Abstract
This study examines the lived experiences and coping strategies of informal construction workers in Assam, India, within the framework of enduring precarity and fragmented social protection. It explores how workers navigate structural vulnerabilities in the absence of effective institutional support. Using a mixed-method approach, the study combines a cross-sectional survey of 765 workers with focus group discussions and in-depth interviews across selected cities. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics and cross-tabulations, while qualitative data were thematically interpreted. The findings reveal a predominantly young, migrant, and low-educated workforce exposed to hazardous working conditions, inadequate housing, and limited access to welfare schemes. Despite the presence of social protection programmes, registration and coverage remain low, and union presence is minimal. In response to these vulnerabilities, workers endure by relying on contractor advances, occupational diversification, informal networks, and somatic coping practices to manage income instability and health risks. While these strategies enable short-term survival, they often reinforce long-term vulnerabilities. The findings highlight the need for context-sensitive policy interventions addressing structural barriers to social protection. The study contributes to the existing literature by empirically grounding the concept of “enduring precarity” and demonstrating how survival strategies simultaneously function as coping mechanisms and mechanisms of structural reproduction.
References
Aditya, B., & Amri, I. (2023). Rethinking informal economy resilience during crisis: Experience from COVID-19 pandemic. The Indian Journal of Labour Economics, 66(3), 711-737. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41027-023-00458-1
Agarwala, R. (2008). Reshaping the social contract: Emerging relations between the state and informal labor in India. Theory and Society, 37(4), 375-408. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-008-9061-5
Agarwala, R. (2013). Informal labor, formal politics, and dignified discontent in India. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139198738
Alowais, A. A., & Suliman, A. (2025). Debt before departure: The role of informal credit in trapping migrant workers. Social Sciences, 14(8), 465. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci14080465
Bhoi, S. R., Joshi., S. H., & Joshi, A. (2022). Out-of-pocket health expenditure among migrant workers in India: A narrative review. Cureus, 14(10), e30948. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.30948
Boccagni, P. (2015). Burden, blessing or both? On the mixed role of transnational ties in migrant informal social support. International Sociology, 30(3), 250-268. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0268580915570508
Bowen, P., Edwards, P., Lingard, H., & Cattell, K. (2014). Workplace stress, stress effects, and coping mechanisms in the construction industry. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 140(3), 04013059. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000807
Breman, J. (1996). Footloose labour: Working in India’s informal economy. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139171076
Breman, J. (2023). A short history of the informal economy. Global Labour Journal, 14(1), 21-39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15173/glj.v14i1.5277
Bussi, M., Schoyen, M.A., Vedeler, J.S., O’Reilly, J., McDonnell, A., & Lewis, C. (2019). Social resilience in facing precarity: Young people ‘rising to the occasion’. In Negotiating early job insecurity (pp. 139-160). Edward Elgar Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788118798.00015
Das, A. (2018). Trends, composition and determinants of rural non-farm employment in Assam and its implication for rural income distribution. In V. Xaxa, D. Saha, & R. Singha (Eds.), Employment and labour market in North-East India (pp. 345-368). Routledge India. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429447020-13
De Haas, H. (2021). A theory of migration: The aspirations-capabilities framework. Comparative Migration Studies, 9(1), 8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40878-020-00210-4
Deshingkar, P. (2017). Poverty reducing potential of labour migration for construction work: Lessons from South Asia. The Institute of Development Studies and Partner Organisations.
Dhal, M. (2020). Labor stand: Face of precarious migrant construction workers in India. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 146(6), 04020048. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001761
Ellis, F. (2000). The determinants of rural livelihood diversification in developing countries. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 51(2), 289-302. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-9552.2000.tb01229.x
Frimpong, S., Sunindijo, R.Y., Wang, C.C., Boadu, E.F., Dansoh, A., & Fagbenro, R. K. (2023). Coping with psychosocial hazards: A systematic review of young construction workers’ practices and their determinants. Buildings, 13(1), 22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13010022
Gopalakrishnan, S., & Kumar, M.P. (2020). Risk factors of morbidity among construction workers: A review. International Journal of Community Medicine and Public Health, 7(11), 4664-71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20204772
Goswami, P. (2024). The political economy of precarious work in India: A case of languishing social policy?. Critical Sociology, 50(1), 125-140. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/08969205231185270
Harvey, D. (2003). The new imperialism. Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199264315.001.0001
Jha, A. (2021). Vulnerability of construction workers during COVID-19: Tracking welfare responses and challenges. The Indian Journal of Labour Economics, 64(4), 1043-1067. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41027-021-00348-4
John, C. P. (2004). Social security and labour welfare with special reference to construction workers in Kerala. Kerala Research Programme on Local Level Development, Centre for Development Studies, Thiruvananthapuram.
