Keywords
analysis
analytics
syllogistic figures
categorical and modal syllogisms
diagrammatic notation
How to Cite
Abstract
What is meant under the genuine title of Aristotle’s ta Analytika is rarely properly understood. Presumably, his analytics was inspired by the method of geometric analysis. For Aristotle, this was a regressive or heuristic procedure, departing from a proposed conclusion (or problem) and asking which premises could be found in order to syllogize, demonstrate or explain it. The terms that form categorical and modal propositions play a fundamental role in analytics. Aristotle introduces letters in lieu of the triples of terms (major – middle – minor) constituting the propositions and the three syllogistic figures that schematize them. His formulation of the three syllogistic figures refers to a syntactical and predicative order and position of the triples of terms, arranged in some diagrammed schemata, which, regrettably, are missing from the extant text of the Prior Analytics. Considering planar and graphic arrangements, both vertical and horizontal orders as well as the position of the three terms involved, we propose a reconstruction, at least to some extent, of these probable lettered diagrams. In such reconstructed diagrams, we can appropriately capture the definition of syllogism as a predicative connexion of terms, and easier survey a synoptic account of all valid predicative relations and transpositions, and also reduce the imperfect syllogisms into the moods of the first figure. Aristotle’s syllogistic is an analytical calculation of terms, understood as predicates and subjects within the categorical propositions, and more precisely of three terms schematized in three figures in predicative links such that, by means of a middle, follows from necessity a conclusion of the extreme terms. The necessity of the consequence is not based on the implication or inference of the propositions, but on a predictive transitivity through the middle term within the syllogistic figures. Syllogism must draw its conclusion through the way its terms are predicated of one another. Aristotle in his Prior Analytics (I 3, 8–22) developed also a complex account of modal syllogisms within necessity and possibility of belonging (predicating). This account involves also such an analytical reduction to the syllogistic figures. In this analytical perspective, we try to throw some light on his modal syllogisms, although this difficult and nowadays thoroughly discussed topic would require a much wider treatment.
References
Aristotele, 2016, Organon. Le Categorie – De Interpretatione – Analitici primi – Analitici secondi – Topici – Confutazioni sofistiche, Testo greco a fronte. Coordinamento generale di Maurizio Migliori. Saggi introduttivi, traduzioni, note e apparati di Marina Bernardini, Milena Bontempi, Adrianna Fermani, Roberta Medda e Lucia Palpacelli, Milano 2016.
Barnes, J., 19942, Aristotle’s Posterior Analytics, Oxford.
Barnes, J., Flannery, K., Ierodiakonou, K., 1991, Alexander of Aphrodisias, On Aristotle Prior Analytics, I.1–7, London.
Colli, G., Aristotele, Organon, Torino 1955 (rist. Milano 2003).
Crubellier, M. (trad.), 2014, Aristote, Premiers Analytiques, Paris 2014.
Detel, W. (Übers.), 2014, Aristoteles, Zweite Analytik, Hamburg.
Ebert, Th., Nortmann, U. (Übers.), 2007, Aristoteles, Analytica Priora, Buch I, Berlin.
Fait, P. (cur.), 2007, Aristotele, Le confutazioni Sofistiche, Roma – Bari.
Mignucci, M. (cur.), 1969, Aristotele, Gli Analitici Primi, Napoli.
Mignucci, M., 1975, L’argomentazione dimostrativa in Aristotele. Commento agli Analitici Secondi, Padova.
Mignucci, M. (cur.), 2007, Aristotele, Analitici secondi, Roma – Bari.
Παπανδρέου, A., 1995, Αριστοτέλους το Όργανον Αναλυτικά πρότερα. Μετά σχολίων, Αθήνα.
Παπανδρέου, A., 1999, Αριστοτέλους το Όργανον Αναλυτικά ύστερα Α. Μετά σχολίων, Αθήνα.
Pellegrin, P. (ed.), 2005, Aristote, Seconds Analytique, Paris.
Ross, W. D., 1949. Aristotle’s Prior and Posterior Analytics: A Revised Text with Introduction and Commentary, Oxford.
Smith, R. (ed.), 1989, Aristotle, Prior Analytics, Indianapolis – Cambridge.
Strobach N., Malink M. (hrsg.), 2015, Aristoteles, Analytica Priora. Buch II, Berlin – New York.
Striker, G. (transl., introd., comm.), 2009, Aristotle, Prior Analytics. Book I, Oxford.
Zanatta, M., 1996, Organon di Aristotele, vol. I–II, Torino.
Zekl, G. H. (hrsg.), 1998, Aristoteles, Erste Analytik. Zweite Analytik, Hamburg.
LETTERATURA FONDAMENTALE
Bäck A. T., 2005, Aristotle’s Theory of Predication, Leiden.
Barnes, J., 2006, “Oservazioni sull’uso delle lettere nella sillogistica di Aristotele”, “Elenchos” 27, pp. 277–304.
