The Copernican Hypotheses Part 2

Main Article Content

Stephen Dersley


The Copernicus constructed by Thomas S. Kuhn in The Copernican Revolution (1957) is a decidedly non-revolutionary astronomer who unwittingly ignited a conceptual revolution in the European worldview. Kuhn’s reading of Copernicus was crucial for his model of science as a deeply conservative discourse, which presented in The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1962). This essay argues that Kuhn’s construction of Copernicus and depends on the suppression of the most radical aspects of Copernicus’ thinking, such as the assumptions of the Commentariolus (1509-14) and the conception of hypothesis of De Revolutionibus (1543). After comparing hypothetical thinking in the writings of Aristotle and Ptolemy, it is suggested that Copernicus’ conceptual breakthrough was enabled by his rigorous use of hypothetical thinking.


Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Dersley, S. (2015). The Copernican Hypotheses Part 2. Journal of Applied Cultural Studies, 1, 109-128.


  1. Aristotle, On the heavens, transl. by J. L. Stocks, Adelaide 2009.
  2. Copernicus N., Commentariolus, in Nicholas Copernicus Minor Works, Warsaw – Cracow 1985.
  3. Copernicus N., De revolutionibus orbium caelestium, transl. C. G. Wallis, New York 1995.
  4. Copernicus N., Joachim G. R., Rosen E., Three Copernican Treatises, transl. E. Rosen, New York 1939.
  5. Kuhn T. S., The Copernican Revolution: planetary astronomy in the development of Western thought, Cambridge 1957.
  6. Ptolemy, The Almagest, transl. G. J. Toomer, New York 1984.
  7. Rosen E., Copernicus and his successors, London 1995.
  8. Swerdlow N. M., The Derivation and First Draft of Copernicus’s Planetary Theory: A Translation of the Commentariolus with Commentary, “Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society” vol. 117, no. 6, Symposium on Copernicus . American Philosophical Society, 1973.