Keywords
economic growth
convergence
spatial regression
regions
European Union
How to Cite
Abstract
Contemporary development policy concentrates predominantly on reducing noticeable economic differences in a spatial system, and an important role in this respect is played by EU Cohesion Policy. Owing to the considerable scale of financial exposure of Cohesion Policy, the assessment of effectiveness of the implemented measures and their greater reliance on evidence are of major significance. Despite numerous attempts to empirically verify the effects of EU funds spending, the problem remains unresolved, and the results of recent studies lead frequently to ambiguous conclusions.
The article aims to verify the β-convergence process in EU regions in the years 2007–2015 allowing for the impact of the received EU funds and the spatial effects determining economic growth. In the research, use was made of a covergence approach consisting in the regression modelling of per capita GDP growth. Spatial econometrics methods were applied, by adding variables determining spatial interactions that can influence the economic growth rate to the specification of the estimated models.
The estimated econometric models show that in the years 2007–2015 EU funds positively affected economic growth. At the same time, the process of reducing economic disparities between EU regions was observed. Moreover, the existence of spatial effects for a dependent variable was confirmed. The results also show that the value of the EU funds received in the surrounding area generally did not translate into the dynamics of growth in a given location. The research presented is one of the few in which spatial interaction was verified by using weights matrices based on contiguity, distance, flows and affiliation.
References
Alecke B., Mitze T., Untiedt G., 2013. Growth effects of regional policy in Germany: Results from a spatially augmented multiplicative interaction model. The Annals of Regional Science 50: 535-554. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-012-0503-7
Anselin L., 2003. Spatial externalities, spatial multipliers, and spatial econometrics. International Regional Science Review 26(2): 153-166. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0160017602250972
Anselin L., Rey S., 1991. Properties of tests for spatial dependence in linear regression models. Geographical Analysis 23(2): 112-131. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1538-4632.1991.tb00228.x
Antunes M., Viegas M., Varum C., Pinho C., 2020. The impact of structural funds on regional growth: A panel data spatial analysis. Intereconomics 55(5): 312-319. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10272-020-0921-1
Bachtler J., Mendez C., 2020. Cohesion policy: Doing more with less. In: Wallace H., Pollack M., Roederer-Rynning Ch., Young A. (eds), Policy-making in the European Union. Oxford University Press, Oxford: 232-253. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/hepl/9780198807605.003.0010
Bähr C., 2008. How does sub-national autonomy affect the effectiveness of structural funds? Kyklos 61(1): 3-18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6435.2008.00389.x
Barro R.J., Sala-i-Martin X., 1992. Convergence. Journal of Political Economy 100(2): 223-251. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/261816
Barro R.J., Sala-i-Martin X., 2004. Economic growth. The MIT Press, Cambridge.
Becker S., Egger P., von Ehrlich M., 2018. Effects of EU regional policy: 1989-2013. Regional Science and Urban Economics 69: 143-152. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2017.12.001
Berkowitz P., Monfort P., Pieńkowski J., 2020. Unpacking the growth impacts of European Union cohesion policy: Transmission channels from cohesion policy into economic growth. Regional Studies 54(1): 60-71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2019.1570491
Blouri Y., von Ehrlich M., 2020. On the optimal design of place-based policies: A structural evaluation of EU regional transfers. Journal of International Economics 125: 103319. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2020.103319
Boldrin M., Canova F., 2001. Inequality and convergence in Europe’s regions: Reconsidering European regional policies. Economic Policy 16(32): 206-253. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0327.00074
Breidenbach P., Mitze T., Schmidt C., 2019. EU regional policy and the neighbour’s curse: Analyzing the income convergence effects of ESIF funding in the presence of spatial spillovers. Journal of Common Market Studies 57(2): 388-405. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12807
Cappelen A., Castellacci F., Fagerberg J., Verspagen B., 2003. The impact of EU regional support on growth and convergence in the European Union. Journal of Common Market Studies 41(4): 621-644. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5965.00438
Crescenzi R., Di Cataldo M., Giua M., 2020. It’s not about the money. EU funds, local opportunities, and Euroscepticism. Regional Science and Urban Economics 84: 103556. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2020.103556
