Keywords
demiurge
cosmos
matter
theology
How to Cite
Abstract
Numenius is an author who straddles the line between Middle Platonism and Neoplatonism. In this contribution, I focus on the differences between the second and the third God, which emerge from analyses of the relevant fragments. Numenius emphasizes, on several occasions, how the second God (i.e., the demiurge) has a dual nature. In this paper, I investigate the role of the demiurge in Numenius and examine in what sense the second and third God are “one.” On the one hand, Numenius seems to be stressing the unity of the second and third levels of reality, but on the other hand, he also appears to be differentiating them. The present analyses concentrate on fragments 19F, 24F, 29T and 30T (respectively 11, 16, 21, and 22 in des Places’ edition). My purpose is to demonstrate that, according to Numenius, the second and the third God are one because they both can be regarded as demiurgic. Thus, Numenius conceives a kind of “double demiurgy,” which preserves the distinction between the second and the third God, who are distinguished from an ontological point of view, but who, at the same time, share a demiurgic function. The second God is then the paradigm, whereas the third God is immanent in matter as a ruling principle of the cosmos, which is similar to the World Soul, as he operates on matter in order to make it rationally ordered.
References
Baltes, M., 1975, “Numenios von Apamea und der platonische Timaios”, Vigiliae Christianae 29, pp. 241-270. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1582870
Baltes, M., 1976, Die Weltentstehung des platonischen Timaios nach den antiken Interpretern, vol. I, Leiden. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004320512
Baltes, M., 1997, “Is the Idea of Good in Plato’s Republic Beyond Being?”, in: M. Joyal (ed.), Studies in Plato and the Platonic Tradition. Essays Presented to J. Whittaker, London-New York, pp. 1-27.
Bonazzi, M., 2004, “Un lettore antico della Repubblica: Numenio di Apamea”, Methexis 17, pp. 71-84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/24680974-90000446
Bonazzi, M., 2015, “Numenio, il Platonismo e le tradizioni orientali”, Χῶρα 13, pp. 225-240. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/chora20151311
Bonazzi, M., 2017, “Middle Platonists on the Eternity of the Universe”, in: G. Roskam, H. Verheyden (eds.), Light in Creation. Ancient Commentators in Dialogue and Debate on the Origin of the World. Tübingen, pp. 3-15.
Boys-Stones, G., 2018, “Numenius on Intellect, Soul and the Authority of Plato”, in: J. Bryan, R. Wardy, J.
Warren (eds.), Authors and Authorities in Ancient Philosophy, Cambridge, pp. 184-201.
Boys-Stones, G., 2018a, Platonist Philosophy 80 BC to AD 250. An Introduction and Collection of Sources in Translation, Cambridge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781139050203
Centrone, B., 2012, “Il Timeo nell’Accademia antica”, in: F. Celia, A. Ulacco (cur.), Il Timeo. Esegesi greche, arabe, latine, Pisa, pp. 57-80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/jj.2036756.6
des Places, E., 1973, Numénius. Fragments. Texte établi et traduit par Eduard Des Places, Paris.
Dillon, J., 19962, The Middle Platonists. 80 B. C. to 220 A. D, Ithaca-New York.
Dodds, E. R., 1960. “Numenius and Ammonius”, in: E. R. Dodds et al., Les sources de Plotin, Vandoeuvres-Genève, pp. 1-33.
Donini, P., 1988, “La connaissance de Dieu et la hiérarchie divine chez Albinos”, in: R. van den Broek, T. Baarda, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004296671_007
J. Mansfeld (eds.), Knowledge of God in the Graeco-Roman World, Leiden, pp. 118-131.
Donini, P., 1994, “Testi e commenti, manuali e insegnamento: la forma sistematica e il metodo della filosofia in età postellenistica”, ANRW, Bd. II 36.7, pp. 5028-5100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110883732-015
Emilsson, E. K., 2007, Plotinus on Intellect, Oxford. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199281701.001.0001
Ferrari, F., 2010, “Esegesi, commento e sistema nel Medioplatonismo”, in: A. Neschke (hrsg.), Argumenta in dialogos Platonis, Teil I: Platoninterpretation ind ihre Hermeneutik von der Antike bis zum Beginn des 19. Jahrunderts. Basel-Stuttgart, pp. 52-76.
Ferrari, F., 2012, “L’esegesi medioplatonica del Timeo: metodi, finalità, risultati”, in: F. Celia, A. Ulacco (cur.),
Il Timeo. Esegesi greche, arabe, latine, Pisa, pp. 81-131.
Ferrari, F., 2014, “Gott als Vater und Schöpfer. Zur Rezeption von Timaios 28c3-5 bei einigen Platonikern”, in: F. Albrecht, R. Feldmeier (eds.), The divine Father. Religious and Philosophical Concepts of Divine Parenthood in Antiquity, Leiden, pp. 57-69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004264779_005
Ferrari, F., 2014, “Materia, movimento, anima e tempo prima della nascita dell’universo: Plutarco e Attico sulla cosmologia del Timeo”, in: E. Coda, C. Martini Bonadeo (ed.), Études de logique et de cosmologie offerts à Henri Hugonnard-Roche, Paris, pp. 255-276.
