Keywords
COVID-19
Italy
post-pandemic world
post-truth era
data visualisation big data
Abstract
This article examines the distortion of data and its visualization in the context of Covid-19 in Italy. While data visualization has become prevalent across various scientific disciplines, it often suffers from being overly intricate, inappropriate for the data type, or capable of causing perceptual biases and data falsification. The surplus of digital data and its subsequent visualization can lead to the manipulation of information, crafting narratives that diverge from official communications and aim to undermine their credibility and accuracy. This article highlights the necessity for properly disseminating data literacy and investigates data visualization’s epistemological and methodological dimensions, focusing specifically on the Italian scenario. Misrepresentation of COVID-19 data is characterized by the distortion and misrepresentation of the pandemic data collected, processed, and presented. Through an empirical case study, the article underscores the imperative to develop and utilize data visualization techniques that faithfully and accurately depict data.
References
Amidon T. R., Nielsen, A. C., Pflugfelder, E. H., Richards, D. P., & Stephens, S. H. (2021). Visual risk literacy in flatten the curve COVID-19 visualizations. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 35(1), 101-109. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651920963439
Andrews, R. J. (2019). Info we trust: How to inspire the world with data. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
Atherton, R. (2021). Missing/Unspecified: Demographic Data Visualization During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 35(1), 80-87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651920957982
Aydın, D. & Çam, M. S. (2019). Data storytelling and digital visualization. In B. O. Aydin, S. Gürbüz, & Ö. Dugan, Public Relations in The Networked Publics (pp. 33-57). Berlin: Peter Lang. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3726/b16513
Baba, V. & Hakem, Z. F. (2012). Toward a theory of evidence-based decision making. Management Decision, 50(5), 832-867. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/00251741211227546
Baranowski, M. (2022). Radicalising cultures of uneven data-driven political communication. Knowledge Cultures, 10(2), 145-155. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22381/kc10220227
Battista, D. (2023). For better or for worse: politics marries pop culture (TikTok and the 2022 Italian elections). Society Register, 7(1), 117-142. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14746/sr.2023.7.1.06
Bharati, S. & Batra, R. (2021). How misuse of statistics can spread misinformation: a study of misrepresentation of COVID-19 data. arXiv, February 14, 1-16.
Brennen, S., Simon, F., & Howard, P. N. (2020). Types, sources, and claims of Covid-19 misinformation. Reuters Institute Digital Report.
Bridgman, A., Merkley, E., Loewen, P.J., Owen, T., Ruths, D., Teichmann, L., & Zhilin, O. (2020). The causes and consequences of COVID-19 misperceptions: Understanding the role of news and social media. Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review, 1(3), np. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37016/mr-2020-028
Briggs, C. L. & Mantini-Briggs, C. (2003). Stories in the time of cholera: Racial profiling during a medical nightmare. London, Berkeley: University of California Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520938526
Burawoy, M. (2021). Public Sociology. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
Burawoy, M. (2005). For Public Sociology. American Sociological Review, 70, 4-28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240507000102
Cairo, A. (2020). How graphs lie: Understanding visual information better. Milan: Raffaele Cortina.
Carrigan, M. & Fatsis, L. (2021a). The Public and Their Platforms: Public Sociology in an Era of Social Media. Bristol, UK: Bristol University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1332/policypress/9781529201055.001.0001
Carrigan, M. & Fatsis, L. (2021b). The epistemological chaos of platform capitalism and the future of the social sciences. Impact of Social Sciences Blog. Retrieved from https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2021/06/10/the-epistemological-chaos-of-platform-capitalism-and-the-future-of-the-social-sciences/
Cinelli, M., Quattrociocchi, W., Galeazzi, A., Valensise, C. M., Brugnoli, E., Schmidt, A. L., & Scala, A. (2020). The Covid-19 social media infodemic. Scientific reports, 10(1), 1-10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-73510-5
Collier, D. & Mahoney, J. (1996). Insights and pitfalls: Selection bias in qualitative research. World politics, 49(1), 56-91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/wp.1996.0023
Cortoni, I., Cristallo, V., Faloni, V., & Mariani, M. (2022). From data to storytelling: The role of infographics in the Covid 19 pandemic narrative. Milan: FrancoAngeli.