Crescenzi R., Giua M., 2020. One or many cohesion policies of the European Union? On the differential economic impacts of cohesion policy across member states. Regional Studies 54(1): 10-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2019.1665174
Crucitti F., Lazarou N.-J., Monfort P., Salotti S., 2023. Where does the EU cohesion policy produce its benefits? A model analysis of the international spillovers generated by the policy. Economic Systems 47(3): 101076. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecosys.2023.101076
Dall’erba S., Fang F., 2017. Meta-analysis of the impact of European Union structural funds on regional growth. Regional Studies 51(6): 822-832. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2015.1100285
Dall’erba S., Le Gallo J., 2008. Regional convergence and the impact of European structural funds over 1989-1999: A spatial econometric analysis. Papers in Regional Science 87(2): 219-244. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1435-5957.2008.00184.x
Durlauf S.N., Johnson P.A., Temple J.R.W., 2009. The econometrics of convergence. In: Mills T.C., Patterson K. (eds), Palgrave handbook of econometrics. Palgrave Macmillan, London: 1087-1118. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230244405_23
Dyba W., Loewen B., Looga J., Zdražil P., 2018. Regional development in Central-Eastern European Countries at the beginning of the 21st century: Path dependence and effects of EU cohesion policy. Quaestiones Geographicae 37(2): 77-92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/quageo-2018-0017
Ederveen S., de Groot H.L.F., Nahuis R., 2006. Fertile soil for structural funds? A panel data analysis of the conditional effectiveness of European cohesion policy. Kyklos 59(1): 17-42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6435.2006.00318.x
Esposti R., Bussoletti S., 2008. Impact of objective 1 funds on regional growth convergence in the European Union: A panel-data approach. Regional Studies 42(2): 159-173. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400601142753
European Commission, 2014. Investment for jobs and growth: Promoting development and good governance in EU regions and cities. Sixth report on economic, social and territorial cohesion. Online: https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/reports/cohesion6/6cr_en.pdf (accessed 24 July 2023).
European Commission, 2017. My region, my Europe, our future. Seventh report on economic, social and territorial cohesion. Online: https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/reports/cohesion7/7cr.pdf (accessed 24 July 2023).
European Commission, 2022. Cohesion in Europe towards 2050. Eighth report on economic, social and territorial cohesion. Online: https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/information-sources/cohesion-report_en (accessed 19 July 2023).
Fiaschi D., Lavezzi A.M., Parenti A., 2018. Does EU cohesion policy work? Theory and evidence. Journal of Regional Science 58(2): 386-423. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jors.12364
Florax R.J., Folmer H., Rey S.J., 2003. Specification searches in spatial econometrics: The relevance of Hendry’s methodology. Regional Science and Urban Economics 33(5): 557-579. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-0462(03)00002-4
Fratesi U., 2016. Impact assessment of EU Cohesion Policy: Theoretical and empirical issues. In: Piattoni S., Polverari L. (eds), Handbook on cohesion policy in the EU. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham: 443-460. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781784715670.00045
Fratesi U., Wishlade F., 2017. The impact of European cohesion policy in different contexts. Regional Studies 51(6): 817-821. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2017.1326673
Hendry D.F., Krolzig H.-M., 2004. We ran one regression. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 66(5): 799-810. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0084.2004.102_1.x
Herodowicz T., 2023. Cohesion policy and environmental protection: The attitude of Polish public organisations. Quaestiones Geographicae 42(2): 85-95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14746/quageo-2023-0017
Kisiała W., Suszyńska, K., 2017. Economic growth and disparities: An empirical analysis for the Central and Eastern European countries. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy 12(4): 613-631. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24136/eq.v12i4.32
Krugman P., 1991. Increasing returns and economic geography. Journal of Political Economy 99(3): 483-499. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/261763
LeSage J.P., Fischer M.M., 2008. Spatial growth regressions: Model specification, estimation and interpretation. Spatial Economic Analysis 3(3): 275-304. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17421770802353758
Longley P.A., Goodchild M.F., Maguire D.J., Rhind D.W., 2005. Geographic information systems and science. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.
