Keywords
right-wing authoritarianism
abortion-rights movement
abortion
abortion ban
Number of views: 47
Number of downloads: 25
Abstract
The present study was inspired by the mass anti-government demonstrations organized by women after the further tightening of abortion laws in Poland. As a result, salient social polarization emerged with a clear-cut division for these who contested marches against near-total abortion ban and those who supported them. In female participants (N = 291), we examined the role of two forms of sexism and right-wing authoritarianism in predicting an attitude towards the abortion-rights movement. In line with the hypotheses, the results showed that right-wing authoritarianism was responsible for the relationship between sexism and attitudes toward the abortion-rights movement. Benevolent and hostile sexism were negatively related to the attitudes toward the abortion-rights movement, but this relationship was partly explained by right-wing authoritarianism. Our findings suggest that targeting right-wing authoritarianism might be crucial for changing the beliefs underlying both forms of sexism and attitudes toward abortion movement. It seems particularly important regarding benevolent sexism still mistaken for protection rather than an ideology patronizing women and preserving gender inequality.
References
Amnesty International. (2021). Poland: A Year On, Abortion Ruling Harms Women. https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2021/10/poland-a-year-on-abortion-ruling-harms-women/
Amnesty International. (2022). Poland: Regression on abortion access harms women. Retrieved from https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2022/01/poland-regression-on-abortion-access-harms-women/
Altemeyer, B. (1981). Right-wing authoritarianism. Winnipeg, Canada: University of Manitoba Press.
Altemeyer, B. & Hunsberger, B. (1992). Authoritarianism, Religious Fundamentalism, Quest, and Prejudice. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 2(2), 113–133. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327582ijpr0202_5
Austion, D. E. & Jackson, M. (2019). Benevolent and hostile sexism differentially predicted by facets of right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation. Personality and Individual Differences, 139(1), 34–38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.11.002
Becker, J. C. (2010). Why do women endorse hostile and benevolent sexism? The role of salient female subtypes and internalization of sexist contents. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research, 62(7-8), 453–467 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-009-9707-4
Breckler, S. J. & Wiggins, E. C. (1989). Affect versus evaluation in the structure of attitudes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 25(3), 253–271 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(89)90022-X
Broniarczyk, N. (2023). Jak to się stało? 30 lat zakazu aborcji w Polsce. Retrieved from https://oko.press/jak-to-sie-stalo-jakie-sa-konsekwencje-30-lat-zakazu-aborcji-w-polsce
CBOS. (2017). Aktywności i doświadczenia Polaków w 2016 roku. Komunikat z badań nr 12/2017. https://www.cbos.pl/SPISKOM.POL/2017/K_012_17.PDF
CBOS. (2020). O dopuszczalności przerywania ciąży i protestach po wyroku Trybunału Konstytucyjnego. Komunikat z badań nr 153/2020. https://www.cbos.pl/SPISKOM.POL/2020/K_153_20.PDF
CEBOS (2021). Preferencje najmłodszych wyborców i ich ewolucja w ostatnich dwóch dekadach. Komunikat z badań nr 122/2021. https://www.cbos.pl/SPISKOM.POL/2021/K_122_21.PDF
Christopher, A. N. & Mull, M. S. (2006). Conservative Ideology and Ambivalent Sexism. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 30(2), 223–230. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2006.00284.x
Conger, A. J. (1974). A revised definition for suppressor variables: A guide to their identification and interpretation. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 34(1), 35-46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447403400105
Connor, R. A. & Fiske, S. T. (2019). Not Minding the Gap: How Hostile Sexism Encourages Choice Explanations for the Gender Income Gap. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 43(1), 22–36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684318815468
Cross, E. J. & Overall, N. C. (2018). Women’s attraction to benevolent sexism: Needing relationship security predicts greater attraction to men who endorse benevolent sexism. European Journal of Social Psychology, 48(3), 336–347. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2334
Desperak, I. (2010). Kongres Kobiet, demokracja parytetowa i ruch kobiecy w Polsce. Przegląd Socjologiczny, 59(3), 131-147.
