Keywords
higher education
diversity
sensitive topics
conceptions of learning
Number of views: 195
Number of downloads: 154
Abstract
This article analyses the concept of diversity in education in the context of Eastern Europe, and how its meaning might differ from that used in Western-focused literature. The study explores the ways in which faculty interpret diversity based on their experience of teaching contexts as being homogenous, situational, or internationalized, for which interviews have been conducted with university educators in Eastern Europe. In a phenomenographic analysis, three different approaches to how teachers engage with diversity in the classroom were identified: (1) exposing students to diversity as an external phenomenon through teaching; (2) focusing on the diversities among students in a given classroom and learning how to navigate them; (3) using the diversities present in the classroom to facilitate inclusive teaching and learning. We argue that the meanings and intentions associated with the understanding of diversity are constitutive of how faculty see their role in facilitating student learning in diverse classroom, and especially of their strategies to address sensitive and controversial topics. Finally, we discuss the implications for teaching practice and academic development, in addition to the relevance of diversity in Eastern European classrooms.
References
Andrushchenko, Victor & Galyna Nesterenko. 2015. “Values discourse of diversity education: Dialogue of Eastern and Western European countries.” Pp. 25-40 in Inclusive Education in Different East and West European Countries, edited by Diana Soulber. https://ec.europa.eu/programmes/erasmus-plus/project-resultcontent/34cd5e51-7598-49e1-a1bd-4e50fdeba30b/Inclusive%20Education%20in%20Different%20East%20and%20West%20European%20Countries.pdf
Åkerlind, Gerlese S. 2004. “A new dimension to understanding university teaching.” Teaching in Higher Education 9(3): 363-75. doi: 10.1080/1356251042000216679
Åkerlind, Gerlese S. 2007. “Constraints on Academics’ Potential for Developing as a Teacher.” Studies in Higher Education 32(1): 21-37. doi: 10.1080/03075070601099416
Ashwin, Paul. 2006. “Variation in academics’ accounts of tutorials.” Studies in Higher Education 31(6): 651-65. doi: 10.1080/03075070601004234
Balint, Mária, Mihály Gubi, & Otto Mihaly. 1980. A polgári nevelés radikális alternatívái [Radical alternatives of the middle-class pedagogy]. Budapest: Tankönyvkiadó.
Berg, Carin & Lazãr Vlãsceanu. 1991. “The Europeanization of Higher Education: Integration and Diversity as Viewed from Eastern Europe.” Higher Education in Europe 16(4): 4-17. doi.org/10.1080/0379772910160402
Berkes, Lilla. 2010. “The Development and Meaning of the Concept of Multiculturalism.” International Relations Quarterly 1(4): 1-6.
Boeije, Hennie. 2002. “A purposeful approach to the constant comparative method in the analysis of qualitative interviews.” Quality and Quantity 36: 391-409. doi: 10.1023/A:1020909529486
Claeys-Kulik, Anna-Lena, Tomas E. Jørgensen, & Henriette Stöber. 2019. Diversity, Equity and Inclusion in European Higher Education Institutions. Results from the INVITED project. Retrieved February 17, 2022 (https://eua.eu/downloads/publications/web_diversity%20equity%20and%20inclusion%20in%20european%20higher%20education%20institutions.pdf).
Csereklye, Erzsebet. 2014. “Multiculturalism in Central and Eastern Europe: The Hungarian story.” Multicultural Education Review 6(1): 102-127.
Dorner, Helga, Gorana Misic, & Margaryta Rymarenko. 2021. “Online Mentoring for Academic Practice: Strategies, Implications, and Innovations.” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1483(1): 98-111. doi: 10.1111/nyas.14301
Dorner, Helga & Jelena Belic. 2021. “From an Individual to an Institution: Observations about the Evolutionary Nature of Conversations.” International Journal for Academic Development 26(3): 210-23. doi: 10.1080/1360144X.2021.1947295
Fox, Dennis. 1983. “Personal Theories of Teaching.” Studies in Higher Education 8(2): 151-163. doi: 10.1080/03075078312331379014
González, Carlos. 2011. “Extending Research on ‘Conceptions of Teaching’: Commonalities and Differences in Recent Investigations.” Teaching in Higher Education 16(1): 65-80. doi: 10.26466/opus.792272
Holmes, Stephen & Ivan Krastev. 2019. “Explaining Eastern Europe: Imitation and its discontents.” Eurozine. Retrieved February 17, 2022 (https://www.eurozine.com/explaining-eastern-europe/).
Kürti, László. 2020. “Orbánism: The Culture of Illiberalism in Hungary.” Ethnologia Europaea 50(2): 62-79. doi: 10.16995/ee.1055
Kerr, Clark. 1990. “The Internationalization of Learning and the Nationalization of the Purposes of Higher Education: Two ‘Laws of Motion’ in Conflict?” European Journal of Education 25(1): 5-22. doi: 10.2307/1502702
Korhonen, Vesa & Markus Weil. 2015. “The Internationalisation of Higher Education: Perspectives on Self-Conceptions in Teaching.” Journal of Research in International Education 14(3): 198-212. doi:10.1177/1475240915615447
Kreber Carolin. 2010. “Academics’ teacher identities, authenticity and pedagogy.” Studies in Higher Education 35(2): 171-194. doi: 10.1080/03075070902953048
Marton, Ference & Wing Y. Pong. 2005. On the unit of description in phenomenography. Higher Education Research and Development 24(4): 335-48. doi: 10.1080/07294360500284706
Pew Research Center. 2018. Eastern and Western Europeans Differ on Importance of Religion, Views of Minorities, and Key Social Issues. Retrieved February 17, 2022 (https://www.pewforum.org/2018/10/29/eastern-and-western-europeans-differ-on-importance-of-religion-views-of-minorities-and-key-social-issues/).