Cotter, K., DeCook, J. R., & Kanthawala, S. (2022). Fact-Checking the Crisis: COVID-19, Infodemics, and the Platformization of Truth, Social Media + Society, 8(1), 1-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051211069048
Crisan, A. (2022). The Importance of Data Visualization in Combating a Pandemic. American Journal of Public Health, 112(6), 893-895. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2022.306857
Dasgupta, N. & Kapadia, F. (2022). The future of the public health data dashboard. American journal of public health, 112(6), 886-888. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2022.306871
Diana, P., Ferrari, G., & Dommarco, P. (2021). Covid-19: An epochal social change. Aprilia (RM): Novalogos.
Doan, S. (2021). Misrepresenting COVID-19: Lying with Charts During the Second Golden Age of Data Design. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 35(1), 73-79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651920958392
Engebretsen, M. & Kennedy, H. (2020). Data visualisation in society. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
Engledowl, C. & Weiland, T. (2021). Data (Mis)representation and COVID-19: Leveraging Misleading Data Visualizations for Developing Statistical Literacy Across Grades 6-16. Journal of Statistics and Data Science Education, 29(2), 160-164. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/26939169.2021.1915215
Eyal, G. (2019). The Crisis of Expertise. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Friendly, M. & Wainer, H. (2021). A history of data visualisation and graphic communication. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674259034
Friendly, M. (2008). A brief history of data visualisation. In Handbook of data (pp. 15-56). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-33037-0_2
Friggeri, A., Adamic, L., Eckles, D., & Cheng, J. (2014). Rumor cascades. Proceedings of the international AAAI conference on web and social media. 8(1), 101-110. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v8i1.14559
Garrett, R. K. & Weeks, B. E. (2017). Epistemic beliefs’ role in promoting misperceptions and conspiracist ideation. PloS One, 12(9), 1-17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0184733
Garrett, R. K., Weeks, B. E., & Neo, R. L. (2016). Driving a wedge between evidence and beliefs: How online ideological news exposure promotes political misperceptions. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 21(5), 331-348. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12164
Goldenberg, A. & Gross, J. J. (2020). Digital emotion contagion. Trends in cognitive sciences, 24(4), 316-328. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2020.01.009
Haldane, V., De Foo, C., Abdalla, S. M., Jung, A. S., Tan, M., Wu, S., & Legido-Quigley, H. (2021). Health systems resilience in managing the Covid-19 pandemic: lessons from 28 countries. Nature Medicine, 27(6), 964-980. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-021-01381-y
Hallonsten, O. (2022). On the essential role of organized skepticism in science’s “internal and lawful autonomy” (Eigengesetzlichkeit). Journal of Classical Sociology, 22(3), 282-303. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1468795X211000247
Harambam, J. (2020a). Contemporary Conspiracy Culture Truth and Knowledge in an Era of Epistemic Instability. New York: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429327605
Harambam, J. (2020b). The corona truth wars: Where have all the STS’ers gone when we need them most? Science and Technology Studies, 33(4) 60-67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23987/sts.99550
Hardesty, K. S. & Hardesty, C. (2020). Math Matters in Communication: Manipulation and Misrepresentation in Data Displays. 2020 IEEE International Professional Communication Conference (ProComm), 61-67. https://10.1109/ProComm48883.2020.00016 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ProComm48883.2020.00016
Hatfield, E., Cacioppo, J. T., & Rapson, R. L. (1993). Emotional contagion. Current directions in psychological science, 2(3), 96-100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.ep10770953
Healy, K. & Moody, J. (2014). Data visualisation in sociology. Annual review of sociology, 40, 105-128. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-071312-145551
Herrando, C. & Constantinides, E. (2021). Emotional contagion: a brief overview and future directions. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 2881. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.712606
Homayouni, H., Ray, I., Ghosh, S., Gondalia, S., & Kahn, M. G. (2021). Anomaly Detection in COVID-19 Time-Series Data. SN Computer Science, 2(4), 279. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42979-021-00658-w
Jabkowski, P., Domaradzki, J., & Baranowski, M. (2023). Exploring COVID-19 conspiracy theories: Education, religiosity, trust in scientists, and political orientation in 26 European countries. Scientific Reports, 13(1), 18116. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-44752-w
Kessler, S. H. & Bachmann, E. (2022). Debunking health myths on the internet: the persuasive effect of (visual) online communication. Journal of Public Health, 30(8), 1823-1835. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-022-01694-3
Laurano, P. (2022). A sociological analysis of institutional trust through the prism of the vaccination campaign. The Italian case and the European context. Quarterly Journal of Administration Sciena. Studies in Social Theory and Research, 4(4), 1-44.
