Keywords
animal rights
animal-based measures
resource-based measures
Abstract
While more than ever we are discussing animal rights and considering the possibility to extend the circle of our moral consideration, we are also more than ever inflicting suffering on more animals than in any time in history. This is especially the case for farm animals. This article aims to demonstrate that introducing animal-based measures into the legal system can be a practical and realistic step towards changing the familiar perspective of farm animals as mere commodities into the sentient beings they are.
Currently, legislation on farm animals builds on what are called resource-based measures. These measures are not based on the animals but on their environment and the conditions in which the animals are living. They are very compatible with the legal system being relatively easy to assess, less subjective and highly repeatable. However, compliance with resource-based measures does not always mean good animal welfare, since these measures are generally considered to be less well correlated to the experiences of the animal.
Animal-based measures, on the other hand, measure the state of the animal based on the actual animal, its behaviour (e.g. repetitive behaviour, human-animal relationship) and/or appearance (posture, facial expression, body condition).
A change where laws on animals actually require looking at the animals has the potential to improve the relationship to the animals and is an essential shift towards farm animals being regarded as someone and not something. By acknowledging animals as whole sentient beings, we do not just see a complex system of ‘behaviours’ (e.g. walking), but first and foremost we see a “behaver”, a dynamic living being, whose movements are always meaningful and psychological expressive.
In conclusion, animal-based measures force us to look at animals and recognize that they are able to feel pain, love, joy, loneliness and fear. Implementing animal-based measures for farm animals makes us, in a practical and realistic way, take those animals that are mostly considered as mere commodities, into our moral consideration, and unveils aspects of their sentience, which are currently hidden by the law.
References
Compassion in World Farming. 2017. Strategic Plan 2013-2017 for Kinder, Fairer Farming Worldwide. Retrieved August 1, 2019 (https://www.ciwf.org.uk/media/3640540/ciwf_strategic_plan_20132017.pdf).
European Food Safety Authority. 2012a. “Scientific Opinion on the use of animal-based measures to assess welfare of dairy cows.” EFSA Journal 10(1): 1-85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2012.2512.
European Food Safety Authority. 2012b. European Union Strategy for the Protection and Welfare of Animals. Retrieved August 1, 2019 (https://ec.europa.eu/food/animals/ welfare/strategy_en).
European Commission. 2016. Special Eurobarometer 442 Attitudes of Europeans towards Animal Welfare. Retrieved July 28, 2019 (https://data.europa.eu/euodp/en/data/dataset/S2096_84_4_442_ENG).
European Court of Auditors. 2018. Special report No 31/2018: Animal welfare in the EU: closing the gap between ambitious goals and practical implementation. Retrieved August 1, 2018 (https://www.eca.europa.eu/en/Pages/DocItem.aspx?did=47557).
Francione, Gary. 2008. Animals as Persons: Essays on the Exploitation of Nonhuman Animals. New York: Columbia University Press.
Graça, João. Maria Manuela Calheiros and Abilio Oliveira. 2014. “Moral Disengagement.” Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 27(5): 749-765.
Nussbaum, Martha and Cass Sunstein. 2005. Animal rights: current debates and new directions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sowery, Katy. 2018. “Sentient beings and tradable products: the curious constitutional status of animals under union law.” Common Market Review 55(1): 55 - 99.
Wemelsfelder, Françoise. 1997. “The scientific validity of subjective concepts in models of animal welfare.” Applied Animal Behaviour Science 53(1-2): 75-88.
Wemelsfelder, Françoise. 2007. “How animals communicate quality of life: the qualitative assessment of animal behaviour.” Animal welfare 16(5): 25-31.
Wemelsfelder, Millard, De Rosa, Napolitano. 2009. “Qualitative Behaviour Assessment.” Pp. 215-224 in Assessment of Animal Welfare Measures for Dairy Cattle, Beef Bulls and Veal Calves, edited by B. Forkman and L. Keeling. Uppsala: SLU Service.
License
Manuscript authors are responsible for obtaining copyright permissions for any copyrighted materials included within manuscripts. The authors must provide permission letters, when appropriate, to the Society Register Editors.
In addition, all published papers in Society Register are published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 Unported License.
1.1 The Author hereby warrants that he/she is the owner of all the copyright and other intellectual property rights in the Work and that, within the scope of the present Agreement, the paper does not infringe the legal rights of another person. The owner of the copyright work also warrants that he/she is the sole and original creator thereof and that is not bound by any legal constraints in regard to the use or sale of the work.
1.2. The Publisher warrants that is the owner of the PRESSto platform for open access journals, hereinafter referred to as the PRESSto Platform.
2. The Author grants the Publisher non-exclusive and free of charge license to unlimited use worldwide over an unspecified period of time in the following areas of exploitation:
2.1. production of multiple copies of the Work produced according to the specific application of a given technology, including printing, reproduction of graphics through mechanical or electrical means (reprography) and digital technology;
2.2. marketing authorisation, loan or lease of the original or copies thereof;
2.3. public performance, public performance in the broadcast, video screening, media enhancements as well as broadcasting and rebroadcasting, made available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them;
2.4. inclusion of the Work into a collective work (i.e. with a number of contributions);
2.5. inclusion of the Work in the electronic version to be offered on an electronic platform, or any other conceivable introduction of the Work in its electronic version to the Internet;
2.6. dissemination of electronic versions of the Work in its electronic version online, in a collective work or independently;
2.7. making the Work in the electronic version available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, in particular by making it accessible via the Internet, Intranet, Extranet;
2.8. making the Work available according to appropriate license pattern CC BY-NC 4.0 as well as another language version of this license or any later version published by Creative Commons.
3. The Author grants the Publisher permission to reproduce a single copy (print or download) and royalty-free use and disposal of rights to compilations of the Work and these compilations.
4. The Author grants the Publisher permission to send metadata files related to the Work, including to commercial and non-commercial journal-indexing databases.
5. The Author represents that, on the basis of the license granted in the present Agreement, the Publisher is entitled and obliged to:
5.1. allow third parties to obtain further licenses (sublicenses) to the Work and to other materials, including derivatives thereof or compilations made, based on or including the Work, whereas the provisions of such sub-licenses will be the same as with the Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) Creative Commons sub-license or another language version of this license, or any later version of this license published by Creative Commons;
5.2. make the Work available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, without any technological constraints;
5.3. appropriately inform members of the public to whom the Work is to be made available about sublicenses in such a way as to ensure that all parties are properly informed (appropriate informing messages).
6. Because of the royalty-free provision of services of the Author (resulting from the scope of obligations stipulated in the present Agreement), the Author shall not be entitled to any author’s fee due and payable on the part of the Publisher (no fee or royalty is payable by the Publisher to the Author).
7.1. In the case of third party claims or actions for indemnity against the Publisher owing to any infractions related to any form of infringement of intellectual property rights protection, including copyright infringements, the Author is obliged to take all possible measures necessary to protect against these claims and, when as a result of legal action, the Publisher, or any third party licensed by the Publisher to use the Work, will have to abandon using the Work in its entirety or in part or, following a court ruling in a legal challenge, to pay damages to a third party, whatever the legal basis
7.2. The Author will immediately inform the Publisher about any damage claims related to intellectual property infringements, including the author’s proprietary rights pertaining to a copyrighted work, filed against the Author. of liability, the Author is obliged to redress the damage resulting from claims made by third party, including costs and expenditures incurred in the process.
7.3. To all matters not settled herein provisions of the Polish Civil Code and the Polish Copyright and Related Rights Act shall apply.