Keywords
DK 21 B18
ancient Greek seafaring
Anaximander
Rossetti
How to Cite
Abstract
Greek seafaring between the 10th and 6th centuries BCE gave rise to a technical culture centered around navigation, commerce, and international cultural exchange. The Greeks were not a unified nation in the modern sense, confined to a territory centralized in Attica or the Peloponnese. Instead, they were a collection of independent city-states (poleis) spread across the Mediterranean, from the Iberian Peninsula to the Black Sea. The intense commercial relationships among these Greek settlements and with other peoples wove a Mediterranean cultural web that fostered a genuine spirit of intercultural exchange, leading to a new cultural synthesis that gave the Greeks – and the world to this day – an extraordinary drive for originality. This technical culture, which Rossetti calls the “cultura dell’attendibilità,” was based on observation, objectivity, and rationality. Without these principles, and relying solely on myth, seafaring could never have flourished. This shift away from myths to a new culture is testified by Xenophanes, who, in DK B 18 (LM D53), contrasts the ancient method of gaining knowledge through communication with the gods with a new method of research that in time yields better results.
References
Burkert, W., 2004, Babylon, Memphis, Persepolis. Eastern Contexts of Greek Culture, Cambridge.
Costa , G., 2008, La Sirena di Archimede, Alessandria.
Fantino, E., Muss, U., Schubert, C., Sier, K. (hrsgg.), Heraklit Im Kontext, Berlin–Boston.
Galgano, N. S., 2017, I precetti dela dea, Bologna.
Galgano, N. S., Giombini, S., Maracci, F., 2020, “Ricostruire la scena: gli Eleati secondo Livio Rossetti,” in: Rossetti et al., 2020, pp. 11–50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5771/9783896659279-11
Havelock, E. A., 1963, Preface to Plato, Cambridge–London. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674038431
Laks, A., Most, G. W., 2016, Early Greek Philosophy, Vol. III: Early Ionian thinkers. Cambridge–London.
Leão, D., Cornelli, G., Peixoto, M. C. (coords.), 2013, Dos Homens e suas Ideias. Estudos sobre as Vidas de Diógenes Laércio, Coimbra DOI: https://doi.org/10.14195/978-989-721-042-6
Lesher, J., 1992, Xenophanes of Colophon: Fragments. A Text and Translation with Commentary, Toronto. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3138/9781442627826
Lesher, J., 1991, “Xenophanes on Inquiry and Discovery: An Alternative to the ‘Hymn to Progress’ Reading of Fr. 18,” Ancient Philosophy 11, pp. 229–248. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/ancientphil19911121
Maddoli, G., Nafssi, M., Prontera, F. (cur.), 2020, Σπουδῆς οὐδὲν ἐλλιποῦσα. Anna Maria Biraschi. Scritti in memoria, Perugia.
Malkin, I., 2013, A small Greek world; networks in the Ancient Mediterranean, Oxford. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315876580
Most, G., 2006, Hesiod. Theogony. Works and days. Testimonia, Cambridge–London.
Robinson, T. M.,1987, Heraclitus: fragments, Toronto.
Rossetti, L., 2013,“L’ideazione del pinax, »mediale Innovation« di Anassimandro,” in: Leão, Cornelli, Peixoto 2013, pp. 89–100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14195/978-989-721-042-6_6
Rossetti, L., 2020, “Il mappamondo di Anassimandro,” in: Maddoli, Nafssi, Prontera 2020, pp. 521–533.
Rossetti, L. et al., 2020, Verso la filosofia: nuove prospettive su parmenide, Zenone e Melisso, N. S. Galgano, S. Giombini, F. Marcacci (cur.), Baden-Baden. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5771/9783896659279
Rovelli, C., 2011, Anassimandro. La natura del pensiero scientifico, Milano.
Shotwell, J. T., 1939, The History of History, Vol. 1, New York. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7312/shot92970
Zmhud, L., 2017, “Heraclitus on Pythagoras,” in: Fantino, Muss, Schubert, Sier 2017, pp. 171–186. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110421323-009
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Nicola Stefano Galgano
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Peitho provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.