Prosser, Michael & Keith Trigwell. 1999. Understanding learning and teaching: The experience in higher education. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Roche, Lawrence A. & Herbert W. Marsh. 2002. “Teaching self-concept in higher education. Reflecting on multiple dimensions of teaching effectiveness.” Pp. 179-218 in Teacher Thinking, Beliefs and Knowledge in Higher Education, edited by N. Hativa & P. Goodyear. Amsterdam: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Rutakumwa, Rutakumwa, Joseph O. Mugisha, Sarah Bernays, Elizabeth Kabunga, Grace Tumwekwase, Martin Mbonye, & Janet Seeley. 2020. “Conducting in-depth interviews with and without voice recorders: a comparative analysis.” Qualitative Research 20(5): 565581. doi: 10.1177/1468794119884806
Scherle, Dana A. & Daniel Heinrich. 2017. “Turkey, Hungary and Poland: The politics of school textbooks.” DW. Retrieved February 17, 2022 (https://www.dw.com/en/turkey-hungary-and-poland-the-politics-of-school-textbooks/a-41032191).
License
Manuscript authors are responsible for obtaining copyright permissions for any copyrighted materials included within manuscripts. The authors must provide permission letters, when appropriate, to the Society Register Editors.
In addition, all published papers in Society Register are published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 Unported License.
1.1 The Author hereby warrants that he/she is the owner of all the copyright and other intellectual property rights in the Work and that, within the scope of the present Agreement, the paper does not infringe the legal rights of another person. The owner of the copyright work also warrants that he/she is the sole and original creator thereof and that is not bound by any legal constraints in regard to the use or sale of the work.
1.2. The Publisher warrants that is the owner of the PRESSto platform for open access journals, hereinafter referred to as the PRESSto Platform.
2. The Author grants the Publisher non-exclusive and free of charge license to unlimited use worldwide over an unspecified period of time in the following areas of exploitation:
2.1. production of multiple copies of the Work produced according to the specific application of a given technology, including printing, reproduction of graphics through mechanical or electrical means (reprography) and digital technology;
2.2. marketing authorisation, loan or lease of the original or copies thereof;
2.3. public performance, public performance in the broadcast, video screening, media enhancements as well as broadcasting and rebroadcasting, made available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them;
2.4. inclusion of the Work into a collective work (i.e. with a number of contributions);
2.5. inclusion of the Work in the electronic version to be offered on an electronic platform, or any other conceivable introduction of the Work in its electronic version to the Internet;
2.6. dissemination of electronic versions of the Work in its electronic version online, in a collective work or independently;
2.7. making the Work in the electronic version available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, in particular by making it accessible via the Internet, Intranet, Extranet;
2.8. making the Work available according to appropriate license pattern CC BY-NC 4.0 as well as another language version of this license or any later version published by Creative Commons.
3. The Author grants the Publisher permission to reproduce a single copy (print or download) and royalty-free use and disposal of rights to compilations of the Work and these compilations.
4. The Author grants the Publisher permission to send metadata files related to the Work, including to commercial and non-commercial journal-indexing databases.
5. The Author represents that, on the basis of the license granted in the present Agreement, the Publisher is entitled and obliged to:
5.1. allow third parties to obtain further licenses (sublicenses) to the Work and to other materials, including derivatives thereof or compilations made, based on or including the Work, whereas the provisions of such sub-licenses will be the same as with the Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) Creative Commons sub-license or another language version of this license, or any later version of this license published by Creative Commons;
5.2. make the Work available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, without any technological constraints;
5.3. appropriately inform members of the public to whom the Work is to be made available about sublicenses in such a way as to ensure that all parties are properly informed (appropriate informing messages).
6. Because of the royalty-free provision of services of the Author (resulting from the scope of obligations stipulated in the present Agreement), the Author shall not be entitled to any author’s fee due and payable on the part of the Publisher (no fee or royalty is payable by the Publisher to the Author).
7.1. In the case of third party claims or actions for indemnity against the Publisher owing to any infractions related to any form of infringement of intellectual property rights protection, including copyright infringements, the Author is obliged to take all possible measures necessary to protect against these claims and, when as a result of legal action, the Publisher, or any third party licensed by the Publisher to use the Work, will have to abandon using the Work in its entirety or in part or, following a court ruling in a legal challenge, to pay damages to a third party, whatever the legal basis
7.2. The Author will immediately inform the Publisher about any damage claims related to intellectual property infringements, including the author’s proprietary rights pertaining to a copyrighted work, filed against the Author. of liability, the Author is obliged to redress the damage resulting from claims made by third party, including costs and expenditures incurred in the process.
7.3. To all matters not settled herein provisions of the Polish Civil Code and the Polish Copyright and Related Rights Act shall apply.