Langdon, R. R., & Sawang, S. (2018). Construction workers’ well-being: What leads to depression, anxiety, and stress?. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 144(2), 04017100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001406
Leonard, M. (2000). Coping strategies in developed and developing societies: The workings of the informal economy. Journal of International Development, 12(8), 1069-1085. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jid.696
Mezzadri, A. (2020). The informal labours of social reproduction. Global Labour Journal, 11(2). 156-163. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15173/glj.v11i2.4310
Millar, K. M. (2014). The precarious present: Wageless labor and disrupted life in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Cultural Anthropology, 29(1), 32-53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14506/ca29.1.04
Millar, K. M. (2017). Toward a critical politics of precarity. Sociology Compass, 11(6), e12483. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12483
Mitra, S. (2018). Out-migration and labour mobility: Case studies from Assam. In V. Xaxa, D. Saha & R. Singha (Eds.), Employment and labour market in North-East India (pp. 284-315). Routledge India. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429447020-11
Munck, R. (2013). The Precariat: A view from the South. Third World Quarterly, 34(5), 747-762. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2013.800751
Nordman, C. J. (2016). Do family and kinship networks support entrepreneurs?. IZA World of Labor, 262, 1-10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15185/izawol.262
Pattenden, J. (2018). Working at the margins of global production networks: Local labour control regimes and rural-based labourers in South India. In J. Pattenden, L. Campling, S. Miyamura & B. Selwyn (Eds.), Class dynamics of development (pp. 65-89). Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315187501-4
Pattenden, J. 2011. Gatekeeping as accumulation and domination: Decentralization and class relations in rural South India. Journal of Agrarian Change, 11(2), 164-194. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0366.2010.00300.x
Picherit, D. (2009). ‘Workers trust us!’: Labour middlemen and the rise of the lower castes in Andhra Pradesh. In J. Breman, I. Guérin & A. Prakash (Eds.), India’s unfree workforce: Of bondage old and new (pp. 259-283). Oxford University Press.
Pitoyo, A. J., Aditya, B., Amri, I., & Rokhim, A. A. (2021). Impacts and strategies behind COVID-19-induced economic crisis: Evidence from informal economy. The Indian Journal of Labour Economics, 64(3), 641-661. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41027-021-00333-x
Press Information Bureau. (2023, December 18). Employment generation in organised/unorganised sector by infrastructure sector. Retrieved from https://www.pib.gov.in/PressReleasePage.aspx?PRID=1987740®=3&lang=2
Reserve Bank of India. (2025). Handbook of Statistics on Indian Economy. Retrieved from https://www.rbi.org.in/scripts/AnnualPublications.aspx?head=Handbook%20of%20Statistics%20on%20Indian%20Economy
Roche, E., O’Donnell, S., & Richardson, N. (2025). Factors influencing the mental health help-seeking behaviours of construction workers in Ireland: Perspectives from managers. Health Promotion International, 40(6), 1-10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/daaf210
Scully, B. (2016). Precarity north and south: A southern critique of Guy Standing. Global Labour Journal, 7(2), 160-173. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15173/glj.v7i2.2521
Shah, A., & Lerche, J. (2020). Migration and the invisible economies of care: Production, social reproduction and seasonal migrant labour in India. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 45(4), 719-734. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/tran.12401
Srivastava, R. (2020). Labour migration, vulnerability, and development policy: The pandemic as inflexion point?. The Indian Journal of Labour Economics, 63(4), 859-883. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41027-020-00301-x
Srivastava, R., & Sutradhar, R. (2016). Labour migration to the construction sector in India and its impact on rural poverty. Indian Journal of Human Development, 10(1), 27-48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0973703016648028
Standing, G. (2011). The precariat: The new dangerous class. Bloomsbury Academic. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781849664554
Standing, G. (2014). A Precariat charter: From denizens to citizens. Bloomsbury Academic. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781472510631
Swider, S. (2015). Building China: precarious employment among migrant construction workers. Work, Employment and Society, 29(1), 41-59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017014526631
Tiwary, G., & Gangopadhyay, P. K. (2011). A review on the occupational health and social security of unorganized workers in the construction industry. Indian Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 15(1), 18-24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5278.83003
Tiwary, G., Gangopadhyay, P. K., Biswas, S., Nayak, K., Chakraborty, D., & Halder, L. (2013). Psychosocial stress of the building construction workers. Human Biology Reviews, 2(3), 207-222.
