Happy Together or Happy Alone? The Tension between the Market and the Family in the Context of Culture

Main Article Content

Michał A. Michalski

Abstract

The article explores the interactions between the family and the market in the context of the happiness and tensions that exist between these two social institutions. The analysis undertaken here also stresses the importance of culture, understood as the norms, values and beliefs which are important for a wide range of actions and processes within a society, and treats it as a useful perspective for the explanation of complex socio economic phenomena. Firstly, the nature and mutual dependence of these two spheres is characterized in order to highlight that the desired social order cannot function without any of them. In this respect the article also aims to explain the role that the family plays in society and the happiness achieved by its members. At the same time, it is stressed that the proper functioning of society depends largely on the vision of a man that a given society accepts. By doing this, the limitations of the anthropological assumptions of the dominant neoclassical economics are indicated and discussed. Secondly, the article shows how the family dimension of human life – social in its nature – is intrinsically connected with the issue of happiness. It is important to stress this because to a large extent happiness in economics and different happiness indices seem to limit their analyses to subjective individual well-being. Finally, the article states that although market and family are to an extent complementary, the proper socio-cultural hierarchy and policies based on it should stress the priority of the latter. Evidence of different kinds for such a standpoint is subsequently presented. In the end, the categories of ‘social’ and ‘human’ capital and their correlation is engaged to improve understanding of the fact that a well-functioning family is a necessary condition for the development and long-term flourishing of the market.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Michalski, M. A. (2015). Happy Together or Happy Alone? The Tension between the Market and the Family in the Context of Culture. Journal of Applied Cultural Studies, 1, 57-80. https://doi.org/10.14746/jacs.2015.1.06
Section
Articles

References

  1. Arendt H., The Human Condition, Chicago & London 1998.
  2. Argyle M., The Psychology of Happiness, New York 2001.
  3. Bartolini S., Bilancini E., If Not Only GDP, What Else? Using Relational Goods to Predict the Trends of Subjective Well-Being, “International Review of Economics” vol. 57, no. 2, 2010.
  4. Becker G. S., Human Capital. A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis with Special Reference to Education, Chicago 1993.
  5. Bellah R. N., Madsen R., Sullivan W. M., Swindler A., Tipton S. M., Habits of the Heart: Individualism and Commitment in American Life, Berkeley 1996.
  6. Benedict XVI, Urbi et Orbi Message of His Holiness Pope Benedict XVI, Christmas 2008.
  7. Benedict XVI, Caritas in veritate, 2009.
  8. Bruni L., Reciprocity, Altruism and the Civil Society, New York 2008.
  9. Bruni L., Stanca L., Watching Alone: Relational Goods, Television and Happiness, “Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization” vol. 65, no. 3-4, 2008.
  10. Coser L. A., Masters of Sociological Thought: Ideas in Historical and Social Context, New York 1977.
  11. Czapiński J., Kapitał ludzki i kapitał społeczny a dobrobyt materialny. Polski paradoks, “Zarządzanie Publiczne” vol. 2, no. 4, 2008.
  12. Czapiński J., Social Capital, in Social Diagnosis. The Subjective Quality and Objective Conditions of Life in Poland, eds J. Czapiński, T. Panek, Warsaw 2009.
  13. Dekker P., Broek A. van den, Civil Society in Longitudinal and Comparative Perspective: Voluntary Associations, Political Involvement, Social Trust and Happiness in a Dozen Countries, Toronto 2004.
  14. Diwan R., Relational Wealth and the Quality of Life, “Journal of Socio-Economics” vol. 29, no. 4, 2000.
  15. Edwards R., J. R. Franklin, Holland J., Families and Social Capital: Exploring the Issues, London 2003.
  16. Elias N., The Society of Individuals, New York & London 1991.
  17. Fehr E., Gächter S., Reciprocity and Economics: The Economic Implications of Homo Reciprocans, “European Economic Review,” vol. 42, 1998.
  18. Fleming T., The Natural Family, in Remarks to The World Congress of Families, Prague 1997.
  19. Frey B. S., Stutzer A., Recent Advances in the Economics of Individual Subjective Well-Being, “Social Research” vol. 77, no. 2, 2010.
  20. Goldman D. P., It’s Not the End of the World. It’s the End of You, New York 2011.
  21. Gorton W. A., Too Much of a Good Thing? Freedom, Individualism, Autonomy and the Decline of Happiness in Liberal Democracies, Vancouver 2008.
  22. Gui B., Stanca L., Happiness and Relational Goods: Well-being and Interpersonal Relations in the Economic Sphere, “International Review of Economics” vol. 57, 2010.
  23. Hofstede G., Cultures and Organizations. Software of the Mind, New York 1997.
  24. Lane R. E., The Loss of Happiness in Market Democracies, New Haven 2000.
  25. Lee D. R., Who Says Money Cannot Buy Happiness?, “The Independent Review” vol. X, no. 3, 2005.
  26. Mejos D. E. A., Against Alienation: Karol Wojtyła’s Theory of Participation, “Kritikē” vol. 1, no. 1, 2007.
  27. Martin M. W., Paradoxes of Happiness, “Journal of Happiness Studies” vol. 9, no. 2, 2008.
  28. Marx K., Kapitał, transl. J. Serafin, Cracow 2009.
  29. Merton R. K., Social Theory and Social Structure, New York 1968.
  30. Michalski M. A., Family Life – between Charism and Institution. Signalling Multidimensionality and Complexity of Human Interactions for Business Institutions and Society, “Annales. Etyka w życiu gospodarczym” vol. 17, no. 4, 2014.
  31. Michalski M.A., Why and How Business Ethics Benefits from Family. Where Trust, Responsibility and Ethics Develop, “Prakseologia” no. 155, 2014.
  32. Nelson J. A., Feminism, Objectivity & Economics, New York 1996.
  33. O’Boyle E. J., Requiem for Homo Economicus, “Journal of Markets and Morality” vol. 10, 2007.
  34. Putnam R. D., Bowling Alone: America’s Declining Social Capital, New York 2011.
  35. Putnam R. D., The Prosperous Community: Social Capital and Public Life, “American Prospect” vol. 13, 1993.
  36. Randells G. D., Business and “Family Values,” in Ethics in the Workplace, eds R. A. Larmer, Belmont 2002.
  37. Roback Morse J., Love & Economics: Why the Laissez-Faire Family Doesn’t Work, Dallas 2001.
  38. Roberts J. A., Manolis C., Tanner J. F. Jr., Adolescent Autonomy and the Impact of Family Structure on Materialism and Compulsive Buying, “Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice” vol. 14, no. 4, 2006.
  39. Schulz N., Home Economics. The Consequences of Changing Family Structure, Washington 2013.
  40. Smith A., An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, “MetaLibri Digital Library” vol. 8, 2007.
  41. Stevenson B., Wolfers J., Economic Growth and Subjective Well-Being: Reassessing the Easterlin Paradox, “Brookings Papers on Economic Activity” Spring 2008.
  42. Strasser M., The Image of Man, in Legal Philosophy: General Aspects eds M. Troper, A. Verza, Stuttgart 2002.