Abstract
In this paper, I will first try to refute Lesher’s hypothesis who reads in 18.1 a polemical reference to divination: in the first verse, in fact, Xenophanes merely outlines an exemplum fictum, punctually overturned in 18.2. The fragment must be read, on the contrary, against the historical background that produced it. The language of Xenophanes in B18 is the same as ever and many are the interconnections with the remaining evidences. Here it is enough to recall the link with the two surviving elegies, in which the value of intellectuals is proudly claimed, as opposed to that of the athletes hailed by the masses. It will come as no surprise, therefore, that in B18 the researchers (ζητοῦντες) are celebrated, with a genuine ‘monument’ to what was being discovered at Miletus. I will also try to show how previous interpretations have been vitiated by an unfair devaluation of Xenophanes’ ‘scientific’ activity, seen as a pre-Herodotean ἱστορίη, not as an investigation referring to a methodology that was taking shape and in which Xenophanes largely recognised himself. B18, therefore, is not the first affirmation of coherent ‘philosophical’ interpretation, but the first, brilliant intuition of what enquiry was revealing, in opposition to the mythical tradition, in a passage from μῦθος to λόγος that was gradual, rich in nuances, but irreversible.
References
Albertelli, P., 1939, Gli Eleati. Testimonianze e frammenti, Bari.
Babut, D., 1977, “L’idee de progres et la relativite du savoir humain selon Xenophane (fragments 18 D.K.)”, Revue de Philologie 51, pp. 217–228.
Barnes, J., 1979, The Presocratic Philosophers, London–Boston.
Bryan, J., 2012, Likeness and Likelihood in the Presocratics and Plato, Cambridge.
Cerri, G. (ed.), 1999, Parmenide, Poema sulla natura, Milano.
Coxon, A. H., 2009, The Fragments of Parmenides. Revised and Expanded Edition With a New Translations by Richard McKirahan ed a New Preface by Malcolm Schofield, Las Vegas.
Curd, P. K., 2002, “The Presocratics as Philophers”, in: Laks, Louguet 2002, pp. 115–138.
Curd, P. K., Graham, D. W. (eds.), 2008, The Oxford Handbook of Presocratic Philosophy, Oxford.
Diels, H. (ed.), 1901, Poetarum Philosophorum Fragmenta, Berlin.
Dodds, E., 1973, The Ancient Concept of Progress (and Other Essays on Greek Literature and Belief), Oxford.
Edelstein, L., 1967, The Idea of Progress in Classical Antiquity, Baltimore.
Fränkel, H., 1974, “Xenophanes’ Empiricism and His Critique of Knowledge (B 34)”, in: Mourelatos 1974, pp. 118–131. (trad. inglese di M. R. Cosgrove da “Xenophanesstudien”, Hermes 60 (1925), pp. 174–192).
Gentili, B., Prato, C. (ed.), 1979, Poetae Elegiaci. Testimonia et Fragmenta, Leipzig.
Gomperz, T., 19224, Griechische Denker. Eine Geschichte der antiken Philosophie, Berlin–Leipzig (prima edizione Leipzig 1893).
Guthrie, W. K. C., 1962, A History of Greek Philosophy, vol. 1, Cambridge.
Heidel, W. A., 1943, “Hecataeus and Xenophanes”, American Journal of Philology 64, pp. 257–275.
Hellmann, O., Strobel, B. (hrsgg.), 2022, Rezeptionen der Vorsokratiker von der Antike bis in die Gegenwart, Berlin.
Kleingünther, A., 1933, ΠΡΩΤΟΣ ΕΥΡΕΤΗΚ, Leipzig.
Lesher, J. H., 1991, “Xenophanes on Inquiry and Discovery: An Alternative to the ‘Hymn of Progress’ Reading of Fr. 18”, Ancient Philosophy 11, pp. 229–248.
Laks, A., , Louguet, C. (edd.), 2002, Qu’est-ce que la philosophie présocratique?, Villeneuve d’Ascq.
Loenen, J., 1956, “In Defence of the Traditional Interpretation of Xenophanes’ Fr. 18”, Mnemosyne 9, pp. 135–136.
Lumpe, A., 1952, Die Philosophie des Xenophanes von Kolophon, München.
McKirahan, R. D., 20102, Philosophy Before Socrates, Indianapolis–Cambridge (prima edizione 1994).
Mogyoródi, E., 2006, “Xenophanes’ epistemology and Parmenides’ quest for knowledge”, in: Sassi 2006, pp. 123–160.
Mondolfo, R., 1958, La comprensione del soggetto umano nell’antichità classica, Firenze.
Mourelatos A. P. D. (ed.), 1974, The Pre-Socratics, New York.
Mourelatos A. P. D., 2008, The cloud-astrophysics of Xenophanes and Ionian Material Monism, in: Curd, Graham 2008, pp. 134–168.
Pauly, A. F., Wissowa, G., Kroll, W. (hrsgg.), 1924, Realencyclopädie der classischen Altertumswissenschaft, Suppl. IV, Stuttgart.
Pfister, F., 1924, Epode, in: Pauly, Wissowa, Kroll 1924, col. 323–344.
Robinson, T. M., 2008, “Presocratic theology”, in: Curd, Graham 2008, pp. 485–498.
Rossetti, L., 2022, Thales the Measurer, London.
Rossetti, L., 2023, Ripensare i Presocratici. Da Talete (anzi da Omero) a Zenone, Milano.
Sassi, M. M. (ed.), 2006, La costruzione del discorso filosofico nell’età dei Presocratici, Pisa.
Sassi, M. M., 20202, Gli inizi della filosofia: in Grecia, Torino (prima edizione 2009).
Timpanaro Cardini, M., 1967, “Saggio sugli Eleati”, Studi Classici e Orientali 16, pp. 149–255.
Tor, S., 2017, Mortal and Divine in Early Greek Epistemology. A Study of Hesiod, Xenophanes and Parmenides, Cambridge.
Tulin, A., 1993, “Xenophanes Fr. 18 D.-K. and the Origins of the Idea of Progress”, Hermes 121, pp. 129–138.
Untersteiner, M., 1956, Senofane. Testimonianze e frammenti, Firenze (2 ed. Milano, 2008).
Vassallo, C., 2022, “Puzzling over so-called ‘Rationalismus’ and its Forerunners – Again on Xenophanes’ B 18 D.-K. (= Xen 204 & 220 Strobel-Wöhrle)”, in: Hellmann, Strobel, 2022, pp. 143–176.
Verdenius, W., 1955, “Xenophanes’ Fr. 18”, Mnemosyne 8, p. 221.
Zeller, E., Mondolfo, R., 1967, La filosofia dei Greci nel suo sviluppo storico, Firenze.
Zeller, E., Nestle, W., 1923, Die Philosophie der Griechen in ihrer geschichtlichen Entwicklung, Leipzig.
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Peitho provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.