Keywords
solipsism
privacy
Wittgenstein
Colotes
Aristocles
internal touch
How to Cite
Abstract
The aim of this paper is to assess the evidence on Cyrenaic solipsism and show how and why some views endorsed by the Cyrenaics appear to be committing them to solipsism. After evaluating the fascinating case for Cyrenaic solipsism, the paper shall deal with an (often) underestimated argument on language attributed to the Cyrenaics, whose logic – if I reconstruct it well – implies that after all the Cyrenaics cannot have endorsed a radical solipsism. Yet, by drawing an illuminating parallel with Wittgenstein’s argument on private language and inner sensations, a case is to be made for the Cyrenaics to have subscribed to a sort of ‘residual solipsism’, which in turn helps us to understand the notion of Cyrenaic privacy at a fuller extent.
References
Adam, C., Tannery, P., 1897-1910, Oeuvres de Descartes, Paris, 12vols.
Ayer, A., 1966, "Can There Be a Private Language?", in: G. Pitcher (ed.), Wittgenstein. The Philosophical Inves¬tigations, London, pp. 251-266. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-15269-8_9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-15269-8_9
Chiesara, M. L., 2001, Aristocles of Messene. Testimonia and Fragments, Oxford.
Coliva, A., 2010, Moore and Wittgenstein, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230289697 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230289697
Dionigi, R., 2001, La fatica di descrivere. Itinerario di Wittgenstein nel linguaggio della filosofia, Macerata.
Everson, S., 1991, "The Objective Appearance of Pyrrhonism", in: S. Everson (ed.), Companions to Ancient Thought: Psychology, Cambridge, pp. 121-147.
Hacker, P. M. S., 1972, Insight and Illusion. Wittgenstein on Philosophy and the Metaphysics of Experience, Oxford.
Hamilton, A., 2014, Routledge Philosophy Guidebook to Wittgenstein and On Certainty, London-New York. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315771762 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315771762
Lampe, K., 2014, The Birth of Hedonism. The Cyrenaics and Pleasure as a Way of Life, Princeton. https://doi.org/10.23943/princeton/9780691161136.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.23943/princeton/9780691161136.001.0001
Langton, R., 2009, Sexual solipsism. Philosophical Essays on Pornography and Objectification, Oxford. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199247066.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199247066.001.0001
Keeling, E., 2018, "Pathos in the Theaetetus", in: L. Pitteloud, E. Keeling (eds.), Psychology and Ontology in Plato, New York, pp. 55-66. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04654-5_5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04654-5_5
Kenny, A., 1966, "Cartesian Privacy", in: G. Pitcher (ed.), Wittgenstein. The Philosophical Investigations, London, pp. 352-370. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-15269-8_13 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-15269-8_13
Kripke, S., 1984, Wittgenstein on Rules and Private Language. An Elementary Exposition, Oxford.
McGinn, M., 2013, The Routledge Guidebook to Wittgenstein's Philosophical IInvestigations, London-New York. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203198117 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203198117
Pears, D., 1987/1988, The False Prison. A Study of the Development of Wittgenstein's Philosophy, vol. I-II, Oxford.
Pears, D., 2008, Paradox and Platitude in Wittgenstein's Philosophy, Oxford-New York.
Philström, S., 2020, Why Solipsism Matters, London-New York. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350126435 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350126435
Rhees, R., (1966), "Can There Be a Private Language?", in: G. Pitcher (ed.), Wittgenstein. The Philosophical Investigations, London, pp. 267-285. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-15269-8_10 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-15269-8_10
Rollins, C. D., 1967, "Solipsism", in: P. Edwards (ed.), The Encyclopedia of Philosophy, vol. 7, London, pp. 487-491
Rowe, C., 2015, "The First-Generation Socratics and the Socratic Schools: the Case of the Cyrenaics", in: U. Zili¬oli (ed.), From the Socratics to the Socratic schools. Classical Ethics, Epistemology and Metaphysics, London- New York, pp. 26-42.
Sedley, D., 2018, "The Duality of Touch", in: S. Purves (ed.), Touch and Ancient Senses, New York-London, pp. 64-74. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315719665-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315719665-5
Todd, W., 1968, Analytical Solipsism, The Hague. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-8829-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-8829-6
Tsouna, V., 1998, The Epistemology of the Cyrenaic School, Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511482663 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511482663
Wittgenstein, L., 1953, Philosophical Investigations, Oxford.
Wittgenstein, L., 1958, The Blue and Brown Books, Oxford.
Wittgenstein, L., 1993, "Notes for Lectures on "Private Experience" and "Sense Data" and The Language of Sense Data and Private Experience (Notes by Rush Rhees)", in: J. Klagge, A. Nordmann (eds.), Philosophical Occasions, 1912-1951, Indianapolis.
Zilioli, U., 2013, "The Wooden Horse: the Cyrenaics in the Theaetetus", in: G. Boys-Stones, D. El Murr, C. Gill, (eds.), The Platonic Art of Philosophy, Cambridge, pp. 114-132. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139856010.012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139856010.012
Zilioli, U., 2014, The Cyrenaics, London-New York. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315729459 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315729459
Zilioli, U. (ed.), 2015, From the Socratics to the Socratic schools. Classical Ethics, Epistemology and Metaphysics, London-New York. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315719467 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315719467
Zilioli, U., 2016, "Could the Cyrenaics live an Ethical Life?", Philosophia Scientiae 20 [3], pp. 29-48. https://doi.org/10.4000/philosophiascientiae.1221 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/philosophiascientiae.1221
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Ugo Zilioli
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Peitho provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.