Ferrari, F., 2017-2018, “Platone ha effettivamente identificato il demiurgo del Timeo e l’idea del bene della Repubblica? Riflessioni intorno a un’antica querelle filosofica”, Χῶρα 15-16, pp. 67-91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/chora2017/201815/165
Frede, M., 1987, “Numenius”, ANRW, Bd. II 36.2, pp. 1034-1075. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110851519-009
Giusta, M., 1986, “Due capitoli sui dossografi di fisica”, in: G. Cambiano (cur.), Storografia e dossografia nella filosofia antica, Torino, pp. 149-201.
Hadot, P., 1987, “Théologie, exégèse, revelation, écriture, dans la philosophie grecque”, in: M. Tardieu (ed.), Les règles de l’interpretation, Paris, pp. 13-34.
Holzhausen, J., 1992, “Eine Anmerkung zum Verhältnis von Numenios und Plotin”, Hermes 120, pp. 250-255.
Jourdan, F., 2014, “La matière à l’origine du mal chez Numénius (fr. 43 et 52 Des Places)”, Philosophie Antique 14, pp. 185-235. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/philosant.795
Jourdan, F., 2021, “Pourquoi n’y a-til pas d’Âme du monde dans le dialogue de Numénius sur le bien? La nonidentification du ‘troisième’ dieu à l’âme du monde dans le Περὶ τἀγαθοῦ”, Philosophie Antique 21, pp. 233-264. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/philosant.5354
Jourdan, F., 2023, Penser et être dieu. Essais sur l’enseignement de Numénius mis en regard des Oracles chaldaïques et lu par Proclus, Heidelberg.
Mansfeld, J., 1989, “Three notes on Albinus”, in: J. Mansfeld (ed.), Studies in later Greek Philosophy and Gnosticism, London, pp. 61-80.
Michalewski, A., 2021, “Constructing Authority. A Re-examination of Some Controversial Issues in the Theology of Numenius”, in: M. Erler, J. E. Heßler, F. M. Petrucci (eds.), Authority and authoritative Texts in the Platonist Tradition, Cambridge, pp. 130-148. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108921596.007
Müller, G., 2009, “Patèr kaì poiētés: Numenio y la interpretaci.n de Timeo 28c 3”, Classica 22, pp. 45-52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14195/2176-6436_22-1_3
Müller, G., 2015, “Qué es “lo que es viviente” (ὅ ἐστι ζῷον) según Numenio de Apamea”, Cuadernos de filosofía 64, pp. 9-22.
O’ Brien, C. S., 2015, The Demiurge in Ancient Thought. Secondary Gods and divine Mediators, Cambridge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139871723
O’ Brien, C. S., 2017, “Alcinous’ Reception of Plato”, in: H. Tarrant, F. Renatud, D. Baltzly, D. A. Layne, Brill’s Compation to the Reception of Plato in Antiquity, Leiden, pp. 171-182. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004355385_012
Opsomer, J., 2005, “Demiurges in Early Imperial Platonism”, in: R. Hirsch-Luipold (hrsg.), Gott und die Götter bei Plutarch. Götterbilder - Gottesbilder - Weltbilder, Berlin-New York, pp. 51-99.
Petrucci, F. M., 2018, Taurus of Beirut. The other Side of Middle Platonism, London-New York.
Petrucci, F. M.., 2019, “Il principio ΔΙΔΑΣΚΑΛΙΑΣ ΧΑΡΙΝ nel Medioplatonismo: breve storia di un dibattito filosofico”, in: C. Natali, E. Cattanei (cur.), Studi sul Medioplatonismo e il Neoplatonismo, Roma, pp. 15-42.
Petty, R., 2012, Fragments of Numenius of Apamea, Westbury. Reydams-Schils, G., 2020, Calcidius on Plato’s Timaeus. Greek Philosophy, Latin Reception and Christian Contexts, Cambridge.
Rossi, A., 2020, Numenio. Sul Bene/De Bono, trad. A. Rossi, intr. C. O. Tommasi-Moreschini, Torino.
Runia, D. T., 1991, “Witness or Participant? Philo and the Neoplatonic Tradition”, in: A. Vanderjagt, D. Pätzold (eds.), The Neoplatonic Tradition. Jewish, Christian and Islamic Themes, Köln, pp. 36-56.
Spanu, N., 2013, “The Interpretation of Timaeus 39E7-9 in the Context of Plotinus’ and Numenius’ Philosophical Circles”, Studia Patristica 63, pp. 155-164.
Tarrant, H., 2004, “Must Commentators know their Sources? Proclus In Timaeum and Numenius”, in: P. Aadamson, H. Baltussen, M. W. F. Stone (eds.), Bullettin of the Institute of Classical Studies 83, pp. 175-190. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-5370.2004.tb02301.x
Zambon, M., 2002, Porphyre et le Moyen Platonisme, Paris.
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Enrico Volpe
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Peitho provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.