Duckitt, J. (2001). A dual-process cognitive-motivational theory of ideology and prejudice. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 33, pp. 41–113). Thousand Oaks, CA: Academic Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(01)80004-6
Duckitt, J. & Fisher, K. (2003). Social threat, worldview, and ideological attitudes. Political Psychology, 24, 199–222. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/0162-895X.00322
European Abortion Policies Atlas. (2024). Retrieved from https://www.epfweb.org/sites/default/files/2021-09/ABORT%20Atlas_EN%202021-v5.pdf
Gender Equality Index. (2023). Gender Equality Index 2023: Poland. Retrieved from https://eige.europa.eu/gender-equality-index/2023/country/PL
Glick, P. & Fiske, S. T. (2001a). An ambivalent alliance: Hostile and benevolent sexism as complementary justifications for gender inequality. American Psychologist, 56(2), 109–118. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066X.56.2.109
Glick, P. & Fiske, S. T. (2001b). Ambivalent sexism. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 33, pp. 115–188). Thousand Oaks, CA: Academic Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(01)80005-8
Glick, P. & Fiske, S. T. (1997). Hostile and benevolent sexism: Measuring ambivalent sexist attitudes toward women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21(1), 119–135. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00104.x
Glick, P., Lameiras, M., Fiske, S. T., Eckes, T., Masser, B., Volpato, C., Manganelli, A. M., Pek, J. C. X., Huang, L.-l., Sakalli-Uğurlu, N., Castro, Y. R., D’Avila Pereira, M. L., Willemsen, T. M., Brunner, A., Six-Materna, I., & Wells, R. (2004). Bad but Bold: Ambivalent Attitudes Toward Men Predict Gender Inequality in 16 Nations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(5), 713–728. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.86.5.713
Gunnarsson Payne, J. (2018). Kobiety jako “lud”. Czarne protesty jako sprzeciw wobec autorytarnego populizmu w perspektywie międzynarodowej. In E. Korolczuk, B. Kowalska, J. Ramme, & C. Snochowska-Gonzalez (Eds.), Bunt kobiet. Czarne Protesty i Strajki Kobiet (pp. 155-183). Gdańsk: Europejskie Centrum Solidarności.
Hellmer, K., Stenson, J. T., & Jylhä, K. M. (2018). What’s (not) underpinning ambivalent sexism?: Revisiting the roles of ideology, religiosity, personality, demographics, and men’s facial hair in explaining hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Individual Differences, 122, 29–39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.10.001
Huang, Y., Osborne, D., Sibley, C. G., & Davies, P. G. (2014). The precious vessel: Ambivalent sexism and opposition to elective and traumatic abortion. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research, 71(11-12), 436–449. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-014-0423-3
Jaśko, K. (2021). Aktywizm młodych: spontaniczność vs. Zinstytucjonalizowanie, online vs. Offline, powody radykalizacji. In K. Skarżyńska (Ed.), Młodzi dorośli: identyfikacje, postawy, aktywizm i problemy życiowe (pp. 63-81). Warszawa: Instytut Problemów Współczesnej Cywilizacji im. Marka Dietricha.
Jonason, P. K., Zajenkowski, M., Szymaniak, K., & Leniarska, M. (2022). Attitudes towards Poland’s ban on abortion: Religiousness, morality, and situational affordances. Personality and Individual Differences, 184, 111229. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.111229
Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W., & Sulloway, F. J. (2003). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 129(3), 339–375. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.129.3.339
Koralewska & Zielińska (2022). ‘Defending the unborn’, ‘protecting women’ and ‘preserving culture and nation’: anti-abortion discourse in the Polish right-wing press. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 24(5), 673–687. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13691058.2021.1878559
Korolczuk, E., Kowalska, B., Nawojski, R., Ramme, J., Snochowska-Gonzalez, C. (2018). Mobilizacja kobiet w latach 2016–2018: przyczyny, konteksty i perspektywy badawcze. In E. Korolczuk, B. Kowalska, J. Ramme, & C. Snochowska-Gonzalez (Eds.), Bunt kobiet. Czarne Protesty i Strajki Kobiet (pp. 17-41). Gdańsk: Europejskie Centrum Solidarności.