Becker , A., 1933, Die Aristotelische Theorie der Möglichkeitsschlüsse, Berlin.
Gaiser, K., Testimonia Platonica. Le antiche testimonianze sulle dottrine non scritte di Platone, Milano 1998.
Berti, E. (ed.), 1981, Aristotle on Science: The Posterior Analytics, Padova.
Berti, E., 1984, “L’analisi geometrica della tradizione euclidea e l’analitica di Aristotele”, In: G. Giannantoni, M. Vegetti (cur.), La scienza ellenistica, Napoli, pp. 95–127 (= E. Berti, Nuovi studi aristotelici, I – Epistemo¬logia, logica e dialettica. Morcelliana 2004, pp. 91–111).
Berti, E., 1993, “Aristotele e l’analisi matematica greca”, in: A. Repola Boatto (cur.), Filosofia logica matematica dal periodo classico al nostro secolo, Ancona, pp. 41–53.
Bocheński I. M., 1951, Ancient Formal Logic, Amsterdam.
Boger, G., 1998, “Completion, reduction and analysis: three proof-theoretic processes in aristotle’s Prior Analytics”, History and Philosophy of Logic 19, pp. 187–226.
Boger, G., 2004, “Aristotle’s Underlying Logic”, in: D.M. Gabbay and J. Woods (eds.), Handbook of the History of Logic, vol. I, Amsterdam, pp. 101–146.
Bonitz, H., 1870, Index Aristotelicus, Berolini.
Buddensiek, F., 1994. Die Modallogik des Aristoteles in den Analytica priora A, Hildesheim.
Byrne, P. H., 1997, Analysis and Science in Aristotle, New York.
Carbone, A. L., 2011, Aristote illustré. Représentations du corps et schématisation dans la biologie aristotélicienne, Paris.
Cavini, W., “Il sillogismo aristotelico”, in: U. Eco (cur.), La grande storia: I: Antichità, vol. 14: Vicino Oriente, Grecia, Roma, EncycloMedia, Milano 2011, pp. 110–139.
Coniglione, F., 2002/2003, Logica antica e medievale. Dispense per il corso di Storia della scienza, Catania.
Corcoran, J. (ed.), 1974, Aristotle’s natural Deduction System, in: J. Corcoran (ed.), Ancient Logic and Its Modern Interpretations, Dordrecht – Holland, pp. 85–13.
Corcoran, J., 2009, “Aristotle’s Demonstrative Logic”, History and Philosophy of Logic 30, pp. 1–20.
Cosenza, P., 1972, Tecniche di transformazione nella sillogistica di Aristotele, Napoli.
Crivelli P., Charles D., 2011, “ΠΡΟΤΑΣΙΣ’ in Aristotle’s Prior Analytics”, Phronesis 56, pp.193–203.
Crivelli, P., 2012, “Aristotle’s logic”, in: C. Schields (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Aristotle, Oxford, pp. 113–149.
Crubellier, M., 2017, “The programme of Aristotelian analytics”, Revista de Humanidades de Valparaíso 5, pp. 29–59.
Düring, I., 1966, Aristoteles. Darstellung und Interpretation seines Denkens, Heidelberg (trad. ital. Aristotele, Mila¬no 1976, 19922).
Ebrey, D., 2015, “Why Are There No Conditionals in Aristotle’s Logic?”, Journal of the History of Philosophy 53, pp.185–205.
Einarson, B., 1936, “On Certain Mathematical Terms in Aristotle’s Logic”, American Journal of Philology 57, pp. 33–54; 151–72.
Englebretsen, G., 1998, Line diagrams for logic: drawing conclusions , Lewiston.
Frede, M., 1974, „Stoic vs. Aristotelian Syllogistic“, Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 56, pp. 1–32 (M. Frede., Essays in Ancient Philosophy, Oxford, 1987, pp. 99–124).
Gabbay, D. M., Woods, J. (eds.), 2004, Handbook of the History of Logic, vol. I, Amsterdam.
Gili, L., 2010, La Sillogistica di Aristotele. La riduzione di tutte le deduzioni valide al sillogismo, Lampi di Stampa 2010.
Gili, L., 2011, La sillogistica di Alessandro di Afrodisia. Sillogistica categorica e sillogistica modale nel commento agli Analitici Primi di Aristotele, Hildesheim.
Johnson, F., 2004, “Aristotle’s Modal Syllogisms”, in: Gabbay – Woods, pp. 247–307.
Keyt, D., 2009, Deductive Logic, in: G. Anagnostopoulos (ed.), A Companion to Aristotle, Blackwell, pp. 31–50.
Kneale W., Keale, M., 1962, The Development of Logic, Oxford. (trad. ital. Storia della logica, Torino 1972).
Kwiatkowski, T., 1980, Jan Łukasiewicz a problem interpretacji logiki Arystotelesa, Lublin.
