmiggiani, P. (2022). Le migrazioni nel discorso pubblico. Milan: FrancoAngeli.
OIM (2022). World Migration Report 2022. Geneva: International Organization for Migration.
Petrelli, A. & Di Napoli, A. (2022). L’impatto del COVID-19 sulla popolazione immigrata in Italia (febbraio 2020-luglio 2021). Risultati di un progetto collaborativo tra INMP e Regioni. Epidemiologia e Prevenzione, 4(46), 3-88.
Picarella, L. (2024). Intersections in the digital society: cancel culture, fake news, and contemporary public discourse. Frontiers in Sociology, 9, 1-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2024.1376049
Picarella, L. (2020). Democrazia, partecipazione e conflitto: el caliente otoño latinoamericano. Culture e Studi del Sociale, 5(2), 427-442.
Picarella, L. & Mangone, E. (2022). Il “corpo delle donne migranti” come resistenza: la narrazione delle caminantes venezuelane. The Lab’s Quarterly, 1, 7-31.
Proyecto Migración Colombia (2021). Caracterización de los hogares migrantes a partir de la Encuesta de Calidad de Vida e Integración de los Migrantes Venezolanos en Colombia. Bogotá: USAID- ACDI/VOCA- BID. Retrieved from https://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/PA00XRJN.pdf
Proyecto Migración Venezuela. (2020). Percepción en redes sociales sobre la migración desde Venezuela. Informe de escucha social. Bogotá: USAID- ACDI/VOCA- BID. Retrieved from https://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/PA00XRJT.pdf
Quan-Haase, A. (2013). Technology and society: Social networks, power, and inequality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Recommendation CM/Rec (2022). 16 of the Committee of Ministers to member States on combating hate speech (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 20 May 2022at the 132 Session of the Committee of Ministers). Bruxelles: European Union.
Reddy, M. & Thiollet, H. (2023). The Making of a Crisis: Migration and Polarisation in the French Press. American Behavioral Scientist, 1-35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00027642231183274
Siebert, R. (2003). Il Razzismo. Roma: Carocci.
Siebert, R. (2012). Voci e silenzi postcoloniali. Roma: Carocci.
Tenjo, J. (2021). Colombia, los inmigrantes y el trabajo. El Espectador, 10 de abril. Retrieved from https://www.elespectador.com/mundo/mas-paises/colombia-los-inmigrantes-y-el-trabajo-article
Tomkins, S. (1962). Affect Imagery Consciousness (Vol. I: The Positive Affects). Berlin: Springer Publishing Company.
UN (2015). Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on September 25, 2015. Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. United Nations Organization, New York.
United Against Racism. (2008). Comprender y luchar contra el Discurso del Odio. Retrieved from http://www.unitedagainstracism.org/pdfs/HateSpeechLeaflet_E.pdf
Valero Martínez, M. (2018). Venezuela, migraciones y territorios fronterizos. Línea Imaginaria, 6(3), 1-24.
Van Dijk, T. (2000). El discurso como interacción social. (1. edición). Barcelona: Gedisa.
Wieviorka, M. (1998). Le racisme. Une introduction. Paris: Seuil. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/dec.wievi.1998.01
Wieviorka, M. (2001). La différence. Paris: Balland.
World Bank Group (2023). Migrants, Refugees and Societies. Washington: The World Bank.
Xposible. (2020). ¿Cuál es el impacto de la migración venezolana en el mercado laboral colombiano? Retrieved from https://www.xposible.com/tendencias/cual-es-el-impacto-de-la-migracion-venezolana-en-el-mercado-laboral-colombiano/
Ziccardi, G. (2016). L’odio online: violenza verbale e ossessioni in rete. Milano: Cortina Raffaello.
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Francesca Cubeddu, Lucia Picarella
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Manuscript authors are responsible for obtaining copyright permissions for any copyrighted materials included within manuscripts. The authors must provide permission letters, when appropriate, to the Society Register Editors.
In addition, all published papers in Society Register are published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 Unported License.
1.1 The Author hereby warrants that he/she is the owner of all the copyright and other intellectual property rights in the Work and that, within the scope of the present Agreement, the paper does not infringe the legal rights of another person. The owner of the copyright work also warrants that he/she is the sole and original creator thereof and that is not bound by any legal constraints in regard to the use or sale of the work.
1.2. The Publisher warrants that is the owner of the PRESSto platform for open access journals, hereinafter referred to as the PRESSto Platform.
2. The Author grants the Publisher non-exclusive and free of charge license to unlimited use worldwide over an unspecified period of time in the following areas of exploitation:
2.1. production of multiple copies of the Work produced according to the specific application of a given technology, including printing, reproduction of graphics through mechanical or electrical means (reprography) and digital technology;
2.2. marketing authorisation, loan or lease of the original or copies thereof;
2.3. public performance, public performance in the broadcast, video screening, media enhancements as well as broadcasting and rebroadcasting, made available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them;
2.4. inclusion of the Work into a collective work (i.e. with a number of contributions);
2.5. inclusion of the Work in the electronic version to be offered on an electronic platform, or any other conceivable introduction of the Work in its electronic version to the Internet;
2.6. dissemination of electronic versions of the Work in its electronic version online, in a collective work or independently;
2.7. making the Work in the electronic version available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, in particular by making it accessible via the Internet, Intranet, Extranet;
2.8. making the Work available according to appropriate license pattern CC BY-NC 4.0 as well as another language version of this license or any later version published by Creative Commons.
3. The Author grants the Publisher permission to reproduce a single copy (print or download) and royalty-free use and disposal of rights to compilations of the Work and these compilations.
4. The Author grants the Publisher permission to send metadata files related to the Work, including to commercial and non-commercial journal-indexing databases.
5. The Author represents that, on the basis of the license granted in the present Agreement, the Publisher is entitled and obliged to:
5.1. allow third parties to obtain further licenses (sublicenses) to the Work and to other materials, including derivatives thereof or compilations made, based on or including the Work, whereas the provisions of such sub-licenses will be the same as with the Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) Creative Commons sub-license or another language version of this license, or any later version of this license published by Creative Commons;
5.2. make the Work available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, without any technological constraints;
5.3. appropriately inform members of the public to whom the Work is to be made available about sublicenses in such a way as to ensure that all parties are properly informed (appropriate informing messages).
6. Because of the royalty-free provision of services of the Author (resulting from the scope of obligations stipulated in the present Agreement), the Author shall not be entitled to any author’s fee due and payable on the part of the Publisher (no fee or royalty is payable by the Publisher to the Author).
7.1. In the case of third party claims or actions for indemnity against the Publisher owing to any infractions related to any form of infringement of intellectual property rights protection, including copyright infringements, the Author is obliged to take all possible measures necessary to protect against these claims and, when as a result of legal action, the Publisher, or any third party licensed by the Publisher to use the Work, will have to abandon using the Work in its entirety or in part or, following a court ruling in a legal challenge, to pay damages to a third party, whatever the legal basis
7.2. The Author will immediately inform the Publisher about any damage claims related to intellectual property infringements, including the author’s proprietary rights pertaining to a copyrighted work, filed against the Author. of liability, the Author is obliged to redress the damage resulting from claims made by third party, including costs and expenditures incurred in the process.
7.3. To all matters not settled herein provisions of the Polish Civil Code and the Polish Copyright and Related Rights Act shall apply.