Vij, R. (2019). The global subject of precarity. Globalizations, 16(4), 506-524. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2019.1600287
Waite, L. (2007). ‘Some people drink as the body should feel a little ease’: Understanding body management amongst manual labourers in Western India. Journal of South Asian Development, 2(2), 227-253. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/097317410700200203
Xaxa, V. (2018). Labour and the labour market in North-East India: A historical exploration. In V. Xaxa, D. Saha & R. Singha (Eds.), Employment and labour market in North-East India (pp. 19-38). Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429447020-2
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Dhritiraj Sarma, Bipasha Sarma, Suresh Kr. Nath

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Manuscript authors are responsible for obtaining copyright permissions for any copyrighted materials included within manuscripts. The authors must provide permission letters, when appropriate, to the Society Register Editors. In addition, all published papers in Society Register are published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. Authors retain copyright and publishing rights to their articles, granting the journal the right to distribute them under the terms of the CC BY-NC 4.0.
1.1 The Author hereby warrants that he/she is the owner of all the copyright and other intellectual property rights in the Work and that, within the scope of the present Agreement, the paper does not infringe the legal rights of another person. The owner of the copyright work also warrants that he/she is the sole and original creator thereof and that is not bound by any legal constraints in regard to the use or sale of the work.
1.2. The Publisher warrants that is the owner of the PRESSto platform for open access journals, hereinafter referred to as the PRESSto Platform.
2. The Author grants the Publisher non-exclusive and free of charge license to unlimited use worldwide over an unspecified period of time in the following areas of exploitation:
2.1. production of multiple copies of the Work produced according to the specific application of a given technology, including printing, reproduction of graphics through mechanical or electrical means (reprography) and digital technology;
2.2. marketing authorisation, loan or lease of the original or copies thereof;
2.3. public performance, public performance in the broadcast, video screening, media enhancements as well as broadcasting and rebroadcasting, made available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them;
2.4. inclusion of the Work into a collective work (i.e. with a number of contributions);
2.5. inclusion of the Work in the electronic version to be offered on an electronic platform, or any other conceivable introduction of the Work in its electronic version to the Internet;
2.6. dissemination of electronic versions of the Work in its electronic version online, in a collective work or independently;
2.7. making the Work in the electronic version available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, in particular by making it accessible via the Internet, Intranet, Extranet;
2.8. making the Work available according to appropriate license pattern CC BY-NC 4.0 as well as another language version of this license or any later version published by Creative Commons.
3. The Author grants the Publisher permission to reproduce a single copy (print or download) and royalty-free use and disposal of rights to compilations of the Work and these compilations.
4. The Author grants the Publisher permission to send metadata files related to the Work, including to commercial and non-commercial journal-indexing databases.
5. The Author represents that, on the basis of the license granted in the present Agreement, the Publisher is entitled and obliged to:
5.1. allow third parties to obtain further licenses (sublicenses) to the Work and to other materials, including derivatives thereof or compilations made, based on or including the Work, whereas the provisions of such sub-licenses will be the same as with the Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) Creative Commons sub-license or another language version of this license, or any later version of this license published by Creative Commons;
5.2. make the Work available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, without any technological constraints;
5.3. appropriately inform members of the public to whom the Work is to be made available about sublicenses in such a way as to ensure that all parties are properly informed (appropriate informing messages).
6. Because of the royalty-free provision of services of the Author (resulting from the scope of obligations stipulated in the present Agreement), the Author shall not be entitled to any author’s fee due and payable on the part of the Publisher (no fee or royalty is payable by the Publisher to the Author).
7.1. In the case of third party claims or actions for indemnity against the Publisher owing to any infractions related to any form of infringement of intellectual property rights protection, including copyright infringements, the Author is obliged to take all possible measures necessary to protect against these claims and, when as a result of legal action, the Publisher, or any third party licensed by the Publisher to use the Work, will have to abandon using the Work in its entirety or in part or, following a court ruling in a legal challenge, to pay damages to a third party, whatever the legal basis
7.2. The Author will immediately inform the Publisher about any damage claims related to intellectual property infringements, including the author’s proprietary rights pertaining to a copyrighted work, filed against the Author. of liability, the Author is obliged to redress the damage resulting from claims made by third party, including costs and expenditures incurred in the process.
7.3. To all matters not settled herein provisions of the Polish Civil Code and the Polish Copyright and Related Rights Act shall apply.