Kotnarowski, M. (2023). Protest i aktywność społeczna. In P. Kosiewski (Ed.), 22 października 2020: PAMIĘĆ PROTESTU (pp. 156-158). Warszawa: Fundacja im. Stefana Batorego. Retrieved from https://www.batory.org.pl/publikacja/22-pazdziernika-2020-pamiec-protestu/
Krajewska, A. (2022). Revisiting Polish Abortion Law: Doctors and Institutions in a Restrictive Regime. Social & Legal Studies, 31(3), 409-438. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/09646639211040171
MacKinnon, D. P., Krull, J. L., & Lockwood, C. M. (2000). Equivalence of the mediation, confounding and suppression effect. Prevention Science, 1(4), 173-181. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026595011371
Meinert, C. L. (2012). Clinical Trials: design, conduct and analysis (Vol. 39). New York: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118422878
Mikołajczak, M. & Pietrzak, J. (2014). Ambivalent Sexism and Religion: Connected Through Values. Sex Roles, 70(9), 387–399. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-014-0379-3
Osborne, D. & Davies, P. G. (2012). When benevolence backfires: Benevolent sexists’ opposition to elective and traumatic abortion. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 42(2), 291–307. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2011.00890.x
Patev, A. J., Hall, C. J., Dunn, C. E., Bell, A. D., Owens, B. D., & Hood, K. B. (2019). Hostile sexism and right-wing authoritarianism as mediators of the relationship between sexual disgust and abortion stigmatizing attitudes. Personality and Individual Differences, 151, 109–528. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.109528
Petty, R. E., Fabrigar, L. R., & Wegener, D. T. (2003). Emotional factors in attitudes and persuasion. In R. J. Davidson, H. H. Scherer, & H. H. Goldsmith (Eds.), Handbook of affective sciences (pp. 752-772). Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195126013.003.0039
Podemski, K. (2023). Protesty jesieni 2020 roku w relacjach wielkopolskich uczestników i uczestniczek. In P. Kosiewski (Ed.), 22 października 2020: PAMIĘĆ PROTESTU (pp. 69-93). Warszawa: Fundacja im. Stefana Batorego. Retrieved from https://www.batory.org.pl/publikacja/22-pazdziernika-2020-pamiec-protestu/
Puls Medycyny. (2020). Oficjalne dane o legalnej aborcji w Polsce: 1110 zabiegów przerwania ciąży w 2019 r. Retrieved from https://pulsmedycyny.pl/medycyna/ginekologia-i-poloznictwo/oficjalne-dane-o-legalnej-aborcji-w-polsce-1110-zabiegow-przerwania-ciazy-w-2019-r/
Radkiewicz, P. (2016). Does authoritarianism imply ethnocentric national attitudes: A revised look at the ‘authoritarian triad’ and right-wing ideology. European Journal of Social Psychology, 46(2), 224-236. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2147
Roets, A., Van Hiel, A., & Dhont, K. (2012). Is sexism a gender issue? A motivated social cognition perspective on men’s and women’s sexist attitudes toward own and other gender. European Journal of Personality, 26(3), 350–359. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/per.843
Rzeczpospolita. (2021). Polacy popierają protest przeciwko wyrokowi TK ws. Aborcji? (Poles support the protest against the Constitutional Tribunal’s judgment on abortion?) [Press release]. Retrieved from https://www.rp.pl/kraj/art288711-sondaz-czy-polacy-popieraja-protesty-przeciwko-wyrokowi-tk-ws-aborcji
Sarlet, M., Dumont, M., Delacollette, N., & Dardenne, B. (2012). Prescription of protective paternalism for men in romantic and work contexts. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 36, 444–457. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684312454842
Sibley, C. G., Wilson, M. S., & Duckitt, J. (2007). Antecedents of men’s hostile and benevolent sexism: the dual roles of social dominance orientation and right-wing authoritarianism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33(2), 160–172. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167206294745
Szczygielska, M. (2019). ‘Good Change’ and Better Activism: Feminist Responses to Backsliding Gender Policies in Poland. In A. Krizsán & C. Roggeband (Eds.), Gendering Democratic backsliding in Central and Eastern Europe: A comparative agenda (pp. 120-160). Budapest: Central European University Press.