Lewandowsky, S., Ecker, U. K., & Cook, J. (2017). Beyond misinformation: Understanding and coping with the “post-truth” era. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 6(4), 353-369. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.07.008
Lewis, J., Bartlett, A., Riesch, H., & Stephens, N. (2023). Why we need a public understanding of social science. Public Understanding of Science, 32(5), 658-672. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/09636625221141862
Lindgren, C. A. (2021). Facts Upon Delivery: What Is Rhetorical About Visualized Models? Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 35(1), 65-72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651920958499
Lovari, A. & Righetti, N. (2020). Public health communication between infodemic and fake news: the role of the Ministry of Health’s Facebook page in the social challenge to Covid-19. Mediascapes Journal, 15, 156-173.
Lupton, D. (2018). Digital sociology. Torino: Pearson.
Lupton, D. & Willis, K. (2021). The COVID-19 Crisis: Social Perspectives. London: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003111344
Lynch, M. (2020). We have never been anti-science: Reflections on science wars and post-truth. Engaging Science, Technology, and Society, 6, 49-57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17351/ests2020.309
Manfredi, G. (2015). The complex mechanisms of communication in emergencies. Guaraldi Editore.
Marres, N. (2017). Digital Sociology: The Reinvention of Social Research. Malden, MA: Polity.
Masick, K. D. & Bouillon, E. (2020). Storytelling with Data in Healthcare. London: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003027218
Mahanti, R. (2022). How Data Can Manage Global Health Pandemics: Analyzing and Understanding COVID-19. New York: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003270911
Mathaisel, D. (2024). Using data visualizations as information communication tools during a crisis: a critical review. Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society, 22(1), 103-123. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JICES-06-2023-0080
McCombs, M. E. & Shaw, D. L. (1972). The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36(2), 176-187. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/267990
McIntyre, L. (2018). Post-Truth. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/11483.001.0001
Mooney, P. & Juhász, L. (2020). Mapping COVID-19: How web-based maps contribute to the infodemic. Dialogues in Human Geography, 10(2), 265-270. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2043820620934926
Moscovici, S. (1984). The Phenomenon of Social Representations. In R.M. Farr & S. Moscovici (Eds.), Social Representations (pp. 3-69). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Nichols, T. (2017). The Death of Expertise. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Olteanu, A., Castillo, C., Diaz, F., & Kiciman, E. (2019). Social data: Biases, methodological pitfalls, and ethical boundaries. Frontiers in Big Data, 2, 13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fdata.2019.00013
Pagani, L., Fortunati, L., & Farinosi, M. (2023). Local government under stress: How a small village community has reacted to the COVID-19 emergency. Society Register, 7(1), 7-34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14746/sr.2023.7.1.01
Pangrazio, L., Sefton-Green, J. (2020). The social utility of ‘data literacy’. Learning, Media and Technology, 45(2), 208-220. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2020.1707223
Pellizzoni, L. (2021). Authority in decline? Scientific expertise in the age of post-truth. Quaderni di Sociologia, 86(65), 133-152. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/qds.4710
Pennycook, G., Bear, A., Collins, E. T., & Rand, D. G. (2020). The implied truth effect: Attaching warnings to a subset of fake news headlines increases perceived accuracy of headlines without warnings. Management science, 66(11), 4944-4957. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2019.3478
Pennycook, G. & Rand, D. G. (2019). Fighting misinformation on social media using crowdsourced judgments of news source quality. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(7), 2521-2526. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1806781116
Pickersgill, M. & Smith, M. (2021). Expertise from the humanities and social sciences is essential for governmental responses to Covid-19. Journal of Global Health, 11, 03081. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7189/jogh.11.03081
Popper, K. R. (2020). The open society and its enemies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Prasad, A. (2021). Anti-science misinformation and conspiracies: Covid-19, post-truth, and science & technology studies (STS). Science, Technology and Society, 27(1), 88-112. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/09717218211003413
Resnik, D. B. (2015), Objectivity of research: Ethical aspects. In J. D. Wright, International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences (pp. 92-95). Amsterdam: Elsevier. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.11019-0
Resnik, D. B. (2008). Scientific autonomy and public oversight. Episteme, 5(2), 220-238. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3366/E1742360008000336
Schneider, C. J. (2014). Social media and e-public sociology. In A. Hanemaayer & C. J. Schneider (Eds.), The public sociology debate: Ethics and engagement (pp. 205-224). Vancouver-Toronto: UBC Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.59962/9780774826655-011
Van der Bles, A. M., van der Linden, S., Freeman, A. L. J., Mitchell, J., Galvao, A. B., Zaval, L., & Spiegelhalter, D. J. (2019). Communicating uncertainty about facts, numbers and science. Royal Society Open Science, 6(5), 181870. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.181870
Vosoughi, S., Roy, D., & Aral, S. (2018). The spread of true and false news online. Science, 359(6380), 1146-1151. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aap9559
Zinovyev, A. (2011). Data visualisation. In B. Badie, D. Berg-Schlosser, & L. Morlino (Eds.), International encyclopedia of political science. Vol. 1 (pp. 537-545). New York: Sage.
