Abstract
In this paper, I show that Aristotle’s refutation of the Eleatic argument in Physics I.8 is based on the idea that a thing at the starting point of coming to be is composite and is made up of what underlies and a privation. In doing so, I clarify how the concept of accidentality as used in his solution should be understood in relation to the composite nature of what comes to be. I also suggest an explanation of why Aristotle’s discussion of the Eleatic dilemma in Physics I.8, unlike his discussion in the previous chapter, is not clear.
References
Ackrill, J., 1981, Aristotle the Philosopher, Oxford.
Algra, K., 2004, “On Generation and Corruption I. 3: Substantial Change and the Problem of Not-Being”, in:
J. Mansfeld, F. De Haas (eds.), Aristotle: On Generation and Corruption, Book I (Symposium Aristotelicum), Oxford, pp. 91–122.
Burnyeat, M., 2001, A Map of Metaphysics Zeta, Pittsburgh.
Charles, D., 2018, “Physics I.7”, in: D. Quarantotto (ed.), Aristotle’s Physics Book I: A Systematic Exploration, Cambridge, pp. 178–205
Charlton, W., 1970, Aristotle Physics Books I and II, Oxford.
Cherniss, H., 1935, Aristotle’s Criticism of Presocratic Philosophy, New York.
Graham, D. W., 1987, Aristotle’s Two Systems, Oxford.
Hardie, R. P., Gaye, R. K. (transl.), 1984, Physics, in: J. Barnes (ed.), The Complete Works of Aristotle, vol. 1, Princeton.
Lewis, F., 1991, Substance and Predication in Aristotle, Cambridge.
Loux, M. J., 1992, “Aristotle and Parmenides: An Interpretation of Physics A8”, Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy 8, pp. 281–319.
Oki, T., 2008, “Aristotle’s Analysis of Coming to Be in Physics A” (in Japanese), Annual Review of the Kansai Philosophical Association 16, pp. 77–87.
Ross, W. D., 1936, Aristotle’s Physics, Oxford.
Waterlow, S., 1982, Nature, Change, and Agency in Aristotle’s Physics, Oxford.
Wicksteed, P. H., Cornford, F. M. (transl.), 1929, Aristotle: Physics, vol. 1: Books 1–4, Cambridge, Mass.
License
Peitho provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.