Szóstakowski, D. & Besta, T. (2024). Perceived threat, injustice appraisal and willingness to join progressive collective action. Current Psychology, 43(8), 7399-7410. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-04926-1
Van den Berg, H., Manstead, A. S. R., Van der Pligt, J., & Wigboldus, D. H. J. (2006). The impact of affective and cognitive focus on attitude formation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42(3), 373–379. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2005.04.009
Van Zomeren, M., Spears, R., Fischer, A. H., & Leach, C. W. (2004). Put your money where your mouth is! Explaining collective action tendencies through group-based anger and group efficacy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(5), 649-664. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.87.5.649
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Monika Dominiak-Kochanek, Joanna Rajchert, Karolina Konopka
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Manuscript authors are responsible for obtaining copyright permissions for any copyrighted materials included within manuscripts. The authors must provide permission letters, when appropriate, to the Society Register Editors. In addition, all published papers in Society Register are published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. Authors retain copyright and publishing rights to their articles, granting the journal the right to distribute them under the terms of the CC BY-NC 4.0.
1.1 The Author hereby warrants that he/she is the owner of all the copyright and other intellectual property rights in the Work and that, within the scope of the present Agreement, the paper does not infringe the legal rights of another person. The owner of the copyright work also warrants that he/she is the sole and original creator thereof and that is not bound by any legal constraints in regard to the use or sale of the work.
1.2. The Publisher warrants that is the owner of the PRESSto platform for open access journals, hereinafter referred to as the PRESSto Platform.
2. The Author grants the Publisher non-exclusive and free of charge license to unlimited use worldwide over an unspecified period of time in the following areas of exploitation:
2.1. production of multiple copies of the Work produced according to the specific application of a given technology, including printing, reproduction of graphics through mechanical or electrical means (reprography) and digital technology;
2.2. marketing authorisation, loan or lease of the original or copies thereof;
2.3. public performance, public performance in the broadcast, video screening, media enhancements as well as broadcasting and rebroadcasting, made available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them;
2.4. inclusion of the Work into a collective work (i.e. with a number of contributions);
2.5. inclusion of the Work in the electronic version to be offered on an electronic platform, or any other conceivable introduction of the Work in its electronic version to the Internet;
2.6. dissemination of electronic versions of the Work in its electronic version online, in a collective work or independently;
2.7. making the Work in the electronic version available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, in particular by making it accessible via the Internet, Intranet, Extranet;
2.8. making the Work available according to appropriate license pattern CC BY-NC 4.0 as well as another language version of this license or any later version published by Creative Commons.
3. The Author grants the Publisher permission to reproduce a single copy (print or download) and royalty-free use and disposal of rights to compilations of the Work and these compilations.
4. The Author grants the Publisher permission to send metadata files related to the Work, including to commercial and non-commercial journal-indexing databases.
5. The Author represents that, on the basis of the license granted in the present Agreement, the Publisher is entitled and obliged to:
5.1. allow third parties to obtain further licenses (sublicenses) to the Work and to other materials, including derivatives thereof or compilations made, based on or including the Work, whereas the provisions of such sub-licenses will be the same as with the Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) Creative Commons sub-license or another language version of this license, or any later version of this license published by Creative Commons;
5.2. make the Work available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, without any technological constraints;
5.3. appropriately inform members of the public to whom the Work is to be made available about sublicenses in such a way as to ensure that all parties are properly informed (appropriate informing messages).
6. Because of the royalty-free provision of services of the Author (resulting from the scope of obligations stipulated in the present Agreement), the Author shall not be entitled to any author’s fee due and payable on the part of the Publisher (no fee or royalty is payable by the Publisher to the Author).
7.1. In the case of third party claims or actions for indemnity against the Publisher owing to any infractions related to any form of infringement of intellectual property rights protection, including copyright infringements, the Author is obliged to take all possible measures necessary to protect against these claims and, when as a result of legal action, the Publisher, or any third party licensed by the Publisher to use the Work, will have to abandon using the Work in its entirety or in part or, following a court ruling in a legal challenge, to pay damages to a third party, whatever the legal basis
7.2. The Author will immediately inform the Publisher about any damage claims related to intellectual property infringements, including the author’s proprietary rights pertaining to a copyrighted work, filed against the Author. of liability, the Author is obliged to redress the damage resulting from claims made by third party, including costs and expenditures incurred in the process.
7.3. To all matters not settled herein provisions of the Polish Civil Code and the Polish Copyright and Related Rights Act shall apply.