Lear, J., 1980, Aristotle and Logical Theory, Cambridge.
Lennox J. G., 1994, “Aristotelian Problems”, Ancient Philosophy 14, pp. 53–77.
Łukasiewicz, J., 19572, Aristotle’s Syllogistic from the Standpoint of Modern Formal Logic, Oxford (trad. ital. La sillogistica di Aristotele, Brescia 1967).
Malink, M., 2006, “A reconstruction of Aristotle’s modal syllogistic”, History and Philosophy of Logic 27, pp. 95–141.
Malink, M., 2013, Aristotle’s modal syllogistic, Cambridge – London.
Mariani, M., 2005, “Sillogistica modale e teorie della predicazione”, Teoria 25, pp.131–154.
Mariani, M., 2018, Logica modale e metafisica. Saggi aristotelici, Pisa.
Mesquita, A. P., 2017, “Aristotle on Predication”, in: P. Stalmaszczyk (ed.), Philosophy and Logic of Predication, Frankfurt am Main et al., pp. 25–51.
McCall, S., 1963, Aristotle’s modal Syllogisms, Amsterdam.
Mignucci, M., 2008, “Il sillogismo aristotelico”, in: M. Migliori, A. Fermani (eds.), Platone e Aristotele: Dialet¬tica e logica, Brescia, pp. 243–264.
Natali, C., 1991, Bios theoretikos : la vita di Aristotele e l’organizzazione della sua scuola, Bologna.
Negro, C., 1967, La sillogistica di Aristotele, Bologna.
Nortmann, U., 1996, Modale Syllogismen, mögliche Welten, Essentialismus: eine Analyse der aristotelischen Modallogik, Berlin – New York.
Patzig, G., 1959, Die aristotelische Syllogistik. Logisch-philologische Untersuchung bei das Buch A der ‘Ersten Analytiken’, Göttingen (trad. inglese: Aristotle’s Theory of Syllogism, Dordrecht 1968).
Patterson, R., 1995, Aristotle’s Modal Logic: Essence and Entailment in the Organon, Cambridge.
Rini, A., 2011, Aristotle’s Modal Proofs: Prior Analytics A 8–22 in Predicate Logic, Springer.
Rose, L. E., 1968, Aristotle’s Syllogistic, Springfield.
Schmidt, K. J., 2000. Die modale Syllogistik des Aristoteles: Eine modal-prädikatenlogische Interpretation, Paderborn.
Seel, G., 1982, Die Aristotelische Modaltheorie, Berlin – New York.
Striker, G., 1994, “Assertoric vs. Modal Syllogistic”, Ancient Philosophy 14, pp. 39–51.
Striker, G., 1996, Perfection and Reduction in Aristotle’s Prior Analytics, in: M. Frede, G. Striker (eds.), Ratio¬nality in Greek Thought, Oxford, pp. 203–219.
Thom, P., 1996, The Logic of Essentialism: An Interpretation of Aristotle’s Modal Syllogistic, Dordrecht – Boston.
Trendelenburg, A. T., 1837, Elementa logices Aristoteleae, Berolini.
Van Rijen J., 1988, Aspects of Aristotle’s Logica of Modalities, Dordrecht.
Wesoły, M., 1984, “Verso un’ interpretazione semantica delle categorie di Aristotele”, Elenchos 5, pp. 103–140.
Wesoły, M., 1996, “Aristotle’s Lost Diagrams of Analytical Figures”, Eos 74, pp. 53–64.
Wesoły, M., 2003, “An Analytic Insight into Aristotle’s Logic”, in: W. Suchoń, M. Wesoły, E. Żarnecka-Biały, Three Studies in Aristotelian Semantics, Kraków, pp. 9–63; 191–199.
Wesoły, M., 2012, „Plato’s analytic System in Aristotle’s critical account“, In: U. Bruchmüller (hrsg.), Platons Hermeneutik und Prinzipiendenken im Licht der Dialoge und der antiken Tradition. Festschrift für Thomas Alexander Szlezák zum 70. Geburtstag, Hildesheim, pp. 248–275.
Wesoły, M., 2012, “ΑΝΑΛΥΣΙΣ ΠΕΡΙ ΤΑ ΣΧΗΜΑΤΑ. Restoring Aristotle’s Lost Diagrams of the Syllogistic Figures”, Peitho. Examina Antiqua 3, pp. 83–114.
Wesoły, M., 2018, „Towards a Reconstruction of Aristotle’s Lost Diagrams of the Syllogistic Figures”, in: Proceedings of the World Congress “Aristotle 2400 Years”, Thessaloniki (in corso di stampa).
Wesoły, M., 2018, “Dowodzenie/wyjaśnianie naukowe według Arystotelesa”, Archiwum Historii Filozofii i Mysli Społecznej 63/2018, pp. 255–282.
License
Peitho provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.