Renewable energy employment and progress toward a just transition in the US and EU
Journal cover Society Register, volume 9, no. 4, year 2025
PDF

Keywords

renewable energy
employment
just transition
regional disparities
decarbonization policy
scenario analysis

Number of views: 141


Number of downloads: 49

Abstract

The rapid growth of renewable energy, driven by technological innovation and energy security concerns, is reshaping global electricity generation. This supports climate change mitigation and has significant implications for employment in the power sector. This study examines employment impacts of renewable deployment scenarios in the US and EU, which pursue ambitious policies such as the Inflation Reduction Act and the EU Green Deal. In the first scenario (Continued Trends), regional disparities persist, with leaders advancing and laggards falling behind. The second (Low Carbon Translation) involves leaders in one low-carbon technology extending their expertise to others (e.g., wind to solar), thereby capturing employment gains. In the third (Proportional Benefit), benefits are distributed proportionally to total regional generation. Analysis reveals disparities: while renewables create net job growth, fossil-dependent or lagging regions may benefit little without targeted interventions. Proportional strategies offer equitable outcomes but may raise system costs. The sharp variation in job distribution highlights the need for a just transition that equitably shares economic and social benefits. Achieving this requires harmonized policies across scales, as well as attention to distributive, procedural, and restorative justice. US and EU efforts provide models, but progress must be measured beyond carbon reductions. Prioritizing equity and inclusivity can maximize global and local benefits, ensuring sustainability and resilience.

https://doi.org/10.14746/sr.2025.9.4.01
PDF

Funding

National Science Centre, Poland, under research project no. 2023/51/B/HS6/00418

References

117th Congress. (2022). H.R.5376 — Inflation Reduction Act of 2022. Retrieved from https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/5376/text

Baranowski, M., Jabkowski, P., & Kammen, D. M. (2025a). Minerals will shape future geopolitical order. Nature, 640, 38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-025-01006-1

Baranowski, M., Jabkowski, P., & Kammen, D. M. (2025b). From the Russian invasion of Ukraine to the battlefield of the future: The geopolitical fight for Ukraine’s mineral wealth. Energy Research & Social Science, 123, 104043. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2025.104043

Barbose, G. L. (2023). U.S. State Renewables Portfolio & Clean Electricity Standards: 2023 Status Update. Retrieved from https://emp.lbl.gov/publications/us-state-renewables-portfolio-clean DOI: https://doi.org/10.2172/1987651

Bazilian, M. D. (2018). The mineral foundation of the energy transition. The Extractive Industries and Society, 5(1), 93-97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2017.12.002

Beck, U. (1992). Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. London: Sage.

Bhattacharyya, S. C. (2009). Fossil-fuel dependence and vulnerability of electricity generation: Case of selected European countries. Energy Policy, 37(6), 2411-2420. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.02.031

Brinkman, G., Bain, D., Buster, G., Draxl, C., Das, P., Ho, J., … Zhang, J. (2021). The North American Renewable Integration Study (NARIS): A U.S. Perspective. United States. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2172/1804701

Covert, T., Greenstone, M., & Knittel, C. R. (2016). Will we ever stop using fossil fuels?. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 30(1), 117-138. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.30.1.117

Cronin, J., Hughes, N., Tomei, J., Caiado Couto, L., Ali, M., Kizilcec, V., … Watson, J. (2021). Embedding justice in the 1.5°C transition: A transdisciplinary research agenda. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Transition, 1, 100001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rset.2021.100001

EMBER. (2023). Global Electricity Review 2023. Retrieved from https://ember-climate.org/insights/research/global-electricity-review-2023/

European Commission. (2019). Communication from the Commission: The European Green Deal. Brussel. Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52019DC0640&qid=1705683009488

European Commission. (2021). Communication from the Commission: ‘Fit for 55’: delivering the EU’s 2030 Climate Target on the way to climate neutrality. Brussels. Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:52021DC0550

European Commission. (2022). Communication from the Commission: RePowerEU Plan. Brussels. Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=COM%3A2022%3A230%3AFIN&qid=1653033742483

Graham, K. & Knittel, C. R. (2024). Assessing the distribution of employment vulnerability to the energy transition using employment carbon footprints. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 121(7), e2314773121. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2314773121

Huber, M. T. (2009). Energizing historical materialism: Fossil fuels, space and the capitalist mode of production. Geoforum, 40(1), 105-115. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2008.08.004

McCauley, D., Pettigrew, K. A., Todd, I., & Milchram, C. (2023). Leaders and laggards in the pursuit of an EU just transition. Ecological Economics, 205, 107699. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2022.107699

Meckling, J. (2025). The geoeconomic turn in decarbonization. Nature, 645, 869-876. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-025-09416-x

Nature. (2022). Europe must not backslide on climate action despite war in Ukraine. Nature, 607, 8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-022-01820-x

Ram, M., Aghahosseini, A., & Breyer, C. (2020). Job creation during the global energy transition towards 100% renewable power system by 2050. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 151, 119682. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.06.008

Rutovitz, J., Dominish, E., & Downes, J. (2015). Calculating global energy sector jobs: 2015 methodology. Retrieved from https://opus.lib.uts.edu.au/bitstream/10453/43718/1/Rutovitzetal2015Calculatingglobalenergysectorjobsmethodology.pdf

Srivastava, N. (2023). Trade in critical minerals: Revisiting the legal regime in times of energy transition. Resources Policy, 82, 103491. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.103491

Stokes, L. C. & Warshaw, C. (2017). Renewable energy policy design and framing influence public support in the United States. Nature Energy, 2(8), 17107. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nenergy.2017.107

Wang, W., Fan, L. W., & Zhou, P. (2022). Evolution of global fossil fuel trade dependencies. Energy, 238, 121924. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.121924

Way, R., Ives, M. C., Mealy, P., & Farmer, J. D. (2022). Empirically grounded technology forecasts and the energy transition. Joule, 6(9), 2057–2082. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2022.08.009