Mankiw G.N., Romer D., Weil D.N., 1992. A contribution to the empirics of economic growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics 107(2): 407-437. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2118477
Maynou L., Saez M., Kyriacou A., Bacaria J., 2016. The impact of structural and cohesion funds on eurozone convergence, 1990-2010. Regional Studies 50(7): 1127-1139. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2014.965137
Mohl P., Hagen T., 2010. Do EU structural funds promote regional growth? New evidence from various panel data approaches. Regional Science and Urban Economics 40(5): 353-365. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2010.03.005
Openshaw S., 1977. A geographical solution to scale and aggregation problems in region-building, partitioning and spatial modelling. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 2(4): 459-472. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/622300
Pellegrini G., Terribile F., Tarola O., Muccigrosso T., Busillo F., 2013. Measuring the effects of European regional policy on economic growth: A regression discontinuity approach. Papers in Regional Science 92(1): 217-233. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1435-5957.2012.00459.x
Pietrzykowski M., 2019. Convergence in GDP per capita across the EU regions – spatial effects. Economics and Business Review 5(2): 64-85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18559/ebr.2019.2.4
Pinho C., Varum C., Antunes M., 2015. Structural funds and European regional growth: Comparison of effects among different programming periods. European Planning Studies 23(7): 1302-1326. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2014.928674
Puigcerver-Peñalver M., 2007. The impact of structural funds policy on European regions’ growth. A theoretical and empirical approach. The European Journal of Comparative Economics 4(2): 179-208.
Rodríguez-Pose A., Fratesi U., 2004. Between development and social policies: The impact of European structural funds in objective 1 regions. Regional Studies 38(1): 97-113. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400310001632226
Rodríguez-Pose A., Garcilazo E., 2015. Quality of government and the returns of investment: examining the impact of cohesion expenditure in European regions. Regional Studies 49(8): 1274-1290. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2015.1007933
Rodríguez-Pose A., Novak K., 2013. Learning processes and economic returns in European cohesion policy. Investigaciones Regionales 25: 7-26.
Sala-i-Martin X.X., 1997. I just run two million regressions. American Economic Review 87: 178-183. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3386/w6252
Scotti F., Flori A., Pammolli F., 2022. The economic impact of structural and cohesion funds across sectors: Immediate, medium-to-long term effects and spillovers. Economic Modelling 111: 1-22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2022.105833
Solow R.M., 1956. A contribution to the theory of economic growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics 70(1): 65-94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1884513
Suchecki B., 2010. Modele regresji przestrzennej (Spatial regression models). In: Suchecki B. (ed.), Ekonometria przestrzenna: Metody i modele analizy danych przestrzennych (Spatial econometrics: Methods and models of spatial data analysis). Wydawnictwo C.H. Beck, Warsaw: 237-266.
Suchecki B., Olejnik A., 2010. Estymacja modeli regresji przestrzennej (Estimation of spatial regression models). In: Suchecki B. (ed.), Ekonometria przestrzenna: Metody i modele analizy danych przestrzennych (Spatial econometrics: Methods and models of spatial data analysis). Wydawnictwo C.H. Beck, Warsaw: 267-290.
Vukašina M., Kersan-Škabić I., Orlić E., 2022. Impact of European structural and investment funds absorption on the regional development in the EU-12 (new member states). Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy 17(4): 857-880. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24136/eq.2022.029
Ward M., Gleditsch K.S., 2019. Spatial regression models. Sage, Thousand Oaks. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781071802588
Wójcik P., 2018. Metody quasi-eksperymentalne i ich zastosowanie w badaniu wpływu historii na współczesność (Quasi-experimental methods and their use in analysing the influence of history on contemporary economies). Ekonomista 2: 156-184.
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Wojciech Kisiała, Bartosz Stępiński
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.