Wheeldon, J. & Ahlberg, M. K. (2012). Visualizing social science research: Maps, methods, and meaning. New York: Sage. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483384528
Woolgar, S. (1988). Knowledge and Reflexivity: New Frontiers in the Sociology of Knowledge. New York: Sage.
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Giovannipaolo Ferrari, Paolo Diana
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Manuscript authors are responsible for obtaining copyright permissions for any copyrighted materials included within manuscripts. The authors must provide permission letters, when appropriate, to the Society Register Editors.
In addition, all published papers in Society Register are published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 Unported License.
1.1 The Author hereby warrants that he/she is the owner of all the copyright and other intellectual property rights in the Work and that, within the scope of the present Agreement, the paper does not infringe the legal rights of another person. The owner of the copyright work also warrants that he/she is the sole and original creator thereof and that is not bound by any legal constraints in regard to the use or sale of the work.
1.2. The Publisher warrants that is the owner of the PRESSto platform for open access journals, hereinafter referred to as the PRESSto Platform.
2. The Author grants the Publisher non-exclusive and free of charge license to unlimited use worldwide over an unspecified period of time in the following areas of exploitation:
2.1. production of multiple copies of the Work produced according to the specific application of a given technology, including printing, reproduction of graphics through mechanical or electrical means (reprography) and digital technology;
2.2. marketing authorisation, loan or lease of the original or copies thereof;
2.3. public performance, public performance in the broadcast, video screening, media enhancements as well as broadcasting and rebroadcasting, made available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them;
2.4. inclusion of the Work into a collective work (i.e. with a number of contributions);
2.5. inclusion of the Work in the electronic version to be offered on an electronic platform, or any other conceivable introduction of the Work in its electronic version to the Internet;
2.6. dissemination of electronic versions of the Work in its electronic version online, in a collective work or independently;
2.7. making the Work in the electronic version available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, in particular by making it accessible via the Internet, Intranet, Extranet;
2.8. making the Work available according to appropriate license pattern CC BY-NC 4.0 as well as another language version of this license or any later version published by Creative Commons.
3. The Author grants the Publisher permission to reproduce a single copy (print or download) and royalty-free use and disposal of rights to compilations of the Work and these compilations.
4. The Author grants the Publisher permission to send metadata files related to the Work, including to commercial and non-commercial journal-indexing databases.
5. The Author represents that, on the basis of the license granted in the present Agreement, the Publisher is entitled and obliged to:
5.1. allow third parties to obtain further licenses (sublicenses) to the Work and to other materials, including derivatives thereof or compilations made, based on or including the Work, whereas the provisions of such sub-licenses will be the same as with the Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) Creative Commons sub-license or another language version of this license, or any later version of this license published by Creative Commons;
5.2. make the Work available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, without any technological constraints;
5.3. appropriately inform members of the public to whom the Work is to be made available about sublicenses in such a way as to ensure that all parties are properly informed (appropriate informing messages).
6. Because of the royalty-free provision of services of the Author (resulting from the scope of obligations stipulated in the present Agreement), the Author shall not be entitled to any author’s fee due and payable on the part of the Publisher (no fee or royalty is payable by the Publisher to the Author).
7.1. In the case of third party claims or actions for indemnity against the Publisher owing to any infractions related to any form of infringement of intellectual property rights protection, including copyright infringements, the Author is obliged to take all possible measures necessary to protect against these claims and, when as a result of legal action, the Publisher, or any third party licensed by the Publisher to use the Work, will have to abandon using the Work in its entirety or in part or, following a court ruling in a legal challenge, to pay damages to a third party, whatever the legal basis
7.2. The Author will immediately inform the Publisher about any damage claims related to intellectual property infringements, including the author’s proprietary rights pertaining to a copyrighted work, filed against the Author. of liability, the Author is obliged to redress the damage resulting from claims made by third party, including costs and expenditures incurred in the process.
7.3. To all matters not settled herein provisions of the Polish Civil Code and the Polish Copyright and Related Rights Act shall apply.